[05:08] <eruditehermit> hi
[05:08] <eruditehermit> is there a ppa for natty upstream linux kernels?
[05:18] <dtchen> eruditehermit: meaning kernels specifically with natty's kernel config, or...?
[05:21] <eruditehermit> dtchen, like kernel 3.0 rc5 that works with stuff in natty like module-init-tools etc
[05:22] <eruditehermit> dtchen, m-i-t and gcc might have changed in oneiric and so their kernels don't work with natty
[05:27] <dtchen> eruditehermit: well, the mainline ones work fine in natty
[05:27] <dtchen> (in fact, that's my biggest headache currently: the versioning of oneiric's kernels now don't allow some external modules to compile)
[05:41] <eruditehermit> dtchen, they won't install because module-init-tools in natty is too old
[06:52] <weidong> Hello, This is weidong zhou from Shanghai, China
[06:53] <weidong> I am new to ubuntu netbook distribution
[06:54] <weidong> and right now I am working on a ubuntu porting project for beaglebaord-xm ubuntu natty 11.04
[06:55] <weidong> we use a 7" 800x480 resolution TFT LCD for beagle board in this project so we have to revise the linux kernel DSS drivers to support it
[06:57] <weidong> my question is how can I get the specific linux kernel source for beagleboard natty 11.04?
[06:58] <weidong> I can only find the pre-built images on your distribution site.
[06:58] <weidong> but I can not find any links for source code
[06:59] <weidong> Any one can help?
[08:21] <Slayerman> Hello
[08:22] <Slayerman> I would like to know if there is a fix/patch for lucid for this bug : XHCI (USB 3.0) kernel Module Prevents Suspend (Bug #522998) ? Thx
[08:22] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 522998 in linux "XHCI (USB 3.0) kernel Module Prevents Suspend" [Medium,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/522998
[08:27] <Slayerman> Yes, I already am on this page, but it's said "Won't Fix" for lucid! Is there a way to get usb3 suspend working on lucid ?
[08:28] <tjaalton> Slayerman: comment #50 should explain why that is
[08:53] <Slayerman> So I need to have kernel 2.6.37 in order to get usb3 suspend working ? but is there linux-image-2.6.37 for lucid ?
[08:56] <tjaalton> Slayerman: there probably is the natty kernel for lucid, which is based on .38.y
[08:57] <Slayerman> I just need to add ppa repo and then sudo apt-get install linux-headers-generic-lts-backport-natty linux-image-generic-lts-backport-natty ?
[08:58] <tjaalton> yeah, looks like it's not in the lucid repo yet
[08:58] <tjaalton> like the maverick kernel is
[09:00] <Slayerman> wich repo I need to use ?
[09:00] <Tommeh> Slayerman: is it not in the backports repo at all?
[09:03] <Slayerman> I don't know, I found this howto get 2.6.37 on lucid : http://ubuntuguide.net/install-latest-kernel-2-6-37-2-6-38-in-ubuntu-10-04-from-ppa is it the right way to do it ?
[09:16] <tjaalton> Slayerman: https://launchpad.net/~kernel-ppa/+archive/ppa?field.series_filter=lucid
[09:30] <Slayerman> Thank you very much !
[11:07] <ogasawara> bryceh: if you have a free moment, can you swing by the kernel room?
[11:12] <RAOF> ogasawara: Bryce isn't actually here; would I do?
[11:13] <ogasawara> RAOF: shoot, that's right.  Yes, if you're free that'd be great.
[11:14] <ogasawara> RAOF: just want to quickly chat about graphics bug workflow with respect to the kernel
[11:14] <RAOF> K.  I'll fire off a mesa build and wander down.
[11:15] <ogasawara> RAOF: cool, thanks
[13:51] <smoser> http://paste.ubuntu.com/634266/
[16:29] <lamont> herton: did you see my update on bug 791512?
[16:29] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 791512 in linux "tcp connections hang in forwarding machine" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/791512
[16:31] <herton> lamont: yes, can you test the new kernel I posted there? tgardner suggested another change, so we can confirm it's not related to af_unix at all
[16:31] <lamont> sure
[17:13] <manjo> pgraner, if you are not terribly busy can I come bug you for 15 20 mts ? 
[17:34] <cjwatson> jcrigby,lool: do you know what happened to most of the linux-linaro-{mx51,vexpress} udebs?  it looks like the kernel suddenly became a lot less modular or something - was that deliberate?  (I'm reviewing stuff in NEW)
[17:36] <jcrigby> cjwatson, for the new cycle we radically reduced the number of enabled CONFIG_* to start with
[17:37] <jcrigby> cjwatson, as time goes on we will see what stuff we really want to turn on
[17:38] <cjwatson> I'm just wondering whether d-i will actually build with that few udebs
[17:38] <cjwatson> vexpress in particular just has kernel-image ...
[17:38] <cjwatson> http://paste.ubuntu.com/634416/
[17:39] <jcrigby> cjwatson, good question, we have yet to actually build an image with these new stripped kernels
[17:39] <cjwatson> compare with http://paste.ubuntu.com/634417/
[17:40] <cjwatson> but if it's intentional, I can accept them as long as you guys commit to fixing the d-i build failures
[17:40] <jcrigby> we will fix them
[17:41] <jcrigby> we just wanted to start minimal and build up and begining of new cycle was good time to break things
[18:05] <lool> cjwatson: In my memory, all udebs are marked as "?" (optional) in d-i; which most should be because in Ubuntu we often build things in the kernel which Debian would build as modules
[18:05] <lool> cjwatson: In any case, I'm happy to look after d-i build failures
[18:38] <cjwatson> jcrigby,lool: ok, thanks
[20:52] <eruditehermit> hey, is there a ppa for mainline kernels on natty?
[20:52] <eruditehermit> the oneiric kernels require an upgraded module-init-tools from the version in natty