/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/06/25/#lubuntu.txt

phillwjmarsden: are you still about?01:23
jmarsdenphillw: Yes.01:23
phillwI still cannot get this bl**dy guest additions to work :( - I know it is operator error, but I've tried and tried again. If you could schedule a bit of time when things are not too busy, I'd appreciate a bit of help as to why tis idiot cannot get it to work!01:26
=== Hellow is now known as collinp
phillwThere is no urgency, the VM's are functioning. It is simply, for me, the lack of being able to C&P between them and also the 'main system'01:27
phillwbtw, has there been any progress on the gnome-power-manager bug in 11-10?01:28
jmarsdenI've not done anything on the gnome-power-manager thing, and I don't know of Julien or anyone else doing anything further with it.01:32
jmarsdenRe cut and paste... they work (say between two instances of leafpad, for a consistent simple test case) on your host OS, right?  Does cut and paste also work between two instances of leafpad that are both running in the same virtualbox VM?01:33
phillwI've only been trying to c&P between Terminal sessions and web pages with code commands. Ctrl+C from web area and Shift+Ctrl+V This works fine on my base system, but the clipboard is not shared.01:35
phillwbetween 2 leafpads, on same VM - it works fine.01:37
jmarsdenTerminal to web has all the weird "wrong clipboard" issues involved.  OK... can you do leafpad to leafpad where each leafpad is in a different VM, or where one is in the host OS and one in a VM?01:38
* phillw is just firing up 11-10 VM01:39
phillwC&P does not work either way with 11-04 VM and 11-10 VM01:41
phillwsoz, had to killall gnome-power-manager... it is a real PITA!01:42
jmarsdenYou are killing it in the 11.10 VM?  I must have too much spare CPU for my own good, or something, I've run an 11.10 Alpha1 VM and not noticed the issue :)01:43
phillwyup, in my 11-10 it cranks my 2nd CPU to 100%01:43
phillwI've seen it mentioned a couple of times, we are getting used to just issuing the command.01:44
phillwBut, I'm only running a poorly AMD Turon :P01:46
phillw*lowly*01:46
jmarsdenYes... OK, it does that here too, on my quad core Q9550 I didn't even notice until I looked for it in htop :)01:47
phillwI've got a CPU all to myself :P01:48
phillwat least that is what that darned gnome system uses!01:48
jmarsdenHmmm, I am wondering if Guest additions don't fully like the X in Oneiric?  I can resize my 11.04 VM and the screen resizes to match.  In my 11.10 VM it doesn't... testing...01:49
phillwI'll leave that with you, bed time here!02:01
jmarsdenOK, goodnight :)02:02
john_rambo Hi, I while starting a game using I *sometimes* find that audio is completely gone ...is there a way to get audio back other that rebooting ? (Lubuntu 11.04)07:06
john_rambo*using wine07:07
xhhi! i have set up a wallpaper, now when i go to desktop prefs > appearance > wallpaper mode, and select 'Fill with background color only' xorg crashes and i am left with a virtual console; is there a known fix for this?10:26
buff27xh, do you also have gnome or kde on the same system? as I cant see "appearance" under prefs10:35
xhbuff27: i am just right-clicking the desktop and selecting 'Desktop Settings'10:36
xhbuff27: i don't have the full kde or gnome, only the libs10:36
buff27xh, I confirm the error10:39
xhbuff27: ok, which bugtracker should this be tracked to? openbox, lxde or lubuntu?10:39
buff27xh, not sure how where or if to log a bug10:39
buff27maybe someone else can advise?10:40
xhbuff27: do you happen to know which config file stores the wallpaper settings? it does not appear to be anywhere in ~/.config/openbox; setting the image to a transparent pixel will work but is kind of stupid..10:44
xhbuff27: oh, found it, looks like this is pcmanfm-related: the setting are in ~/.config/pcmanfm/lubuntu/pcmanfm.conf10:47
xhbuff27: ok, i going to try setting wallpaper_mode=1 in  ~/.config/pcmanfm/lubuntu/pcmanfm.conf10:49
buff27xh, roger10:50
xhbuff27: didn't work, tried both 0 and 1 for wallpaper_mode, but no change, cannot get rid of the picture; the funny thing is that there are two pcmanfm.conf files: ~/.config/pcmanfm/pcmanfm.conf and ~/.config/pcmanfm/lubuntu/pcmanfm.conf10:58
xhbuff27: looks like the second is used10:59
buff27xh, you trying to reduce ram usage?11:01
xhbuff27: by removing the wallpaper? no, i just have days when i prefer solid colors11:03
xhbuff27: white space (or other-colored space) is the basic element of design, as someone said :)11:04
xhbuff27: and any kind of _form_ is actually taking space, so you get less of it11:05
buff27xh, so is it a bug to report?11:06
xhbuff27: i suppose so, but it is tricky to figure out where to, and what are the preconditions to reproduce, do you have a dual monitor setup? because i do, and it i did not try with a single head11:09
buff27xh, no just a single monitor11:09
buff27xh, and a fresh install just a few hours ago with a few of my favourite packages apt-get'd11:10
xhbuff27: i see, oh, looks like what i need: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu/ReportingBugs11:12
xhbuff27: that's really neat!11:15
buff27xh, what's that?11:15
xhbuff27: you just run in terminal `ubuntu-bug pcmanfm` or whatever component is affected and the app does most of the job for you..11:16
buff27xh, uh errrr really?11:16
xhbuff27: try it :)11:17
xhbuff27: it will then open a browser window to fill in the details and stuff11:17
xhbuff27: um, but i still have create a launchpad account..11:18
buff27xh, i see, i was just reading about apport11:18
buff27pm xh?11:19
xhbuff27: how does that work?11:19
buff27pm  = private message, as in I'm requesting to private message you11:20
xhbuff27: i understand but never did it before, do i have to type some command?11:20
=== markus_ is now known as elros
buff27xh, what irc client do you use?11:21
xhbuff27: xchat11:21
buff27xh, you should see like a new channel with my nick11:22
draiochhave probs trying to get sound output on a dell optiplex g280, have alsa default drivers installed, check obvious mute sound level any help pls19:13
draiochrunning lubuntu 11.0419:14
jmarsdendraioch: I'm not an expert on the sound stuff, but you can try using alsamixer in a terminal window to see what the sound device settings are and set volume levels per device...19:15
draiochok thanks jmarsden19:23
jmarsdendraioch: You're welcome.19:23
Dexohey, can i ask a question19:24
Dexois there a difference between Lubuntu and getting Ubuntu Server and installing LXDE?19:25
OctatronA lot of the polished interface isn't setup probably I'd say?  Issue like when you install a new program the menu wouldn't show the program without running a script19:27
OctatronAt least that was my experience with installing Ubuntu and icewm, blackbox and fluxbox in the past19:28
Dexois lubuntu better than ubuntuserver+lxde?19:28
Dexocause im gonna use it on my old deksotp to host a game server and i want a gui since im not great with terminal so i choose lxde since its light19:29
OctatronIt's basically the same thing except with Lubuntu someone has gone through and made sure all the loose ends are sorted out so everything works seamlessly without having to invoke isoteric commands from terminal19:29
Dexook then lubuntu it is19:29
Octatrongood choice, saves alot of headache I'd say19:30
Dexoone friend says ONLY ubuntu server. one says Mint. so i conprimised.19:30
OctatronHope the game isn't too high end on an old pc19:31
DexoMineCraft19:31
Octatronhow old is the laptop?19:31
Dexopentium 3, 512mb ram19:31
Dexodel optiplex gx11019:31
Dexocould that handle lxde19:32
Octatronmaybe ferret out another 512mb and it might be ok19:32
draiochhow can i tell what sound card is installed19:32
Octatronlspci at terminal19:32
Dexowith that i have now, do u recommand just ubuntu server?19:32
Octatronor lspci | grep sound19:32
Octatronsee how you go, try it I'm just guessing here19:33
Dexoif its to slow, ill just reinstall with just server19:33
draiochthx octatron got an output from that lspci thx19:34
Dexois lubuntu 10.4 lighter than 11.0419:34
jmarsdendraioch: Or alsamixer, press f2 and a menu showing various alsa config items appears...19:35
OctatronProviding the sound driver's actually loaded19:35
draiochyea thx ill have another try with that later thx jmarsden octatron19:36
OctatronLook around for some extra ram if you can, it shouldn't be too expensive if you need to buy it.. it might even take old desktop pc ram19:37
Dexoddr ram is expensive compared to ddr219:37
Dexoill check my other old desktop, i think it has ddr2 though19:37
Octatronalways cool when you can reuse old parts19:38
Octatronperhaps run memcheck at startup to check it's all working as well19:38
Dexok. whats better amd athlon 64 or pentium 319:39
Dexoboth 1 gig ram19:39
Dexoim not good with processors.19:39
jmarsdenDexo: At the same clock speed, a PIII might be faster than an Athlon 64.  But most Athlon 64s will run at a higher clock than a PIII...19:40
Octatronmight have to run some benchmark software, I'm not sure but I usually trusted Intel over AMD the old stuff use to overheat19:41
jmarsdenDexo: If you can boot from the Lubuntu livecd, hardinfo has some basic benchmark tests in it that you could run...19:41
Dexoi may do that19:42
Dexo" and competes primarily with Intel's Pentium 4"19:44
Dexoso that would suggestion its better than a pentuim 319:44
OctatronWell Athlon 64 might be able to run a 64 bit version perhaps of Ubuntu instead of a 32 bit .. might be worth it19:46
Dexoi didnt know my deksotp was 64 bit lol. i thoguh it was 32 since its old. ill go check19:47
Octatronthe chip name seems to suggest it might.. I'm just guessing again here19:47
Dexoany way to see if its 64-bit without turning it on19:48
OctatronDexo: Have a look here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Athlon_64#Single-core_Athlon_6419:50
Dexoont he amd website for that processor it has this, "Simultaneous 32-bit and 64-bit computing"19:51
OctatronLook in my experience, if a 64bit live cd detects a 32bit chipset it stops booting and tells me.. so you could just try it19:51
jmarsdenDexo: An Athlon 64 is a 64-bit capable chip, it can run "amd64" Debian and Ubuntu code.  Unless you have plenty of RAM, it may not be worth doing that, though.19:52
Octatronwas that written when 512mb was alot of ram though?19:52
Dexoand ti would have 1 gig19:52
Dexoit*19:54
jmarsdenUnless you have at least 4GB there's not much point running 64bit, in my opinion.19:55
Dexoright now on this computer i have 64 bit and its win7 with 3gig ddr319:55
Dexosooooooooo19:55
jmarsdenAnd did you benchmark the speed difference between win7 64bit and win7 32bit on that same machine?19:55
Dexo?19:56
jmarsdenif not, you don't know whether 64bit gave you any advantage over 32bit.19:56
Dexoi got the computer with 64 bit19:57
OctatronDexo: I'd do 64bit, if the chip supports it even with 1GB of Ram it's like having a 4 lane highway instead of a 2 lane.  Windows 7 64bit has a whole bunch of 32 bit programs which is pointless, however all of ubuntu's software should utilise the 64bit os19:57
jmarsdenOctatron: No, 64bit on low RAM machines is wasteful of RAM for no real benefit.19:57
Dexojmarsden, any input on that ^^19:57
jmarsdenbenchmarks to disprove this welcomed...19:57
bioterrorsure19:58
bioterrorbigger address spaces19:58
bioterrorifconfig for example19:58
Dexodarn, 2 people saying oppisite ideas19:58
jmarsdenbioterror: ifconfig runs faster on a 64bit machine???  really?19:58
bioterrorjmarsden, RX and TX Bytes ;)19:59
DexoLoL19:59
bioterrorsee yourself ;)19:59
bioterrormove few gigs19:59
jmarsdenbioterror: Oh, you mean it uses 64bit counters instead of 32bit counters, depending on the CPU architecture?20:00
bioterror32bit cycles around 3.9GB of I remember right20:00
bioterrortoo tired to do calculations :D20:01
bioterrors/of/if/20:01
bioterrorjust talking about wasting precious RAM with 64bit system20:01
Dexohow would 64-bit waste ram?20:01
OctatronHave a look at this guys: http://www.tuxradar.com/content/ubuntu-904-32-bit-vs-64-bit-benchmarks20:01
jmarsdenDexo: Because programs use 64bit variables for things, so that's twice the space a 32bit one would use...20:02
Dexoohhhhh20:02
jmarsdenOctatron: And normal use (boot time, compression, etc, there is no significant speed difference.  Only doing some audio/video stuff where they carefully optimized the 64bit version do you see any benefit.20:03
bioterrorhttp://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=616&num=2 let's dig some old articles :D20:05
bioterrorhttp://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=ubuntu_32_pae&num=1 a little newer ;)20:06
DexoThis link really helped: http://www.tuxradar.com/content/ubuntu-904-32-bit-vs-64-bit-benchmarks20:07
Dexokinda shows 64-bit better20:07
jmarsdenDexo: Only in audio/video tasks, as I read it... anyway, it's your machine, your choice what OS you run.20:07
Dexolol20:07
Dexowhere doi dl lubuntu20:08
Unit193bioterror: That set it! I'm going to use 64 ;)20:08
bioterror:D20:08
Dexoone last question for u guys. for a game servr 32 or 6420:09
jmarsdenDexo: REad the topic of this channel.  https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Lubuntu/GetLubuntu20:09
bioterrorUnit193, I hope you're going to use Solaris then ;)20:09
Dexooh lol, srry jmarsden. i was looking on the website20:09
OctatronBascially, each time your CPU pumps through some data it's using all the chips capability by putting through 64bits in one cycle instead of 32bits, so on small things you might not see much difference but on loading big stuff you probably will.. providing you don't go over your ram amount20:10
Unit193bioterror: Naaa, I'm going to use OpenIndiana20:10
Dexoso 32bit is good for small tasks and 64 is good for large tasks?20:11
Octatronwell kinda, for example.. firefox would probably load a bit faster because it's getting a bit fat lately20:12
Dexoim not gonna be doing any of that stuff, just server hosting20:12
Dexo(it also seems 64-bit is bad with Flash)20:13
Octatronwell your gaming server will probably take up some considerable cpu usage, so it might be worth it for the sake of computing where a player is and what is happening quicker20:13
Dexoso u say 64-bit.20:13
OctatronOnly because Adobe aren't quick enough to come out with a good flash prog, But I'm using a 64bit Lucid install atm and my flash is fine so it's probably solved20:14
OctatronWhy not try both and IRC the results to the next Ubuntu-au mailing list20:15
Dexowould a minimal install be better for a server hosting computer?20:15
Octatronit would for sure, less to load up as long as your comfortable with command line20:16
Dexooh minimal is a terminal20:16
Dexonvm then20:16
Dexoif i wanted terminal i would just get ubuntu server20:16
Dexoi want the lightest possibal but still hvae gui :P20:17
OctatronThat's right, you could install webmin so at least you could administer stuff through a web browser on another machine but it won't do anything for minecraft i don't think20:17
Dexoyea what my one friend does (who uses ubuntu server) is ssh to the minecraft server's console and uses ftp to upload and edit the files20:18
Octatronwell lxde is good, but some lighter/ less polished ones are, fluxbox, openbox, icewm20:18
Dexoright now i host it from my current computer, win7 3gig ram ddr3. and its fine20:19
Dexomaybe ill; check out fluxbox20:19
Octatronthere's no menu button you just right click and it appears..20:20
Dexono. fluxbox is to crude lol20:20
Dexoi would be better off with a terminal20:20
Octatronyou tube em you'll see what they look like20:20
OctatronYes learn terminal and achieve a power greater than any Jedi!20:21
jmarsdenOctatron: webmin is officially no longer supported in Ubuntu or Debian.20:22
jmarsden!webmin20:22
ubot5webmin is no longer supported in Debian and Ubuntu. It is not compatible with the way that Ubuntu packages handle configuration files, and is likely to cause unexpected issues with your system.20:22
jmarsdenDexo: Yes, if you are going to run a production server, learn to use the shell.20:23
OctatronReally? dam.. that's a shame it was so pretty..20:23
Dexoill need to look up some terminal tutorials lol20:23
Dexoare all ubuntu terminals basically the same?20:24
Octatrongoogle cheat sheet should spit out something20:24
DexoLOL. im watching a tutorial on youtube and the guys terminal naem thingy the user@user-place is the same as mine is :P20:25
jmarsdenDexo: Don't confuse the terminal emulator with the shell that is running in it.  The various terminal emulators look a bit different, some have tabs for multiple sessions, some have transparency, etc etc.  All run the same bash shell and so the same set of commands...20:27
Dexoyea, i was just wondering if there was any difference between say, Mint and Ubuntu, or PCLinux20:27
jmarsdenThose are not terminals ... ?20:27
Dexoi no. there flavors20:28
bioterror!shell | Dexo20:28
ubot5Dexo: The linux terminal or command-line interface is very powerful. Open a terminal via Applications -> Accessories -> Terminal (Gnome), K-menu -> System -> Konsole (KDE), or Menu -> Accessories -> LXTerminal (LXDE). Guide: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UsingTheTerminal20:28
Dexoyea i no20:28
Octatronbascally type a letter or two in and hit tab a few times, when you see one you like type in "man commandfound"20:30
jmarsdenDexo: There are no significant differences between the set of commands you will need to learn to admin a server running any Debian or Ubuntu based Linux.  if you are new to servers, I'd suggest running Ubuntu server, because #ubuntu-server is a good place to get server-oriented support when you need it.20:31
Dexojmarsden, its a minecraft server. ive been running it for months i know how to use it. i jsut want a better computer to run it.20:32
Dexothe commands wont be changing.20:32
Dexo(unless there commands outside of the server)20:33
jmarsdenUm... I think you and I mean different things by the word "server" in the above conversation...20:33
Dexolol20:33
Dexoa minecraft server. im hosting a game server20:34
OctatronYou could just cheat and youtube it like this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ORJ69LGVYA http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rcEtjGIujt820:34
Dexolol or that :P20:34
OctatronIf you want to test your skills with Linux command line first, you could install Virtualbox on your windows 7 beast and put Ubuntu server within that and just play with it a bit20:36
Dexoi normally use ubuntu on my laptop as a virtual and mess with console in there20:37
Dexoi have 9.10 and just got 11.0420:37
Octatroncool that's the way to do it!20:37
Dexognome 3 is really nice compared to gnone 220:37
Dexounity is cool20:38
OctatronReally? I find them so restricting... can't move anything20:38
Dexoi agree, but if u like eye candy20:38
Dexoi would use 9.10 over 11.04. but 11.04 looks much better20:39
OctatronDude, take gnome2 and install compiz with awn and all the special effects with compizconfig settings manager and you'll find a whole lot more effects!20:40
Dexooooooooo. i might. but i mgiht need to bump up the virtual pc's ram20:40
OctatronLook at this, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VvfRpmqKRbs The dark side is more powerful!20:41
Dexois 10.04 much better than 9.10?20:42
Dexois it worth the update?20:42
Octatron10.04 is LTS so yes, its pretty stable I think20:44
Dexomaybe ill update. would i recommend updating or just a new install?20:45
jmarsden9.10 is already end of life, a couple of months back.  So yes, you need to use 10.04 :)20:46
Dexoend of life? not supported anymore20:47
jmarsdenUpgrade or fresh install is up to you, depends how much customization you have done on the 9.10 setup.20:47
OctatronIf you don't need to backup stuff do a fresh install, the upgrade distro's option are always a bit messy20:47
jmarsdenDexo: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases says it went EOL on April 20, 2011.20:47
jmarsdenApril 30, 2011 I mean :)20:48
jmarsdenIt's obsolete, anyway!  No longer supported, no more security updates, etc.20:49
Dexoill install 10.04 then20:49
OctatronThat's right, generally they try out all the new cool stuff between LTS releases which might be buggy and when you hit *.04 they attempt to make it as stable as possible with the longest amount of support20:51
Dexoi fi install that epic graphical effect thing u said. will 1 gig ram on a virtual handle it?20:52
Dexothe host has win7 with 4gig ddr2 ram20:52
bioterrorOctatron, awful video :D20:52
OctatronUm, Probably would struggle I'd say.. 2Gb might be ok but don't turn all of them on.20:53
Dexook.20:53
Dexoi can bump it up to 2 gig20:53
jmarsdenHowever, you don't really need or want any "epic graphical effects" on a *server* machine or server VM!  Run Ubuntu Server 10.04 and learn the commands needed to manage it.20:53
Dexoi know. he just showed me them and im gonna install them on my vitual for fun20:54
OctatronThat's the way, do the fun stuff otherwise you'll think Ubuntu is as about as exciting as accounting :P20:55
Dexoyep20:56
Dexoonce i get some extra money maybe ill get a ubuntu laptop20:56
jmarsdenI'd recommend two VMs: a server VM for running a server, and a desktop VM for "fun stuff", in that case.20:57
Dexowhy cant i just use the terminal on the desktop instead of installing ubuntu server20:58
OctatronYeah you could do that, it just chews more ram that's all20:58
jmarsdenBecause you won't, you'll fall back to GUi tools whenever you want to do something you don't yet know how to do from the shell... and because on an older PC running a PIII or whatever you don't want to waste RAM or CPU on a GUI...20:59
Dexoi see what ur saying20:59
phillwjmarsden: he could do as I did, 2 X 512MB VM's for lubuntu 11-04 and 11-10 (or in his case, stable & 'test'), with both running I'm not touching swap.20:59
Dexoand plus. once i install lubuntu onto my desktop. i can still use the gui21:00
jmarsden<Dexo> i would be better off with a terminal21:01
jmarsdenYou said it.  For a server on older hardware, I agree.  So my suggestion is to learn it that way...21:01
OctatronIt's not as hard as you think, you'll probably use about 20 or so common commands and google the rest when you need them21:03
phillwjmarsden: I'm sorta guessing, but could you just install Oracle VM onto the minimal iso and it also get the dependancies it needed?21:03
Dexolol21:03
jmarsdenphillw: I'm not sure... you could try it :)21:04
phillwwhen I get back home, I may give it a go :) Or, if it complains, it may be happy under lubuntu-core which is pretty stripped down...21:05
OctatronThink of it as a manual or reference, you don't have to know all the commands off the bat just the basics and them whatever bits minecraft needs21:05
jmarsdenDexo: A couple of talsk I have to my local Linux User Group might help you out, if the notes are usable for someone who didn't attend the talks... see http://crosswire.org/~jmarsden/talks/intro-to-the-linux-command-line/intro-to-the-linux-command-line.html and http://crosswire.org/~jmarsden/talks/managing-a-server-using-a-gui/managing-a-server-using-a-gui.html21:06
jmarsdens/talsk I have/talks I gave/21:06
OctatronDexo: here's some homework :P http://fosswire.com/post/2008/04/ubuntu-cheat-sheet/21:10
phillwjmarsden: did you get chance to look at the gnome-power-manager or my C&P issue within VM?21:11
OctatronDexo: And it's ugly cousin: http://fosswire.com/post/2007/08/unixlinux-command-cheat-sheet/21:12
* phillw although, for anyone new(ish) to the ubuntu family http://ubuntu-manual.org/download/10.04e2/en_US/screen is an excellent resource, written by the various guys on various teams :)21:18
phillwyou can even buy the book, if you prefer a hard back copy.21:18
OctatronWell Im off to bed night all!21:27
bioterrorsleep tight! ;)21:28
head_victimhttps://help.ubuntu.com/community/Lubuntu/Documentation/UpgradeToLubuntu21:34
head_victimDo you still need to add the PPA for this to work?21:34
phillwhead_victim: it would depend on the version of lubuntu you are switching to.21:36
phillw10.04 does, afaik, still need the ppa21:37
head_victimOk, do we know what version that became redundant? I'm just about to point someone to that link from my LUG so want to update it before I go posting it to the ML21:37
phillwnot needed for 11.0421:37
head_victimOk but 10.10 on you do or don't?21:37
bioterrornever used ppa with 10.121:37
bioterror10.1021:37
head_victimSweet so 10.04 or earlier use the ppa, 10.10 or later, no need to add the PPA.21:37
* head_victim logs in to change it now while I remember21:38
phillwhead_victim: again, as far as we know. Use that link and edit it accordingly (else I will, it is an easy edit :P )21:39
head_victimphillw: I'm just doing it simple and easy, if you can have a quick look I've just hit save21:40
phillwhead_victim: yeah, I'll just make one quick change. I do not thing any of those instructions apply to 9.10, which is out of support anyway.21:43
head_victimNo worries mate21:44
phillw10.04 and post 10.04 are the onlyones needed21:44
head_victimOn that note I might head to bed, 7am here and I haven't slept yet.21:44
phillwhead_victim: go get some Zzzz's :)21:46
head_victimSorry I haven't been around heaps, still watching from the ether and helping where I can.21:46
phillwhead_victim: each of us help where and when we can, all help is appreciated. Now..... GOT TO BED!!!!!!21:47
PhosphenesAre there any lubuntu forums or do we use the lxde forums?22:49
jmarsdenphillw: re cut and paste and gnome-power-manager: I got sidetracked (got another updated package into Debian instead)22:51
phillwjmarsden: when you start 11-10 Lubuntu a1, it eats one of your CPU's at 100%22:55
jmarsdenYes.  It still does :)  I just didn't notice until you pointed it out yesterday :)22:56
phillwPhosphenes: use the lubuntu tage on the main forum.22:56
phillw*tag*22:57
Phosphenesubuntuforums you mean?22:57
phillwPhosphenes: yup :)22:57
Phosphenescool, thanks22:57
phillwthat lets people know it is lubuntu and lets us hunt them down :D22:57
phillwjmarsden: from an earlier chat on here, is https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Lubuntu/Documentation/UpgradeToLubuntu now factually correct with the usage of ppa *only* for 10.04?22:59
jmarsdenphillw: I think so, but I wasn't around in the early days/years... I have no idea what Lubuntu 9.xx did at all, or if it even existed :)23:00
phillwjmarsden: there was a 9.10, but that pre-dates even me :)23:01
phillwhence 10.04, and post 10.04. The backporting to 10.04 is down to you and julien (well, and pcmanfm)23:02
jmarsdenOK.  I think the page is correct for 10.04 and later.23:04
phillwPhosphenes: if you are 'playing' with 11-10, can you use http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1774388 it is a rather futile attempt to try and herd cats, but the forum mods have said that they will kick the odd stray onto that thread. It is not JUST about the title :P23:06
PhosphenesI'm still on 11.04 but I'll check it out23:07
phillwjmarsden: I got the shock of my life... I allowed 9.10 Ubuntu to update to the last kernel release, and blow me down with a feather, it recognised my 3G device. There is hope yet :)23:11
jmarsdenAha!  Last as in last that was provided for 9.10, or last as in most recent Ubuntu kernel in existence??23:12
phillwI'll pop 11.04 lubuntu onto a hard disk area and see how it gets on23:12
phillwI think last of the 9.10....  Linux piglet 2.6.31-23-generic-pae #75-Ubuntu SMP Fri Mar 18 19:14:10 UTC 2011 i686 GNU/Linux23:12
jmarsdenOK.  Hmmm... you are running with a -pae kernel?  You shouldn't need that unless you have more than 4GB RAM, I think?23:13
phillwthe 11-10 VM is on Linux piglet 2.6.31-23-generic-pae #75-Ubuntu SMP Fri Mar 18 19:14:10 UTC 2011 i686 GNU/Linux23:14
jmarsdenHmmm, my 11.04 VM runs 2.6.38-8-generic23:14
phillwI was told it was 3.2GB of Ram, but I am on 4GB of RAM, so switched to the PAE23:14
jmarsdenNote, no -pae :)23:14
jmarsdenAh, OK... that sort of makes sense.23:15
phillwahh, C&P failed... again.....23:15
jmarsdenEverything I touch that has 4GB or more is running 64bit anyway...23:15
phillw11-10 VM is on 3.0-123:16
phillw2.6.38-8 on 11-04 VM23:17
phillwjmarsden: you'd be better placed to tell me, should I change to 64 ONLY, or use PAE in order to test out compatibility with older kit on 32 bit only? I'm not a performance freak, so a slight reduction in speed is not an issue for me.23:20
jmarsdenVery few people use -pae, in my experience.  I'd switch the host OS to 64bit and then run 32bit or 64bit VMs as desired within it.23:20
jmarsdenOlder kit generally doesn't have > 3.2GB and so does not need PAE.23:21
phillwjmarsden: well, add the Canonical build of lubuntu 64 bit to your list :P (Yes, I know you already have ;) )23:21
phillwolder kit generally does not have a hidden 500GB drive in it either :D23:22
jmarsdenOh you bet, as soon as we have one, I'll have Lubuntu 11.10 amd64 in a (64bit) VM.  It's getting closer, little by little... lubuntu is now recognized by tasksel, for instance...23:23
phillwI guess at some point I'm going to want to see how far ubuntu have gotten with HDMI, as it appears this new piglet has one of those as a vid output23:23
kosaidpohello guys23:30
kosaidpoi cant find mysql workbench23:30
kosaidpon when i dl the deb it says i dont have some dep's :P23:30
kosaidpoeven the lib vesion i have its newer then wht it requires23:31
jmarsdenWhere and are you getting the .deb file ?23:31
kosaidpofrom mysql site jmarsden23:31
jmarsdenDo they provide the *source* debian package for it?  So you can rebuild it?23:31
kosaidpoyeh i saw that too i guess23:32
kosaidpohang on jmarsden23:32
jmarsdenThen d/l the source package and rebuild it, it should then need your versions of the libraries not whatever was on the machine they used to build that .deb with :)23:32
kosaidpojmarsden: okies im jst not used to the rebuilt idea tho :p23:35
jmarsdenI can probably walk you through that...23:36
kosaidpojmarsden: tnx well lets me try this deb first okies23:36
kosaidpo:D23:37
kosaidpojmarsden: its gettin installed :D23:38
jmarsdenOK.23:39
kosaidpojmarsden: thnaks23:39

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!