[00:02] <pcpratts> I get a warning: WARN: uid is 0 but '/etc' is owned by 1000
[03:20] <poolie> hi spiv, i hope V is better?
[05:37] <Rhonda> poolie: uh, how do you manage to get uid 1000 as owner for /etc?
[07:20] <poolie> Rhonda: i think you have me confused with pcpratts
[07:44] <Rhonda> Erm, right.
[08:23] <dholbach> good morning
[08:37] <nigelb> Folks, I'm working with iamfuzz to get a list of ftbfs where its failing because of the toolchain change.  Hopefully, that can drive some people to jump in and fix them. (apart from myself)
[09:51] <geser> nigelb: if you have some candidates with a good internet connection, you can point them to the openarena-* ones (the source packages are 36-400 MB big)
[09:51] <geser> fixing them is pretty easy as the problematic binary gets build in debian/rules
[09:53]  * tumbleweed is happy to sort those out
[09:54] <tumbleweed> nigelb: doko filed bugs for a fair number of the toolchain related FTBFSs, didn't he?
[09:58] <geser> tumbleweed: thanks, using something like "$(DEB_BUILD_GNU_TYPE)-gcc -Wall $(CFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) -lz debian/qvmbrute.c -o debian/qvmbrute" should do it
[10:00] <geser> that's for openarena-{085-data,maps,misc,players,players-mature,texutures), that's in total around 800 MB of source packages to download
[10:02] <tumbleweed> geser: 085-data looks like an argument-order issue, with -lz too soon
[10:02]  * tumbleweed has a local mirror on my desktop these days :)
[10:03] <geser> tumbleweed: yes, exactly
[11:04] <nigelb> tumbleweed: probably. But I want to catch as many as I can.
[11:16] <nigelb> tumbleweed: Do you suggest I use the bugs that doko filed or scroll through the build failures to catch more, if any?
[11:17] <tumbleweed> nigelb: I don't know, I assume the onse he filed are a good start. But the build failures are the most accurate source, obviously
[11:18] <nigelb> tumbleweed: I'm working with iamfuzz to get a list by 20th and get folks to work on them (of course work on those bugs myself too!)
[11:18] <tumbleweed> nigelb: great. I'm sure there are a bunch of us who'd happily help + mentor those
[11:19] <nigelb> tumbleweed: :)
[11:29] <Laney> nigelb: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=no-add-needed;users=peter.fritzsche@gmx.de;exclude=tags%3Apatch
[11:29] <Laney> you might be interested in debian failures too ...
[11:30] <nigelb> Laney: oooh, that's neat.
[11:30] <nigelb> Laney: what's the binuitls-gold?
[11:31] <Laney> a different linker which uses --no-add-needed
[11:31] <Laney> http://wiki.debian.org/ToolChain/DSOLinking
[11:31] <nigelb> Laney: So, essentially, its the same thing that happens in Ubuntu.
[11:32] <Laney> right
[11:32] <nigelb> Then, this goes to my list as well :-)
[11:32] <Laney> some of those might have unforwarded patches in ubuntu
[11:33] <nigelb> hrm, possible. The build I fixed a few days back in Ubuntu got fixed in Debian too with my patch :-)
[11:34] <Laney> good chap
[15:10] <aboudreault> Hi
[15:10] <aboudreault> I try to build a package... my dev machine is lucid. and the pbuilder env is lucid. However. I always get this message: You should recreate aclocal.m4 with macros from libtool 2.2.6 Debian-2.2.6a-1ubuntu1
[15:11] <lucidfox> What package is it?
[15:11] <aboudreault> though I ran: aclocal, automake, autoconf
[15:11] <aboudreault> what's the problem, the libtool should be the same, no?
[15:11] <aboudreault> lucidfox, it one of our packages. spatialite.
[15:15] <aboudreault> looks like my ltmain.sh is not regenerated. will delete it explicitly.
[15:17] <cjwatson> run libtoolize too (or just use autoreconf instead of running all the tools separately)?
[15:19] <aboudreault> yeah, just ran autoreconf, I didn't know that utility.
[15:20] <aboudreault> alright, it fixes the issue.
[15:21] <geser> aboudreault: better use autoreconf, a missing run of libtool caused recently a weird FTBFS in oneiric (pidgin)
[15:21] <aboudreault> I see. thanks
[16:22] <aboudreault> there is no libiconv on ubuntu?
[16:24] <aboudreault> ha, it seems to be in libc.
[18:57] <Quintasan> debfx: ping
[18:58] <debfx> Quintasan: pingpong
[18:58] <Quintasan> debfx: Why doesn't pbuilder-dist save my sources.list?
[18:58] <Quintasan> debfx: I logged in with --save-after-login, all packages are there
[18:58] <Quintasan> but sources.list are replaced
[18:59] <debfx> Quintasan: the source.list is defined in pbuilderrc
[18:59]  * Quintasan has nothing in there
[19:00] <debfx> Quintasan: pbuilder-dist probably passes the options directly to pbuilder
[19:02] <Quintasan> --override-config
[19:02] <Quintasan> herp derp
[22:48] <Laney> away until Tuesday if someone else wants to take over pushing GHC up to the top of the hill
[22:49] <Laney> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/ghc.html very almost gone
[22:56] <cjwatson> Laney: I can keep it going, I think
[22:56] <cjwatson> did some rescoring just now
[22:57] <Laney> nice
[22:57] <Laney> there's some FTBFS I haven't gotten around to giving back yet
[22:58] <cjwatson> yeah, was doing a bit of those
[22:58] <cjwatson> gitit for one :-)
[22:58] <Laney> sometimes the tracker doesn't show all of the bdeps for some reason
[22:59] <cjwatson> also a bunch of Build-Depends: ghc6 in applications
[22:59] <cjwatson> but I assume that will need to involve the Debian Haskell team
[23:00] <Laney> yeah, they don't matter so much
[23:00] <Laney> transitional to the rescue
[23:00] <Laney> but if you get bored ;-)
[23:00] <cjwatson> at what point can I unblacklist and sync haskell-dummy?
[23:01] <Laney> now should be fine
[23:01] <Laney> probably want to remove ghc6 from the tracker though
[23:01] <cjwatson> OK, cool, will do that in a bit
[23:01] <cjwatson> I removed it from the archive, will that do?
[23:01] <Laney> as in libghc6*
[23:01] <Laney> otherwise the dummies will interfere
[23:01] <cjwatson> oh, right, hmm
[23:02] <cjwatson> maybe wait 'til it all goes green then?
[23:03] <Laney> actually they shouldn't match is_affected
[23:04] <cjwatson> mm, right, haskell-dummy Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7)
[23:06] <Laney> it probably confused the tracker because of the untransitioned packages
[23:06] <Laney> but there's none of those left any more
[23:26] <sjkwizard> is it possible to add xflux (http://stereopsis.com/flux/linux.html) to the ubuntu official repository?
[23:27] <sjkwizard> ops...i mean fluxgui (that include xflux)