[11:06] <lifeless> persia: are we meeting tonight?
[11:07] <persia> I hadn't announced such a thing, but I suppose we could.
[11:07] <persia> Main bit to sort being to make sure that this is a good time, since it hadn't been in the past (based on attendance).
[11:08] <czajkowski> if yer stuck send a mail to the board and see if any of us can stand in nhandler steped in last week for EMEA
[11:08] <czajkowski> aloha btw :)
[11:09] <persia> We're stuck on a more fundamental level, really, but thanks :)
[11:09]  * persia has an action item from UDS to sort, but it's not yet floated to the top in the priority stack.
[11:09] <czajkowski> persia: no worries, well if you need at least for today as we've had people coming to EMEA to get approved
[11:10] <persia> Are there any candidates who showed up despite there being no meeting announcement?
[11:15] <lifeless> persia: not that I know of; its more that I didn't recall an announce, so assumed I'd missed it
[11:19] <persia> No, I've just been digging at a morass of other things, and didn't get to "[persia] become secretary for APAC membership board to take ownership over meeting time issue" yet.
[12:19] <czajkowski> c
[12:20] <jpds> py
[12:20] <jpds> czajkowski: Again?
[12:26] <czajkowski> indeed :(
[16:56] <nijaba> o/
[16:57] <ttx> \o
[16:57] <sommer> o//
[16:57] <ttx> smells like 2008.
[16:58] <sommer> ah the smell of victory!
[17:00] <Daviey> o/
[17:00] <RoAkSoAx> o/
[17:00] <Daviey> (/me mentions that he is on the phone conucrrently, so might be a little quiet in this meeting)
[17:01] <smb> o/
[17:01] <SpamapS> \_o
[17:01] <RoAkSoAx> alright I guess we should get this started
[17:02] <RoAkSoAx> #startmeeting
[17:02] <MootBot> Meeting started at 11:02. The chair is RoAkSoAx.
[17:02] <MootBot> Commands Available: [TOPIC], [IDEA], [ACTION], [AGREED], [LINK], [VOTE]
[17:02] <RoAkSoAx> [TOPIC] Review ACTION points from previous meeting
[17:02] <MootBot> New Topic:  Review ACTION points from previous meeting
[17:02] <RoAkSoAx> The only action from previouys meeting was:
[17:02] <RoAkSoAx> sommer and j1mc to look at doc presentation
[17:03] <sommer> j1mc told me that he already started some stuff with the presentation
[17:03] <sommer> he said he'd let me know when he had something tangible
[17:04] <Daviey> sommer: is j1mc likely to be here later?
[17:04] <sommer> might be another week since I haven't heard anything... I'll also start working on getting something mocked together
[17:04] <sommer> Daviey: not sure, maybe
[17:04] <Daviey> okay, sounds like it needs defering.
[17:04] <Daviey> sommer: thanks :)
[17:04] <sommer> np
[17:04] <RoAkSoAx> [ACTION] deferring sommer and j1mc to look at doc presentation
[17:04] <MootBot> ACTION received:  deferring sommer and j1mc to look at doc presentation
[17:04] <RoAkSoAx> ok so there's no other action
[17:04] <RoAkSoAx> let's move on
[17:05] <RoAkSoAx> [TOPIC] Oneiric Development
[17:05] <MootBot> New Topic:  Oneiric Development
[17:05] <Daviey> o/
[17:05] <Daviey> Since the last meeting we have a funky new work item tracker:
[17:05] <Daviey> http://status.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-oneiric/ubuntu-server.html
[17:05] <Daviey> It's well worth having a look around there, to see how we are doing.
[17:05] <Daviey> We do have some skew, due to a bug in the WI tracker vs Launchpad teams. :/
[17:05] <MootBot> LINK received:  http://status.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-oneiric/ubuntu-server.html
[17:05] <Daviey> We do seem to be pretty well on track.  Incomming bug count is low (as expected).
[17:05] <Daviey> Merges of packages pertinent to Server are looking minimal now.  (Thanks everyone for watching that)
[17:05] <Daviey> We really need to put extended focus on feature work.
[17:05] <Daviey> But generally, things are looking rosey.  Nice job.
[17:06] <Daviey> ..
[17:06] <SpamapS> purty colors
[17:06] <RoAkSoAx> indeed
[17:06] <SpamapS> seems we should raise the WI number to 660
[17:06] <Daviey> SpamapS: yeah...
[17:06] <Daviey> Oh, the other thing to add.. is TOPICS
[17:06] <Daviey> This is something quite new.
[17:06] <Daviey> one moment
[17:07] <RoAkSoAx> ok...
[17:07] <Daviey> See the server pertinent topics, http://status.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-oneiric/
[17:07] <Daviey> This allows more finegrain tracking of topics / features.
[17:07] <Daviey> ... done. Thanks.
[17:07] <RoAkSoAx> awesome
[17:08] <RoAkSoAx> if there's noone else who wants to raise something
[17:08] <RoAkSoAx> let's move on
[17:08] <RoAkSoAx> [TOPIC] Ubuntu Server Team Events
[17:08] <MootBot> New Topic:  Ubuntu Server Team Events
[17:08] <RoAkSoAx> are there any events of interest that someone's is participating in?
[17:09] <RoAkSoAx> i guess not
[17:09] <RoAkSoAx> so let's move on
[17:09] <Daviey> Most of Canonical Server team will be in Dublin week of 27th
[17:09] <RoAkSoAx> ahh the Rally
[17:09] <RoAkSoAx> indeed
[17:09] <smoser> ...
[17:09] <Daviey> So any Dublin peeps want to meet for a beer... do speak up.
[17:09] <SpamapS> I will be at CloudCamp tonight in San diego
[17:09] <smoser> i will be giving a 5 minute blurb on Ubuntu one at a local event next friday
[17:09] <SpamapS> http://cloudcamp-sandiego-2011.eventbrite.com/
[17:09] <Daviey> smoser: I'll book my flight now to that...
[17:09] <MootBot> LINK received:  http://cloudcamp-sandiego-2011.eventbrite.com/
[17:09] <smoser> and am talking tonight at Mug.org meeting about Ubuntu Server Oneiric
[17:10] <smoser> Daviey, right.
[17:10] <smoser> its good.
[17:10] <Daviey> smoser: (you need to comment where it is)
[17:10]  * Daviey mentions https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/server-o-ensemble-conference-talks
[17:11] <RoAkSoAx> quite a few events
[17:11] <RoAkSoAx> so I guess there's nothing else
[17:11] <RoAkSoAx> i'll move on
[17:11] <RoAkSoAx> [TOPIC] Weekly Updates & Questions for the QA Team (hggdh)
[17:11] <MootBot> New Topic:  Weekly Updates & Questions for the QA Team (hggdh)
[17:11] <RoAkSoAx> hggdh: o/
[17:11] <zul> oh and im at OLS right now
[17:12] <zul> sorry carry on :)
[17:12] <RoAkSoAx> hehe
[17:12] <Daviey> hggdh: Hello sir!
[17:12] <smoser> hggdh, so could you please update me on where we stand on hardy kernels in ec2 ?
[17:13] <smoser> ...
[17:13] <smoser> i guess i will bother him later.
[17:13] <RoAkSoAx> seems that hggdh  is not around
[17:13] <RoAkSoAx> we'll have to come back to him later
[17:13] <RoAkSoAx> [TOPIC] Weekly Updates & Questions for the Kernel Team (smb)
[17:13] <smb> smoser, I can
[17:13] <MootBot> New Topic:  Weekly Updates & Questions for the Kernel Team (smb)
[17:13] <smb> Various little things done last week as well as changing hardy-xen to conform to qa-regression-testing and putting together a iscsitarget package proposal which I sent out to a few people that potentially can help me with some packaging stuff.
[17:14] <smb> smoser, So basically the config option is turned off now (COMPAT_VDSO)
[17:14] <smb> It was not really a regression though
[17:14] <smb> So it should not prevent releasing the kernel as it is now
[17:14] <smoser> so theres a kernel in -proposed ?
[17:14] <smoser> that we think might be good
[17:15] <Daviey> smb: Now the kernel is a major version higher, what exciting things are exciting to us?
[17:15] <smb> The kernel currently in proposed has the problem with compat_vdso
[17:15] <smb> but its not new. There will be the next one after that without
[17:15] <smb> Daviey, beside of new things outside the kernel breaking? :)
[17:16] <Daviey> smb: we love that.
[17:16] <hggdh> RoAkSoAx: in a sprint right now, with James
[17:17] <RoAkSoAx> hggdh: alrighty ;)
[17:17] <RoAkSoAx> smb: anything else you'd like to add?
[17:17] <smb> Oh, and I tried to boot a 2.6.39 as dom0 which went surprisingly well
[17:17] <smb> Well beside of some crashes the way down
[17:17] <zul> sweet
[17:18] <smb> I hope I can sort those out.
[17:18] <smb> Otherwise nothing else here
[17:18] <RoAkSoAx> alrighty then
[17:18] <RoAkSoAx> moving on
[17:18] <RoAkSoAx> [TOPIC] Weekly Updates & Questions regarding Ubuntu ARM Server (NCommander)
[17:18] <MootBot> New Topic:  Weekly Updates & Questions regarding Ubuntu ARM Server (NCommander)
[17:19] <RoAkSoAx> NCommand1r:
[17:19] <RoAkSoAx> o/
[17:19] <Daviey> smb: that is great news!
[17:19] <Daviey> NCommand1r: is currently on a call.. suspect he'll have to /pass
[17:19] <RoAkSoAx> Daviey: alright
[17:19] <RoAkSoAx> [TOPIC] Weekly Updates & Questions from the Ubuntu Community
[17:19] <MootBot> New Topic:  Weekly Updates & Questions from the Ubuntu Community
[17:20] <RoAkSoAx> anyone from the Community has anything that they would like to bring into our attention?
[17:21] <RoAkSoAx> seems noone
[17:21] <RoAkSoAx> [TOPIC] Open Discussion
[17:21] <MootBot> New Topic:  Open Discussion
[17:21] <RoAkSoAx> everybody seems bussy latelty :)
[17:21] <Daviey> :(
[17:21] <SpamapS> So..
[17:21] <SpamapS> MySQL 5.5 ..
[17:22] <zul> please say its done
[17:22] <SpamapS> We really need to start by getting it into Debian, but Norbert seems very busy.
[17:22] <Daviey> heck, there is an outstanding merge for mysql 5.1 that is getting larger.
[17:22] <SpamapS> I am thinking that we, the ubuntu server team, should step up and 1) gain DD access (at least 2 of us) and 2) offer to help maintain MySQL in Debian.
[17:22] <zul> agreed
[17:23] <SpamapS> Daviey: indeed, we've been holding off since 5.5 is a target for oneiric and 5.1 will be demoted.
[17:23] <Daviey> SpamapS: Who is talking to Norbert atm?
[17:23] <SpamapS> me
[17:23] <SpamapS> and he's been swamped.. he's had the 5.5 packages I prepared for 2 weeks now
[17:23] <Daviey> SpamapS: How is that going?  Is he eager for help?
[17:23] <SpamapS> Yes
[17:23] <Daviey> oh splendid
[17:24] <Daviey> SpamapS: Is he looking to sponsor your packages?
[17:24] <SpamapS> I think we should offer it more clearly.. right now its just patches and little bits of help here and there.
[17:24] <SpamapS> MySQL is maintained by a "team" in Debian, but that team only has one DD.. Norbert
[17:24] <Daviey> Well we should certainly look to be more visable contributors to the team
[17:24] <SpamapS> I think I have enough cred now to ask Norbert to support me for DD
[17:25] <SpamapS> But I think we should have another server team member seek DD status.
[17:25] <Daviey> dandy.
[17:25] <zul> i would volunteer
[17:25] <Daviey> I think most of the team would quite like that.
[17:25] <Daviey> So i'm not sure there needs to be a specific volunteer, most of us that i know of are striving for it.
[17:26] <SpamapS> zul: ok, I'll draft an email for the pkg-mysql-maint mailing list and send it to you for review.
[17:26] <Daviey> You don't need to be a DD to be a contributor, or even a maintainer :)
[17:26] <SpamapS> Daviey: thats just the thing, you need to be a DD to help with this situation. :-/
[17:26] <zul> SpamapS, cool beans
[17:27] <Daviey> SpamapS: ah?
[17:27] <SpamapS> Because after MySQL 5.5 is uploaded.. *all* of the rdepends need to be rebuilt
[17:27] <Daviey> How so?
[17:27] <SpamapS> $ apt-cache rdepends libmysqlclient16|wc -l
[17:27] <SpamapS> 174
[17:27] <Daviey> Well that is a transition.. not sure it needs NMU's for that..
[17:27] <Daviey> Surely it would hit experiemental first?
[17:28] <SpamapS> Daviey: I think you're missing the point.. that w/o DD all we can do is file bugs and beg.
[17:28] <SpamapS> I'm a little worried we're too late for the transition to be successful in Oneiric. :(
[17:28] <Daviey> Hmm.
[17:29] <Daviey> Lets take this out of meeting and draft a plan.
[17:29] <SpamapS> Yes good idea, I just wanted to bring up the situation.
[17:30] <RoAkSoAx> alright
[17:30] <Daviey> good stuff
[17:30] <RoAkSoAx> since NCommand1r and hggdh and in call/sprint respectively, let's end this
[17:30] <RoAkSoAx> [TOPIC] Announce next meeting date and time
[17:30] <MootBot> New Topic:  Announce next meeting date and time
[17:31] <RoAkSoAx> Tuesday, June 21st 2011 16:00 UTC
[17:31] <RoAkSoAx> thanks all
[17:31] <Daviey> Thanks RoAkSoAx o/
[17:31] <RoAkSoAx> #endmeeting
[17:31] <MootBot> Meeting finished at 11:31.
[17:31] <sommer> thx all
[17:59] <ppisati> o/
[17:59] <sconklin> \o
[18:00] <kamal> o/
[18:00] <smb> o/
[18:00] <sforshee> o/
[18:00] <ogasawara> #startmeeting
[18:00] <MootBot> Meeting started at 12:00. The chair is ogasawara.
[18:00] <MootBot> Commands Available: [TOPIC], [IDEA], [ACTION], [AGREED], [LINK], [VOTE]
[18:00] <cking> p/
[18:00] <ogasawara> [LINK] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/Meeting
[18:00] <jjohansen> \o
[18:00] <ogasawara> [LINK] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/ReleaseStatus/Natty
[18:00] <MootBot> LINK received:  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/Meeting
[18:00] <MootBot> LINK received:  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/ReleaseStatus/Natty
[18:00] <ogasawara> [TOPIC] ARM Status (ppisati)
[18:00] <MootBot> New Topic:  ARM Status (ppisati)
[18:00] <ppisati> CVE fixes for all the branches (lucid/imx51 and [maverick|natty]/ti-omap4), plus lucid/mvl-dove got a rebase too.
[18:00] <ppisati> Still tracking down a usb problem we have with gcc 4.6 that is now affecting both omap3 and omap4 (lp#796892 and lp#791552).
[18:00] <ppisati> ..
[18:00] <ogasawara> [TOPIC] Release Metrics and Incoming Bugs (ogasawara)
[18:00] <MootBot> New Topic:  Release Metrics and Incoming Bugs (ogasawara)
[18:01] <ogasawara> [LINK] http://reports.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/ogasawara/kt-meeting.txt
[18:01] <MootBot> LINK received:  http://reports.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/ogasawara/kt-meeting.txt
[18:01] <ogasawara> [18:01] <ogasawara>  * 26 linux kernel bugs (up 6)
[18:01] <ogasawara> [18:01] <ogasawara>  * 3 linux kernel bugs (up 3)
[18:01] <ogasawara> [18:01] <ogasawara>  * 0 linux kernel bugs (no change 0)
[18:01] <ogasawara> [18:01] <ogasawara>  * 25 linux kernel bugs (down 1)
[18:01] <ogasawara> [18:01] <ogasawara>  * 3 linux kernel bugs (no change 0)
[18:01] <ogasawara> [18:01] <ogasawara>  * 8 linux kernel bugs (no change 0)
[18:01] <ogasawara> [18:01] <ogasawara>  * 0 linux kernel bugs (no change 0)
[18:01] <ogasawara> [18:01] <ogasawara>  * 19 oneiric bugs (up 4)
[18:01] <ogasawara>  * 1312 natty bugs (up 58)
[18:01] <ogasawara>  * 1127 maverick bugs (up 1)
[18:01] <ogasawara>  * 1037 lucid bugs (up 3)
[18:01] <ogasawara>  * 38 hardy bugs (no change 0)
[18:01] <ogasawara> [18:01] <ogasawara> [18:01] <ogasawara>  * 0 oneiric bugs (no change 0)
[18:01] <ogasawara>  * 4 natty bugs (up 2)
[18:01] <ogasawara>  * 42 maverick bugs (up 1)
[18:01] <ogasawara>  * 75 lucid bugs (no change 0)
[18:01] <ogasawara>  * 0 hardy bugs (no change 0)
[18:01] <ogasawara> [18:01] <ogasawara>  * 0 oneiric bugs (no change 0)
[18:02] <ogasawara>  * 453 natty bugs (down 3)
[18:02] <ogasawara>  * 248 maverick bugs (up 1)
[18:02] <ogasawara>  * 224 lucid bugs (no change 0)
[18:02] <ogasawara>  * 2 hardy bugs (no change 0)
[18:02] <ogasawara> [18:02] <ogasawara>  * 0 oneiric bugs (no change 0)
[18:02] <ogasawara>  * 2 natty bugs (up 1)
[18:02] <ogasawara>  * 2 maverick bugs (no change 0)
[18:02] <ogasawara>  * 0 lucid bugs (no change 0)
[18:02] <ogasawara>  * 0 hardy bugs (no change 0)
[18:02] <ogasawara> ..
[18:02] <ogasawara> [TOPIC] Blueprints: Oneiric Delta Review (ogasawara)
[18:02] <MootBot> New Topic:  Blueprints: Oneiric Delta Review (ogasawara)
[18:02] <ogasawara> [LINK] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/other-kernel-o-ubuntu-delta-review
[18:02] <MootBot> LINK received:  https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/other-kernel-o-ubuntu-delta-review
[18:02] <ogasawara> apw, jjohansen, lag, manjo, ralveti, rtg: you have Alpha-2 work items to review your set of Ubuntu patches.  Please take a moment to review when you have a chance. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/Specs/KernelOneiricUbuntuDeltaReview for your specific set of patches.
[18:02] <ogasawara> ..
[18:02] <ogasawara> [TOPIC] Blueprints: Oneiric Server Requirements (smb)
[18:02] <MootBot> New Topic:  Blueprints: Oneiric Server Requirements (smb)
[18:02] <ogasawara> [LINK] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/other-kernel-o-server-requirements
[18:02] <MootBot> LINK received:  https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/other-kernel-o-server-requirements
[18:02] <smb> Started to play with dom0 and it worked surprisingly well for a first attempt
[18:03] <Daviey> \o/
[18:03] <smb> But there are some workings on the way up and more serious fails on the way down to look at
[18:03] <smb> ..
[18:03] <ogasawara> [TOPIC] Status: General Oneiric (ogasawara)
[18:03] <MootBot> New Topic:  Status: General Oneiric (ogasawara)
[18:03]  * smb meant warnings not workings...
[18:03] <ogasawara> Thanks to apw's efforts, fallout from changing to a v3.0 kernel should be resolved.  We've gone ahead and uploaded a v3.0 kernel and meta package to the archive.  Previous issues noted with the i915 driver as well as running an early 3.0-rc on atom processors should be resolved.  For anyone not yet running a 3.0 kernel, please install and help with some early testing.
[18:03] <ogasawara> ..
[18:04] <ogasawara> [TOPIC] Status: Stable Kernel Team (bjf/sconklin)
[18:04] <MootBot> New Topic:  Status: Stable Kernel Team (bjf/sconklin)
[18:04] <sconklin> ||
[18:04] <sconklin> || The stable kernel team has had multiple delays in getting a start to the current
[18:04] <sconklin> || cycle due to several regressions that were due to upstream stable updates.
[18:04] <sconklin> || Status now is:
[18:04] <sconklin> ||
[18:04] <sconklin> || Hardy: kernel has released
[18:04] <sconklin> ||
[18:04] <sconklin> || Lucid: Currently in verification. We have a regression that looks like it will be resolved
[18:04] <sconklin> || by reverting an upstream patch. If that's true, we will revert this at the end of
[18:04] <sconklin> || verification and proceed with QA and/or Certification
[18:04] <sconklin> ||
[18:04] <sconklin> || Maverick: Currently in verification. No regressions so far. Only two bugs remaining to
[18:04] <sconklin> || be verified.
[18:04] <sconklin> ||
[18:04] <sconklin> || Natty: Currently in verification, with two possible regressions reported. The root cause
[18:04] <sconklin> || of the regressions isn't known, and bisecting will be done to attempt to find them.
[18:04] <sconklin> || It's not known whether they will be found before completion of the verification time.
[18:04] <sconklin> ||
[18:04] <sconklin> || Current SRU status is here: http://people.canonical.com/~kernel/reports/sru-report.html
[18:04] <sconklin> ||
[18:04] <sconklin> ..
[18:05] <ogasawara> [TOPIC] Security & bugfix kernels - Maverick/Lucid/Hardy (sconklin)
[18:05] <MootBot> New Topic:  Security & bugfix kernels - Maverick/Lucid/Hardy (sconklin)
[18:05] <sconklin> || Current versions can always be found here: http://people.canonical.com/~kernel/reports/versions.html
[18:05] <sconklin> ||
[18:05] <sconklin> || Package                                    || Upd/Sec              || Proposed             ||  TiP || Verified ||
[18:05] <sconklin> ||                                            ||                      ||                      ||      ||          ||
[18:05] <sconklin> || lucid    linux-meta-lts-backport-natty     ||                      || 2.6.38.10.20         ||    0 ||        0 ||
[18:05] <sconklin> || ---      linux-ec2                         || 2.6.32-316.31        || 2.6.32-317.34        ||    3 ||        1 ||
[18:05] <sconklin> || ---      linux-lts-backport-natty          ||                      || 2.6.38-10.44~lucid1  ||    1 ||        1 ||
[18:05] <sconklin> || ---      linux-meta-mvl-dove               || 2.6.32.216.18        || 2.6.32.217.19        ||    0 ||        0 ||
[18:05] <sconklin> || ---      linux-ports-meta                  || 2.6.32.32.24         || 2.6.32.33.25         ||    0 ||        0 ||
[18:05] <sconklin> || ---      linux-mvl-dove                    || 2.6.32-216.33        || 2.6.32-217.34        ||    8 ||        6 ||
[18:05] <sconklin> || ---      linux-meta-lts-backport-maverick  || 2.6.35.25.36         || 2.6.35.30.38         ||    0 ||        0 ||
[18:05] <sconklin> || ---      linux-lts-backport-maverick       || 2.6.35-25.44~lucid1  || 2.6.35-30.54~lucid1  ||   21 ||       21 ||
[18:05] <sconklin> || ---      linux-meta                        || 2.6.32.32.38         || 2.6.32.33.39         ||    0 ||        0 ||
[18:05] <sconklin> || ---      linux-firmware                    || 1.34.7               || 1.34.10              ||    0 ||        0 ||
[18:05] <sconklin> || ---      linux                             || 2.6.32-32.62         || 2.6.32-33.66         ||    3 ||        1 ||
[18:05] <sconklin> || ---      linux-fsl-imx51                   || 2.6.31-608.25        || 2.6.31-609.26        ||    0 ||        0 ||
[18:05] <sconklin> || ---      linux-meta-fsl-imx51              || 2.6.31.608.9         || 2.6.31.609.10        ||    0 ||        0 ||
[18:05] <sconklin> || ---      linux-backports-modules-2.6.32    || 2.6.32-32.32         || 2.6.32-33.33         ||    0 ||        0 ||
[18:05] <sconklin> || ---      linux-meta-ec2                    || 2.6.32.316.17        || 2.6.32.317.18        ||    0 ||        0 ||
[18:05] <sconklin> ||                                            ||                      ||                      ||      ||          ||
[18:05] <sconklin> || maverick linux-ports-meta                  || 2.6.35.28.21         || 2.6.35.30.23         ||    0 ||        0 ||
[18:05] <sconklin> || ---      linux-mvl-dove                    || 2.6.32-416.33        || 2.6.32-417.34        ||    6 ||        5 ||
[18:05] <sconklin> || ---      linux-meta-mvl-dove               || 2.6.32.416.6         || 2.6.32.417.7         ||    0 ||        0 ||
[18:06] <sconklin> || ---      linux-firmware                    || 1.38.6               || 1.38.8               ||    1 ||        0 ||
[18:06] <sconklin> || ---      linux                             || 2.6.35-28.50         || 2.6.35-30.54         ||   14 ||       12 ||
[18:06] <sconklin> || ---      linux-backports-modules-2.6.35    || 2.6.35-28.20         || 2.6.35-30.22         ||    0 ||        0 ||
[18:06] <sconklin> || ---      linux-meta                        || 2.6.35.28.36         || 2.6.35.30.38         ||    0 ||        0 ||
[18:06] <sconklin> ||                                            ||                      ||                      ||      ||          ||
[18:06] <sconklin> || natty    linux-ti-omap4                    ||                      || 2.6.38-1209.13       ||   10 ||       10 ||
[18:06] <sconklin> || ---      linux-backports-modules-2.6.38    ||                      || 2.6.38-10.6          ||    0 ||        0 ||
[18:06] <sconklin> || ---      linux-meta-ti-omap4               ||                      || 2.6.38.1209.7        ||    0 ||        0 ||
[18:06] <sconklin> || ---      linux-meta                        ||                      || 2.6.38.10.25         ||    0 ||        0 ||
[18:06] <sconklin> || ---      linux                             ||                      || 2.6.38-10.44         ||   15 ||       15 ||
[18:06] <sconklin> ||                                            ||                      ||                      ||      ||          ||
[18:06] <sconklin> ..
[18:06] <ogasawara> [TOPIC] Open Discussion or Questions: Raise your hand to be recognized (o/)
[18:06] <MootBot> New Topic:  Open Discussion or Questions: Raise your hand to be recognized (o/)
[18:06] <apw> ..
[18:06] <ogasawara> thanks everyone
[18:06] <ogasawara> #endmeeting
[18:06] <MootBot> Meeting finished at 12:06.
[18:07] <kamal> thanks ogasawara
[18:07] <cking> nice one
[18:07] <sconklin> thanks!
[18:07] <Daviey> Wow, is that the shortest meeting ever?
[18:07] <apw> Daviey, not close
[18:07]  * smb just has not looked for a second
[18:07] <Daviey> :o
[18:08]  * Daviey notes that the server team needs to take some lessons from the kernel team.
[18:09] <ogra_> Daviey, i hope you dont ... to read statistics i can use libO calc better than wasting time for a meeting :P
[18:10] <Daviey> heh
[19:58] <Lcawte> Anyone here for the Gaming team meeting, head over to #ubuntu-gaming, we're due to start in a minute
[20:12]  * Lcawte wonders how many new folks are here