[05:48] <micahg> ScottK: are you around to reject an SRU from the queue?
[05:54]  * micahg hugs whoever did that :)
[06:01] <ScottK> micahg: Sure.  What is it?
[06:07]  * Rhonda hugs micahg. Just because.
[06:29] <micahg> ScottK: hmm, someone seems to have already taken care of it, thanks
[06:29] <ScottK> You're welcome.  It was tough, but I managed.
[06:29] <micahg> :)
[06:31]  * micahg hugs Rhonda 
[06:35] <Rhonda> Who is coming to debconf, btw?
[06:39] <Rhonda> Oh, I need to renew my membership
[06:40] <Rhonda> Oh, that's a single click, I thought it would require attending another irc session. nice :)
[06:42] <StevenK> Rhonda: It does if you wait too long. :-)
=== aalex is now known as aalex-home
=== hannesw_ is now known as hannesw
=== hggdh_ is now known as hggdh
[12:10] <hrw> hi
[12:11] <hrw> is it normal that launchpad is unable to set 'fix released' for debian tracked bugs?
[12:11] <hrw> bug 739151 is fixed in ubuntu (fix released status) and in debian (fix commited status)
[12:11] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 739151 in dpkg-cross (Debian) "dpkg-cross does not do sensible things with multi-arch: same packages" [Unknown,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/739151
[12:11] <tumbleweed> I haven't seen launchpad follow debian bts changes recentely
[12:13] <persia> Did something change to break it?
[12:14] <hrw> my bug got closed in debian on 11 May 2011 so thats why I wondered
[12:14] <hrw> will ask on #launchpad
[12:15] <persia> That's a lot of latency
[12:15] <hrw> LP team has a high priority bug to fix it
[12:22]  * Rhonda reported Debian BTS tracking issues in #launchpad before and got the impression that it's not really of interest.
[12:28] <lifeless> Rhonda: it is of interest; there are very few people familiar with it
[12:28] <lifeless> Rhonda: and tbh its a bit of a pain to sync with
[12:31] <Rhonda> Doesn't the soap interface offer what is wanted/needed?
[12:31] <Rhonda> I think there is even an rsync-able area with the raw data.
[12:33] <lifeless> Rhonda: the raw data is split into a 'live' and 'archive' data set
[12:34] <lifeless> Rhonda: AIUI this causes us some headaches tracking things
[14:42] <hrw> ok. eglibc for lucid rebuild started
[14:42] <hrw> hope that SRU process does not takes ages
[15:09] <ScottK> It's eglibc. What could go wrong?
[15:21] <Rhonda> hmm. I wonder whether I should drop the idea of applying for PPU rights.
[15:21] <geser> Rhonda: why?
[15:22] <Rhonda> Because it looks like noone is interested in endorsing (?) me.
[15:23]  * Rhonda . o O ( https://wiki.ubuntu.com/GerfriedFuchs/DeveloperApplication FWIW )
[15:24] <Laney> i'll add one, but then it might mean i should abstain from voting ;-)
[15:26] <geser> Laney: hopefully not the complete DMB add endorsements else we have a problem
[15:27] <Laney> pass it up to the TB...
[15:29] <Laney> well, I can't actually log into the wiki
[15:32] <lucidfox> I thought Rhonda was a MOTU already?
[15:33] <Laney> this is for PPU
[15:34] <sladen> Rhonda: 2 months with no sponsors. Crikey
[15:35] <Laney> I would have done if I'd paid more attention :(
[15:37] <Rhonda> sladen: I wasn't very pushy about it, to be honest.
[15:37] <Rhonda> Maybe I should blog about it and trigger some readers from planet.ubuntu. ;)
[15:38] <Rhonda> lucidfox: MOTU is fine, but there are three packages that I maintain in Debian that are in Ubuntu main - and thus MOTU doesn't help here. :)
[15:38] <lucidfox> ahhh, I see
[15:45] <sladen> Rhonda: I would be _more_ pushy about it
[15:55] <Rhonda> sladen: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/GerfriedFuchs/DeveloperApplication now, hush hush!
[15:55] <sladen> Rhonda: 'ts already.  I'll send you the bill later
[15:55] <sladen> Rhonda: 'ts alright.  I'll send you the bill later
[16:00] <Rhonda> ;)
[17:54] <ScottK> Rhonda: Did I sponsor any uploads for you?
[19:25] <psusi> soren: it seems that netcat-openbsd immediately shuts down the socket and exits when it encounters eof on stdin when you pipe the output of echo to it.  Is this a bug, or intended behavior?
[19:30] <psusi> soren: I would think it should wait for the remote side to shutdown the socket before close()ing it and exit()int
[19:42] <Rhonda> ScottK: irssi :)
[19:45] <shockrates> hey
[19:46] <shockrates> can someone please add those 2 deb packages (pcsxr_1.9.92-1_i386.deb and pcsxr_1.9.92-1_amd64.deb) in ubuntu repository? http://pcsxr.codeplex.com/releases/view/50048
[19:46] <shockrates> it has been tested by a lot of people in the ubuntu community/forums and it works good
[19:47] <shockrates> i am not very familiar with ubuntu as its not my main os
[19:47] <shockrates> someone who is and is capable of doing it, please upload those 2 deb packages. thanks
[19:48] <directhex> shockrates, random .debs aren't uploaded (or uploadable) to ubuntu. only source packages can be uploaded, whereupon the ubuntu build servers build the debs
[19:49] <micahg> ugh, user left too fast and oneiric already has a higher version
[19:49] <directhex> typical
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
[20:39] <soren> psusi: theres a bug report on the subject. im typing on my phone, so id rayher not elaborate a whole lot here.
[20:39] <psusi> soren: I found it
[20:40] <soren> short version: its intended, but its controversial.
[20:41] <psusi> soren: it seems that the issue was resolved by having -q default to -1, though I'm stil thinking that even when you time out, the correct thing to do is just shutdown() and wait for the other end to finish sending any output and hangup, rather than shutdown() and immeditely exit()
=== erhesrhsrtb54vyh is now known as Elbrus
[22:34] <ScottK> Rhonda: Is that one of the ones you're asking PPU for?
[23:36] <micahg> tumbleweed: are these new ftbfs bugs just off of the regular upload build failures?