| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
| kim0 | Morning fellas | 08:28 |
|---|---|---|
| === daker_ is now known as daker | ||
| niemeyer | Good mornings! | 14:44 |
| hazmat_ | niemeyer: g'morning | 14:44 |
| niemeyer | A bit late today.. broke my glasses over the weekend, and had to run to try getting new ones before the trip :-( | 14:45 |
| hazmat_ | niemeyer: i pushed an old branch of txzk into review, i realized i needed it for some of the connection level error handling in the subsequent session branch | 14:45 |
| niemeyer | hazmat_: Sounds good.. will do another pass in the queue today | 14:45 |
| hazmat_ | niemeyer: that sucks, i finally broke down and got a new pair (my last pair was being held together by electrical tape..) | 14:46 |
| niemeyer | hazmat_: Ouch :) | 14:46 |
| niemeyer | hazmat_: I'm tempted to get an extra pair | 14:46 |
| niemeyer | hazmat_: Btw, there were several things pending there on Friday in the review queue. Would be good to have a pass there if you find a moment. | 14:46 |
| hazmat_ | niemeyer: sure | 14:47 |
| _mup_ | txzookeeper/session-event-handling r46 committed by kapil.foss@gmail.com | 14:51 |
| _mup_ | - merge swap-sync-errors-to-failures | 14:51 |
| _mup_ | - allow for connection error handler to return a deferred, whose result will be chained | 14:51 |
| _mup_ | to the api deferred. | 14:51 |
| _mup_ | txzookeeper/session-event-handling r47 committed by kapil.foss@gmail.com | 15:51 |
| _mup_ | Improve connection error handler to api call result chaining. | 15:51 |
| niemeyer | hazmat_: session-event-handling mentions a pre-requisite branch which doesn't seem to be in review | 16:51 |
| hazmat_ | niemeyer: it is in review in txzookeeper | 16:53 |
| hazmat_ | niemeyer: its not visible in the ensemble kanban | 16:53 |
| hazmat_ | niemeyer: the mp for session-event-handling has a link | 16:53 |
| niemeyer | hazmat_: Should it be to enable others to more easily pick it up as well? | 16:53 |
| hazmat_ | niemeyer: i can add a cross linked bug for it, if that's helpful | 16:55 |
| niemeyer | hazmat_: Either that or we can harass someone directly to look at it :-) | 16:56 |
| hazmat_ | niemeyer: i was going for the later ;-) | 16:56 |
| niemeyer | hazmat_: Sounds good too | 16:56 |
| hazmat_ | off to see a man about a new car, bbiab | 16:57 |
| niemeyer | I'll have lunch now too.. | 16:57 |
| niemeyer | Will go through the branches after it | 16:57 |
| niemeyer | biab | 16:57 |
| SpamapS | niemeyer: so, re the man page.. I think you're right. While I was writing the man page manually, I kept thinking this should probably be in the online help, and just auto-generated into the man page. | 17:30 |
| SpamapS | niemeyer: I'll take a look at doing just that. | 17:31 |
| niemeyer | SpamapS: Ah, manually generated would work wonderfully too! | 17:34 |
| niemeyer | SpamapS: Erm | 17:34 |
| niemeyer | SpamapS: Ah, automatically generated would work wonderfully too! | 17:34 |
| * niemeyer takes his pills | 17:34 | |
| niemeyer | " | 17:46 |
| niemeyer | AWS CloudFormation enables system administrators | 17:46 |
| niemeyer | and developers to create repeatable AWS | 17:46 |
| niemeyer | infrastructure deployments (Stacks) using | 17:46 |
| niemeyer | customizable architecture templates." | 17:46 |
| niemeyer | Sounds like we picked the right term for the concept.. (stacks) :-) | 17:47 |
| SpamapS | yeah | 17:48 |
| SpamapS | is there a draft spec for that yet? | 17:48 |
| niemeyer | SpamapS: No, just evolving over conversations for now | 17:52 |
| _mup_ | ensemble/debug-log-relation-settings-changes r266 committed by jim.baker@canonical.com | 17:56 |
| _mup_ | Doc strings, better total ordering on YAMLState item changes when logged | 17:56 |
| m_3 | the cloudformation example templates use amazon | 18:01 |
| m_3 | 's distribution | 18:01 |
| SpamapS | m_3: indeed, cloudformation is pretty much built around amazon's distro | 18:03 |
| m_3 | SpamapS: the events seem to be the template's responsibility... http://paste.ubuntu.com/629916/ | 18:05 |
| SpamapS | m_3: yeah, another hacky thing just like running chef from one cookbook on another host. | 18:08 |
| === bcsaller1 is now known as bcsaller | ||
| _mup_ | ensemble/debug-log-relation-settings-changes r267 committed by jim.baker@canonical.com | 18:14 |
| _mup_ | Verify representation of change items | 18:14 |
| negronjl | SpamapS: https://bugs.launchpad.net/principia/+bug/799837 ( tomcat / no clustering ) | 18:14 |
| _mup_ | Bug #799837: new-formula ( tomcat6 ) <new-formula> <Principia Ensemble:New> < https://launchpad.net/bugs/799837 > | 18:14 |
| negronjl | SpamapS: I have to do some other work for now but, will work on tomcat clustering when I get a chance. | 18:15 |
| SpamapS | negronjl: ok.. yeah I have some other stuff that has been neglected.. will take a look later today. | 18:15 |
| negronjl | SpamapS: I know you're just neglecting me. :) | 18:16 |
| _mup_ | ensemble/debug-log-relation-settings-changes r268 committed by jim.baker@canonical.com | 18:36 |
| _mup_ | Test flush directly to ensure it returns the change items | 18:36 |
| _mup_ | ensemble/debug-log-relation-settings-changes r269 committed by jim.baker@canonical.com | 18:42 |
| _mup_ | PEP8, fix misspelling | 18:42 |
| === daker is now known as daker_ | ||
| niemeyer | Anyone up for a quick review on this: https://code.launchpad.net/~kim0/ensemble/updating-faq/+merge/64679? | 19:29 |
| jimbaker` | niemeyer, taking a look | 19:33 |
| kim0 | what's the purpose of tagging new formulas with "new-formula" ? | 19:39 |
| kim0 | that's probably the only way today to locate formulas in foreign branches ? | 19:41 |
| SpamapS | kim0: so you can find them for review. | 19:45 |
| niemeyer | kim0: I don't think we've agreed to that convention | 19:45 |
| niemeyer | kim0: At least I didn't see it being mentioned | 19:45 |
| SpamapS | Its how I'm reviewing new formulas in principia. :) | 19:45 |
| SpamapS | its just a bug tag | 19:45 |
| niemeyer | SpamapS: It's nice to present convention suggestions in general | 19:45 |
| niemeyer | SpamapS: Otherwise you'll be the only one using it :) | 19:45 |
| SpamapS | niemeyer: I did, in my Principia wiki page | 19:45 |
| niemeyer | SpamapS: Heh | 19:46 |
| SpamapS | https://ensemble.ubuntu.com/Principia mentions it and did from the very first revision I think. | 19:46 |
| SpamapS | https://bugs.launchpad.net/principia/+bugs?field.tag=new-formula | 19:47 |
| SpamapS | Quite a list. :) | 19:47 |
| niemeyer | That's nice! | 19:47 |
| niemeyer | I heard Launchpad may get support for listing branches through the API as soon as next week | 19:48 |
| niemeyer | Which means we'll be able to evolve the remote repo support pretty soon | 19:48 |
| SpamapS | Sweet.. the mr solution I have now *sucks*. :) | 19:48 |
| jimbaker` | kim0, niemeyer - approved the FAQ branch | 19:49 |
| niemeyer | jimbaker`: Nothing will beat "deploy lp:~spamaps/formula" I guess :-) | 19:49 |
| niemeyer | Oops | 19:49 |
| niemeyer | SpamapS: Nothing will beat "deploy lp:~spamaps/formula" I guess :-) | 19:49 |
| SpamapS | niemeyer: and even better will just be the ability to not pull down all of the formulas in order to have a chance at automatic dependency resolution. | 19:50 |
| niemeyer | SpamapS: Ah, definitely | 19:51 |
| niemeyer | SpamapS: This will be the next step | 19:51 |
| SpamapS | or even stepping back further, forget the dependencies, just a 'ensemble search tomcat' and have it show you the available formulas.. very useful. | 19:52 |
| niemeyer | jimbaker`: Thanks. Can you please please merge it then? | 19:54 |
| niemeyer | Erm | 19:54 |
| niemeyer | s/please please/please/ :) | 19:54 |
| jimbaker` | kim0, also according to wikipedia (can we really say that? someone else at least...), it should apparently "at run time" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Run_time) | 19:54 |
| niemeyer | SpamapS: Ah, that'll be awesome indeed | 19:54 |
| jimbaker` | niemeyer, good to know it's not so urgent ;) | 19:54 |
| niemeyer | SpamapS: Or "info tomcat" | 19:55 |
| niemeyer | jimbaker`: Hehe :) | 19:55 |
| niemeyer | jimbaker`: Brain hiccup | 19:55 |
| jimbaker` | niemeyer, ok, i will make the fixes we both recommended | 19:55 |
| niemeyer | jimbaker`: I think he already handled my review | 19:55 |
| niemeyer | kim0: Right? | 19:55 |
| jimbaker` | niemeyer, kim0 applied the changes you requested | 19:57 |
| * kim0 reading .. catching up | 19:58 | |
| jimbaker` | niemeyer, i can take care of the minor fixes i suggested | 19:58 |
| niemeyer | jimbaker`: Sweet, thanks | 19:58 |
| jimbaker` | or kim0, since you're here, maybe easier process from a branch history perspective if you just do it :) | 19:58 |
| kim0 | jimbaker`: okie, applying your comments .. thanks for the review :) | 20:00 |
| kim0 | jimbaker`: hmm, is there a smart way to reference your merge proposal comments, in my commit message? | 20:03 |
| jimbaker` | kim0, i'm not aware of being able to link this in at the commit level | 20:05 |
| jimbaker` | kim0, but our usual practice is to always reply to each comment, if only with an "ack" | 20:05 |
| kim0 | jimbaker`: updates pushed .. can I do the merge? | 20:06 |
| jimbaker` | kim0, i personally find that if i do that, the chance that i inadvertently let a review comment slide w/o action goes way down | 20:06 |
| jimbaker` | kim0, hey, if you are able to do so, i will certainly let you merge :), but otherwise i can readily do it | 20:06 |
| * kim0 takes a shot | 20:07 | |
| kim0 | merged | 20:16 |
| === _mup__ is now known as _mup_ | ||
| === almaisan-away is now known as al-maisan | ||
| === al-maisan is now known as almaisan-away | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!