[02:57] <ScottK> How well are Intel HD3000 graphics working on Natty?
[03:00] <hyperair> HD3000? the ones that come with the sandy bridge?
[03:00] <ScottK> Dunno.
[03:02] <ScottK> Yes.
[03:03] <ScottK> Which it turns out I have, so I actually know the answer to the question.
[08:34] <hyperair> ScottK: hahah. so how has the hd3000 been for you?
[08:39] <tjaalton> works fine for me, on a desktop anyway (natty)
[08:40] <tjaalton> there are bugs with external monitor handling at least, but a partial fix is being prepared
[08:42] <tjaalton> partial in that the rest is yet to be fixed upstream, but easily worked around
[08:43] <tjaalton> (cycling through the external display modes can leave the other monitor blank, but another cycle fixes it)
[11:06] <tjaalton> RAOF: mesa in NEW because of libgpm, but you already knew that. get the archive admin privs stat, so you could push it through ;)
[11:07] <RAOF> tjaalton: I was looking at that and they didn't seem to be NEW.  Or perhaps launchpad has changed its display of NEW packages.
[11:11] <tjaalton> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/oneiric/+source/mesa/7.11~1-0ubuntu2 shows them as such
[11:12] <RAOF> Right.  But https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/7.11~1-0ubuntu2/+build/2600799 (for example) doesn't list any of the packages as NEW.
[11:13] <tjaalton> "Binary packages awaiting approval in NEW queue", though it lists them all. never seen it to list only the diff
[13:30] <Sarvatt> RAOF: master builds fine too with your packaging, no clue what problem that other guy is hitting https://launchpad.net/~sarvatt/+archive/mesa/+builds?build_text=&build_state=all
[13:30] <Sarvatt> RAOF: mind if i lower the debhelper build dep in the ubuntu branch to the actual version we need?
[13:33] <Sarvatt> i'm just going to add a llvm build dep for the /usr/bin/llvm-config, and use llvm-dev instead of hardcoding 2.9 in edgers
[13:40] <Sarvatt> gotta make sure i dont run a script that uploads a 7.12.0+git this time by mistake, screwed up every release since 7.8
[14:46] <tjaalton> should we update to xserver 1.10.2.901 or branch tip? should fix at least bug 441653
[14:47] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 441653 in xorg-server (Ubuntu) "radeon graphics mode and console does not start - xf86OpenConsole: VT_WAITACTIVE failed: Interrupted system call (affects: 62) (dups: 2) (heat: 342)" [High,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/441653
[14:49] <tjaalton> RAOF: btw, dunno if you saw but the raw events patches are not going in 1.11
[15:11] <RAOF> tjaalton: I saw.  I've pulled what was on the list, though; I just need to check that it actually *works* :)
[15:17] <tjaalton> heh, ok
[15:27] <RAOF> (Which means writing a tiny XI 2.1 client that subscribes to raw events)
[15:44] <tjaalton> filing sync-requests for some input drivers
[15:52] <tjaalton> hmm we have an old -ati?
[15:53] <tjaalton> 6.14.0 vs 6.14.2
[15:54] <Sarvatt> yup
[15:55] <tjaalton> merging it
[15:55] <RAOF> Any reason we have an older ati?
[15:55] <tjaalton> just general lazyness?-)
[15:56] <tjaalton> dunno, don't think so. probably just an oversight
[15:57] <Sarvatt> can drop the patch bryce brought in a few days ago cus its in 6.14.2
[15:57] <tjaalton> yeah
[16:00] <Sarvatt> http://sarvatt.com/downloads/500_xi2.1.patch is the refreshed one for the latest 1.10 branch
[16:04] <tjaalton> Sarvatt: what's the gbp.conf used for?
[16:04] <tjaalton> in -ati
[16:04] <Sarvatt> RAOF
[16:05] <tjaalton> oh
[16:05] <Sarvatt> pretty sure he's the only one that uses git buildpackage for it :)
[16:05] <RAOF> Yeah :)
[16:05] <RAOF> It makes ‘git-buildpackage’ work.
[16:05] <tjaalton> this is the only package that has that?
[16:05] <tjaalton> haven't come across this before
[16:05] <Sarvatt> nope there's a few others like nouveau
[16:05] <RAOF> No.  mesa does too, as does... intel?
[16:06] <tjaalton> ok, maybe I just haven't touched those
[16:07] <tjaalton> so it doesn't work if you're on ubuntu-natty or such?-)
[16:08] <tseliot> RAOF: in Natty I should still use gl_conf for tegra, right (even though it's gles)?
[16:11] <Sarvatt> err, our libgles is in /usr/lib in natty isn't it
[16:11] <Sarvatt> probably going to have to go the diversion route instead?
[16:12] <tjaalton> dropping the change of removing existing radeon-kms.conf, since lucid final already had that
[16:26] <tjaalton> pushed to git
[16:26] <tjaalton> well, pushing..
[16:26] <tjaalton> thanks to the xauth timeout it's taking time
[16:26] <tjaalton> there
[16:28] <tjaalton> huh, diff shows we're missing src/bicubic_table.py
[16:30] <tjaalton> ah, actually debian has that as a diff to upstream
[18:27] <Sarvatt> would anyone mind if i changed x-x-v-intel's build deps to libxcb-aux0-dev | libxcb-util0-dev to make backporting easier, or the debhelper (>= 8.1.2ubuntu2) for mesa?
[18:28] <Sarvatt> 8.1.3 isnt in natty and we had all the multiarch stuff backported in 8.1.2ubuntu2
[19:15] <bryceh> Sarvatt, fine by me; backporting sounds good
[20:31] <ScottK> Sarvatt: There was an update from natty-updates yesterday that I think caused me to lose your PPA package with the crash fix for Sandybridge.  Any chance you would update your PPA (X just died again on me)?
[20:47] <ricotz> Sarvatt, i hope adding the missing xfixes packages will fix the xserver build on natty
[20:47] <ricotz> i restarted them so hoping the best
[21:52] <ricotz> Sarvatt, your xserver tarball lives in the futurue :P