[01:44] <BUGabundo> mount.nfs: access denied by server while mounting nas:/volume1
[01:44] <BUGabundo> beats me :(
[01:48] <Ian_Corne> :(
[01:49] <BUGabundo> no idea why I can't nfs mount it
[01:49] <BUGabundo> and GUI for network (samba, ssh, etc) is crashing
[01:49] <BUGabundo> also gparted
[01:50] <BUGabundo> and turning NM off, kills WiFi
[01:53] <Ian_Corne> I've had an update from NM today
[01:54] <BUGabundo>   Installed: 0.8.9997+git.20110614t173923.b4a72d1-0ubuntu1
[01:54] <Ian_Corne>   Installed: 0.8.9997+git.20110614t173923.b4a72d1-0ubuntu1
[01:54] <Ian_Corne>   Installed: 0.8.9997+git.20110616t193616.b2e6a33-0ubuntu1
[01:55] <Ian_Corne> it was network-manager-gnome that was updated
[01:55] <Ian_Corne> sorry
[01:56] <BUGabundo>   Installed: 0.8.9997+git.20110529t170033.9ec4c5d-0ubuntu1
[01:56] <BUGabundo> updating
[01:56] <BUGabundo> I guess my mirrors are always old
[01:57] <Ian_Corne> ugh
[01:57] <Ian_Corne> no matter what I do
[01:57] <Ian_Corne> I always get thrown back to unity2D
[01:57] <Ian_Corne> $ glxinfo | grep direct
[01:57] <Ian_Corne> direct rendering: Yes
[01:57] <Ian_Corne> $ glxinfo | grep direct
[01:57] <Ian_Corne> direct rendering: Yes
[01:57] <Ian_Corne> oops sorry for double
[01:57] <BUGabundo> does your keychain password get rested too ?
[01:58] <BUGabundo> I have a pass different from the user
[01:58] <BUGabundo> and for the 3rd time, it got reseted
[01:58] <Ian_Corne> no
[01:58] <Ian_Corne> I don't have it different
[01:58] <Ian_Corne> ah but the unity_support_test fails
[01:58] <Ian_Corne> ah that's to bad :(
[01:58] <Ian_Corne> Hopefully, the nvidia driver will work again soon :)
[08:47] <trijntje_oneiric> Hi all, I have a general question about the alpha
[08:48] <trijntje_oneiric> what should I do when I find bugs in the alpha, should I report all of them if they are not reported yet, or would that generate too much noise for the developers, who may already be aware that they broke something
[08:55] <tsimpson> trijntje_oneiric: the point of alpha/beta is for people to report bugs
[08:57] <trijntje_oneiric> tsimpson, so I should just report the bugs, and let the developers deal with them
[08:57] <tsimpson> yes
[09:00] <trijntje_oneiric> ok thanks! I was not sure because there are still a lot of bugs, so that would make a lot of bug reports
[09:19] <trijntje_oneiric> What program draws the sound icon on the top panel?
[09:31] <htorque> ok, who broke nautilus?
[09:31] <htorque> https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/799007
[09:31] <ubottu> Ubuntu bug 799007 in nautilus (Ubuntu) "nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in gtk_icon_info_load_symbolic()" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[09:35] <Ian_Corne> htorque: apt-get install gnome-icon-theme-full ?
[09:36] <Ian_Corne> does that fix it?
[09:37] <htorque> on it
[09:37] <htorque> yeah, nautilus starts
[09:39] <htorque> Ian_Corne: thanks, added that information to the report
[09:40] <Ian_Corne> ok :)
=== F3ar is now known as F3ar|away
=== KNUBBIG_ is now known as KNUBBIG
=== KNUBBIG is now known as KNUBBIG_
[13:40] <trijntje> What program draws the sound icon in the top panel? It has a bug but I dont know what package it belongs to
[13:45] <trijntje> found it: /usr/lib/indicator-session/indicator-session-service
[13:45] <zniavre> good afternnon
[13:45] <zniavre> noon*
[13:46] <zniavre> im using oneiric with gnome classic session (no unity )
[13:46] <zniavre> there is a way to activate overlay scrollbar ?
=== CardinalFang_ is now known as CardinalFang
[15:59] <CardinalFang> Hrm.  Anyone know why window placement on my Unity desktop would be so close to the new panelthing that it forces it to hide?
[16:52] <BUGabundo> bye
[17:27] <dupondje> Hi
[17:27] <dupondje> somebody alive ? :)
[17:28] <penguin42> sshh we're sleeping
[17:29] <dupondje> I just upgraded to oneiric
[17:29] <dupondje> but seems there is something weird with gnucash
[17:29] <dupondje> gnucash-common isn't build from the source package ?
[17:29] <dupondje> but its just a sync from debian, where it IS build ?
[17:30] <dupondje> http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gnucash.html
[17:30] <dupondje> vs
[17:30] <dupondje> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnucash
[17:30] <penguin42> it's possible that there's a library difference that's stopping it
[17:32] <penguin42> oh, that is a bit odd
[17:33] <penguin42> dupondje: That looks like a bug somewhere
[17:34] <dupondje> can you try to rebuild it on a clean up-to-date pbuilder ? :p
[17:34]  * penguin42 hasn't got one in front of me - I could set one up, but so could you :-)
[17:34] <dupondje> yea true
[17:34] <dupondje> i'll fix it
[17:35] <penguin42> ah!
[17:35] <penguin42> dupondje: I think I know what it is
[17:35] <Ampelbein> penguin42:, dupondje: the problem is that arch all packages are only built on i386
[17:35] <Ampelbein> penguin42, dupondje: and gnucash FTBFS there.
[17:35] <penguin42> dupondje: and the i386 build failed
[17:36] <penguin42> odd failure; dpkg-trigger: error: syntax error in triggers deferred file `/var/lib/dpkg/triggers/Unincorp' at character `:' midline
[17:36] <Ampelbein> penguin42: was fixed with https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/oneiric/+source/dpkg/1.16.0.3ubuntu2
[17:37] <penguin42> ah well there you go
[17:37] <dupondje> ah :D
[17:37] <dupondje> hehe ok
[17:37] <penguin42> always fun when something like dpkg gets broken
[17:37] <dupondje> true
[17:37] <dupondje> ah well
[17:37] <Ampelbein> bug 798803 ;-)
[17:37] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 798803 in dpkg (Ubuntu) "package libatkmm-1.6-1 2.22.5-1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: syntax error in triggers deferred file `/var/lib/dpkg/triggers/Unincorp' at character `:' midline" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/798803
[17:37] <dupondje> nobody around to rebuild gnucash ? :D
[17:38] <Ampelbein> i'll trigger a rebuild
[17:38] <dupondje> thanks
[17:38] <Ampelbein> there you go: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnucash/1:2.4.6-3/+build/2570289
[17:39] <dupondje> sweet
[17:39] <dupondje> else upgrade went quite fine
[17:39] <dupondje> :D
[17:46] <Ian_Corne> anyone else on unity 2D?
[19:27] <dupondje> Ampelbein: ?
[19:27] <dupondje> can you rebuild https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libaqbanking ?
[19:27] <dupondje> seems like that one failed also :D
[19:28] <Ampelbein> dupondje: but for another reason
[19:28] <dupondje> make: *** [binary] Error 1
[19:28] <dupondje> mmm odd
[19:29] <Ampelbein> dupondje: the no-change retrys only work if the error is only temporary.
[19:30] <dupondje> yea I know :)
[19:30] <Ampelbein> dupondje: the error is in the description lines before that line.
[19:30] <dupondje> well its a warning indeed
[19:30] <dupondje> but it did build on amd64 for example
[19:31] <Ampelbein> dupondje: libaqbanking-data_5.0.10-1_all.deb is arch all thus only builds on i386
[19:31] <Ampelbein> dupondje: see the dpkg-deb: building package `libaqbanking-data' in `../libaqbanking-data_5.0.10-1_all.deb'. line before the warning
[19:38] <dupondje> the version check has a exit 1
[19:38] <dupondje> so it makes indeed the build fail
[19:38] <dupondje> should not be WARNING then but ERROR imo
[19:38] <dupondje> :D
[19:52] <dupondje> Ampelbein: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libaqbanking/+bug/799225
[19:52] <ubottu> Ubuntu bug 799225 in libaqbanking (Ubuntu) "Fix FTBFS caused by not up-to-date Build Depend" [Undecided,New]
[19:52] <dupondje> could you check ?
[19:52] <dupondje> this should fix it :)
[19:57] <Ampelbein> dupondje: checking
[20:12] <Ampelbein> dupondje: sponsored, thanks for your work! Small change I did was to add LP bugnumber to debian/changelog
[20:12] <dupondje> ah yea right :) forgot
[20:12] <dupondje> thanks
[20:12] <dupondje> :D
[20:15] <dupondje> aha, and the debian maintainer commented also
[20:15] <dupondje> maby he fixes it in debian asap, then we can sync again in some days :)
=== F3ar|away is now known as F3ar
[20:29] <dupondje> and it build :D
[20:32] <Ampelbein> dupondje: nice ;-)
[20:33] <Ampelbein> dupondje: I was about to suggest using submittodebian or send the patch manually.
[20:34] <dupondje> well its not really a bug in debian at this moment
[20:35] <dupondje> as libgwenhywfar60-dev was 4.0.3 when the package got build :)
[20:35] <dupondje> but anyway, think the maintainer will fix it anyway
[20:35] <dupondje> btw, the build package will first get into the oneiric queue?
[20:36] <dupondje> then it needs to be accepted before its in the archive ? :d
[20:37] <Ampelbein> dupondje: it already is ACCEPTED
[20:37] <Ampelbein> dupondje: otherwise it would be in NEW
[20:38] <Ampelbein> dupondje: see https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/oneiric/+queue?queue_state=2&queue_text=
[20:38] <dupondje> that goes auto or ? :)
[20:42] <Ampelbein> dupondje: it only needs manual approval once per binary package (from NEW), after that it's automatic
[20:49] <dsathe> gnome shell chat integration seems to have a issue
[20:49] <dsathe> not maximising / closing
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
=== KNUBBIG_ is now known as KNUBBIG
=== KNUBBIG is now known as KNUBBIG_
[22:44] <Ian_Corne> trying to install nvidia current atm= 0 upgraded, 2 newly installed, 382 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
[22:44] <Ian_Corne> *no*
[22:47] <yofel> yeah, I've got some mesa lib held back here which tries to remove nvidia :/
[22:48] <Ampelbein> Ian_Corne: see bug 798007 for the cause
[22:48] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 798007 in mesa (Ubuntu) "[Oneiric] Latest mesa (7.10.3) breaks 3D with nvidia-current" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/798007
[22:50] <Ian_Corne> I know the bug :)
[22:51] <Ian_Corne> yofel: I'm running with 'experimental 3D support' now
[22:51] <Ian_Corne> whatever that might be
[22:51] <charlie-tca> gallium
[22:51] <yofel> gallium I think
[22:51] <Ian_Corne> $ /usr/lib/nux/unity_support_test -p does give back no
[22:51] <Ian_Corne> video                  18908  1 nouveau
[22:51] <Ian_Corne> so maybe the driver is just not enabled?
[22:52] <yofel> wouldn't help me much since nouveau's accelleration is broken on my hardware :/
[22:52] <yofel> no idea, really
[22:52] <Ian_Corne> jockey says it's in use
[22:52] <Ian_Corne> but i've not been able to trust jockey much in 11.10
[22:52] <Ian_Corne> I think it's confused
[22:53] <Ian_Corne> after I installed the mesa updates, jockey still showed nvidia installed, which was not the case
[22:53] <yofel> well, xorg.log will tell what's being used in any case
[22:54] <yofel> bah, battery empty, bbl
[22:55] <Ian_Corne> according to the log, it tries to load nvidia, fails, tries to load nv, fails, loads vesa (wtf?) and then a whole bunch of stuff about nouveau
[22:55] <Ian_Corne> 317 [     8.376] (EE) NOUVEAU(0): Error creating GPU channel: -19
[22:55] <Ian_Corne> 318 [     8.376] (EE) NOUVEAU(0): Error initialising acceleration.  Falling back to NoAccel
[22:55] <Ian_Corne> guess it's broken for my card too :)