| lifeless | huwshimi: is this you - http://huw.ugbox.net/ ? | 00:08 |
|---|---|---|
| huwshimi | lifeless: It was, a loooong time ago, yes | 00:12 |
| huwshimi | lifeless: How come? | 00:12 |
| lifeless | huwshimi: its linked from the bottom of http://twistedmatrix.com/trac/wiki/IPv6 | 00:13 |
| huwshimi | lifeless: Oh yeah :) | 00:14 |
| LPCIBot | Project windmill-devel build #207: STILL FAILING in 1 hr 5 min: https://lpci.wedontsleep.org/job/windmill-devel/207/ | 03:58 |
| === michaelh1 is now known as michaelh1|away | ||
| === michaelh1|away is now known as michaelh1 | ||
| === michaelh1 is now known as michaelh1|away | ||
| lifeless | stub: \o/ thanks for fix-releasing that bug | 07:23 |
| lifeless | stub: the followup branch with the journal etc is all landed and just passed bb | 07:23 |
| stub | One down... | 07:23 |
| stub | I'll be starting on the extension. Hopefully importance and the two booleans won't bloat things to impractical levels. | 07:24 |
| lifeless | stub: I think it ended up being a 54MB table | 07:24 |
| lifeless | stub: e.g. still quite compact | 07:24 |
| stub | How many discreet importances are there? | 07:25 |
| lifeless | unknown wishlist low medium high critical (+ perhaps 2 backwards compat ?) | 07:26 |
| stub | huh... we have some bugtasks with priority set | 07:28 |
| stub | Only 30k or so... must have been a bug in bugs | 07:29 |
| stub | Or is that settable via the API? | 07:29 |
| LPCIBot | Project windmill-db-devel build #383: STILL FAILING in 2 min 43 sec: https://lpci.wedontsleep.org/job/windmill-db-devel/383/ | 07:29 |
| lifeless | stub: unmigrated early-days stuff? | 07:30 |
| lifeless | I'm not sure python even knows about the column now | 07:30 |
| lifeless | stub: ah, your branches were targeted at db-devel | 07:30 |
| nigelb | Someday I need to get around to fixing that sorting. I've been holding it off. | 07:58 |
| jtv | Any reviewers in the house? I'm pretty sure the topic is out of date! https://code.launchpad.net/~jtv/launchpad/pre-bug-791204-getPackageUploads-name-filter/+merge/64345 | 08:03 |
| === jtv changed the topic of #launchpad-dev to: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | On call reviewer: - | Critical bugs:209 - 0:[######=_]:256 | ||
| jtv | stub: are you ocr'ing today? | 08:04 |
| nigelb | Aww, the branding wiki linked in the email isn't accessible outside of Canonical :( | 08:09 |
| huwshimi | nigelb: Oh, apologies about that. I'll see if there's another link I can use | 08:10 |
| nigelb | huwshimi: Ah, thanks! | 08:11 |
| jtv | Anybody want to review an extensive but relatively straightforward lint branch? https://code.launchpad.net/~jtv/launchpad/more-pre-791204-lint/+merge/64365 | 08:13 |
| stub | jtv: yo | 08:24 |
| jtv | stub: got time to review this one? Not hard: https://code.launchpad.net/~jtv/launchpad/more-pre-791204-lint/+merge/64365 | 08:24 |
| jtv | and hi, btw :) | 08:24 |
| stub | If it is just lint, r=jtv would be fine. Or do you want another pair of eyeballs on it? | 08:25 |
| jtv | stub: there's a few places where I went beyond the entirely trivial. Not far, but still. | 08:25 |
| stub | One place I see, and that is pretty obviously an improvement. r=stub | 08:28 |
| stub | Off for a quick bite to eat | 08:29 |
| jtv | thanks stub! | 08:29 |
| stub | np :) | 08:30 |
| LPCIBot | Project devel build #798: STILL FAILING in 5 hr 50 min: https://lpci.wedontsleep.org/job/devel/798/ | 08:31 |
| LPCIBot | Project parallel-test build #30: STILL FAILING in 1 hr 21 min: https://lpci.wedontsleep.org/job/parallel-test/30/ | 08:34 |
| stub | Yay. http://pgreplay.projects.postgresql.org/ might let us actually create a DB benchmark. | 08:49 |
| LPCIBot | Project windmill-db-devel build #384: STILL FAILING in 1 hr 11 min: https://lpci.wedontsleep.org/job/windmill-db-devel/384/ | 08:56 |
| jml | huwshimi: hello | 09:00 |
| huwshimi | jml: Hey | 09:00 |
| jml | huwshimi: skype? | 09:01 |
| huwshimi | jml: Just logging in | 09:01 |
| huwshimi | jml: Just one sec | 09:01 |
| mrevell | Hello! | 09:02 |
| huwshimi | jml: back | 09:03 |
| jml | mrevell: hi | 09:04 |
| huwshimi | nigelb: Here is that link: https://dev.launchpad.net/Projects/Rebranding | 09:15 |
| nigelb | huwshimi: thanks :-) | 09:15 |
| nigelb | Can we introduce a bug into launchpad that will report the number of critical bugs against lauchpad as zero? ;-) | 09:16 |
| jml | nigelb: no. | 09:22 |
| nigelb | jml: Drat. I tried :-) | 09:22 |
| === jtv1 is now known as jtv | ||
| === cjwatson_ is now known as cjwatson | ||
| lifeless | nigelb: we could, but it would be a regression and so critical :P | 09:42 |
| lifeless | jml: btw, hi | 09:43 |
| jml | lifeless: hello | 09:43 |
| lifeless | stub: that looks interesting | 09:43 |
| lifeless | jml: hows today looking ? | 09:47 |
| nigelb | lifeless: Hehe | 09:48 |
| jml | huwshimi: http://lpqateam.canonical.com/doc/scope.html | 09:49 |
| jml | lifeless: otp | 09:49 |
| jml | lifeless: should have time for a call if you'd like one | 09:54 |
| lifeless | that would be nice | 09:56 |
| jml | lifeless: now? skype? | 10:01 |
| jml | lifeless: Since you're not answering. I'm going to go wash the dishes. Will be back soon. | 10:05 |
| * bigjools adds a bug tag subscription and rejoices | 10:11 | |
| danilos | bigjools, nooooo, we didn't make it to be used! | 10:11 |
| bigjools | (ab)used | 10:11 |
| jml | back | 10:14 |
| lifeless | jml: yes, and yes | 10:15 |
| === stub1 is now known as stub | ||
| jtv | wgrant, StevenK: has either of you touched the Upgrade button on df's oneiric/+localpackagediffs lately? Mind if I hit it in a few minutes? | 10:30 |
| StevenK | jtv: I seriously doubt it, since .au has a public holiday today. | 10:31 |
| jtv | that's never stopped you before | 10:31 |
| jtv | you geocontrarian bunch of workaholics | 10:32 |
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| === michaelh1|away is now known as michaelh1 | ||
| === michaelh1 is now known as michaelh1|away | ||
| LPCIBot | Project windmill-devel build #208: STILL FAILING in 1 hr 8 min: https://lpci.wedontsleep.org/job/windmill-devel/208/ | 11:32 |
| jtv | Review needed! https://code.launchpad.net/~jtv/launchpad/pre-bug-791204-getPackageUploads-name-filter/+merge/64345 | 12:02 |
| bigjools | jtv: looking at it now | 12:16 |
| jtv | thanks! | 12:16 |
| bigjools | jtv: are you doing full substring on the name_filter? | 12:16 |
| jtv | No, prefix. | 12:16 |
| bigjools | jtv: the old code did full substring | 12:16 |
| jtv | Didn't look like it. | 12:16 |
| bigjools | "sourcepackagename.name LIKE '%%' || %s || '%%'" | 12:16 |
| jtv | argh | 12:17 |
| bigjools | there's also an exact_match param in the old code | 12:17 |
| jtv | oh well, good thing I isolated that in a function. | 12:17 |
| jtv | Yes | 12:17 |
| jtv | I'll have to mimick that as well, for the script. | 12:17 |
| bigjools | not sure where that was used though | 12:17 |
| jtv | In the script. :( | 12:17 |
| jtv | I just found it. | 12:17 |
| jtv | But it won't be hard, again because I isolated the match in a separate function. | 12:17 |
| bigjools | ok | 12:18 |
| jtv | Maybe I should tackle both of these issues together in a separate branch: instead of prefix match, give a choice of exact match or full substring match. | 12:19 |
| jtv | (There were some intricacies w.r.t. pattern escaping) | 12:19 |
| bigjools | well you'd be landing a regression... | 12:20 |
| === mrevell is now known as mrevell-lunch | ||
| jtv | No, because we're not actually calling that method yet. | 12:25 |
| jtv | Or at least not with that argument! | 12:25 |
| bigjools | oh you've not changed code to call it yet | 12:25 |
| jtv | No, because that requires both this branch and the other one that I'm currently writing an MP for. | 12:26 |
| bigjools | ok | 12:27 |
| bigjools | the substring query is going to cack up the performance something rotten | 12:27 |
| bigjools | jtv: also the old getQueueItems had some messed up ordering that was discarded when it did the union at the bottom | 12:28 |
| bigjools | I wonder if we can fix that | 12:28 |
| bigjools | but the problem is that the old query ordered on different things depending on the upload type | 12:29 |
| jtv | What kind of ordering do we want, from the user's perspective? | 12:33 |
| bigjools | not entirely sure tbh, but anything consistent will be better than the current code | 12:33 |
| bigjools | it's quite hard to order because of the different types of upload | 12:33 |
| jtv | Yeah… if it weren't for custom uploads, I'd say we clearly need to sort by package. | 12:34 |
| bigjools | sorting by packageupload.id is a good start, it just won't order the items that share the same PU | 12:34 |
| jtv | And then maybe have a separate more queue-oriented page for seeing how the work goes. | 12:34 |
| jtv | Isn't it just the builds that share a PU? | 12:35 |
| jtv | Anyway, it's probably not going to be _that_ hard to treat that as a separate issue? | 12:37 |
| bigjools | jtv: a single upload can have builds, sources AND custom files | 12:38 |
| bigjools | there's not many of those in practice any more, but the model allows it | 12:38 |
| jtv | Oh ewll | 12:38 |
| jtv | well | 12:38 |
| jtv | That's for a separate query though. | 12:39 |
| jtv | This query only returns the PUs. | 12:40 |
| jtv | When we display those, I have a feeling the sorting of items within a PU will work out without too much difficulty. | 12:40 |
| jtv | Oh this just had to happen to me, didn't it? | 12:46 |
| jtv | Diff against target:666 lines (+391/-50) 8 files modified (has conflicts) | 12:46 |
| jtv | Woe to you, oh earth and sea… | 12:47 |
| bigjools | jtv: reviewed, needs-fixing | 12:47 |
| jtv | thanks | 12:47 |
| bigjools | jtv: so FYI there's one PCJ with a PU in the dogfood DB now, since I synced an unknown package. It'll be good QA fodder :) | 12:53 |
| * jtv cackles nastily | 12:53 | |
| benji | /topichttps://dev.launchpad.net/ | On call reviewer: benji | Critical bugs:209 - 0:[######=_]:256 | 13:13 |
| benji | /topichttps://dev.launchpad.net/ | On call reviewer: benji | Critical bugs:209 - 0:[######=_]:256 | 13:13 |
| benji | pfft | 13:13 |
| === benji changed the topic of #launchpad-dev to: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | On call reviewer: benji | Critical bugs:209 - 0:[######=_]:256 | ||
| === jelmer_ is now known as jelmer | ||
| danilos | benji, hey, hey, I've got a few branches awaiting review, the first one at https://code.launchpad.net/~danilo/launchpad/bug-772754-other-subscribers-lp-names/+merge/64178 | 13:15 |
| benji | danilos: I'll take a look | 13:15 |
| danilos | benji, cool, thanks | 13:15 |
| lifeless | jml: sorry, cut the last bit off | 13:15 |
| lifeless | jml: was good talking; have a great day | 13:16 |
| LPCIBot | Project db-devel build #630: FAILURE in 5 hr 51 min: https://lpci.wedontsleep.org/job/db-devel/630/ | 13:21 |
| === mrevell-lunch is now known as mrevell | ||
| rvba | benji: Hi! Could you take a look at https://code.launchpad.net/~rvb/launchpad/initseries-bug-795537/+merge/64231 ? | 13:40 |
| benji | rvba: sure | 13:40 |
| rvba | benji: Thanks! | 13:40 |
| LPCIBot | Project windmill-devel build #209: STILL FAILING in 1 hr 7 min: https://lpci.wedontsleep.org/job/windmill-devel/209/ | 14:06 |
| benji | danilos: I'm done with https://code.launchpad.net/~danilo/launchpad/bug-772754-other-subscribers-lp-names/+merge/64178 | 14:23 |
| danilos | benji, cool, thanks, care to take on the next one: https://code.launchpad.net/~danilo/launchpad/bug-772754-other-subscribers-subscribers/+merge/64179? :) | 14:24 |
| benji | danilos: sure, you're second in line, but I don't think it'll be a very long wait | 14:25 |
| danilos | benji, great, thanks | 14:25 |
| benji | rvba: I'm done with https://code.launchpad.net/~rvb/launchpad/initseries-bug-795537/+merge/64231 | 14:30 |
| rvba | benji: Thanks! | 14:30 |
| jelmer | benji: Hi! Can I add another branch to your queue? | 14:32 |
| benji | jelmer: absolutely | 14:32 |
| jelmer | benji: Thanks :) MP is at https://code.launchpad.net/~jelmer/launchpad/auto-upgrade/+merge/64398 | 14:33 |
| allenap | benji: Can I push another merge proposal (shortish, some javascript) on your stack? https://code.launchpad.net/~allenap/launchpad/localpackagediffs-latest-comment-bug-746379/+merge/64334 | 14:36 |
| benji | allenap: sure | 14:36 |
| allenap | Thanks :) | 14:36 |
| === Ursinha is now known as Ursula | ||
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| cr3 | can someone explain the purpose of lazr.canonical.timeout.urlfetch when urllib2.urlopen already supports a timeout parameter? | 15:40 |
| benji | danilos and jelmer,done with your reviews | 15:43 |
| LPCIBot | Project parallel-test build #31: STILL FAILING in 1 hr 0 min: https://lpci.wedontsleep.org/job/parallel-test/31/ | 15:44 |
| danilos | benji, cool, thanks again | 15:51 |
| benji | np | 15:51 |
| jelmer | benji: thanks :) | 15:51 |
| benji | np | 15:51 |
| === salgado is now known as salgado-lunch | ||
| jml | sinzui: hi | 16:00 |
| sinzui | hi | 16:00 |
| jml | sinzui: would you like to have a call about disclosure? | 16:01 |
| sinzui | okay | 16:01 |
| LPCIBot | Project windmill-db-devel build #385: STILL FAILING in 1 hr 14 min: https://lpci.wedontsleep.org/job/windmill-db-devel/385/ | 16:01 |
| sinzui | jml: I am on mumble | 16:01 |
| jml | sinzui: mumble hates my guts. I have dared to change my hardware. Give me a sec. | 16:02 |
| sinzui | jml: I will also learn is mumble works for me on oneiric | 16:02 |
| benji | allenap: I'm done with https://code.launchpad.net/~allenap/launchpad/localpackagediffs-latest-comment-bug-746379/+merge/64334 | 16:06 |
| === Ursula is now known as Ursinha | ||
| allenap | benji: Thank you :) | 16:07 |
| benji | my pleasure | 16:07 |
| jcsackett_ | sinzui: just saw bug 707234 bumped up. think i might tackle that today. | 16:08 |
| _mup_ | Bug #707234: Ajax controls disabled on bugs with many tasks due to multiple redundant copies of person picker make_picker function in view-source:https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad-project/+bugs?advanced=1 <disclosure> <javascript> <person-picker> <regression> <Launchpad itself:Triaged> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/707234 > | 16:08 |
| jcsackett_ | up for chatting about it when you're done talking with jml? | 16:09 |
| === jcsackett_ is now known as jcsackett | ||
| LPCIBot | Project devel build #799: STILL FAILING in 6 hr 2 min: https://lpci.wedontsleep.org/job/devel/799/ | 16:14 |
| sinzui | jcsackett: I am available to chat now | 16:24 |
| === matsubara is now known as matsubara-lunch | ||
| cr3 | nevermind my question about urlfetch, I suspect the reason is that the timeout parameter was only added to urllib2.urlopen in 2.6 | 16:41 |
| bigjools | mrevell: you might find this interesting reading (then again it may put you to sleep) https://dev.launchpad.net/Soyuz/DerivativeDistributions | 16:46 |
| mrevell | bigjools, Thanks :) | 16:48 |
| LPCIBot | Project windmill-devel build #210: STILL FAILING in 1 hr 6 min: https://lpci.wedontsleep.org/job/windmill-devel/210/ | 16:51 |
| timrc | bigjools, Cody ran the complete test suite before landing my fix for #724740 and I had one failure... does that have to mean I introduced a regression? If so it's causing some serious head scratching, because the failure seems completely unrelated to my change (and if there is a relationship, I'm scared :)) | 16:55 |
| _mup_ | Bug #724740: setting a ppa private cannot be done over the API <api> <oem-services> <ppa> <Launchpad itself:In Progress by timrchavez> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/724740 > | 16:55 |
| bigjools | timrc: can you paste the failure? It's not unheard of to have random failures :/ | 16:55 |
| timrc | bigjools, http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/625962/ | 16:57 |
| timrc | bigjools, I'll dig deeper into this, myself... it just struck me as odd as this being the one place of failure | 16:57 |
| bigjools | timrc: ah that does look related | 16:58 |
| bigjools | timrc: where's your merge proposal? | 16:58 |
| timrc | bigjools, https://code.launchpad.net/~timrchavez/launchpad/set_ppa_private_from_api_724740-2/+merge/63950 | 16:59 |
| bigjools | timrc: if you run that test locally does it fail again? | 17:00 |
| timrc | bigjools, yes, when I run the test locally it fails | 17:02 |
| bigjools | timrc: if you revert your changes does it still fail? | 17:06 |
| allenap | benji: Got time for another shortish javascript branch? https://code.launchpad.net/~allenap/launchpad/localpackagediffs-commenting-bug-795573/+merge/64418 | 17:07 |
| benji | allenap: sure | 17:07 |
| allenap | Thanks again :) | 17:08 |
| * jml has to run. | 17:10 | |
| jml | see y'all later. | 17:10 |
| bigjools | timrc: I'm testing locally too | 17:10 |
| timrc | bigjools, testing now | 17:12 |
| === m4n1sh is now known as manish | ||
| timrc | bigjools, yeah, must be a regression caused by me :( test ran fine with my changes removed | 17:17 |
| bigjools | ok let's work out why | 17:18 |
| bigjools | and indeed it fails for me too | 17:19 |
| benji | allenap: I'm done with https://code.launchpad.net/~allenap/launchpad/localpackagediffs-commenting-bug-795573/+merge/64418 | 17:21 |
| === salgado-lunch is now known as salgado | ||
| allenap | Thanks benji. | 17:22 |
| cr3 | is there a naming convention for urls in the web and webservice interfaces for referring to sets and individual elements within sets, eg plural for the former (/foos) and singular for the latter (/foo/1) | 17:48 |
| bigjools | good question | 17:51 |
| cr3 | what I'm observing from the apidoc is plural all the way, eg /foos and /foos/1 taking my above example. I can understand that motivation for people playing with urls manually, so removing /1 from the latter would immediately resolve into a working url | 17:52 |
| cr3 | I would appreciate some confirmation whether I'm observing a legacy decision or one that still holds today | 17:53 |
| bigjools | timrc: I can see where that test is failing but I can't work out why | 18:00 |
| bigjools | timrc: IArchiveSet.getArchivesForDistribution() is not returning the copy_archive created at the top of the test | 18:00 |
| bigjools | so the script that needs it doesn't do anything | 18:00 |
| bigjools | timrc: I have to go now, maybe someone else can help you or grab wgrant when he's around later in your day | 18:01 |
| bigjools | cr3: I think /foos is a good pattern | 18:01 |
| sinzui | launchpad tells me that it cannot import subunit using python 2.6 when running on oneiric :( | 18:01 |
| bigjools | the singular is up for debate | 18:01 |
| bigjools | it depends on the domain | 18:02 |
| timrc | bigjools, alrighty... thanks for the help | 18:02 |
| bigjools | timrc: you're welcome. Good luck. | 18:02 |
| === matsubara-lunch is now known as matsubara | ||
| cr3 | bigjools: implying /foos/1 for an individual element under /foos, right? | 18:03 |
| bigjools | cr3: well one example is /builders and /builders/<builder> | 18:04 |
| cr3 | bigjools: I just tried accessing /people/cr3 on launchpad, which redirects me to /~cr3 whereas /person/cr3 asks me if I lost somthing :) | 18:04 |
| * bigjools has to run for the day | 18:04 | |
| bigjools | there you go thenb | 18:05 |
| bigjools | good night all | 18:05 |
| mrevell | Good night my comrades. | 18:08 |
| Ursinha | matsubara: hi :) did you file bugs for any of your dd exploratory testing notes? | 19:01 |
| matsubara | Ursinha, not yet | 19:04 |
| LPCIBot | Project windmill-devel build #211: STILL FAILING in 1 hr 7 min: https://lpci.wedontsleep.org/job/windmill-devel/211/ | 19:06 |
| abentley | benji: could you please review https://code.launchpad.net/~abentley/launchpad/ppa-api-errors/+merge/64425 ? | 19:07 |
| benji | abentley: sure | 19:07 |
| bdmurray | I'm having an issue running 'make schema' on my launchpad dev system | 19:11 |
| bdmurray | http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/626039/ | 19:12 |
| benji | abentley: I'm done with https://code.launchpad.net/~abentley/launchpad/ppa-api-errors/+merge/64425 I had one thought that you might want to consider. | 19:16 |
| abentley | benji: ? | 19:16 |
| benji | abentley: I don't understand what you don't understand. :) | 19:17 |
| abentley | benji: You said there was something I might want to consider. I was saying "Hmmm? Go on..." | 19:17 |
| benji | ah, it's in a comment on the MP | 19:17 |
| abentley | benji: BadRequest is only emitted for status 400 AFAIK. | 19:17 |
| benji | abentley: since the test docstring explicityly says 400, it would be good to actually test for that, and I'm paranoid enough to expect that same message to one day be given a different status code | 19:20 |
| abentley | benji: Very well, I'll change the test to say "Bad Request". | 19:22 |
| benji | k | 19:22 |
| abentley | benji: I submit that if you're afraid standards bodies are out to get you, you truly are paranoid. | 19:23 |
| benji | heh; it's more that the people writing the software are fallible | 19:24 |
| abentley | benji: I think that if I tested the status code of BadRequest, I'd be violating the principle of "Test only one thing", because I'd be testing the behaviour of lazr.restfulclient. | 19:31 |
| benji | abentley: I'd buy that. | 19:32 |
| bac | hi james_w, i need to create a new test data suite for archiveuploader. do you know how to do that, specifically working out getting them properly signed? | 19:56 |
| bac | abentley, flacoste: ^^ | 19:59 |
| flacoste | bac: what do you want to do exactly? | 20:00 |
| bac | flacoste: create a test for a maintainer with a bad email address (bug 519857) | 20:00 |
| _mup_ | Bug #519857: Upload processor OOPSes with bad email addresses <lp-soyuz> <oops> <soyuz-upload> <Launchpad itself:In Progress by bac> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/519857 > | 20:00 |
| flacoste | benji: if you have time, could you review https://code.launchpad.net/~flacoste/launchpad/bug-781993-1/+merge/64258 pretty please? | 20:00 |
| bac | flacoste: so i figure i need to create a new suite, with a bad maintainer or Changed-by email address...but it has to be properly signed | 20:01 |
| benji | flacoste: sure | 20:01 |
| flacoste | thanks benji | 20:01 |
| flacoste | bac: why don't you write this as a unit test to safe_fix_maintainer | 20:02 |
| flacoste | bac: which operates on a hash | 20:02 |
| flacoste | err, dictionary | 20:02 |
| * flacoste again showed he's a former perl hacker | 20:02 | |
| bac | flacoste: i'll look into that. thanks. | 20:02 |
| flacoste | bac: if you want to go end-to-end, i think there are probably some helper method in soyuz for that, but would be best to ask bigjools, StevenK or wgrant about it | 20:04 |
| bac | flacoste: actually, no. i was intending for safe_fix_maintainer to still raise the same error, but i'd just handle it in process | 20:04 |
| bac | flacoste: which is why i wanted an end-to-end test | 20:04 |
| bac | and it looked like the way things are done in test_uploadprocessor.py is to create novel suites... | 20:05 |
| james_w | bac, from what I remember the checking of real packages tends to operate on packages contained in the LP source tree | 20:07 |
| flacoste | which is more a case of missing test architecture i think | 20:10 |
| flacoste | but i may be mistaken | 20:10 |
| flacoste | bac: you want to make the fix in processChanges? | 20:10 |
| bac | james_w: what i think i need to do is in lib/lp/archiveuploader/tests/data/suite create a new suite, say, bar_1.0-1_bad_maintainer_email and in it change bar_1.0-1_source.changes to futz with the maintainer or changed-by email address to invoke the failure. but when i do that i need to sign that file | 20:10 |
| LPCIBot | Project db-devel build #631: STILL FAILING in 5 hr 39 min: https://lpci.wedontsleep.org/job/db-devel/631/ | 20:10 |
| bac | flacoste: i was intending something like http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/626072/ | 20:11 |
| LPCIBot | Project parallel-test build #32: STILL FAILING in 1 hr 5 min: https://lpci.wedontsleep.org/job/parallel-test/32/ | 20:11 |
| james_w | flacoste, there's no support in the test suite for signing packages that I know of, which is why all of those are already signed | 20:12 |
| bac | james_w, flacoste: right, so that's what i'm trying to figure out. i see a secring.gpg but it doesn't seem to have in it what i need. so i'm trying to figure out where the keys are and perhaps some instructions... | 20:13 |
| james_w | bac, ah, got it | 20:13 |
| bac | james_w: sorry it was so circuitous | 20:13 |
| james_w | I've never had to do it myself | 20:13 |
| james_w | so I can't help you I'm afraid | 20:14 |
| bac | james_w: ah, right then. of the people awake you seemed like the best candidate | 20:14 |
| bac | james_w: thanks anway! | 20:14 |
| benji | flacoste: I'm done with https://code.launchpad.net/~allenap/launchpad/initialise-to-initialize/+merge/64121 | 20:15 |
| bac | flacoste: perhaps i should put this aside until i can talk to bigjools | 20:15 |
| allenap | benji: EWRONGURL I suspect. | 20:15 |
| benji | pfft! | 20:15 |
| flacoste | bac: yeah, probably a good idea | 20:15 |
| benji | allenap: the curse of having multiple tabs open at once | 20:16 |
| allenap | benji: But thanks for reviewing that one :) | 20:16 |
| benji | flacoste: I actually meant that I'm done with this https://code.launchpad.net/~flacoste/launchpad/bug-781993-1/+merge/64258 ;) | 20:19 |
| flacoste | benji: ah, cool, thanks! | 20:19 |
| benji | allenap: I just had a thought about your branch that I want to check out, so if you're panning on jumping on the merge, hold off for one sec | 20:24 |
| allenap | benji: Sure. | 20:25 |
| LPCIBot | Project windmill-db-devel build #386: STILL FAILING in 1 hr 13 min: https://lpci.wedontsleep.org/job/windmill-db-devel/386/ | 20:29 |
| benji | allenap: ok, we're good, my negative thought didn't pan out (I was concerned that one or more symbols exposed by the web service might have been changed) | 20:31 |
| allenap | benji: Thanks for thinking of it and checking :) | 20:32 |
| === matsubara is now known as matsubara-afk | ||
| lifeless | flacoste: this explains a lot :P | 20:45 |
| flacoste | lifeless: ??? | 20:45 |
| lifeless | 07:02 * flacoste again showed he's a former perl hacker | 20:46 |
| lifeless | :P | 20:46 |
| flacoste | lol | 20:46 |
| LPCIBot | Project windmill-devel build #212: STILL FAILING in 47 min: https://lpci.wedontsleep.org/job/windmill-devel/212/ | 20:57 |
| flacoste | lifeless: call time? | 20:58 |
| === michaelh1|away is now known as michaelh1 | ||
| lifeless | yup | 20:59 |
| poolie | hi flacoste, lifeless | 21:13 |
| bdmurray | I sorted out my question | 21:28 |
| cr3 | might there be an interface for accessing oops reports? I'm wondering what might be wrong with this one: OOPS-1990AP106 | 21:29 |
| LPCIBot | Yippie, build fixed! | 21:39 |
| LPCIBot | Project devel build #800: FIXED in 5 hr 24 min: https://lpci.wedontsleep.org/job/devel/800/ | 21:39 |
| LPCIBot | Project windmill-devel build #213: STILL FAILING in 44 min: https://lpci.wedontsleep.org/job/windmill-devel/213/ | 21:42 |
| === benji changed the topic of #launchpad-dev to: https://dev.launchpad.net/ | On call reviewer: - | Critical bugs:209 - 0:[######=_]:256 | ||
| LPCIBot | Project windmill-devel build #214: STILL FAILING in 42 min: https://lpci.wedontsleep.org/job/windmill-devel/214/ | 22:25 |
| === salgado is now known as salgado-afk | ||
| lifeless | o/ poolie | 23:22 |
| lifeless | sinzui: Was your team touching on bug 66552 ? I think its a dupe or something | 23:43 |
| _mup_ | Bug #66552: Unhelpful error when reporting bug with non-existent package entered and "I don't know" chosen <lp-bugs> <Launchpad itself:Triaged> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/66552 > | 23:43 |
| bdmurray | I'm now getting an error trying to run most tests | 23:56 |
| bdmurray | http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/626204/ | 23:56 |
| lifeless | fun | 23:57 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!