/srv/irclogs.ubuntu.com/2011/06/29/#ubuntu-desktop.txt

fta2hi, do I have to remove half of gnome to complete the upgrades (oneiric) or is that libgnome-desktop-3-2 transition still a WIP?07:55
fta2the former seems a bad idea to me07:56
ricotzfta2, hi, the transition should be done07:58
fta2ricotz, really? http://paste.ubuntu.com/634826/08:00
ricotzfta2, hmm, i am using aptitude08:04
ricotzbut the old libpanel-applet package can be removed08:05
ricotzaptitude should give you more solutions where you should get a better one08:06
fta2nope, they are all worse08:06
fta2they all imply removing a part of gnome and leaving most new stuff un-upgraded08:09
fta2it's been like that for a week08:09
ricotzperhaps there is some "custom" package which holds the old stuff08:10
ricotzi havent used a unity session lately, but my installation seems consistent08:10
ricotzso i think i should everything needed installed, there were updates which needed some tweaking -- meaning aptitude gave me like 10+ solutions08:12
fta2i don't think i have anything custom related to this08:12
ricotzfor example the deskbar-applet08:13
fta2auto-installed, removing...08:14
ricotzprobably aptitude shows you a lot local/old packages08:14
ricotzif there are mark them to purge, select an upgrade and browse the solutions08:16
fta2ricotz, nada, (and i've used debian/ubuntu for ~15y now, so i'm usually used to this stuff)08:19
fta2it all seems to be related to   libgnome-desktop-3-0: Depends: gnome-desktop3-data (= 3.0.2-2) but 3.1.2-0ubuntu1 is to be installed.08:20
ricotzfta2, did you used the gnome3-ppa?08:22
fta2no08:22
ricotzif you have cheese installed08:22
ricotzok08:22
fta2http://paste.ubuntu.com/634839/08:22
ricotzapt-cache rdepends libgnome-desktop-3-008:25
ricotzE: Keine Pakete gefunden08:25
ricotzhttp://paste.debian.net/plain/12135508:28
ricotzdesrt, hello, i had to override the eventfd check since it only checks the installed kernel headers (right?) and not capability of the actual running kernel08:33
desrtricotz: the bug is fixed upstream now09:05
ricotzdesrt, https://launchpadlibrarian.net/74258089/buildlog_ubuntu-oneiric-amd64.glib2.0_2.29.9~git20110628.315210ec-0ubuntu1~11.10~ricotz0_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz09:10
desrtricotz: is that with the changes to git master as of yesterday evening?09:16
ricotzdesrt, yes, commit 315210ec09:17
fta2hm, the preview pane in evo3 is broken (nvidia), it's either always blank/empty or corrupted (no refresh when scrolled)09:17
fta2ricotz, i managed to complete my upgrade09:17
desrtricotz: huh.09:17
ricotzfta2, good :)09:17
fta2ricotz, i had to help apt* and drop all indicators-applet-*09:18
ricotzdesrt, as i asked, it is checking the installed kernel headers but not the running kernel, so tests are failing09:18
desrtricotz: something doesn't stack up here09:18
desrtricotz: the error in your build log should be impossible with the new code09:19
desrttake a look at the patch in commit 1b0e5e7683148f769189fc82ab731ee25d06c04c09:19
desrt+    if (efd == -1 && (errno == ENOSYS || errno == EINVAL))09:19
desrt"Invalid argument" (shown in your message) is EINVAL09:19
desrtso it should hit that branch of the 'if'09:20
desrtthe error message that i see is on the 'else'09:20
desrtare you 100% sure you got that commit in the upload?09:21
ricotzlet me double check, but i am sure09:21
desrti have a doubt :)09:23
ricotzdesrt, it is, https://edge.launchpad.net/~ricotz/+archive/staging/+files/glib2.0_2.29.9%7Egit20110628.315210ec.orig.tar.xz09:23
desrtricotz: i am quite confused09:26
desrtricotz: i'll check something locally09:27
desrti still don't believe my eyes :P)09:27
ricotz;)09:28
ricotzdesrt, again, the check in configure.ac is only a compile check not a runtime check, right?09:31
desrtit shouldn't matter09:31
desrtthe check in gmain.c itself is a runtime check09:32
desrtwith a fallback09:32
ricotzok09:32
ricotzfta, do you have time to update the gnome3 ppa stats again?09:44
fta2ricotz, sure09:44
ricotzfta2, thanks09:44
desrtricotz: i found a machine with a .25 kernel09:44
desrtgonna take your tarball for a spin09:45
fta2uh, my evo3 corruption is caused by liboverlay-scrollbar*09:45
ricotzdesrt, looks like it is time to update the builders to lucid (.32) ;)09:46
desrtricotz: i tried building your tarball on my 2.6.25 machine. no problems.10:00
desrtafter _installing dbus_ it passes the tests10:00
desrtrodrigo_: hey.  how you been lately?10:00
ricotzdesrt, hmm, the builders are running 2.6.24, but shouldnt make a difference since .27 is the requirement10:01
desrtindeed10:01
desrtwhat the heck are the builders running?10:02
desrtmy 2.6.25 system is hardy10:02
desrtah.  but it's a custom linode kernel10:02
desrtthey probably went with a point release higher than the distro10:03
ricotzalright, but still it should work code-wise10:04
desrti'm digging deeper10:05
desrtricotz: i can't match your whacky combination of shiny-new-buildroot vs. ancient-kernel10:10
desrtcan i give you a patch that will add some printf() and get you to apply it and try again?10:10
ricotzdesrt, also i am only able to reproduce this in the ppa, so i would need to upload it there, but i can do10:13
desrtricotz; http://fpaste.org/6S3L/10:14
desrtuh wait10:15
desrtno.  that's correct.  continue. :)10:15
ricotzok10:15
desrttalk to you in a few hours, i guess :)10:15
ricotzprobably10:15
fta2ricotz, done (your g3 stats)10:18
fta2ricotz, fyi, there's taking 15min to fetch now, against 8min ~2w ago10:18
fta2ricotz, feel free to go blame lp10:19
ricotzfta2, thank you -- you are indeed a statistics fan :P10:20
seb128seems you are both statistics fan ;-)10:21
ricotzdesrt, https://edge.launchpad.net/~ricotz/+archive/staging/+build/259967210:22
ricotzseb128, fta2, remembering the buildtime ;)10:23
desrtricotz: let me know when it's done10:23
ricotzdesrt, ok, probably in 1 hour10:24
mterryvuntz, hello!  I'm about to work on adding support for OnlyShowIn=Unity/NotShowIn=Unity to gnome-menus.  Would you like me to send that patch to bugzilla when done?10:26
fta2ricotz, well, the reason i remember your stats fetch time is that i found it absolutely slow to fetch ~5000 rows of a table in 8min, even worse now in 15 min10:27
fta2ricotz, and to get my daily dose of chromium stats, it now takes 5h+ :P10:28
ricotzfta2, alright :), this sounds horrible slow10:29
seb128ricotz, why do you do oneiric uploads in the ppa?10:34
ricotzseb128, just to have a working package until the MIR is done10:35
seb128ricotz, hum, ok10:35
seb128we should demote cheese to universe10:35
vuntzmterry: there's already a patch in bugzilla for something like this10:39
vuntzmterry: and it's waiting for a big branch to get merged, so... I'd advise you to wait a bit, actually :)10:39
mterryvuntz, oh!  didn't know.  let me see how that patch was done10:40
seb128vuntz, is the gobject friendly refactoring going to land soon?10:42
mterryvuntz, you're talking about the XDG_CURRENT_DESKTOP support I gather10:42
mterrydidrocks, hah, see -- an environment variable for it ^10:42
didrocksmterry: nice! not sure how it will work if you explictely ask for fallback then10:43
vuntzmterry: yeah, that'd be based on that10:45
vuntzseb128: soonish, yes10:45
mterryvuntz, one problem with that patch is it doesn't support "blended desktops" where Unity also shows things that say OnlyShowIn=GNOME.  Maybe the environment variable could be a list?  Or special support for Unity could be added?  /me looks for spec for that variable10:45
vuntzseb128: we need an API addition in glib10:45
vuntzmterry: that sounds like you want something which isn't supported in the spec10:46
vuntzmterry: there's no notion of "blended desktops"10:46
mterryvuntz, I know, for OnlyShowIn.  But I didn't know how XDG_CURRENT_DESKTOP was spec'd.  Seems like it's not yet?10:48
mterryJust a conversation on the xdg list10:49
vuntzyeah, it's not10:49
TommehWhy on earth does smartmontools depend on postfix :/10:50
* mterry knows that "blended desktops" is a bad idea as long as there isn't a "GNOMEShell" OnlyShowIn value, but doesn't want to go and add "Unity;" to all the desktops in the world10:50
vuntzbut my other idea was to add some API like gmenu_set_desktop(), and that's not really better10:50
mterryvuntz, I assume there is no intention to add a "GNOMEShell" OnlyShowIn value?  That the intention is that the future will be shell only?10:51
mterryvuntz, but with an environment variable...  that won't work with running "other-desktop --replace" or launching things from VT1 with "DISPLAY=:0.0" right?10:53
mdeslaurpitti: do you know of any reason we shouldn't replace gksu with something like "pkexec env DISPLAY=$DISPLAY XAUTHORITY=$XAUTHORITY synaptic"?10:54
mdeslaurpitti: we really want to remove gksu as it doesn't support pam/two factor auth correctly10:54
seb128mdeslaur, did anyone look at gksu-polkit?10:54
mdeslaurseb128: yeah, but it currently has security issues, and they haven't been fixed10:55
seb128ok10:55
seb128I was just mentioning it in case, I would like to get ride of gksu as well10:55
mdeslaurseb128: I'd rather just use something that's already in main10:55
mdeslaur(and maintained)10:55
seb128(for different reasons, what bothers me in the different user experiences between gksu and polkit prompts)10:55
mdeslauryes10:56
vuntzmterry: no plan for GNOMEShell value, indeed11:06
vuntzmterry: and --replace is really not a good way to start another desktop11:06
vuntzmterry: doing this between gnome 3 & unity won't 100% work, for instance11:06
cyphermoxkenvandine: your calendar crash might be fixed by http://git.gnome.org/browse/evolution/commit/?id=46eec90c098d5b239035568ae5c25ae9127a837311:09
mterryvuntz, and VT1 apps aren't a concern?11:12
mterryvuntz, (just thinking that maybe a dbus way of querying which desktop one is on would be more foolproof)11:13
pittimdeslaur: pkexec env seems like a nice trick indeed11:15
pittimdeslaur: I'd love to get rid of gksu as well11:15
mdeslaurpitti: the only inconvenience is the message that gets displayed in the policykit window is less than ideal, we could either write a small wrapper for each app, or add a --title option to pkexec or something similar11:16
pittimdeslaur: the dialog is rather nasty, though; it says it needs your password to run /usr/bin/env11:16
mdeslauryeah, a wrapper could be used to get "pkexec synaptic-root $DISPLAY $XAUTHORITY"11:17
mdeslaurwhich would make the window better11:17
mdeslauror, we could add a new option...something like --title "Synaptic package manager"11:17
pittimdeslaur: it might be more palatable for upstream to actually add an option to set an env var11:17
pittimdeslaur: hm, perhaps --title is better indeed11:18
pittithen we could write a generic wrapper which takes a .desktop file, grabs the translated name from it, uses that as --title, and runs the Exec= line through pkexec DISPLAY..11:18
mdeslauryes11:18
vuntzmterry: a dbus way would be nice11:19
pittimdeslaur: would you mind opening an upstream bugzilla for the --title thing, and then I'll grab davidz this afternoon and discuss it with him?11:19
mdeslaurpitti: sure, I'll do it in the next hour, and I'll let you know the bug number11:20
pittithanks!11:20
pittiso we could call this wrapper "pkexecdesktop"11:20
desrtrobert_ancell: hey.  how's the dbus stuff going?11:23
desrtrobert_ancell: i love you11:24
desrtrobert_ancell: but i'm ashamed to say it to you in person11:24
seb128robert_ancell, is it ready yet? can I try it?11:24
robert_ancelldesrt, sorry, the feeling's not mutual11:24
desrt:~(11:24
robert_ancellseb128, no, and it's not getting any closer with you continuously asking me11:24
desrtrobert_ancell: i'm glad it's not just me that you hate11:25
robert_ancellthat's it, i'm stopping the car! EVERYONE OUT!11:25
* pitti holds up the "Equal hate for everyone!!" cardboard sign11:25
desrthm.  we didn't get that11:25
desrtwe got "if you ask one more time, we're turning around and going home"11:25
desrtcome to think about it, i guess i should have asked "are we there yet?" more often on the way to school11:26
mptmdeslaur, we should add that option to USC as well: software-center --title "Synaptic Package Manager"11:27
mptjust to mess with people11:27
mdeslaurmpt: hehe, that was just an example :)11:27
Sweetsharkdesrt and seb128 seem to have found a fancy new way to communicate via audio ...11:28
desrtmumble mumble11:29
seb128can't hear you!11:29
pittiSweetshark: really badly greppable, though11:29
Sweetsharkdesrt: lies! almost nobody on the mumble server!11:29
desrtpitti: google is working on something, i'm sure11:29
mptmdeslaur, PolicyKit is just one of the things that would benefit from being able to get an application name and icon from a binary name. Others include System Monitor, gnome-session (these applications are blocking logout), and whatever it is that tries and fails to eject disks (this file is in use by this application).11:30
mdeslaurmpt: oh, interesting...then we probably should be looking at a proper way of doing this instead of just the specific use case I was thinking of11:32
mptmdeslaur, yes, that would be cool. It seems like the kind of thing that the maintainers of those individual pieces don't do because from their p.o.v. it's too hard11:35
mptThere's a similar problem in getting from a package name to an application name+icon, needed by both USC and Update Manager. The API for that should look similar.11:36
mptkenvandine, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SoftwareCenter?action=AttachFile&do=view&target=menu-go.png11:39
mpt(initial sketch)11:40
kenvandinethx11:40
seb128pitti, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/accountsservice/+bug/78568011:41
ubot2Ubuntu bug 785680 in accountsservice "[MIR] accountsservice" [Undecided,New]11:41
kenvandinempt, those make sense, and i like ][ as a next/prev11:42
kenvandinevuntz, you are my hero!11:46
kenvandinevuntz, your fix for bgo 652769 worked11:47
vuntzkenvandine: :-)11:47
kenvandinevuntz, thx!11:47
mdeslaurpitti: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3876912:08
ubot2Freedesktop bug 38769 in libpolkit "Allow specifying user friendly application name when using pkexec" [Enhancement,New]12:08
pittimdeslaur: cheers!12:13
ricotzdesrt, https://launchpadlibrarian.net/74290372/buildlog_ubuntu-oneiric-amd64.glib2.0_2.29.9~git20110628.315210ec-0ubuntu1~11.10~ricotz2_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz13:56
=== m_conley_away is now known as m_conley
ricotzseems like there is no output :\13:56
desrtricotz: i repeat my assertion that you must be compiling the wrong thing13:57
desrtthat failure is quite interesting, though13:59
desrti do believe it could be caused by the eventfd thing though14:00
desrtlooks like the mainloop is failing to wake up14:00
ricotzdesrt, you looked at the tarball and it includes the fixes14:01
desrtthere is clearly some inconsistency here14:02
desrtsince i didn't modify anything except for the g_error codepath14:02
desrti think you hit the opposite side of a race14:02
desrtis there any way you can send the same build unmodified?14:02
desrtin hopes of seeing it go the other way...14:02
ricotzdesrt, use "dget https://edge.launchpad.net/~ricotz/+archive/staging/+files/glib2.0_2.29.9%7Egit20110628.315210ec-0ubuntu1%7E11.10%7Ericotz2.dsc"14:02
seb128desrt, ricotz: you can retry the build yes14:04
desrtchrisccoulson: what did this 'kill -11 `pidof xchat`' thing that i saw you typing mean?14:05
ricotzseb128, could this be something similar to the gnome-keyring build failures which looked up14:05
desrti want to learn more about the things that you do14:05
ricotzseb128, * locked up14:05
seb128ricotz, not sure, it would need debugging to say14:05
chrisccoulsonlol14:05
ricotzdesrt, seb128 i could restart them but both amd64 and i386 stopping at the same position14:08
ricotzwhich is quite unlikely to be random14:09
desrtricotz: by looking at my patch do you agree that i only modified the g_error() statement?14:10
ricotzdesrt, yes14:10
desrtso why should the result change from last time being a g_error to this time being not a g_error?14:11
desrtother than by chance14:11
ricotzdesrt, ok, restarted14:17
desrtsorry :/14:19
desrthopefully this time we get a different result14:19
fta2dpm, hi, I just landed ca@valencia in the last chromium update (M12)14:26
ricotzdesrt, i hope so too14:27
dpmfta2, awesome, thanks! :)14:28
seb128ricotz, your glib upload built on natty and not oneiric?14:29
seb128that's weird14:29
ricotzseb128, this is a patched one to force the success14:30
seb128ricotz, oh, that's cheating! ;-)14:30
ricotzseb128, could you look at webkit to fix headers with G_CONST_RETURN?14:34
seb128ricotz, is that an issue for any build currently?14:34
seb128it's all desrt's fault again!14:34
ricotzprobably everything which want to build against it ;) -- i just looked at rhythmbox git14:35
seb128ricotz, well, they put compat defines, so only things that build with G_DISABLE_DEPRECATED14:37
seb128you can build without that define as a workaround14:37
ricotzright, same goes for the gtkbox stuff14:38
seb128grrrr desrt grrrr!14:38
seb128ricotz, pitti: ok, http://trac.webkit.org/changeset/88872 should do the trick14:42
seb128I'm pondering doing the "if it applies it's good enough to be uploaded" ;-)14:43
TheMusoronoc: What time is the GVC meeting?14:48
ronocTheMuso, 4pm14:48
TheMusoronoc: Cheers.14:48
ronocTheMuso, np14:48
TheMusoronoc: Where abouts?14:48
ronocTheMuso, in the indicators room, down the other end of the same floor you are on. At Marianna and co take a right instead of a left and walk all the way down (around the corner) we are on the right at the bottom of the hall14:50
ronocTheMuso, Dawson suite - indicators room14:50
mvonessita: if you are fine with https://code.launchpad.net/~mvo/ubuntu-sso-client/dh_python2/+merge/66304 I can upload it14:54
mvo(or wait and let someone else upload it)14:54
nessitamvo: seems ok :-)14:54
seb128go mvo go!14:55
mvothanks nessita I will just upload then14:55
nessitathanks!!!14:55
mvoyw14:55
TheMusoronoc: Thanks.14:55
ricotzseb128, then go for the upload ;)15:08
seb128yeah, will do in a bit15:08
ricotzgreat15:08
ricotzdesrt, seb128, i386 gone through (https://edge.launchpad.net/~ricotz/+archive/staging/+build/2599673/+files/buildlog_ubuntu-oneiric-i386.glib2.0_2.29.9%7Egit20110628.315210ec-0ubuntu1%7E11.10%7Ericotz2_BUILDING.txt.gz), but the amd64 stopped again (https://edge.launchpad.net/~ricotz/+archive/staging/+build/2599672)15:11
desrtricotz: this is extremely frustrating15:12
desrtat this point, if i had to guess i'd guess that15:12
desrt a) the upload that you did first somehow didn't include the patch15:13
desrt b) these new uploads (which do include the patch) have the bug fixed, but now there is a new bug15:13
ricotzdesrt, this tarball includes the fix since the beginning, ~ricotz0 both failed, ~ricotz1 patched configure.ac, ~ricotz2 dont patch configure.ac include your debug15:14
desrtwhat configure.ac patch?15:15
ricotzwhich mean if i had restarted ~ricotz0 sometimes it might/should succeeded too15:15
ricotzdesrt, https://edge.launchpad.net/~ricotz/+archive/staging/+files/glib2.0_2.29.9%7Egit20110628.315210ec-0ubuntu1%7E11.10%7Ericotz0_2.29.9%7Egit20110628.315210ec-0ubuntu1%7E11.10%7Ericotz1.diff.gz15:16
ricotzhttps://edge.launchpad.net/~ricotz/+archive/staging/+files/glib2.0_2.29.9%7Egit20110628.315210ec-0ubuntu1%7E11.10%7Ericotz1_2.29.9%7Egit20110628.315210ec-0ubuntu1%7E11.10%7Ericotz2.diff.gz15:16
ricotzdesrt, so it is random :\15:18
ftais anyone able to create/add an imap account in evo3 (oneiric)?15:59
seb128fta, details?15:59
seb128what issue do you get?15:59
ftathe dialog box is totally broken here, after the 1st forward, it goes back to the 1st step, and loops15:59
seb128right, that's a known issue and due to the gtkassistant refactoring in 3.116:00
seb128bug #79946916:01
ubot2Launchpad bug 799469 in evolution "evolution 3.0 setup assistant jump step with new gtkassistant (3.1)" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/79946916:01
ftaok, thanks16:01
fta(once again, i'm not crazy)16:01
ftaseb128, the bug says evo 3.0, same with 3.1.* (in case it matters)16:03
seb128fta, right, I can confirm and the bug didn't get any recent update upstream either16:04
seb128TheMuso, there is a sponsoring request for a new onboard version, maybe you could have a look to it?16:31
seb128cyphermox, http://cgit.freedesktop.org/geoclue/commit/?id=f2f988bfdda6a347a8190612af1501466b64d76b16:58
pittiseb128, mdeslaur: david and I just discussed the pkexec X11ification, and came to a workable agreement17:03
mdeslaurpitti: I just saw your notes in the bug, sounds great17:04
seb128pitti, great17:04
pittimdeslaur: it would also be a security improvement, as with .policy files you can't spoof the title any more (which you can with gksu)17:05
mdeslaurpitti: yes, that's a good idea17:06
mdeslaurpitti: I wonder if there would be a reason to limit the DISPLAY and XAUTHORITY passing of variables to only when you try to run as root17:07
mdeslaurmeh, maybe not17:07
seb128pitti, robert_ancell's bug is https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59626017:10
ubot2Gnome bug 596260 in authentication dialog "Make authentication dialogs system-modal and improve wording/design" [Major,Assigned]17:10
mterryrobert_ancell, I opened https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/803519 btw17:11
ubot2Ubuntu bug 803519 in nautilus "Use Unity as a registered XDG environment" [Undecided,New]17:11
agateauhey, libgtest-dev apparently misses /usr/lib/libgtest.so, is it a known problem?17:15
agateaudidrocks: ^17:16
seb128agateau, hey17:17
didrocksagateau: hum, not really, we are in sync with debian though17:17
didrocksagateau: but it doesn't have the right versionning from my discussion with Tim17:17
didrocksso it needs update at least, and maybe fixing that at the same time17:17
agateaudidrocks: the -dev only contains the .a files17:17
agateaudidrocks: unity test do not build on oneiric because of that17:18
didrocksagateau: ok, it's screwed then, would be nice to fix that in debian directly17:18
didrocksagateau: hum, wasn't a missing release the cause? like the .6 version?17:18
didrocks(from what Tim told me)17:18
seb128didrocks, agateau: do you want me to fix it and open a debian bug?17:19
didrocksseb128: that would be awesome!17:19
agateaudidrocks: I haven't talked about that with Tim, all I know is make complains with "No rule to make target `/usr/lib/libgtest.so', needed by `tests/test-gtest'.  Stop."17:19
seb128didrocks, agateau: on it17:19
didrocksseb128: thanks a lot :)17:19
agateauseb128: great :)17:19
seb128yw17:19
agateauseb128: while you're at it, it's also missing /usr/lib/libgtest_main.so17:21
seb128agateau, I will fix it to install everything which is missing, no worry17:23
agateauseb128: ok17:23
seb128agateau, didrocks: you tricked me!17:24
seb128that thing is using cmake!17:24
agateauseb128: mmm... there seems to be another problem: after manually creating the symlinks I get a link error, but I guess providing the missing files is still a good idea :)17:25
didrocks\o/17:25
agateauseb128: ah!17:25
didrocksagateau: nicely done :)17:25
agateauresistence is futile17:25
agateau*resistance17:25
seb128didrocks, neil got the gtk3 indicator loader landed17:26
seb128didrocks, do you want to backport it or should kenvandine or I do it?17:26
didrocksseb128: I would prefer a proper unity release with the dialog stuff tested as well, so that we can have both (and do it tomorrow)17:27
seb128ok17:27
didrocksseb128: I'll poke him directly for this17:27
seb128I'm not sure I want to delay the indicators to be back on the unity dialog to be working though17:27
seb128agateau, didrocks: gtest is not a packaging error, I'm not going to fix cmake build but if you give me a patch I can add it to the package17:28
agateauseb128: I can have a look17:29
seb128hum17:29
seb128debian did17:29
seb128  * control: Switch to cmake (upstream deprecated autoconf build).  Build17:29
seb128    only static library (remove libgtest0 package).  Install full source17:29
seb128    and example files.17:29
seb128I'm wondering why17:29
agateauoh17:29
agateauseb128: shouldn't it conflicts/replaces with libgtest0 then?17:29
agateauthat explains the linking error17:30
seb128agateau, it should17:30
seb128didrocks, he doesn't want to roll a tarball, let's talk about that tonight17:30
didrocksseb128: who "he"?17:31
seb128didrocks, he said that he would need a new nux, etc if he rolled a tarball from trunk and he don't want to start tarballing the stack17:31
seb128didrocks, njpatel17:31
didrockshum… and when will we have a working dialogs then?17:31
didrockslet's talk about that tonight then…17:31
seb128not today or tomorrow apparently17:31
seb128right17:31
jbichaseb128: howdy17:32
seb128hey jbicha, how are you?17:32
jbichahttps://code.launchpad.net/~jbicha/ubuntu/oneiric/gnome-applets/gnome-applets-3.1.2/+merge/6623217:32
didrocksseb128: are we sure those are tested?17:32
didrockslike the dialog, which wasn't?17:32
seb128didrocks, let's discuss tonight17:32
seb128jbicha, thanks17:32
jbichaI'm doing fine, how's Dublin?17:32
agateauseb128: mmm can't uninstall libgtest0, google-mock depends on it17:33
seb128agateau, yeah, I don't know why the debian maintainer did that17:33
seb128he didn't explain17:33
agateauseb128: maybe upstream did the change?17:34
seb128not sure17:35
agateauseb128: mmm upstream provides both autotools and cmake,17:36
agateauseb128: but the cmake version only builds static libs and does not provide install targets!17:36
seb128agateau, http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/gtest.git;a=blob;f=debian/README.Debian;h=15381ee64ee60750dfd019dd58d4c267351254b4;hb=fced3a5054fcdf6a891d9c9f9a32fa7e1380226317:36
seb128agateau, http://groups.google.com/group/googletestframework/browse_thread/thread/668eff1cebf5309d17:37
pedro_so who is working on metacity ? bug 802747 :-)17:37
ubot2Launchpad bug 802747 in metacity "window redraw glitches caused by ubuntu patch" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/80274717:37
agateauwow17:37
agateauseb128: they want people to build it with the same compiler flags, but using static libs does not mean same compiler flags, so it's not really a solution I would say17:38
agateauseb128: you can still force the build of shared libs, though17:40
agateauseb128: not sure we want to go that way17:40
seb128agateau, I would prefer not taking decisions over Debian for a project I don't know or work with17:40
agateauseb128: makes sense17:40
seb128I will assume the Debian maintainer has a better clue than me17:40
mterrytremolux, when does oneiric get for-purchase apps?17:42
tremoluxmterry: it usually happens quite late in the cycle17:42
mterrytremolux, <whine>I want it now!</whine>17:43
tremoluxmterry: you could check with iamfuzz to see when he plans it for O17:43
mterrytremolux, all us devs would love to buy stuff, but we can't!17:44
agateauseb128: I am going to try to make unity tests use the static gtest libs17:44
* mterry just noticed Bridge Construction Set in the store17:44
seb128agateau, thanks17:44
tremoluxmterry: yeah!  me wants all the good stuff too!17:46
jasoncwarner_test18:04
jasoncwarner_test18:04
seb128jasoncwarner_, test!18:05
jasoncwarner_seb128: TEST!!!!18:05
seb128jasoncwarner_, STEAK?!18:05
seb128;-)18:05
=== alecu is now known as alecu-lunch
=== alecu-lunch is now known as alecu
DOODcan i have help with a wirless stick please19:22
DOODhello19:23
dobeyi ♥ impatient people in the wrong channel :)19:31
awe_cyphermox, congrats, just the saw the email on ubuntu-desktop!  Well deserved!19:51
=== m_conley is now known as m_conley_away
cyphermoxawe_: thanks23:23
awe_your welcome!23:23

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!