/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/06/13/#lubuntu.txt

robinaboyay, so far so good for switching to lubuntu00:00
frank_Will there be any errors if I install LXDE on my Ubuntu Natty installation? My CPU was running too hot because of Unity and I want to try LXDE to see if that will make it run cooler. Any word on this?06:08
marazwell, if you're certain it was indeed Unity that was eating up your CPU, then yes, LXDE might be a solution. however, attempting to fix a hardware problem (insufficient CPU cooling) with a software change is kind of the Apple way of doing things.06:11
frank_as soon as I switched to classic GNOME my fan stopped spinning loudly06:13
frank_and the temp is now okay and I heard LXDE is much better06:13
frank_what about all those RAM eating deamons.... will they disappear if I switch to LXDE?06:15
marazprobably not06:17
head_victimDepends on what you're running, if you're still running all the same programs it might not change a lot other than the DE overhead06:17
marazyou should take a good look at your processes while running Unity and see if there are any single ones that use too much cpu06:18
frank_I wanted to install Lubuntu but it currently doesnt have an alternative install CD06:19
marazhttps://help.ubuntu.com/community/Lubuntu/Documentation/AlternateInstall06:21
frank_now it does! ?06:22
marazheh, maybe you just didn't look hard enough ;)06:22
frank_wait... can I do full disk encryption with it? That's the whole point06:23
bioterrorhow can CPU run too hot becouse of unity as it uses GPU ;)06:32
marazfrank_: did you actually check that it was the Unity binary using too much CPU and not something else?06:33
bioterrorubuntu does not support full system encryption06:41
bioterroronly home folder encryption06:41
bioterroras far as I iknow06:41
jmarsdenbioterror: Per filesystem  crypto has been around for a very long time in Ubuntu.  See https://help.ubuntu.com/community/EncryptedFilesystems06:43
jmarsdenThe per home directory stuff is *newer* :)06:43
bioterrorand smarter06:44
jmarsdenbioterror: Not smarter if you are concerned about people reading data out of your swap partition, etc... :)  Each user makes their own decision on what level of security vs ease of use tradeoffs they want to make.06:45
bioterrordont make swap then!06:45
jmarsdenAssuming that your own priorities and security needs are the same as every other Ubuntu user is probably a bad idea.06:45
jmarsdenbioterror: If you are unaware of why someone might want full disk encryption, you should *definitely* not be telling people that Ubuntu can't do it...06:47
bioterrorit's not by default06:51
bioterrorthe default way is home drive encryption06:51
bioterrorand that's okay, as people seems to have difficulties even to chroot into system without encryption06:51
bioterrorright?06:51
jmarsdenFull disk encryption is not for the average end user.  But it does exist, and for some people it is important.  SO telling them it doesn't exist is a bad idea :)06:52
bioterrorwhere did I say it does not exist?06:52
jmarsden<bioterror> ubuntu does not support full system encryption06:52
bioterrorI just said it does not support as in it's not there by default06:52
bioterrorhome folder encryption yes06:53
jmarsdenHuh?  Home dir crypto is not enabled by default either.06:53
bioterroryou have that option when you install?06:53
jmarsdenThat is not "by default", you have to take a specific step if you want it.06:53
bioterrorhttp://s3.amazonaws.com/files.posterous.com/temp-2010-07-05/vqJzzcFCDEokakgaHzohHACtAxazInAJsDHstzicmdGdJfGpsqpfifhbDoqE/Ubuntu_HomeFolderEncryption_Linux-Mag.com.jpg.scaled1000.jpg?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAJFZAE65UYRT34AOQ&Expires=1307944727&Signature=dO4uNnbd4ETsYK%2FvP4LUuBPGaQc%3D06:53
bioterrorhttp://dl.maximumpc.com/galleries/20ubuntu/passwordprotect108_sm.png better picture06:54
jmarsdenYou are telling me the checkbox is checked *by* *default* ???06:54
jmarsdenI have never seen that.06:54
bioterrordid I say that?06:54
bioterrorare you now inserting words into my mouth?06:55
jmarsdenYou said "as it it's not there by default" followed by "home folder encryption yes".  I.E., you said home folder encryption is there by default.  It is not, you have to specifically enable it.06:55
bioterroryou're such a waste of energy06:56
jmarsdenI'm simply pointing out what you said.06:56
frank_Of course Whole Disk Encryption exists for Ubuntu through LUKS06:58
frank_I am using that right now06:58
frank_I used the alternative CD to achieve it06:58
jmarsdenExactly my point.06:58
jmarsden<bioterror> ubuntu does not support full system encryption06:58
frank_that statement is wrong06:59
jmarsdenAppears to be somewhat incorrect, in the light of that.  Anyway... now we are clear what Ubuntu can do, let's move on.06:59
frank_obviously06:59
frank_my question is can I achieve Whole Disk Encryption on Lubuntu with the alternative install CD?07:01
frank_This one https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Lubuntu/Documentation/AlternateInstall07:02
jmarsdenThere is no Lubuntu Alternative CD, so yes, the Ubuntu one will do it, and as long as you install all the appropriate packages and then install lubuntu-desktop to get Lubuntu, it should do the right thing.07:03
frank_What about this one https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Lubuntu/Documentation/AlternateInstall07:03
frank_is that not an alternative CD?07:03
jmarsdenYes, but it is not an Lubuntu alternative CD :)07:03
jmarsdenIt is the normal Ubuntu one.07:03
frank_are you sure?07:04
jmarsdenOr the normal Ubuntu minimal install one.07:04
jmarsdenYes.  I wrote the script that generates the Lubuntu ISOs.  It does not generate an alternate installer.07:04
jmarsdenWell, there may be an older alternate Lubuntu CD... there is none for 11.04.07:05
frank_I see07:05
frank_so now that I got GNOME and full disk encryption can I install LXDE without getting errors?07:06
jmarsdenThe mini iso documented on that page is the standard Ubuntu one. m https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Lubuntu/Documentation/MinimalInstall links to http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/natty/main/installer-i386/current/images/netboot/07:06
jmarsdenI don't see why not, the DE should not care about the underlying LUKS stuff as far as I know.  But I have not tried it :)07:07
frank_not LUKS errors.. but LXDE errors07:07
frank_and more bloat07:07
jmarsdenWhat would make LXDE even know that LUKS exists?07:08
jmarsdenIf you were starting from scratch I'd suggest using the mini.iso and then installing lubuntu-desktop, to avoid having all the GNOEM stuff around that you don't need.07:08
frank_Can I follow this guide safely? http://www.psychocats.net/ubuntu/purelxde07:09
jmarsdenIf linux can boot from a LUKS encrypted boot and root partition, then LXDE can run on top of that; at least, as far as I know.07:09
frank_Yeah, I understand that.07:10
jmarsdenNo idea on those removal commands, I'd have to look through them in detail to see what they remove.07:10
jmarsdenas long as they don't kill anything LUKS/crypto related, you should be fine to use them.07:10
frank_I think they just remove GNOME stuff not kernel stuff07:11
jmarsdenLooks like it, but very hard to read in a one line horizontally scrolling box :)07:11
jmarsdenOddly, those commands remove things like gcc and gcc-4.5 ... which I do not remember being installed by default in Ubuntu...07:13
frank_let me check07:13
jmarsdenAnd which are clearly not GNOME-specific.07:13
frank_I have a fresh install07:13
frank_yes, they are installed07:15
jmarsdenHmmm, interesting, I wonder what led to that.  OK.07:15
frank_default ubuntu stuff i guess07:16
frank_so can I do it safely?07:17
jmarsdenLooks like it to me; but you should have backups anyway... right?07:18
frank_yes07:18
jmarsdenThen I'd say go for it.07:18
frank_alright... here it goes07:18
leszekhi10:47
elroshi11:09
rashthedudehow can I start the GUI desktop?17:02
rashthedudetried, startx....not working17:03
elrosstartlxde?17:03
rashthedudeah, ok17:03
elrosstartlubuntu17:03
bioterrorstartlubuntu is correct17:03
bioterroras it performs some MAGIC ;)17:03
phillw-virtualdrat, beeten to it :P17:04
elros\o/17:04
rashthedudeso 'startlubuntu' is the correct command?17:04
phillw-virtualrashthedude: +117:04
rashthedudephillw-virtual didnt quite get that17:05
phillwstartlubuntu is the correct one (+1 means some agrees)17:06
phillw*someone*17:06
rashthedudelol, ok17:06
rashthedudeso lubuntu has everything ubuntu comes with apart from the window manager?18:18
bioterrorand different default applications18:19
bioterrorthe base is same, candy on the top is different18:19
rashthedudedifferent default applications?18:19
rashthedudewhat is missing in particular?18:19
bioterrorno openoffice/libreoffice18:20
bioterrorno rhythmbox, and so on18:20
rashthedudeah ok18:20
rashthedudeubuntu one?18:20
pcmanjmarsden: hi18:21
pcmangilir: hi18:21
gilirhi pcman18:22
Ahmuck10.04 LTS for lubuntu is supported?18:43
elroslubuntu 10.04 is techinically not an LTS, but the devs have a PPA that includes important updates19:03
elrosAhmuck: you can expect that there are security updates to common desktop applications (firefox, thunderbird & other apps that come with ubuntu) for 36 months, kernel updates for 60 months19:11
elrosthe PPA includes updates to lxde / lubuntu applications, most notably pcmanfm, support is unofficial19:12
bioterrorit's treated as LTS becouse of support for i586 platforms19:34
bioterrorhmmmm20:04
bioterrortitia@konna:~$ ls -la /usr/bin/gksudo20:05
bioterrorlrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 4 2010-11-06 13:21 /usr/bin/gksudo -> gksu20:05
bioterror:D20:05
* bioterror TIL gksudo == gksu20:05
elrosI just figured out a hundred nerd jokes regarding symlinks :)20:11
urisI just installed lubuntu on an HP nx7400 laptop. But the menu when I login only shows 'Run' and 'Logout'20:41
urishow can I fix this?20:41

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!