[00:03] slangasek: speaking of cmake, do you know what happened with bug #773062? it wasn't closed with an lp closer or anything [00:03] Launchpad bug 773062 in cmake (Ubuntu) "cmake does not work well with ccache" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/773062 [00:03] i'm trying to figure out how to handle bug #784409, which sounds like it should be an sru and not a backport, but i can't tell [00:03] Launchpad bug 784409 in natty-backports "cmake natty-backport needed to fix ccache compatibility" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/784409 [00:03] broder: Debian maintainer redid the patch to not use dpkg-architecture [00:05] ok, that doesn't really sound sru-worthy :( [00:05] i guess i'll have to look for another way [00:08] well, you should probably wait until the patch is *reliable*... there are still smatterings of build failures turning up [00:08] but I don't see why replacing the old patch with the new one would be inappropriate in SRU [01:50] slangasek: i guess. unfortunately i also don't see how the new patch would keep the ccache failure from happening === asac_ is now known as asac [03:40] bdrung_: cool, thanks, I'll get that built and released ASAP === _LibertyZero is now known as LibertyZero === _LibertyZero is now known as LibertyZero === JanC is now known as Guest4037 === DktrKranz is now known as Guest5532 === Pilif12p_ is now known as Pilif12p === maxb_ is now known as maxb === lifeless_ is now known as lifeless [12:09] mdeslaur: ping. [12:09] hyperair: yes? [12:10] mdeslaur: regarding https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/651931, should i include the -13 changelog entry, or should i just merge everything into a -12.2 changelog entry? [12:10] Ubuntu bug 651931 in evince (Ubuntu Natty) "evince crashed with SIGSEGV in clear_job_selection()" [Undecided,Triaged] [12:10] er sorry, i mean -0ubuntu13, and -0ubuntu12.2 [12:12] hyperair: no, just include the patch in the appropriate patch system, and add a changelog entry for -12.2 [12:12] it's already part of the existing patch system afaik [12:12] so i'll just merge the -0ubuntu13 entry into -0ubuntu12.2? [12:13] yes, change 0ubuntu12 into 0ubuntu12.2 [12:13] and add the bug number (LP: xyz) [12:13] 13 to 12.2 you mean [12:13] oh, yes, sorry :) [12:13] typo [12:14] okay [12:15] hyperair: thanks. re-subcribe "ubuntu-security-sponsors" after you've attached the updated debdiff, and whoever's on patch piloting duty tomorrow will sponsor it [12:15] security? [12:15] but that's not a security bug though? [12:15] argh, sorry...It's early here..:) [12:16] heh :) === matti_ is now known as matti [12:17] hyperair: so, please subscribe "ubuntu-sponsors" is what I meant :) [12:17] mdeslaur: alright, thanks =) [12:17] hyperair: thanks! === superm1` is now known as superm1 [13:48] mdeslaur: thanks. [13:48] mdeslaur: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vlc/+bug/796189 [13:48] Ubuntu bug 796189 in vlc (Ubuntu) "package vlc-data 1.0.6-1ubuntu1.7 failed to install/upgrade: corrupted filesystem tarfile - corrupted package archive" [Undecided,New] [13:54] bdrung: thanks for the debdiffs! === matti_ is now known as matti === infinity1 is now known as infinity === jtechidna is now known as JontheEchidna === abhinav_ is now known as abhianv- === abhianv- is now known as abhinav- === TerminX_ is now known as TerminX [20:05] cjwatson_: finally getting around to attempting a fix-up of the debconf branch history here, and I can't find any upstream VCSes that can be merged into lp:~ubuntu-core-dev/debconf/ubuntu (no common ancestor)... any suggestions on how to proceed? === Guest70256 is now known as Lutin === yofel_ is now known as yofel === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan === jelmer is now known as Guest81401 === Guest4037 is now known as JanC === Adri2000 is now known as Guest26577 [22:54] slangasek: are you still around? can you pocket copy something for me? [22:56] micahg: sure [22:57] slangasek: can you pocket copy chromium-browser, lucid only, from lucid-proposed to lucid-security [22:58] micahg: to lucid-updates as well? [22:59] slangasek: sure [22:59] micahg: done [22:59] * micahg thinks there's a cron job that does that, but getting it in -updates soon lightens the load on security.u.c [22:59] slangasek: thanks! [23:00] slangasek: will you be around later this evening, I hope to have maverick and natty done in a few hours [23:01] micahg: I'm going to be out for the next few hours, possibly back after [23:01] slangasek: ok, no worries, I'm sure I can find someone later === jelmer is now known as Guest92963 === cinerama_ is now known as cinerama