| shadeslayer | what happened to my sound | 00:00 |
|---|---|---|
| CIA-52 | [ksnapshot] Harald Sitter <apachelogger@ubuntu.com> * apachelogger@ubuntu.com-20110626230033-8y13dp5p7abix6gk * debian/changelog Repacked tarball to include COPYING files | 00:00 |
| shadeslayer | i'll bbl | 00:01 |
| * yofel looks up how CIA-52 was set up | 00:04 | |
| CIA-52 | [ubuntu] Philip Muškovac * 3 * debian/changelog use repacked tar to include COPYING files | 00:12 |
| yofel | hm, branch.nick is fairly unhelpful is the branch is called ubuntu on LP | 00:12 |
| yofel | s/is/if/ | 00:13 |
| kubotu | yofel meant: "hm, branch.nick if fairly unhelpful is the branch is called ubuntu on LP" | 00:13 |
| yofel | sed fail | 00:13 |
| yofel | ouch, forgot docs/ in the copyright | 00:14 |
| ScottK | apachelogger's new branch location proposal would also fix that. | 00:17 |
| ScottK | (... unhelpful ...) | 00:17 |
| apachelogger | righto | 00:17 |
| yofel | true ^^ | 00:17 |
| apachelogger | I shall write a scripty tomorrow | 00:17 |
| CIA-52 | [ubuntu] Philip Muškovac * 4 * debian/copyright include documentation licensing in copyright | 00:21 |
| shadeslayer | ok so continuing | 01:12 |
| yofel | smokekde doesn't build. fun... | 01:12 |
| shadeslayer | hahaaha ... i just saw ScottK's reply on collibri notifications :D | 01:15 |
| yofel | lol | 01:16 |
| shadeslayer | hmmm | 01:30 |
| shadeslayer | how does one deal with multiple copyrights in kate | 01:30 |
| shadeslayer | we have GPL/LGPL/LGPL-2+ | 01:31 |
| shadeslayer | apachelogger: do i put all of these licenses in the repo? | 01:31 |
| yofel | GPL would be COPYING, LGPL COPYING.LIB, not sure about muliple LGPL versions... | 01:35 |
| shadeslayer | well overall its GPL | 01:40 |
| shadeslayer | but it has 57 files under LGPL, 81 under GPL-2+ | 01:41 |
| shadeslayer | apachelogger: yofel trolololol http://paste.kde.org/88465 | 01:53 |
| shadeslayer | the networks are trolling me | 01:53 |
| yofel | nice loop | 01:54 |
| shadeslayer | yep | 01:54 |
| shadeslayer | yofel: my git commits are now routed via your server as well :P | 01:54 |
| yofel | as long as it works... | 01:54 |
| shadeslayer | heh " Arrgh! Debian shall play their narrow-minded legal games without me. | 01:59 |
| shadeslayer | Konsole is gone to Artistic Licence." | 01:59 |
| shadeslayer | yofel: did you see that? :P | 01:59 |
| shadeslayer | someone removed COPYING and COPYING.lib earluer | 02:00 |
| shadeslayer | *earlier | 02:00 |
| shadeslayer | and you just put them back again ^_^ | 02:00 |
| yofel | where? I didn't see anything in the git log | 02:01 |
| shadeslayer | https://projects.kde.org/projects/kde/kdebase/konsole/repository/revisions/1d58923033311b53a16102e83ef6891b224bfc39 | 02:01 |
| yofel | well, I'll blame someone then that LICENSE.readme is missing :P | 02:02 |
| shadeslayer | hahah :P | 02:02 |
| yofel | and I obviously didn't check the log THAT far back =Þ | 02:04 |
| shadeslayer | git log --grep to the rescue :P | 02:05 |
| shadeslayer | well, i'm not commiting anything till we sort this out with apachelogger | 02:07 |
| yofel | ack | 02:08 |
| rbelem | Quintasan_, yup... kubuntu_05_samba_sharing.diff is upstream :-) | 03:13 |
| yofel | morning | 06:34 |
| yofel | gah, used up this months mobile bandwidth. 60kbps is too slow... | 06:47 |
| yofel | yay, libkdcraw doesn't have copying.lib either... | 07:26 |
| yofel | at least here it's just one version of the LGPL | 07:27 |
| apachelogger | wut? | 07:35 |
| apachelogger | hm | 07:35 |
| apachelogger | yofel: what was shadeslayer's commit-blocking-problem earlier? | 07:35 |
| yofel | as I understood it he (and me) didn't know whether to put multiple versions of the LGPL into the package | 07:37 |
| yofel | like lgpl-2, 2.1, ... | 07:37 |
| apachelogger | like it matters | 07:44 |
| apachelogger | besides, that depends on whether they are + or not | 07:44 |
| apachelogger | if so then you obviously can just drop the newest explicitly mentioned version | 07:44 |
| apachelogger | if not then you could name them COPYING.LGPL2 COPYING.LGPL21 etc. | 07:45 |
| apachelogger | or you just concat them together into COPYING.LIB (which is of course less) | 07:45 |
| apachelogger | anyhow | 07:45 |
| apachelogger | exam | 07:45 |
| apachelogger | cya | 07:45 |
| yofel | viel erfolg | 07:46 |
| === SolidLiq is now known as solid_liq | ||
| NCommander | ScottK: yay for added bonuses | 08:58 |
| bambee | morning | 09:11 |
| yofel | great, yet another gimp crash in #kubuntu | 09:12 |
| yofel | anyone remember what the problem was? | 09:12 |
| bambee | "kdebase-runtime but it is not going to be installed" (on launchpad) wtf ? o_O | 09:16 |
| bambee | (missing deps) | 09:16 |
| bambee | aaahh!! it's kde-runtime now o_O | 09:16 |
| bambee | epic fail xD | 09:17 |
| yofel | ^^ | 09:17 |
| yofel | (found the bug for gimp btw.) | 09:18 |
| agateau | apachelogger: am I missing licenses? | 09:41 |
| * agateau sucks at licensing | 09:41 | |
| tsimpson | don't feel bad, everyone sucks at licensing | 09:42 |
| yofel | well, you can't do worse than smoke, so don't feel bad ^^ | 09:43 |
| yofel | wtf | 10:19 |
| yofel | what kind of version bump is libkdcraw.so.9.0.0 -> libkdcraw.so.20.0.0 | 10:22 |
| yofel | they're not following their own docs | 10:23 |
| yofel | # 1.3.0 => 10.0.0 (Released with KDE 4.7.0) | 10:23 |
| yofel | # 2.0.0 => 20.0.0 (Included into digiKam 2.0.0 collection) | 10:23 |
| yofel | bbl | 10:36 |
| bulldog98 | yofel: maybe the tarball contains the wrong sources? | 10:37 |
| apachelogger | agateau: your docs as commented a line that goes like FDLLicense or something like that | 10:37 |
| apachelogger | hence the docs have no defined license | 10:37 |
| agateau | apachelogger: I take it this is a bad situation | 10:37 |
| apachelogger | well, not unless no one notices ^^ | 10:37 |
| agateau | apachelogger: I kind of remember changing it a long time ago, back when Debian said they would not ship FDL-licensed doc | 10:38 |
| apachelogger | yes, but that is not particularly a solution | 10:38 |
| agateau | apachelogger: I think the idea back then was that it would make the doc GPL-licensed, as it was part of Gwenview | 10:38 |
| apachelogger | agateau: only implicit, if so you need to state this in the docs IMHO | 10:38 |
| apachelogger | otherwise it is to be considered not free software at all, as it is not clear that it is covered by the GPL | 10:39 |
| * agateau looks at the code | 10:40 | |
| agateau | apachelogger: is Gwenview documentation already packaged? | 10:49 |
| jussi | apachelogger: Harald... you here? | 11:03 |
| apachelogger | jussi: always | 11:18 |
| apachelogger | agateau: it is part of your git repo ;) | 11:18 |
| apachelogger | which makes it part of the tar, and the tar is primarily concenred with licensing | 11:19 |
| agateau | apachelogger: I know about that :), I was referring to a Debian package :) | 11:19 |
| apachelogger | well, dunno, if you install it then it is packaged ^^ | 11:19 |
| agateau | apachelogger: master CMakeLists.txt says it is installed, but that may be a new situation | 11:20 |
| agateau | apachelogger: mmm KDE/4.6 branch says it is installed as well, but I don't see the doc in Gwenview package | 11:21 |
| apachelogger | in 4.6 it might be stripped into kdegraphics-doc | 11:22 |
| jussi | apachelogger: can you share your image? | 11:28 |
| apachelogger | nakkid pictures? | 11:29 |
| jussi | apachelogger: no... | 11:29 |
| jussi | :D | 11:29 |
| apachelogger | you gotta be more precise | 11:29 |
| jussi | I mean for the mx53 | 11:29 |
| apachelogger | jussi: the linaro one? | 11:46 |
| jussi | apachelogger: yep | 11:46 |
| apachelogger | not before friday | 11:46 |
| jussi | :( | 11:46 |
| apachelogger | my QSB is like 100km away from me | 11:46 |
| jussi | oh | 11:46 |
| apachelogger | jussi: just follow the guide on the wiki | 11:46 |
| jussi | the guide is somewhat unclear | 11:46 |
| apachelogger | how is that? | 11:47 |
| apachelogger | s/how/why/ | 11:47 |
| kubotu | apachelogger meant: "why is that?" | 11:47 |
| jussi | to start with, linaro-media-create doesnt seem to be in my repos... | 11:48 |
| jussi | do I need some ppa? | 11:48 |
| jussi | or is it only a 32 bit thing? | 11:49 |
| apachelogger | 64bit ought to work too | 11:50 |
| apachelogger | ah | 11:51 |
| apachelogger | jussi: linaro-image-tools | 11:51 |
| jussi | well that would help :) | 11:51 |
| * jussi fixes the wiki | 11:52 | |
| yofel | someone should fix gstreamer0.10-qapt | 12:04 |
| yofel | Setting up gstreamer0.10-qapt (1.1.85-0ubuntu1) ... | 12:04 |
| yofel | update-alternatives: <link> and <path> can't be the same | 12:04 |
| yofel | </snip> | 12:04 |
| yofel | JontheEchidna: ^ | 12:04 |
| jussi | apachelogger: Am I missing something, or is this ok? http://paste.ubuntu.com/633570/ | 12:09 |
| jussi | nvm, looks like I need python-testtools | 12:10 |
| ulysses | JontheEchidna: the title is wrong here: https://projects.kde.org/news/65 | 12:17 |
| jussi | bah, still getting the following 2 errors, if anyone knows what Im missing: | 12:18 |
| jussi | ERROR: Python module hardwarepack_format not found | 12:18 |
| jussi | ERROR: Python module FetchImage not found | 12:18 |
| jussi | apachelogger: :( | 12:26 |
| apachelogger | oh my | 12:26 |
| apachelogger | jussi: I do not even have no such files | 12:27 |
| jussi | apachelogger: this is rather annoying. | 12:37 |
| jussi | and weird | 12:37 |
| apachelogger | indeedly | 12:38 |
| apachelogger | also I am busy rightnows | 12:38 |
| jussi | ok | 12:38 |
| bambee | I've a question: why kdebase-runtime is not found from kubuntu-ninjas ? it's not into the ppa I agree, but it should be found into the main repositories... | 13:12 |
| bambee | (I need to change the dependency to kde-runtime, I know, however kdebase-runtime should be found anyway..) | 13:13 |
| ScottK | Do you require a minimum version that's not available as kdebase-runtime? | 13:29 |
| bambee | ScottK: see the build failure for kdebase-workspace (into the ppa), it depends on python-kde4 which depends on kdebase-runtime AND kdepim-runtime => both are not found | 13:31 |
| ScottK | bambee: You're misreading the build log. | 13:34 |
| ScottK | python-kde4 : Depends: kdebase-runtime but it is not going to be installed | 13:34 |
| ScottK | Depends: kdepim-runtime but it is not going to be installed | 13:34 |
| ScottK | That doesn't mean it couldn't find them, but that they aren't installable. | 13:34 |
| bambee | why are they not installable? I mean, launchpad does not use main repositories? | 13:36 |
| bambee | well, I've probably misunderstood something... :\ | 13:49 |
| shadeslayer | yofel: networks fixed :D | 14:19 |
| ScottK | bambee: There isn't enough information in the build log to know why it's uninstallable. | 14:22 |
| ScottK | bambee: I'm sure it does use the main repositories. The best way to find out why is to add the ninjas ppa to a chroot or VM and try to install it. | 14:22 |
| bambee | ScottK: I will try | 14:24 |
| bambee | thanks | 14:24 |
| ScottK | Great. | 14:24 |
| === mgraesslin_ is now known as mgraesslin | ||
| yofel | shadeslayer: yay :) | 16:46 |
| shadeslayer | apachelogger: could you ping me when you're free, this is regarding the license of kate in the git repos | 17:25 |
| yofel | shadeslayer: read backlog | 17:26 |
| yofel | from ~10h ago | 17:26 |
| shadeslayer | yofel: alright, you guys already discussed this? | 17:26 |
| yofel | well, somewhat | 17:27 |
| shadeslayer | ah hmm .... | 17:28 |
| shadeslayer | well the solution seems to be COPYING.LGPL2 , COPYING.LGPL2.1, COPYING.GPL | 17:28 |
| * shadeslayer adds | 17:28 | |
| yofel | I'm wondering if you need to fix the source comments though | 17:29 |
| shadeslayer | source comments? | 17:29 |
| yofel | if they say see COPYING.LIB and you add COPYING.LGPL2 I don't think we won much | 17:29 |
| yofel | well, you do ship a copy though | 17:30 |
| shadeslayer | there's no COPYING.LIB | 17:30 |
| shadeslayer | not in kate anyways | 17:30 |
| yofel | what I mean is that the sources have: | 17:31 |
| yofel | You should have received a copy of the GNU Library General Public License | 17:31 |
| yofel | along with this library; see the file COPYING.LIB. | 17:31 |
| yofel | in the header | 17:31 |
| yofel | heh, there's a kate/COPYING.LIB | 17:33 |
| shadeslayer | i don't see it anywhere ^_^ | 17:37 |
| shadeslayer | ah under kate/ | 17:38 |
| shadeslayer | katepart has the required COPYING.LIB too | 17:40 |
| yofel | this is chaos | 17:40 |
| shadeslayer | yeah | 17:40 |
| shadeslayer | should we send a email to KDE Devel? | 17:40 |
| shadeslayer | bambee: i know your FTBFS issue i think | 17:45 |
| shadeslayer | bambee: is your packaging pushed somewhere? | 17:45 |
| shadeslayer | python-kde4 : Depends: kdebase-runtime but it is not going to be installed | 17:45 |
| shadeslayer | Depends: kdepim-runtime but it is not going to be installed | 17:45 |
| shadeslayer | there's no kdebase-runtime anymore | 17:46 |
| yofel | we already concluded that :P | 17:46 |
| shadeslayer | heh :D | 17:46 |
| shadeslayer | did you fix it? :P | 17:46 |
| yofel | don't think so, he was looking at what actually pulled them in I think | 17:47 |
| bambee | shadeslayer: not yet | 17:47 |
| yofel | if workspace really build-deps on python-kde4 we need to figure smokekde out | 17:47 |
| bambee | shadeslayer: you can get back the source from the ppa, i think... | 17:48 |
| yofel | sure, apt-get source will fetch it | 17:48 |
| bambee | I could also be wrong, as I said I've probably misunderstood something... | 17:50 |
| bambee | python-kde4 is required by plasma-scriptengines, but it's a runtime dependency in this case... | 17:56 |
| bambee | shadeslayer: kdebase-runtime is not into the ppa I agree, however it should be found into the main repository used by launchpad :) | 18:00 |
| bambee | and as ScottK said, they are not installable, the message is not really well explained... the problem can be a conflict or another thing... | 18:02 |
| yofel | bambee: yeah, but plasma-scriptengine-javascript comes from kde-runtime | 18:06 |
| yofel | is at version 4:4.6.90 | 18:07 |
| yofel | and kdebase-runtime depends on plasma-scriptengine-javascript = 4:4.6.3-ubuntu3 | 18:07 |
| yofel | if you force version 4:4.6.3-ubuntu3 for plasma-scriptengine-javascript then it works | 18:08 |
| yofel | but that's not default apt-get behaviour | 18:08 |
| bambee | I am talking about plasma-scriptengines-python | 18:08 |
| yofel | nor aptitude | 18:08 |
| yofel | hm, aptitude complains about -javascript though | 18:09 |
| yofel | probably the same reason | 18:09 |
| yofel | the solution is obviously to use kde-runtime | 18:09 |
| yofel | and to fix kdepim-runtime | 18:09 |
| === ximion1 is now known as ximion | ||
| yofel | did we reach a consensus about the packaging branches btw.? | 18:44 |
| yofel | it would good to know that before I create more projects... | 18:44 |
| yofel | *would be | 18:44 |
| * ScottK looks at apachelogger as holder of the consensus cookie. | 19:04 | |
| yofel | heh, need to debug byobu anyway, locks up all the time in O :( | 19:06 |
| yofel | now... why the hell does smokekde build against neon but the package fails to build... | 19:30 |
| === ximion1 is now known as ximion | ||
| === Linkmaster_ is now known as Linkmaster | ||
| === tazz_ is now known as tazz | ||
| bambee | why the hell kdebase-workspace builds JUST FINE with pbuilder ? (using an oneiric chroot with kubuntu-ninjas-ppa) | 19:47 |
| yofel | pbuilder uses aptitude to install dependencies, launchpad sbuild, and sbuild has some oddities | 19:48 |
| bambee | aaah... | 19:48 |
| yofel | at least I think it uses sbuild | 19:49 |
| bambee | yofel: in your opinion the solution is to use kde-runtime, but python-kde4 will depend on kdebase-runtime anyway (it's a runtime dependency)... | 19:55 |
| yofel | right, fix python-kde4 and kdepim-runtime | 19:56 |
| yofel | on the todo list anyway | 19:56 |
| bambee | however if the last python-kde4 is upload, it should depend on kde-runtime (using the new symbol files) | 19:56 |
| bambee | yofel: ok | 19:56 |
| yofel | python-kde4 is stuck on me getting smokekde to build though :S | 19:57 |
| yofel | and I don't get what the problem is... | 19:57 |
| * yofel tries again | 19:57 | |
| yofel | and I still haven't found the libkdcraw devs... | 19:59 |
| yofel | /usr/include/kjob.h: In member function 'void __smokekdecore::x_KJob::x_30(Smoke::Stack)': | 20:00 |
| yofel | /usr/include/kjob.h:356:10: error: 'void KJob::finished(KJob*)' is private | 20:00 |
| yofel | sure, but why doesn't this fail if I build against neon??? kjob.h is exactly the same | 20:01 |
| === neversfelde__ is now known as neversfelde | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| yofel | bambee: on an additional note: why is your package named kdebase-workspace? ^ | 21:50 |
| yofel | ^^ | 21:50 |
| bambee | do you mean that it should be named kde-workspace? | 21:51 |
| bambee | ^^ | 21:51 |
| yofel | it should | 21:51 |
| yofel | there is no kdebase anymore | 21:51 |
| bambee | okay | 21:51 |
| bambee | noted | 21:51 |
| yofel | we'll stick to the upstream naming, or we'll have to rename it every time | 21:53 |
| yofel | no point in doing that | 21:53 |
| shadeslayer | apachelogger: uh .. i think i'm starting to see things http://i.imgur.com/QlcUc.png | 22:00 |
| === ximion is now known as ximion1 | ||
| CIA-52 | [lp:~kubuntu-packagers/smokekde/ubuntu] Philip Muškovac * 1 * (37 files in 4 dirs) add initial packaging for smokekde | 22:26 |
| yofel | can someone try to build that? I'm out of ideas... | 22:26 |
| shadeslayer | yofel: i can try a test build, hold on | 22:40 |
| yofel | the 'private:' statement in kjob is wrapped in | 22:42 |
| yofel | #if !defined(Q_MOC_RUN) && !defined(DOXYGEN_SHOULD_SKIP_THIS) && !defined(IN_IDE_PARSER) | 22:42 |
| yofel | so I guess in a local build something of that is defined, but I don't get why it breaks in pbuilder | 22:42 |
| ScottK | Missing build-dep? | 23:14 |
| yofel | could be, but if yet I don't get what | 23:15 |
| yofel | s/yet/yes/ | 23:15 |
| kubotu | yofel meant: "could be, but if yes I don't get what" | 23:15 |
| shadeslayer | you won't like what i did, but atleast its building at 11 % right now | 23:29 |
| shadeslayer | @_@ /usr/include/kselectionproxymodel.h:271:10: error: 'void KSelectionProxyModel::rootIndexAboutToBeRemoved(const QModelIndex&)' is private | 23:31 |
| yofel | yep, if you manually comment kjob.h stuff out you'll get that ^^ | 23:41 |
| shadeslayer | hehe | 23:43 |
| shadeslayer | yofel: it looks like you're missing deps | 23:44 |
| shadeslayer | can't quite figure out which ones | 23:44 |
| yofel | good to know we're at the same point now... | 23:44 |
| shadeslayer | or the macro's are foobared | 23:44 |
| yofel | no idea, there's no diff between neon smokekde and 4.6.90, but neonbuild runs fine, while 4.6.90 fails | 23:46 |
| yofel | except the build-deps | 23:46 |
| yofel | not the amount, but neon/4.6.90 | 23:46 |
| shadeslayer | also, i might have found the solution to our neon dbus issue | 23:46 |
| yofel | oh, really? | 23:46 |
| shadeslayer | yeah | 23:46 |
| * yofel checks smokeqt buildlog... | 23:47 | |
| shadeslayer | i'm testing and will let you know if it work | 23:47 |
| shadeslayer | s/work/works/ | 23:47 |
| kubotu | shadeslayer meant: "i'm testing and will let you know if it works" | 23:47 |
| shadeslayer | dbus uses something called session-local.conf to add custom locations | 23:49 |
| shadeslayer | so we just install that in .project-neon-kde/ and it *should* work | 23:49 |
| yofel | erm, in ~/.project-neon-kde/ ? | 23:50 |
| yofel | well, we can copy that in the session script | 23:51 |
| shadeslayer | yofel: http://paste.kde.org/89089/ < here's what the config file will look like | 23:53 |
| yofel | if you say so ^^ | 23:53 |
| * yofel just realized we're 2 days away from 4.6.5 tagging | 23:55 | |
| yofel | someone invent cloning | 23:55 |
| shadeslayer | alright | 23:56 |
| shadeslayer | yofel: we need to put that file as session-local.conf in /etc/dbus-1 | 23:56 |
| yofel | *that* is a problem | 23:56 |
| shadeslayer | but that might interfere with the normal session | 23:56 |
| shadeslayer | hmm | 23:56 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!
