[00:11] <michaelh1> Hey, I'm getting a timeout error when trying to attach a GCC bugzilla entry to a gcc-linaro launchpad ticket
[00:12] <ovnicraft> hello i am trying to branch a project bzr branch lp:openobject-server/6.0 and tell me is not a branch
[00:13] <MarkAtwood> im unable to push or pull from bzr on launchpad
[00:13] <wgrant> MarkAtwood, ovnicraft: Launchpad is still coming up from maintenance.
[00:13] <wgrant> Codehosting is not quite back yet.
[00:13] <wgrant> michaelh1: Do you have an OOPS ID?
[00:13] <MarkAtwood> does launchpad have a "launchpad is up/down" url that can be checked?
[00:13] <wgrant> http://identi.ca/launchpadstatus
[00:13] <ovnicraft> wgrant, ok
[00:14] <michaelh1> wgrant: I didn't write it down, but on refresh I see the bugzilla ticket has been attached...
[00:15] <michaelh1> wgrant: oh, cancel that, too many tabs open.  Reproducing...
[00:15] <MarkAtwood> ty
[00:15] <michaelh1> wgrant: Error ID: OOPS-1985CE168
[00:16] <wgrant> michaelh1: Thanks, looking.
[00:17] <ovnicraft> wgrant, there are people who don't want to use that social network called indeti.ca
[00:17] <ovnicraft> identi.ca*
[00:17] <MarkAtwood> ovnicraft, you dont need an account to look at a feed on it
[00:17] <MarkAtwood> and its also on twitter
[00:18] <MarkAtwood> which you also dont need an account to look at a status
[00:18] <ovnicraft> that its better

[00:20] <wgrant> ovnicraft: Major downtime like this is also announced on https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/launchpad-announce. But identi.ca is accessible to anybody in a web browser or as RSS/Atom feeds.
[00:20] <wgrant> And it has everything.
[00:21] <ovnicraft> i prefer follow the twitter aaccount
[00:21] <wgrant> Or that.
[00:42] <W3ird_N3rd> hmm.. er is dus toch iets aan de fritzbox wat niet is in te stellen
[00:43] <W3ird_N3rd> sorry wrong chan
[02:13] <komputes> The project Twinkle (C#) https://launchpad.net/twinkle is incorrectly the upstream link and suggested upstream for twinkle (sip) https://launchpad.net/twinkle/+packages. How can I correct this?
[02:21] <spiv> komputes: is the right upstream registered in Launchpad?
[02:22] <komputes> spiv: not sure, couldn't find it - correct upstream is http://mfnboer.home.xs4all.nl/twinkle/index.html although i'm emailing the maintainer to find out where he wants bugs reported
[02:23] <spiv> Basically the page to edit the upstream link are https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/oneiric/+source/twinkle/+edit-packaging etc
[02:24] <spiv> I guess if upstream doesn't publish their branches there's not much we can do (except remove the incorrect link, of course)
[02:25] <komputes> spiv: can you please do that for now?
[02:25] <spiv> Ok.
[02:25] <komputes> once i get the maintainer's response, I'll register the project with the bug URL
[02:26] <komputes> publishing branches upstream is not a requirement to register a project is it?
[02:26] <spiv> No
[02:26] <spiv> It just makes it more useful :)
[02:26] <spiv> Ok, links deleted I tihnk
[02:28] <spiv> komputes: I suppose the link between launchpad.net/twinkle and the 'wink' source package in hardy is also wrong?
[02:29] <komputes> spiv: seems that way to me, i don't see a relation
[02:30] <spiv> That's what I thought.  Ok, I've removed that one too.
[02:37] <michaelh1> wgrant: hey, I'm getting the same timeout on a different bug when adding http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49030 to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-4.5/+bug/689887/+choose-affected-product
[02:37] <michaelh1> wgrant: Error ID: OOPS-1986DX6
[02:38] <wgrant> michaelh1: Hm, that's not good. Thanks, we're investigating.
[02:40] <komputes> spiv: error ID OOPS-1986CC7 after creating the project
[02:41] <wgrant> komputes: Where did you get that link?
[02:42] <wgrant> There's a ' ' instead of a '+' in the URL.
[02:42] <lifeless> michaelh1: what were you adding the task onto ?
[02:42] <michaelh1> lifeless: gcc upstream
[02:43] <lifeless> so a bugwatch
[02:43] <michaelh1> lifeless: yes
[02:55] <bryceh> lifeless, bug #794802 looks kinda bad
[02:56] <bryceh> lifeless, I think it might be a regression from today's launchpad update
[02:56] <wgrant> bryceh: We're investigating that now.
[02:56] <wgrant> It is.
[02:56] <bryceh> wgrant, ok great
[04:12] <lifeless> bryceh: michaelh1: we've updated part of the db schema - this should help with the issue
[04:52] <james_w> were there any API/blueprint related changes in either of the rollouts?
[04:52] <james_w> we're seeing some odd behaviour correlated with the time of the rollout
[04:52] <wgrant> james_w: What's the issue?
[04:52] <james_w> specifically some sort of double reporting
[04:52] <james_w> I haven't really verified with the URL yet
[04:53] <james_w> API I mean
[04:53] <james_w> http://status.chrisjohnston.org/ubuntu-oneiric/
[04:53] <james_w> you can see on the graph that it has just doubled in size, and this is because the db is getting double entries
[04:53] <wgrant> james_w: Interesting. Nothing like that should have changed.
[04:57] <james_w> wgrant, ok, I'll keep digging
[05:09] <poolie> o/ james_w
[05:09] <james_w> hi
[05:29] <james_w> ok, so it's not launchpad
[05:29] <james_w> just some code I added today that is behaving completely not as expected
[09:25] <jdobrien> e
[09:39] <ara> Hello guys! I have seen that bug 151129 is marked as Fix Released \o/
[09:39] <ara> Now... how do I subscribe to a tag?
[09:39] <ara> I have been looking around the UI, but I don't seem to find it
[09:40] <maxb> ara: The new UI may not have been turned on for everyone yet
[09:41] <ara> But I can see the new options in Edit bug mail, i.e.
[09:42] <maxb> If you go to https://bugs.launchpad.net/some-project, and click "Subscribe to bug mail", do you see "(more options...)" at the bottom?
[09:44] <ara> no :(
[09:44] <ara> OK, I guess I'll just wait
[09:44] <ara> thanks
[09:44] <lifeless> its on for everyone
[09:45] <lifeless> ara: what project are you trying to subscribe to tags on ?
[09:45] <ara> I tried Ubuntu (in general) and in the linux package specifically as well
[09:46] <lifeless> ara: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux, top right you should see
[09:46] <lifeless> View full publishing history
[09:46] <lifeless> View full change log
[09:46] <lifeless> Subscribe to bug mail
[09:46] <lifeless> Edit bug mail
[09:46] <lifeless> Configure bug tracker
[09:46] <lifeless> do you ?
[09:47] <ara> ah, OK, I was looking at bugs.lp.net/ubuntu/+source/linux
[09:47] <lifeless> UI fail
[09:47] <ara> mmm, a bit confusing that it is not under bugs
[09:47] <wgrant> maxb: It's been turned on for everyone for a few hours.
[09:47] <lifeless> sorry!
[09:48] <lifeless> ara: well, its not meant to be bug specific
[09:48] <lifeless> but we only funded the bugs part of it so far
[09:48] <wgrant> ara: The links are there too.
[09:48] <ara> lifeless, still, I can't see where to subscribe to a particular ta
[09:48] <ara> g
[09:48] <wgrant> ara: What happens if you edit your subscription on "Edit bug mail"?
[09:48] <lifeless> under the bug counts
[09:49] <lifeless> ara: click on 'are added or changed in any way'
[09:49] <lifeless> ara: then 'bugs must match this filter'
[09:49] <lifeless> then tags
[09:49] <ara> lifeless, OK, found, thanks
[09:50] <ara> thanks for the support
[09:51] <lifeless> de nada
[10:41] <apw> is it known that you cannot change status on any task on a bug with nominations ?  (at least thats how it seems)
[10:44] <lifeless> apw: see topic
[10:46] <apw> lifeless, eta for the fix to roll, as not one bug i want to change is changable and i can only queue so many updates in my head
[10:47] <lifeless> we're qaing the fix at the moment
[10:47] <apw> so is that 3 hours best case or 1, wondering how long to go away for
[10:48] <lifeless> 15 minutes?
[10:48] <lifeless> +-
[10:48] <apw> lifeless, thanks
[10:49] <lifeless> it may not work of course, but I think it will
[10:49] <apw> yep i understand theres no guarentee, just looking at a lower bound
[11:04] <lifeless> apw: care to try again ?
[11:04] <apw> lifeless, doing
[11:05] <apw> lifeless, seems borked still to me
[11:05] <apw> (Error ID: OOPS-1986DY50)
[11:06] <lifeless> thanks
[11:06] <lifeless> and we'll continue
[11:06] <apw> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/794715
[11:06] <apw> lifeless, my test case is trying to make that linux task Invalid
[11:23] <dholbach> thanks for the update in the topic!
[11:52] <wgrant> apw: We've identified the remaining issue, but it's going to take a while longer to fix. We've increased the timeout, though, so it should work now. Could you try it again, please?
[11:52] <apw> wgrant, trying ... yes that worked
[11:53] <wgrant> It's not going to be fast yet, but at least it will work.
[11:53] <apw> wgrant, all i want ... launchpad is never fast
[11:53] <wgrant> Heh.
[13:30] <jml> bdmurray: https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/297614
[13:31] <jml> bdmurray: that's the bug I meant.
[16:54] <nigelb> rockstar: ping, around?
[17:42] <rockstar> nigelb, hi
[17:42] <nigelb> rockstar: hey, just wanted to check with you about tarmac.  Does it need its on LP user?
[17:42] <nigelb> *own
[17:42] <rockstar> nigelb, nope.  I run it as my user.
[17:43] <rockstar> nigelb, but on the box you run it on, you'd better believe it needs its own UNIX user.
[17:43] <nigelb> rockstar: ah, okay!
[17:43] <rockstar> Otherwise a malicious script could read out all sorts of fun things from your user account.
[17:43] <nigelb> heh
[17:44] <rockstar> nigelb, if you get stuck, there's always #tarmac
[17:44] <nigelb> oh, nice! /me joins :)
[18:29] <mpt> How is muting bug mail different from unsubscribing?
[18:30] <mpt> Is it about retaining access to private bug reports, or something else?
[18:33] <benji> mpt: muting is mainly for when you subscribe to a bug target but aren't interested in a particular bug
[18:34] <benji> it can also be useful if you are a member of a team that is subscribed to a bug and you're not interested
[18:34] <mpt> ah
[18:36] <mpt> So basically what we used to call "ignore" subscriptions back in the old days :-)
[18:48] <Ramindu> hello
[18:48] <Ramindu> I'm in a spot of trouble at LP
[18:48] <Ramindu> I have a project on LP
[18:48] <Ramindu> and I wanted to set a certain branch as the Translations focus
[18:48] <Ramindu> so when I did that
[18:49] <Ramindu> it set that branch as the DEVELOPMENT focus as well, essentially making the original development focus trunk disappear
[18:49] <Ramindu> :(
[18:49] <Ramindu> is it possible to revert this?
[19:01] <abentley> Ramindu, sure, it's easy to change the development focus.
[23:05] <MBarvian> kiko: ping
[23:05] <kiko> MBarvian?
[23:05] <MBarvian> kiko: hi!
[23:05] <kiko> hey there
[23:05] <MBarvian> kiko: I was wondering if you could rename a project for us?
[23:06] <kiko> MBarvian, hah, I can't anymore. ask flacoste :-P
[23:06] <MBarvian> flacoste: ping
[23:06] <kiko> they revoked my admin access!
[23:06] <MBarvian> kiko: no problem. thanks anyway!
[23:06] <kiko> sure thing
[23:09] <MBarvian> kiko: anyone else I could contact? :P
[23:10] <lifeless> file a ticket on https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/
[23:11] <MBarvian> lifeless: done.
[23:15] <Mel> hello Peaple, can  some one help me please . i  still sending accepted packages to  Launchpad . but never  get  build correctly .  can  some help me  please ?. i'am new  to this  PPA  world
[23:22] <Mel> can some one help  here ?
[23:31] <poolie> hi Mel, still here?
[23:32] <poolie> you get an acceptance mail?
[23:32] <poolie> do they show up in the ppa's web page?
[23:33] <Mel> yes
[23:33] <Mel> Accepted:
[23:33] <Mel>  OK: pidgin_2.9-2ubuntu.tar.gz
[23:33] <Mel>  OK: pidgin_2.9-2ubuntu.dsc
[23:33] <Mel>      -> Component: main Section: net
[23:33] <Mel> pidgin (2:2.9-2ubuntu) natty; urgency=low
[23:33] <Mel>   * Initial release (Closes: #nnnn)  <nnnn is the bug number of your ITP>
[23:33] <Mel> --
[23:33] <Mel> You are receiving this email because you are the uploader of the above
[23:33] <Mel> PPA package.
[23:35] <poolie> ok so it was attempted to be built, it just failed
[23:36] <Mel> yes.  and  i  don't know  why its  failed
[23:36] <Mel> can i post here the link of the log ?
[23:36] <poolie> sure
[23:36] <poolie> so the interesting bit is near the bottom
[23:36] <poolie> make: *** [build] Error 9
[23:36] <poolie> dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
[23:36] <poolie> now i wonder why that happened, so i look further up
[23:37] <poolie> > configure: error: The intltool scripts were not found. Please install intltool.
[23:37] <poolie> that's the problem
[23:37] <poolie> you need to declare a build dependency on intltool
[23:37] <poolie> or whatever package contains it
[23:37] <poolie> otherwise it won't be present when your thing is built
[23:39] <Mel> ok,  thats means  iniltool  doesnt  exit  on the  Server !!? or in my  machine ?
[23:42] <Mel> poolie !!
[23:45] <poolie> you have to declare all build dependencies other than the most basic ones
[23:46] <Mel> how to  ? shall i  add them to   control  file ?
[23:55] <poolie> yes
[23:55] <poolie> Mel: http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html
[23:58] <lifeless>           http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/
[23:58] <poolie> hello lifeless
[23:58] <lifeless> hi poolie
[23:59] <Mel> i will   have  a look . i  downloaded old  source   (copied  control file from there) i hope it will work this time