=== pitti_ is now known as pitti
=== doko_ is now known as doko
=== Daviey is now known as Da
=== Da is now known as Daviey
=== chuck_ is now known as zul
[11:54] <debfx> could someone please have a look at virtualbox in NEW? it's just a renamed package (from virtualbox-ose) and I'd like to backport it to natty
[12:57] <cjwatson> ScottK: when you say "Ubuntu changes are all incorporated or OBE", satisfy my curiosity - what does OBE mean?
[12:57] <cjwatson> (in sync requests)
[12:57] <ScottK> Overtaken By Events.
[12:57] <ScottK> (i.e. no longer relevant)
[12:58] <ScottK> Sorry, I thought that was a generic acronym.
[12:58] <cjwatson> aha, thanks
[13:53] <cjwatson> Laney,ScottK: confirm that it's OK to remove geordi, following the Debian removal?  I notice a discussion here a couple of days back which suggests that, but since it's modified in Ubuntu I tend to explicitly ask
[13:53] <ScottK> cjwatson: Yes.  Please do.
[13:54] <cjwatson> OK, done, thanks
[13:56] <Laney> the emails about removing geordi taught me about codepad.org which is actually rather cool
=== pgraner is now known as pgraner-afk
=== pgraner-afk is now known as pgraner
[14:57] <jdstrand> skaet: hi! it occurred to me that the people who should be notified in !regression-alert was out of date. I got this updated today but was wondering if we could tie its review to the release cycle
[14:57] <jdstrand> skaet: and it so, where
[14:58] <jdstrand> skaet: I initially looked at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReleaseChecklist, it seemed odd in there (but I'd be happy to put it there if you think that is best)
[14:58] <skaet> jdstrand,  definitely interested,  but probably need a bit of education.
[15:08] <jdstrand> skaet: is it this page: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/NewReleaseCycleProcess?
[15:08] <skaet> jdstrand,  yes that's a better place.
[15:08] <jdstrand> skaet: do you have a preference which section it belongs in?
[15:08] <skaet> at the start of the cycle we should know the roles for the upcoming release,  so a cross check then makes sense.
[15:09] <skaet> probably at the First Few weeks after..
[15:09] <jdstrand> k
[15:09]  * jdstrand edits
[15:57] <skaet> ScottK - based on the Kubuntu council meeting yesterday,  can I assume that the Kubuntu specs are all now approved for Oneiric?
[15:59] <skaet> jdstrand,  thanks.  :)
[16:00] <jdstrand> skaet: sure thing! :)
[16:06] <ScottK> skaet: Yes.  I'll mark the specs ujp here in a bit.
[16:18] <skaet> ScottK, thanks.
=== ogasawara_ is now known as ogasawara
=== jibouman` is now known as jiboumans
=== elmo__ is now known as k
=== k is now known as Guest82647
=== Guest82647 is now known as elmo
[20:33] <skaet> ScottK, can you please update https://wiki.ubuntu.com/OneiricOcelot/ReleaseImageContacts with the Kubuntu information?  ie. test contacts, and which images are shipping per milestone.
[20:35] <ScottK> skaet: I'm a bit tied up today.  Please ping me tomorrow if I forget.
[20:36] <skaet> ScottK.  Ok,  will add it as an action to the agenda ;-)
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
[21:19] <jdstrand> is there something wrong with the publisher?
[21:21] <jdstrand> I unembargoed something 5 hours ago and it is sitting in ACCEPTED
[21:33] <cjwatson> jdstrand: it seems to be running - what package?
[21:34] <jdstrand> cjwatson: I brought it up in #launchpad-ops
[21:34] <jdstrand> cjwatson: basically, look at the accepted queue for lucid, maverick and natty