/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/06/12/#ubuntu-meeting.txt

=== JanC is now known as Guest4037
=== mc44_ is now known as mc44
=== maxb_ is now known as maxb
=== lifeless_ is now known as lifeless
=== valorie_ is now known as valorie
=== infinity1 is now known as infinity
=== pleia2_ is now known as pleia2
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
=== Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan
j1mchey there :)20:58
Rocket2DMnhey guys20:59
j1mchi connor20:59
vtanthropologisthi all21:00
j1mchi vtanthropologist21:00
j1mcthanks for joining21:00
j1mcshall we get started? i'm not sure if as many people are going to join this time.21:01
vtanthropologistsure21:01
j1mci'm ok with waiting a few more minutes, too.21:01
Rocket2DMnare we expecting anybody else?21:01
j1mcphil bull joined #ubuntu-docs not too long ago... he isn't normally on irc, so ...21:02
j1mci'm hopeful that he'll join21:02
vtanthropologistso who are all those people in the sidebar?  do they just stay logged on to this channel permanently?21:03
j1mcmostly, yes21:03
j1mcok, i guess we'll get started.21:03
j1mc#startmeeting21:03
MootBotMeeting started at 15:03. The chair is j1mc.21:03
MootBotCommands Available: [TOPIC], [IDEA], [ACTION], [AGREED], [LINK], [VOTE]21:03
j1mcwe have an agenda up here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DocumentationTeam/MeetingAgenda21:04
j1mcwith oneiric planning... i think maybe we should take that to the list.21:05
j1mci think we'll get better discussion from everyone that way.21:05
j1mc[TOPIC] Oneiric planning21:05
MootBotNew Topic:  Oneiric planning21:05
j1mcwhat do you both think?21:05
vtanthropologistI haven't been involved enough to know what's needed21:06
vtanthropologistexcept ... a lot more21:07
j1mcheya philbull21:07
vtanthropologisthi philbull21:07
philbullhey, sorry, got the wrong channel21:07
j1mcvtanthropologist: fair enough21:07
philbullhi guys21:07
Rocket2DMnhey philbull21:07
j1mclet me see if i can find the link to the wiki page for oneiric planning21:07
vtanthropologisthttps://wiki.ubuntu.com/DocumentationTeam/SystemDocumentation/Tasks/Oneiric21:07
Rocket2DMnj1mc, are there any particular items for oneiric planning we want to discuss right now?21:07
vtanthropologistis that it?21:08
j1mchttps://wiki.ubuntu.com/DocumentationTeam/SystemDocumentation/Tasks/Oneiric21:09
jbichahi21:10
j1mcRocket2DMn: well, we have the wiki topic listed for later21:10
j1mcand we also are going to touch on gnome doc plans21:10
j1mcjbicha: howdy21:11
j1mci think we can move on for now. we'll touch on the important parts as we progress through other topics.21:12
j1mc[TOPIC] Gnome app doc plans21:12
MootBotNew Topic:  Gnome app doc plans21:12
j1mcthere's actually some news to report on this21:12
j1mcphilbull: would you want to talk about what happened in the past week on this?21:13
philbullSure21:13
philbullFrom the GNOME perspective?21:13
j1mcthat's fine... just the progress that was made21:14
j1mcthe work that was done to generate topics for apps21:14
philbullWell, the GNOME docs team held a hackfest at the OpenHelp conference in Cincinnati this past week21:14
philbullThe idea is to get as many GNOME applications' help converted over to Mallard/topic-based help as possible for GNOME 3.221:15
philbullTo that end, we stubbed-out a load of topics for a number of GNOME applications21:15
philbull(I'll be releasing a set of stubs some time this week, hopefully)21:15
philbullPeople can then take those stub topics, one at a time if they like, and write the content21:15
philbullGiven enough people working on them, we can have a lot of the help converted over in very little time21:16
philbull(We managed to do this during the Toronto docs hackfest in March, but for the GNOME desktop help)21:16
philbullI think that's about it - we need to convert lots of apps over, and we will have a basic structure prepared very soon21:16
philbullUbuntu should help out with this21:17
j1mcCool.  Yes, I think we'll get some help from Ubuntu...21:17
Rocket2DMnWill we be using Gnome version 3.2 in Oneiric?21:17
j1mc... but we can also get help from Fedora and OpenSUSE, too.21:17
j1mcRocket2DMn: good question. i would think so... the apps that we have oneiric right now are gtk3 apps.21:18
j1mcwe can follow-up, though.21:19
j1mc[ACTION] Check to see if we'll have gnome 3.2 apps or gnome 3.0 apps in oneiric.21:19
MootBotACTION received:  Check to see if we'll have gnome 3.2 apps or gnome 3.0 apps in oneiric.21:19
Rocket2DMnyeah i'm looking at the alpha1 tech overview wiki page, i see that we have switched to gnome 3 which is good news21:20
Rocket2DMnnot sure what trouble they will have transitioning Unity, but that's not really our problem except for any changes the user sees21:20
j1mcjust one last point on this... i think it will make it easier for new contributors to help with writing docs. the topics will be stubbed-out, so all of the boilerplate will be taken care of.21:22
j1mcthat should make things easier for anyone who wants to help.21:22
j1mcbut... more info on that later, i guess.21:22
j1mcanything else on this for now?21:22
j1mc[TOPIC] Team strategy document21:23
MootBotNew Topic:  Team strategy document21:23
j1mcI don't really have an update on this. :) my last commit was a week or so ago21:23
j1mc[TOPIC] Ubuntu help website21:24
MootBotNew Topic:  Ubuntu help website21:24
j1mcthis is kinda interesting.21:24
vtanthropologistI haven't spent much time looking at the content to think about how it could be improved, but I've had to spend a bit of time on converting xml for a browser for another project21:25
j1mci had a talk with jono late last week, and there seems to be more of a drive to improve help.ubuntu.com, but i'm not sure if they are eager to provide additional help, or what.21:25
vtanthropologistI feel more comfortable about the idea of helping build the site now - if you still need it21:25
j1mcat the close of our talk, he said he was going to send a note to the docs team ML, but maybe he hasn't had a chance to yet.21:26
j1mcvtanthropologist: cool21:26
j1mcfor me, the big question is, are we at a point where we can mostly assume that people have access to the web?21:26
j1mcwhat do you think?21:27
Rocket2DMnj1mc, in most cases people do, but are we planning on adding documentation there that we won't ship as a package?21:27
vtanthropologistHaving lived in a developing country and seen anyone with access to a pc having access to the web, I'd say yes21:27
philbullj1mc: In most cases, apart from the very important case where someone can't get their wireless drivers working21:27
j1mcjbicha: what do you think?21:28
philbullI guess people can ask to use a friend's internet connection21:28
Rocket2DMnj1mc, what are we getting at?21:28
j1mcRocket2DMn: yeah, i think that would be a possibility.21:28
vtanthropologistI agree with philbull that we need to cater for wireless outages, but in that case most people still have windows as a fallback21:29
j1mcRocket2DMn: i was thinking of something like http://support.mozilla.com21:29
j1mcand having a subset of those docs on-disk21:29
philbullAnother issue is translation21:29
j1mcthere is also http://support.mozilla.com/es/home21:30
j1mci don't know about this, either ... i'm not sure if this is the right way to go, and i don't want people to be driven into anything.21:31
Rocket2DMnIt would be nice to have a portal like that to different documentation sources21:32
Rocket2DMni'm not sure we can get away from shipping docs at this time, we don't even have a framework for posting translated docs online yet21:32
* j1mc nods21:32
Rocket2DMnit was brought up in earlier discussions about doing that though, which i think would be great21:32
Rocket2DMnif that proves to be effective and maintainable, we might be able to look at moving away from shipping docs in 12.0421:33
j1mci'm not sure what else to say on it for now... i think that having a stronger, more interactive web presence for help would be good, and it sounds like people are agreeable to it21:36
j1mcit's just a matter of criteria and resources21:36
j1mcother thoughts on this for now?21:37
philbullThe Mozilla offering looks good (SuMo)21:37
philbulland it would be nice to have the community wiki docs and official docs available from the same interface21:37
j1mcone thing about SuMo is that they release weekly21:38
j1mcso it's a bit of a moving target. although it's open source, i don't know of any other groups that are using it.21:38
j1mci wish we could have a hackfest to work together on this.21:39
j1mcphilbull: i'll put our notes together and get them out on the mailing list.21:40
philbullgreat, thanks j1mc21:40
j1mcok... next topic21:40
j1mc[TOPIC] server docs21:40
MootBotNew Topic:  server docs21:40
j1mcthe server team had a meeting where they asked about the update to the server docs21:41
j1mcadam sommer and the server group are interested in the format similar to docs.openstack.org21:41
j1mcand i'm going to get a test build together this week.21:41
j1mcaside from getting confirmation from the server group, nothing too knew to report on that for now, though.21:42
j1mcs/knew/new21:42
j1mc[TOPIC] docs team blog21:42
MootBotNew Topic:  docs team blog21:42
vtanthropologistare you talking about having two different sites?  a SuMo-like help site and a openstack-like docs site?  isn't that overkill?21:43
vtanthropologistsorry. I missed the topic change21:43
j1mcvtanthropologist: good point. as a short-term thing, i think having the server docs in a nicer format would be good.21:44
j1mcif we have the build tools available, and we don't have to change the server docs too much, i think it's ok to go ahead with at least a draft attempt at the new layout.21:44
vtanthropologistso SuMo is a long-term vision?  but you're talking about 12.0421:45
j1mci think so21:45
j1mcright now, we don't have much in the line of support for web resources, so ... that will take more time to sort out, i think.21:46
vtanthropologistit seems like too many conflicting focuses to me21:47
j1mcit's a lot of work, yes21:47
j1mcwhat do others think?21:47
charlie-tcaCan I throw my two cents in?21:48
Rocket2DMni think i got confused on our topics - are we talking about the blog or about a new web interface to the docs?21:48
j1mcRocket2DMn: we went back to the web-talk, sorry about that21:49
j1mccharlie-tca: sure21:49
charlie-tcaI have been using Ubuntu/Xubuntu for about 6 years now.21:49
charlie-tcaI have been helping with support in IRC for about three21:49
charlie-tcaI do think having the docs on the web would be at least as helpful as on the CD, since most people will not look for docs anywhere but online21:50
charlie-tcaThe first thought in today's world is "google"21:50
charlie-tcaand google seldom says "look at your computer"21:51
j1mc:)21:51
charlie-tcaEven when wireless fails, people do not look at their installed system for docs.21:51
charlie-tcaThanks for letting me say it.21:51
j1mcthanks, charlie-tca21:52
j1mcdo other people think the short-term look at redoing server-docs, but progressing toward long-term getting the web-help in shape would be a good direction to go?21:53
j1mcor is it a conflict of sorts?21:53
j1mci know it's a lot of work.21:53
Rocket2DMni dont thikn that conflicts, the serverguide is already online-only21:53
Rocket2DMnbut i think we need to continue shipping desktop docs for now21:54
Rocket2DMnpeople still report bugs about using the desktop help, so people are definitely using it21:54
j1mc:)21:54
j1mcothers?21:54
Rocket2DMn(on their systems that is)21:54
vtanthropologistif the server docs will be minimal effort, it's probably ok, but I thought it would make more sense to put effort into one site and build it out for the other components as we can21:54
* j1mc nods... 21:55
j1mci'll get to work on the server docs, and we'll start considering options for web help.21:55
j1mci think this level of agreement is ok for this meeting though.21:56
j1mc[AGREED] jim to get to work on the server docs, and we'll start considering options for web help.21:56
MootBotAGREED received:  jim to get to work on the server docs, and we'll start considering options for web help.21:56
ScottKPlease don't break the existing server guide.  It's pretty good.21:56
j1mc[TOPIC] docs team blog - for real21:56
MootBotNew Topic:  docs team blog - for real21:56
j1mcScottK: it'll stay in the same format. same docbook.21:56
j1mcScottK: we'll talk more later21:57
j1mcmdke emailed canonical RT about docs.ubuntu.com21:57
j1mcbut we haven't heard back21:57
j1mcany comments on the emails that went out about this?21:58
Rocket2DMndo other teams have a dedicated blog?21:58
=== Guest4037 is now known as JanC
j1mci know that the server team does, and i think a11y does, too.21:59
j1mcthere might be more21:59
j1mcdesign team...21:59
j1mcperhaps talk on this more once we hear back from RT?22:01
stgraberedubuntu does as well. QA too, release team too, ...22:01
j1mcok... we'll wait on this a bit.22:02
j1mci know we're just over our hour, but can we still talk about the wiki?22:02
Rocket2DMni'm available if other teams dont have this time slot reserved22:03
j1mcok - we'll try here...22:03
j1mc[TOPIC] Wiki cleanup22:03
MootBotNew Topic:  Wiki cleanup22:03
j1mcRocket2DMn: you had some good comments on the ML about this.22:04
j1mchave you had additional thoughts about it? anything you'd like to add?22:05
Rocket2DMni've spent some time over the last couple of weeks deleting a lot of old wiki pages22:05
Rocket2DMnwe could use help updating pages and/or tagging pages that need work or just need to be outright removed22:05
j1mci think that would be a good start22:06
Rocket2DMnI have a question though22:07
j1mcwould anyone be available to get the word out about this request?22:07
j1mcsure22:07
Rocket2DMnsome pages that are translated into other languages are marked for deletion22:07
Rocket2DMnDo we support translated pages on the community docs?22:07
Rocket2DMnI don't think it's the correct place for them, but I've never gone out of my way to manage them22:07
j1mcgood question... i would guess that the language coverage is pretty spotty, too.22:08
Rocket2DMnit is, I'm not sure how well the pages are maintained either22:08
j1mcis there an example page that you could point to?22:09
j1mchow do you know if a page is translated?22:09
Rocket2DMnhttps://help.ubuntu.com/community/NlBluetooth22:09
Rocket2DMnhttps://help.ubuntu.com/community/RussianDocumentation22:09
Rocket2DMnetc22:09
j1mcthanks, Rocket2DMn.22:10
j1mcshould we bring these up on the ML?22:11
j1mci would feel bad about just deleting them, but we have no idea what they say, and i doubt they receive much of a review.22:11
j1mcor i have no way of knowing if they are reviewed22:11
Rocket2DMnML is fine with me22:12
vtanthropologistcan a deleted page be restored or do you delete the history too?22:13
Rocket2DMnthey can be restored22:13
j1mcRocket2DMn: do you have a blog on the planet? can you post about how to tag pages as outdated / needing review / recommended for deletion, or just point people to those pages on the wiki that describe how to do it?22:13
Rocket2DMnj1mc, i don't keep a blog22:14
vtanthropologistok, so worst case if you don't get a response on the ML, deleting it should bring anyone that's been using it out of the woodwork22:14
j1mcok... i can blog about it.22:15
Rocket2DMnvtanthropologist, if they are subscribed to the page, they should get an email22:15
j1mcRocket2DMn: could you send a note out to the ML about the translations?22:15
j1mc(the wiki pages that have been translated)22:16
Rocket2DMnyeah22:16
j1mcok. :)22:16
j1mc[ACTION] connor to send note to the ML about translated wiki pages22:17
MootBotACTION received:  connor to send note to the ML about translated wiki pages22:17
j1mc[ACTION] jim to blog about tagging wiki pages22:17
MootBotACTION received:  jim to blog about tagging wiki pages22:17
j1mcanything else for today?22:17
Rocket2DMni dont have anything22:17
vtanthropologistnor me22:18
j1mcokies... thanks for joining all.  :)22:18
j1mcenjoy the rest of your sunday, wherever that may be.22:18
j1mc#endmeeting22:18
MootBotMeeting finished at 16:18.22:18
vtanthropologistSunday finished 7 hours ago, but there's lots of Monday left to enjoy22:18
vtanthropologist:)22:19
j1mci'll send the minutes and log to the ML22:19
j1mcvtanthropologist: i forget that you're in Australia. what part?22:19
Rocket2DMnthanks j1mc22:19
vtanthropologistSydney22:19
j1mccool. :)22:19
vtanthropologistI take it you're in the US22:19
vtanthropologist?22:19
j1mci just met someone from red hat in brisbane last week.22:19
j1mcbut i heard brisbane is kind of a smaller city22:19
j1mcyes, i'm in the states22:20
vtanthropologistyep.  we call it Brisvagas22:20
vtanthropologistwhich part of the US?22:20
j1mccentral... chicago area.22:21
vtanthropologistI liked Chicago.  I didn't get out of the city though22:21
j1mcvtanthropologist: are there certain doc areas where you might want to write some docs? any certain apps or topics areas?22:21
vtanthropologistI'd like to give it a go.  I was working with philbull on writing a better installation guide as pdf, but that lost momentum22:22
vtanthropologistI find it difficult to know where things are up to in the docs systems and I wonder if I know the apps well enough to write docs22:23
j1mcok. we will have a better list of apps that need help soon.22:23
vtanthropologistI use the basics a lot, but the basic docs already seem to be covered22:23
vtanthropologistthat's why I thought I could help with building the web site22:24
j1mcyeah, when we were brainstorming docs for seahorse... we were asking lots of questions like, "what is this?" "what does this do?"22:24
j1mcediting and review can be a good place to get situated, too.22:24
j1mcif you aren't sure where things are in the "docs ecosystem"22:24
vtanthropologistagain, I can't find what needs reviewing.22:24
vtanthropologistexactly22:25
j1mcok - i can write up something about that, too. that is good to know.22:25
j1mci'm going to head-out... thanks for your input, vtanthropologist22:25
vtanthropologistI think there needs to be a much better onboarding process for interested newbies22:25
vtanthropologistyep.  have a good day22:26
j1mcthanks again.  ttyl22:26
=== Adri2000 is now known as Guest26577

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!