=== yeager_ is now known as yeager
[07:41] <dpm> morning
[07:45] <TLE> good morning
[08:07] <askhl> Good evening
[08:07] <TLE> show off ;)
[08:07] <askhl> :)
[08:08] <TLE> how's it going, you keeping the yanks busy
[08:09] <askhl> Yeah.  Well, one of them at least
[08:09] <askhl> Just have to finish some things before tomorrow...
[08:10] <TLE> before tomorrow? Was it just 1 week or are you going to be doing something else?
[08:10] <askhl> Going home on Sunday
[08:11] <TLE> ahh
[08:26] <dpm> evening askhl, are you in the US?
[08:56] <askhl> dpm, yes, near San Francisco
[08:56] <askhl> Nice place...
[08:57] <dpm> cool, I've never been there, but from people who've been in SF I've heard is quite nice
[08:57] <dpm> enjoy!
[08:58] <askhl> Thanks.  Haven't actually seen the city yet, it's work-related so that'll be in the weekend
[08:59] <RawChid> Morning :)
[09:00] <dpm> morning RawChid :)
[09:00] <dpm> ok, I have to step back for a bit, if there is anything, I'll read the scrollback
[09:00] <dpm> bbl
[10:21] <kelemengabor> hi, TLE, dpm: I'm testing the proposed langpacks for Maverick, and there is a problem: they are not brand new base packs, only updates, which means bug 690248 is NOT fixed by them :(
[10:21] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 690248 in ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu Maverick) (and 2 other projects) "In Maverick 'About Ubuntu' displays Natty info (affects: 64) (dups: 23) (heat: 338)" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/690248
[10:21] <kelemengabor> can we do something about this?
[10:22] <TLE> kelemengabor: hallo
[10:22] <TLE> what do you mean by brand new, is it a problem because they are not complete lang packs or it is a problem due to the time where they were built?
[10:23] <kelemengabor> yeah, I mean not complete, sorry
[10:24] <kelemengabor> so the language-pacj-gnome-hu is version 20110531, but -base is still 20110315, the buggy one
[10:26] <TLE> ahh crap, I thought they were actually supposed to be complete
[10:29] <TLE> I think we need dpm and/or pitti in on this
[13:34] <dpm> hi kelemengabor, TLE, so I understand for the bug that the fixed Ubuntu docs package was already uploaded and all it's needed is to upload new full language packs?
[13:34] <kelemengabor> dpm: I think so, yes
[13:35] <dpm> ok, we've disabled maverick langpacks from the schedule of regular exports, let me see how we can request an export
[13:44] <TLE> dpm: but I just thought that we just had one done
[13:45] <TLE> you already disabled the regular exports before this cycle, which was why we had to wait until a manual one was run
[13:45] <TLE> and I though that it would be a full one
[15:20] <dpm> TLE, no, we hadn't had one for maverick. On the e-mail exchange with pitti we said that for maverick we had already disabled exports, but since we didn't need a full export (i.e. no FF5 changes in maverick), we could use the latest delta langpacks in the maverick PPA and just copy them to maverick-proposed. I think what pitti said with waiting was rather referring to not to have two simultaneous "copy to proposed" processes going on (natty + maver
[15:20] <dpm> ick), as IIRC, due to a bug in LP the copy process is not just a copy, but it means building the langpacks for all languages, which does take time and resources.
[15:20] <dpm> In any case, I would have requested a full export if I had had bug 690248 in mind
[15:20] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 690248 in ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu Maverick) (and 2 other projects) "In Maverick 'About Ubuntu' displays Natty info (affects: 64) (dups: 23) (heat: 338)" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/690248
[15:21] <dpm> on #launchpad they tell me that the full maverick export should be ready by Monday
[16:06] <artnay> this is interesting: http://nienhueser.de/blog/?p=328