[10:12] <RAOF> Oh, arse.  Of course i915 doesn't build on armel.  Bah.
[10:39] <tseliot> RAOF: is it even useful on armel?
[10:39] <jcristau> is that a real question?
[10:42] <tseliot> :)
[10:43] <tseliot> ever heard of rhetorical questions? ;)
[11:44] <tjaalton> RAOF: push the branches :)
[11:47] <RAOF> tjaalton: Done, like a dinner.
[12:38] <tjaalton> RAOF: xserver too :)
[12:44] <RAOF> The xserver costs extra.
[12:46] <tjaalton> we'll see about that in dublin
[12:46] <tjaalton> oh you actually built the thing
[12:46] <RAOF> Well, yes.
[12:47] <RAOF> I needed to, you see.  'Cause of multiarch and stuff :)
[12:47] <tjaalton> yes, so the pointer barrier patch needed an extra commit
[12:47] <tjaalton> totally missed that
[12:49] <RAOF> And there's an extra commit for the crtc-confine stuff, but I wanted to upload mesa and X now.
[12:55] <RAOF> I once made the mistake of printing out each error compiz ate in the hope of working out why DnD wasn't working.  My terminal wasn't happy.
[15:57] <Sarvatt> woo, multiarch X/mesa is a fun nightmare to wake up to :)
[15:58] <tjaalton> a dream come true
[15:58] <Sarvatt> thought it was getting too easy to update natty and oneiric from the same packaging branches for more than a few weeks :)
[16:00] <jcristau> as a bonus it broke nvidia and fglrx in sid
[16:01] <tseliot> heh
[17:00] <Sarvatt> guess it's time to switch to amd64. ia32-libs mesa was all that was holding me back because using 6 month old stable mesa releases is crazy :)
[17:02] <Sarvatt> extra fun: wonder if its possible to switch without a reinstall :)
[17:52] <bjsnider> Sarvatt, are you going to put the 275 blob in x-updates?
[17:59] <Sarvatt> sure, give me a sec
[18:15] <Sarvatt> bjsnider: uploaded for natty at least
[19:56] <bjsnider> Sarvatt, cool