[03:32] <cjohnston> howd
[03:32] <cjohnston> y
[03:33] <mhall119> hiya
[14:23] <daker> another spam bug 800676
[14:23] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 800676 in loco-directory "SPAM in the Microblogging widget (affects: 3) (heat: 14)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/800676
[16:33] <nigelb> mhall119: jealous of cjohnston and me yet?:P
[16:33] <nigelb> https://dev.launchpad.net/Contributions
[16:50] <mhall119> yes
[16:50] <mhall119> though jamalta has you both beat
[18:35] <cjohnston> mhall119: nigelb fwiw I was told by james_w that they are not using Summit in August, so we are free!
[18:38] <james_w> break it to your heart's content! :-)
[18:38] <cjohnston> only if you help :-P
[18:39] <cjohnston> and if it is already broken, is it possible to break it
[19:22] <nigelb> \o/
[19:22] <nigelb> james_w: Any specific reason you aren't?
[19:23] <james_w> nigelb, we're not using blueprints for setting schedules
[19:23] <nigelb> Ah, yes
[19:23] <nigelb> james_w: and what are you folks using instead of summit?
[19:23] <james_w> the wiki
[19:23] <nigelb> heh, WIN.
[19:24] <nigelb> :-)
[19:51] <mhall119> james_w: I bet that'll work out just fine...
[20:25] <Ronnie> mhall119, cjohnston, daker_: first concept: http://ubuntuone.com/p/10gg/
[20:35] <cjohnston> lookin good
[21:02] <mhall119> Ronnie: looking very good
[21:08] <Ronnie> i think the homepage needs more info to be tab worthy, but i dont know what we are missing
[21:08] <cjohnston> i think thats a good start
[21:09] <Ronnie> true, we can expand it later
[21:09] <mhall119> Ronnie: as long as we get "more" tab worthy, we're making the right kind of progress
[21:09] <mhall119> Ronnie: my only concern is the image size
[21:10] <Ronnie> mhall119: that was mine too
[21:10] <mhall119> if this is going to be on a tab I go back to, I won't want to scroll down each time to see the content
[21:10] <Ronnie> i tried a slide of 3 images but that feeled not right
[21:11] <Ronnie> i also tried variations without the second navbar, which isnt very usefull on the homepage
[21:12] <mhall119> Ronnie: I like how you placed the google maps, but it might need a caption to explain what the markers are
[21:35] <Ronnie> mhall119, cjohnston: new version:
[21:35] <Ronnie> http://ubuntuone.com/p/10gg/
[21:40] <Ronnie> maybe we should separate the home page and the social page. therefore the social (tab-worthy) page will be smaller
[21:41] <YoBoY> great Ronnie but like the others, the photo is taking too much space, big pictures like that are more suitable for static informative pages
[21:42] <Ronnie> YoBoY: if you want to play with the design: http://ubuntuone.com/p/10gf/
[21:43] <cjohnston> Ronnie: the size on cloud.u.c isnt bad
[21:44] <mhall119> Ronnie: I like the headers
[21:45] <Ronnie> mhall119: just normal h2 for the main-content ;)
[21:48] <mhall119> yeah, but it makes it much clearer what the content is
[21:50] <YoBoY> how can you work with so many layers :D
[21:52] <Ronnie> YoBoY: Gimp 2.7
[21:52] <Ronnie> layer grouping
[21:52] <YoBoY> ok, I understand, only have the 2.6
[21:52] <YoBoY> and i'm more used to inkscape
[21:52] <Ronnie> YoBoY: you should update, 2.7 has single window modus
[21:53] <Ronnie> mhall119, YoBoY: new update http://ubuntuone.com/p/10gg/
[21:53] <YoBoY> yes I know, you already told me that once :)
[21:54] <YoBoY> better
[21:55] <YoBoY> what do you plan to put on the 4 blocks under the images ?
[21:56] <Ronnie> YoBoY: http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5184/5763041728_9d776baccd_o.jpg
[21:57] <YoBoY> ha yes jono mockup right ?
[21:57] <Ronnie> yup
[21:57] <Ronnie> putting the right content in the blocks add an additional 8 layers ;)
[22:00] <YoBoY> having these blocks and an empty second level navigation seems strange to me
[22:10] <Ronnie> YoBoY: true, i noticed that before
[22:10] <Ronnie> http://ubuntuone.com/p/10gg/
[22:16] <YoBoY> erasing the menu is not the solution, you lost the search field :)
[22:34] <cjohnston> Ronnie: i like that one better.. then we can have a global jam advertisement image on the right.. and two other things
[22:34] <Ronnie> cjohnston: that should be possible
[23:21] <mhall119> I agree with YoBoY, we should keep the sub-nav for the search field