[00:18] <fontanon> tumbleweed: I'm not getting the hang of it .. after marking the datapkg.egg-info directory for deleting (in debian/rules::clean) I've re-uploaded the source package but launchpad rejects with this error:
[00:18] <fontanon> "File datapkg_0.8-1~ppa1~maverick1.debian.tar.gz already exists in CKAN Utils, but uploaded version has different contents. See more information about this error in https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/UploadErrors.
[00:18] <fontanon> Files specified in DSC are broken or missing, skipping package unpack verification."
[00:19] <jmarsden> fontanon: You can't change a package without changing its version numbering.  Create datapkg_0.8-1~ppa1~maverick2   and all will be well.
[00:19] <fontanon> debian source package has a different content, of course! i needed to modify the debian/rules file!
[00:20] <jmarsden> debian/changelog more likely :)
[00:20] <fontanon> sure :)
[00:22] <fontanon> but IMHO, it may be more convenient just dropping the current datapkg_0.8-1~ppa1~maverick1 and reuploading it again. In fact, i'm trying to fix a source package bug and not publishing another brand new version, don't you think?
[00:22] <fontanon> newbie questions :)
[00:26] <jmarsden> fontanon: That's not the way Launchpad works.  test your packages locally, build them on your own machine, before uploading to your PPA.
[00:29] <fontanon> Very sensible advice. Dunno why, even with pdebuild, the egg-info packaging issue didn't showed up. I felt quite confident before uploading to my PPA ...
=== medberry is now known as med_out
[00:31] <tumbleweed> fontanon: that's probably because your pbuilder has internet access
[00:32] <fontanon> Really? How does internet access affect pbuilder?
[00:34] <jmarsden> a pbuilder on your local PC can access the Internet, a PPA build machine cannot, by design.
[00:36] <fontanon> jmarsden: thanks I didn't ever wonder
[00:36] <jmarsden> fontanon: You're welcome.
[01:09] <wgrant> aj00200: https://launchpad.net/people/+me/+edit
[02:49] <jmarsden> About how long is the PPA builder queue for i386 likely to remain at elevated levels (like 20 hours) ?
[03:01] <wgrant> jmarsden: Should be back to normalish once the UK wakes up on Monday and gives back the builders.
[03:02] <wgrant> (they're busy testing kernel SRUs, I believe)
[03:02] <jmarsden> OK, thanks.  BTW is there any way that kind of status info could be put on the launchpad.net/builders page?
[03:04] <wgrant> Possibly.
[03:04] <wgrant> Ideally it wouldn't happen at all :)
[03:07] <jmarsden> Well, sure, but that would mean Canonical has to buy N extra machines that sit idle except when kernel SRUs happen... probably unlikely to be cost-justifiable :)
=== thomi_ is now known as thomi
[12:31] <Ampelbein> hi there, changelogs.ubuntu.com seems to be down
[13:12] <Quintasan> james_w: ping
=== Naresh`` is now known as Naresh
[19:16] <io> I'm in the process of verifying my PGP key on my account. The encrypted verification email has been sent to me but I use Google Mail. What's the easiest way of downloading it to decrypt it?
[20:28] <broder> hmm...looks like one of the recipe builders is having some sort of umask issue?
[20:28] <broder> https://launchpad.net/~barnowl/+archive/daily/+recipebuild/52209
=== Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan
=== beuno is now known as beuno-honeymoon