[00:15] <chewyTree> for this bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/801363 it seems like this is more of a request, what should i put the status as?
[00:15] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 801363 in unity (Ubuntu) "Win+W won't show minimized windows (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New]
[00:15] <chewyTree> would it be an opinion?
[00:19] <chewyTree> anyone?
[00:22] <paultag> chewyTree: humm, that's a toughie
[00:22] <paultag> chewyTree: it's opinion sure, but more of a 100 papercuts sort of thing
[00:22] <paultag> chewyTree: pass it off to one of the papercutters and see if they want it
[00:22] <chewyTree> paultag yes i agree, thanks
[00:23] <chewyTree> do you know if they have a specific channel i can join?
[00:23] <paultag> chewyTree: I don't recall. I think vish is a papercutter, though
[00:23] <paultag> chewyTree: I also can't remember if meta w was a binding before unity as well, might want to check that out too
[00:24] <paultag> chewyTree: if it used to be one, and is not anymore, we should consider it. I'm not sure if it borkes unity (being a meta key binding)
[00:24] <paultag> BBL, gl chewyTree
[00:25] <chewyTree> even if it is, being that it wont bring up the window to begin with would have to do with the coding
[00:25] <chewyTree> paultag, thanks
[01:52] <chewyTree> anyone here to help for a bit?
[01:53] <micahg> !ask | chewyTree
[01:53] <ubot4> chewyTree: Please don't ask to ask a question, simply ask the question (all on ONE line and in the channel, so that others can read and follow it easily). If anyone knows the answer they will most likely reply. :-)
[01:53] <chewyTree> im working on triaging this bug, this is what the user responded https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/goldendict/+bug/801166 what should i do now? first day on the job ;p
[01:53] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 801166 in goldendict (Ubuntu) "missing icon in unity launcher and from systray (affects: 1) (heat: 10)" [Undecided,Incomplete]
[01:55] <micahg> chewyTree: that's not a fix, but a workaround, the system tray is deprecated in Ubuntu (not necessarily in derivatives)
[01:56] <chewyTree> micahg, so how would i go about from here? still leave it incomplete? cause i couldnt replicate it
[01:58] <micahg> chewyTree: it appears in the launcher just fine, I wonder if the user is complaining about the quality of the icon
[01:59] <chewyTree> micahg, but in the description he says its missing entirely from both and that omgubuntu post it seems like he just found a work around?
[01:59] <chewyTree> micahg, though i dont think white listing has anything to do with the systray, only the launcher correct?
[02:00] <micahg> chewyTree: it won't show up on the launcher until you launch it or add it (only the default set and what you launch shows up there unless you add more things), the systray is not meant to work in 11.04, the whitelist is only for certain applications
[02:00] <micahg> chewyTree: no, whitelisting is only the systray
[02:00] <chewyTree> oooo
[02:03] <chewyTree> ill ask him to be more specific, if it was just a complaint ill mark it invalid once he responds
[02:04] <micahg> chewyTree: well, if it's about the systray, it would be invalid, or if about not knowing how to add to the launcher, but if it's about the icon quality, it would be Low or wishlist/triaged
[02:05] <chewyTree> micahg, okie, thanks alot man, just learning how things work.
[02:05] <micahg> chewyTree: no problem, feel free to ask any questions you like
[03:21] <hggdh> micahg: do we have enigmail for the current TB?
[03:22] <hggdh> (and good evening, sir)
[03:31] <micahg> hggdh: indeed we do, and good evening to you as well :)
[03:31] <micahg> it should work in all stable releases
[03:31] <micahg> and oneiric
[08:56] <Leth`> Morning. Is anyone around who can triage a bug for me? It's #785234
[09:02] <Leth`> here's the link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sudo/+bug/785234
[09:02] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 785234 in sudo (Ubuntu) "Sudo leaves defunct child process (affects: 1) (heat: 90)" [Undecided,New]
[10:28] <jtaylor> can someone mark this bug wishlist please: 801420
[11:30] <jibel> jtaylor, done
[11:30] <jtaylor> thx
[12:25] <Leth`> Can spmeone triage a bug for me? It's #785234
[12:26] <Leth`> bug #785234
[12:26] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 785234 in sudo (Ubuntu) "Sudo leaves defunct child process (affects: 1) (heat: 90)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/785234
[12:43] <benonsoftware> Hay all
[12:45] <brendand> Leth` what do you mean triage it for you? You mean mark it as Triaged?
[12:47] <Leth`> tbh, I'm not sure. I filed it a while ago, was hoping that I could help it along towards a fix because it's still bugging me :P
[12:49] <Leth`> brendand: also i was wondering if i'd got the metadata right. It didn't look like some of the other reports i'd seen
[13:31] <brendand> Leth` well, if we plan to take sudo 1.7.5 for oneiric then it will get fixed, otherwise unlikely
[13:31] <brendand> Leth` and then only in O
[13:32] <Leth`> hmm, ok :(
[13:32] <Leth`> it means my script hangs at the sudo call
[13:32] <Leth`> because sudo never notices it's child process exits
[13:33] <Leth`> thanks for the info
[15:07] <zombie_> if duplicates of a bug have been found, should it be marked as confirmed?
[15:15] <vish> zombie_: if you are sure it is a dup, mark the dups to main bug, and if main bug is not confirmed you can set to confirmed
[15:16] <zombie_> sm1 else has already marked the dups...
[15:19] <charlie-tca> zombie_: the dups are automatically marked as confirmed when marked as duplicate bug of ???
[15:20] <charlie-tca> The master normally should be marked confirmed, based on the multiple duplicates of it.
[15:20] <charlie-tca> Since we know more than one person is experiencing the same issue
[15:23] <zombie_> i have marked the master as confirmed...
[16:07] <zombie_> I am slightly confused.If bug#777497 is fix released and is a duplicate of bug#762641 how come the latter is incomplete?
[16:09] <charlie-tca> bug 777497
[16:09] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 777497 in vlc (Ubuntu) "package vlc-nox 1.1.9-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 139 (dup-of: 762641)" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/777497
[16:09] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 762641 in vlc (Debian) (and 4 other projects) "package vlc-nox 1.1.9-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 139 (affects: 22) (dups: 26) (heat: 237)" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/762641
[16:10] <charlie-tca> We can fix the bug in Ubuntu, and forward a fix to Debian, or simply mark the upstream task as invalid, if the bug is only an Ubuntu issue
[16:13] <charlie-tca> zombie_: the dup should not have been marked as fixed, it should have been changed from incomplete to confirmed when marked as a duplicate
[16:14] <zombie_> so someone made an error, rite? It shud not be fix-released
[16:15] <charlie-tca> right, you could change it to confirmed instead
[16:15] <zombie_> k
[16:51] <hggdh> (this is just a sanity control, but a dup should not be fix-released. Status on duplicates are disregarded)
[16:52] <charlie-tca> +1
[17:04] <bil21al> hi, i want to report the bugs of ubuntu 11.10 oneirice.with alpha 1 can i report them or i can only report crashes.
[17:05] <Abhijit> bil21al, yes you can report bugs
[17:05] <Abhijit> for alpha
[17:06] <bil21al> ok thank u abhijit
[17:09] <Abhijit> bil21al, welcome.
[17:15] <bil21al> abhijit: as we write ubuntu-bug unity for unity bugs so what should we write for launcher bug in oneirics?
[17:18] <charlie-tca> Is it still unity?
[17:18] <charlie-tca> bil21al: we don't report bugs by release version, but by the package.
[17:19] <bil21al> charlie-tca;so i stop now before the release of oneirics???
[17:23] <charlie-tca> no, report it with the same ubuntu-bug unity, since the launcher is still part of unity
[17:24] <charlie-tca> It should tag it for oneiric even