[00:03] <broder> slangasek: speaking of cmake, do you know what happened with bug #773062? it wasn't closed with an lp closer or anything
[00:03] <broder> i'm trying to figure out how to handle bug #784409, which sounds like it should be an sru and not a backport, but i can't tell
[00:03] <slangasek> broder: Debian maintainer redid the patch to not use dpkg-architecture
[00:05] <broder> ok, that doesn't really sound sru-worthy :(
[00:05] <broder> i guess i'll have to look for another way
[00:08] <slangasek> well, you should probably wait until the patch is *reliable*... there are still smatterings of build failures turning up
[00:08] <slangasek> but I don't see why replacing the old patch with the new one would be inappropriate in SRU
[01:50] <broder> slangasek: i guess. unfortunately i also don't see how the new patch would keep the ccache failure from happening
[03:40] <mdeslaur> bdrung_: cool, thanks, I'll get that built and released ASAP
[12:09] <hyperair> mdeslaur: ping.
[12:09] <mdeslaur> hyperair: yes?
[12:10] <hyperair> mdeslaur: regarding https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/651931, should i include the -13 changelog entry, or should i just merge everything into a -12.2 changelog entry?
[12:10] <hyperair> er sorry, i mean -0ubuntu13, and -0ubuntu12.2
[12:12] <mdeslaur> hyperair: no, just include the patch in the appropriate patch system, and add a changelog entry for -12.2
[12:12] <hyperair> it's already part of the existing patch system afaik
[12:12] <hyperair> so i'll just merge the -0ubuntu13 entry into -0ubuntu12.2?
[12:13] <mdeslaur> yes, change 0ubuntu12 into 0ubuntu12.2
[12:13] <mdeslaur> and add the bug number (LP: xyz)
[12:13] <hyperair> 13 to 12.2 you mean
[12:13] <mdeslaur> oh, yes, sorry :)
[12:13] <mdeslaur> typo
[12:14] <hyperair> okay
[12:15] <mdeslaur> hyperair: thanks. re-subcribe "ubuntu-security-sponsors" after you've attached the updated debdiff, and whoever's on patch piloting duty tomorrow will sponsor it
[12:15] <hyperair> security?
[12:15] <hyperair> but that's not a security bug though?
[12:15] <mdeslaur> argh, sorry...It's early here..:)
[12:16] <hyperair> heh :)
[12:17] <mdeslaur> hyperair: so, please subscribe "ubuntu-sponsors" is what I meant :)
[12:17] <hyperair> mdeslaur: alright, thanks =)
[12:17] <mdeslaur> hyperair: thanks!
[13:48] <bdrung> mdeslaur: thanks.
[13:48] <bdrung> mdeslaur: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vlc/+bug/796189
[13:54] <mdeslaur> bdrung: thanks for the debdiffs!
[20:05] <slangasek> cjwatson_: finally getting around to attempting a fix-up of the debconf branch history here, and I can't find any upstream VCSes that can be merged into lp:~ubuntu-core-dev/debconf/ubuntu (no common ancestor)... any suggestions on how to proceed?
[22:54] <micahg> slangasek: are you still around?  can you pocket copy something for me?
[22:56] <slangasek> micahg: sure
[22:57] <micahg> slangasek: can you pocket copy chromium-browser, lucid only, from lucid-proposed to lucid-security
[22:58] <slangasek> micahg: to lucid-updates as well?
[22:59] <micahg> slangasek: sure
[22:59] <slangasek> micahg: done
[22:59]  * micahg thinks there's a cron job that does that, but getting it in -updates soon lightens the load on security.u.c
[22:59] <micahg> slangasek: thanks!
[23:00] <micahg> slangasek: will you be around later this evening, I hope to have maverick and natty done in a few hours
[23:01] <slangasek> micahg: I'm going to be out for the next few hours, possibly back after
[23:01] <micahg> slangasek: ok, no worries, I'm sure I can find someone later