| BenC | sconklin: I thought I had verified that patch already | 02:11 |
|---|---|---|
| chadhogg | jjohansen: I was unable to boot with the kernel you built me; details on launchpad | 02:28 |
| twb | Stupid question: why does lucid-backports have linux kernels up to .35, but e.g. "compat wireless" modules up to .38? | 05:28 |
| twb | Oh, I see, it looks like it's the driver taken from the .38 tree and compiled against .32 | 05:29 |
| === smb` is now known as smb | ||
| smb | morning | 07:42 |
| apw | smb morning | 08:24 |
| diwic | apw, before my vacation I traced down a bug in PulseAudio that could be a gcc bug. Do you know how to proceed with that? | 08:25 |
| apw | diwic, normally one would file a bug against gcc, they will want the minimum code fragment that causes the miss-compile and a good description of how it is miss compiled | 08:26 |
| apw | against gcc-4.5 or whatever i guess | 08:27 |
| apw | how do we know it is a compiler problem ? | 08:27 |
| twb | apw: problem goes away when you change the compiler | 08:27 |
| apw | as unfortuanatly code which is relying on undefined side effects of some code forms can then change if you change the compiler | 08:27 |
| jjohansen | twb: all other parts of the environment the same? | 08:28 |
| apw | twb, one would really want to find the exact bit of code whihch is being miss built | 08:28 |
| diwic | apw, is bug 789031 filed against the right package? | 08:28 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 789031 in gcc-defaults "Built-in ASM constraint "rm" does not work" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/789031 | 08:28 |
| twb | apw: granted | 08:28 |
| apw | diwic now that even sounds familiar, i wonder if something in the kernel ht the same issue | 08:29 |
| apw | diwic, i think i'd expect it to be gc-4.5 or gcc-4.6 depending on the version you are using | 08:29 |
| diwic | apw, actually in pulseaudio the problem was worse, it allocated one "r" and one "rm" into the same register | 08:30 |
| diwic | apw, but I couldn't get that done to a simple example | 08:31 |
| apw | so i think other than i think you want to do the right version, it looks good. i would poke doko so he is aware, he is likely to recognise it if its come by already as a fix | 08:31 |
| diwic | ok | 08:32 |
| * diwic pokes in ubuntu-devel | 08:33 | |
| === jk-- is now known as jk- | ||
| === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan | ||
| akgraner | jjohansen, you around? Was given your name for the person to contact for possible interview series? | 09:27 |
| jjohansen | akgraner: hey, of course I am around, what are you doing up so late | 09:27 |
| akgraner | jjohansen, late it's early here I'm about to start my day :-) | 09:28 |
| jjohansen | akgraner: ouch that is early | 09:28 |
| akgraner | nah just sleep decided to hid from me so I thought I would get some work done :-) | 09:28 |
| jazz2 | hi, I upgraded my server from 9.04 to 10.04 (via 9.10); the server is connected in my lan via wlan(wpa2); ... | 10:29 |
| jazz2 | the problem now is that the speed downloading from the server to the lan is down from ~700kb to ~100kb, while uploading to it is mostly not affected (~700kB). ... | 10:29 |
| jazz2 | I tried: | 10:29 |
| jazz2 | a) using a wired lan connection->normal speed, | 10:29 |
| jazz2 | b) booting with kernel 2.6.28-19-generic -> wlan speeds are back to normal | 10:29 |
| jazz2 | c) booting with kernel 2.6.31-14-generic -> wlan speeds still degraded | 10:29 |
| jazz2 | question now is: what changed between the kernels and where do I start to fix this? any help would be highly appreciated | 10:29 |
| erhart | has someone tried to run a natty kernel in lucid? | 10:35 |
| ohsix | jazz2: what wifi chipset? | 10:37 |
| erhart | intel wifilink 5100 agn | 10:39 |
| jazz2 | ohsix, where do I look for it | 10:39 |
| jazz2 | i think it's something like Realtek | 10:39 |
| jazz2 | ohsix, zd1211rw | 10:40 |
| ppisati | cooloney: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=roc/ubuntu-lucid.git;a=commitdiff;h=fc58ea3748869d2fa811dff26aa0fa07490b22b2 | 11:08 |
| ppisati | cooloney: i can't find any branch where this patch has been applied | 11:08 |
| ppisati | cooloney: is it in use at all? | 11:08 |
| * smb -> lunch | 11:09 | |
| * ppisati out to get some food | 12:09 | |
| sconklin | smb: your comment in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/681083 - sorry I'm not up on all the virt stuff - does his test imply that the bug has been fixed in the XenMotion case, or only that the kernel doesn't fail in a major way? | 14:54 |
| ubot2 | Ubuntu bug 681083 in linux "Ubuntu Crashes/Freeze on XenMotion" [Medium,In progress] | 14:54 |
| smb | sconklin, Whatever they exactly do in xenmotion I actually do not know. But one part is running generic kernels (-pae in i386) as domU guests. | 14:56 |
| smb | So when he took that 2.6.35 kernel I provided and installed it into his Lucid guest, the Maverick kernel got tested | 14:56 |
| smb | sconklin, Probably another argument could be that this patch is now added for the next 2.6.32 (may or may not get picked for .35 as well) longterm tree | 14:57 |
| smb | So sooner or later it will come. But I heard you are slightly frustrated by longterm trees. :) | 14:58 |
| sconklin | BenC: I see your test results in the bug - It's that the SRU process requires that someone actually test the kernel in -proposed, and it looks like you tested a test build to validate the patch. | 15:02 |
| BenC | sconklin: Ok, I'll test the actual build | 15:03 |
| sconklin | thanks, much appreciated | 15:03 |
| flipside | hello | 15:23 |
| BenC | sconklin: Ok, confirmed...where do I add my two-cents? | 15:35 |
| sconklin | add a comment and I'll set the tag. Thanks! | 15:36 |
| * BenC has forgotten the bug report | 15:41 | |
| sconklin | stand by | 15:41 |
| BenC | Found it in scrollback | 15:41 |
| apw | apw ... | 16:05 |
| apw | apw_ ? | 16:13 |
| bjf | apw ?? | 16:13 |
| * smb wonders whether apw exploded... | 16:39 | |
| apw | smb, trying out a new irc client was all | 16:39 |
| smb | apw, Ah. :) | 16:40 |
| * smb -> eod | 17:39 | |
| jjohansen | apw: tangerine seems to be hanging on builds (not just in schroots), who do we hit up to look into it | 17:45 |
| apw | jjohansen, whats the symptoms | 17:46 |
| apw | cnd what you doing to tangerine? | 17:46 |
| sforshee | apw, fakeroot is hanging in the kernel trying to get some semaphore | 17:46 |
| jjohansen | apw: it just hangs, sforshee reported and I duplicated | 17:46 |
| apw | sforshee, anything specific, which sema ? | 17:47 |
| sforshee | apw, not sure | 17:47 |
| apw | i can bounce it if thats useful | 17:47 |
| sforshee | you'll see a bunch of faked-sysv processes in uninterruptible sleep | 17:47 |
| sforshee | /proc/<pid>/wchan shows call_rwsem_down_write_failed | 17:48 |
| sforshee | apw, yeah it prolly needs to be bounced when cnd is done | 17:48 |
| apw | ok well let me know when he is done, if he can be anythiong other than done | 17:49 |
| apw | sforshee, given its actual makes which are spinning, i'd say he is not making progress | 17:49 |
| apw | yeah they are dead i recon | 17:50 |
| apw | sforshee, i don;'t think cnd is making progress | 17:53 |
| apw | votes for bouncing ?? | 17:53 |
| apw | jjohansen, sforshee ^^ | 17:53 |
| jjohansen | +1 | 17:53 |
| sforshee | +1 | 17:53 |
| apw | in progress | 17:54 |
| sforshee | bjf, could you accept my natty nomination on bug #767192 ? | 17:55 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 767192 in linux "Wireless flaky on Acer Aspire 5100 after installing Natty" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/767192 | 17:55 |
| sforshee | thanks apw | 17:55 |
| sforshee | anyone around that can accept my natty nomination on bug #767192 ? | 19:16 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 767192 in linux "Wireless flaky on Acer Aspire 5100 after installing Natty" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/767192 | 19:16 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan | ||
| Specialist | Hi there, are there any plans to publish a kernel update for natty based on a recent -stable (> 2.6.38.6) kernel version? | 21:41 |
| Specialist | I am asking because I am affected by bug #746860, which has already been fixed upstream | 21:43 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 746860 in linux "System sporadically freezes during suspend to RAM" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/746860 | 21:43 |
| sconklin | Specialist: the natty kernel currently in -proposed is current thru 2.6.38.8 but has two known regressions that we will have to resolve before we can fix it and spin another release | 21:49 |
| sconklin | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/792013 is the tracking bug for that, and has other bugs linked from there for the regressions | 21:50 |
| ubot2 | Ubuntu bug 792013 in linux "[Regression] linux: 2.6.38-10.44 -proposed tracker" [Medium,In progress] | 21:50 |
| Specialist | sconklin: thanks! i'll see whether those affect me and will probably just take the kernel from -proposed if they don't | 21:50 |
| sconklin | Specialist: if either of them affect you in a way you can reproduce, we could use help bisecting kernels to locate the problem. I think our main reporter is gone until Monday . . . | 21:52 |
| vanhoof | sconklin: ah cool, I didn't know -10 in -proposed carried all the way through 2.6.38.8 | 21:53 |
| sconklin | Specialist: sorry, I got that wrong. The release in -proposed has up through 2.6.38.7 | 21:53 |
| * vanhoof has a few bugs that will get closed out then :) | 21:53 | |
| vanhoof | ah rats :D | 21:53 |
| sconklin | we've temporarily stopped taking upstream updates because of the load of regressions we got in the last batch | 21:54 |
| sconklin | vanhoof: anything you really care about, open an SRU bug even though it's in a stable update, and get it on the kernel list for acks. | 21:55 |
| Specialist | sconklin: np, as long as it's > .6, it's fine ;-) i'll let you know if i see anything unusual comparable to the two regressions with the -proposed version | 21:55 |
| Specialist | sconklin: is the bisect progress documented somewhere? | 21:55 |
| sconklin | vanhoof: sorry to push things into that path, but we're trying not to take another multi-week train wreck | 21:55 |
| sconklin | Specialist: hold in - herton has been doing those ^^ | 21:56 |
| vanhoof | sconklin: well .8 will make its way in at some point | 21:57 |
| herton | Specialist: for bug 793796, the bisect progress is on last comment on bug report | 21:59 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 793796 in linux "2.6.38-10 panic after ejecting drive" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/793796 | 21:59 |
| herton | it's waiting for the reporter to test the next step | 22:00 |
| herton | the other one (bug 794096) is on a bisect also with the reporter, he will only be able to test next bisect next week... | 22:01 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 794096 in linux "SMTP and posting to a web-form time out (probably due to netfilter changes)" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/794096 | 22:01 |
| herton | this last one is weird, as reporter already tested with the most likely changes which could cause the issue reverted | 22:02 |
| herton | and there isn't much info yet which could point to real issue | 22:03 |
| herton | I tried to reproduce both here but without success, so if there is anyone else being able to reproduce the same and able to help would be great | 22:04 |
| Kano | hi, which config option is the problematic one that now a newer module-init-tools is required | 22:58 |
| Kano | rc2 worked fine with lenny, rc3 does not | 22:59 |
| Kano | but even with squeeze 3.0rc3 works,so you do not need that extreme depend | 23:00 |
| Kano | i lower it in my install scripts anyway | 23:00 |
| Kano | this just takes useless time | 23:00 |
| apw | Kano, its there becase we need it in the oneiric tree where the versions are correctly specified, and its getting copied to the mainline builds. i'll fix it when i have time | 23:58 |
| apw | as you have noted you can actually fix it yourself as you make your own packages | 23:59 |
| Kano | no i use dpkg-deb | 23:59 |
| Kano | http://kanotix.com/files/fix/mainline/install-daily.sh | 23:59 |
| Kano | take a look | 23:59 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!