=== asac_ is now known as asac
[09:57] <lucidfox> Is there anywhere I can ping the SRU team to test bug #749047? Been lying around for three weeks now
[09:57] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 749047 in emerald "emerald version 0.7.2-0ubuntu6 failed to build on i386" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/749047
[09:57] <lucidfox> er, wrong bug
[09:57] <lucidfox> bug #733393
[09:57] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 733393 in emerald "[natty, SRU] emerald segfault on launch" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/733393
[10:07] <Laney> you mean the SRU verification team, and I'm not aware of any organised presence
[10:07] <Laney> (anyone can do it)
[20:38] <RAOF> lucidfox: Yeah.  We don't necessarily test the fixes, we just gate them based on testing.
[22:33] <bryceh> lucidfox, it looks like there was a caveat to the testing that indicates it was an incomplete fix?  You might want to reply to the bug and clarify.
[22:33] <bryceh> lucidfox, if you've tested the fix yourself and found it solved the issue for you, that would be a worthwhile data point to add
[22:34] <bryceh> if the fix is incomplete, your view on whether it is still worth inclusion despite the lack would probably help too
[22:34] <bryceh> lucidfox, the main thing the sru team is looking for is if the patch causes any regressions aside from the bug.