[03:46] <robert_ancell> hughhalf, hey, can I ask you some questions about the language requirements we were discussion about lightdm?
[03:47] <robert_ancell> probably best discussed in #ubuntu-desktop
[07:54] <didrocks> good morning
[07:59] <ricotz> slangasek, hello, perhaps you could take a look at this libgcrypt update -- http://people.ubuntu.com/~ricotz/libgcrypt11/
[08:32] <dholbach> good morning
[10:02] <jml> hello
[10:03] <ajmitch> jml: hi
[10:04] <jml> ajmitch: hi :)
[10:14] <cjwatson> mvo: do you think python-apt's data.tar.xz support could be SRUed to lucid-updates for LP, or is it going to need to be a lucid-cat special?
[10:22] <Laney> how do I do git reset --hard origin in bzr?
[10:23] <mvo> cjwatson: I think we can SRU that
[10:27] <cjwatson> Laney: bzr revert; bzr uncommit -r:parent
[10:27] <Laney> cheers
[10:28] <Laney> bzr: ERROR: exceptions.TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for +: 'NoneType' and 'int'
[10:28] <Laney> :-)
[10:34] <cjwatson> Laney: well, I was assuming you actually had a :parent
[10:34] <cjwatson> you can use a specific revision number to -r instead
[10:34] <Laney> cjwatson: I do
[10:42] <Laney> cjwatson: I did bzr pull -r:parent --overwrite — seems to have worked
[10:43] <Laney> seems like the problem was trying to uncommit to a revision not in the history
[11:05] <cjwatson> Laney: ah, yeah, if the parent had moved on
[11:06] <cjwatson> I suspect something involving ancestor: would've worked too
[13:06] <doko> jhunt: upstart now built successfully on armel, I think you could revert back to build libnih with -Os on armel again
[13:09] <infinity> doko: Shiny.
[13:10] <infinity> doko: What fixed it?
[13:11] <doko> infinity: #791315
[13:14] <infinity> doko: Hrm.  I wonder if it might be time for a mass-give-back on armel.
[13:14] <infinity> (Well, maybe I'll do some selective ones)
[13:15] <doko> I doubt it. but then please wait until gcc-4.6.1 is uploaded and built for armel
[13:16] <infinity> doko: Yeah, not doing a mass give-back.  Honest.  Just remembered a few build failures that sounded suspiciously like they could relate to that particular glibc fix.
[13:38] <pitti> stgraber: edubuntu DVD built again, I fixed the langpack
[13:40] <Aquina> hello!
[13:41] <Aquina> Can someone point me to some config or thelike within the repo to get an impression on server and desktop kernel differences?
[13:56] <persia> Aquina, Get the "linux" source package, and look at the different configs therein.  If you have questions about the organisation of that source package, #ubuntu-kernel may be a more targeted place to ask.
[14:00] <Laney> persia maco Laney stgraber bdrung stgraber DMB ping
[14:00] <Laney> geser you too
[14:28] <geser> Laney: busy at work
[15:24] <zul> didrocks: can you have a look at bug #795089 please
[15:28] <stgraber> Laney: sorry, was on holiday today and forgot to send an e-mail to the DMB mailing list...
[15:28] <Laney> no worries, the agenda is hardly full anyway
[15:35] <dupondje> bind9 version of natty seems more recent than the version in Oneiric mmmm
[15:39] <cjwatson> dupondje: will be fixed in the next publisher run, thanks
[15:41] <dupondje> thx
[15:53] <seb128> doko, let's move there
[15:53] <seb128> it's private because it's an apport segfault and it could contain password or other infos
[15:53] <seb128> I don't but it got 5 duplicates since yesterday
[15:57] <seb128> doko, in fact it could be a gdm bug, ignore the ping for now
[16:00] <jamespage> hey - please could a member of the archive team reject metainf-services from the NEW queue - thankyou
[16:05] <dupondje> Can somebody trigger a rebuild for https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ispell ?
[16:06] <dupondje> its ftbfs because of broken dpkg some time ago it seems )
[16:06] <dupondje> :)
[16:07] <cjwatson> dupondje: indeed.  done
[16:12] <tumbleweed> zul: your python-mox upload doesn't look like it called dh_python2 during build
[16:13] <zul> tumbleweed: crappers
[16:31] <Daviey> doko: Hey!  Can you clarify the reasoning for using dh_pysupport for bug 798362?  I thought we were supposed to be phasing it out, in favour of dh_python2?
[18:04] <dupondje> cjwatson: are you working on courier ?
[19:00] <Quibus> tumbleweed: we registered openMSX at Launchpad now :-)
[19:03] <tumbleweed> Quibus: hope you find it useful
[19:06] <Quibus> tumbleweed: it doesn't seem to automatically couple to the sf.net stuff
[19:07] <doko> Daviey: thinko. should be dh_python2
[19:08] <tumbleweed> Quibus: it won't. But (if you tell it the project uses sf for bugs) it should let you link the bug to sf. You still have to file it there manually.
[19:18] <sveinse> Is it possible to override/set the version in a package in a multi binary package, or is this always linked against changelog/the source package?
[19:19] <micahg> sveinse: yes, you can
[19:20] <sveinse> micahg: How do you do that?
[19:20] <Daviey> doko: ah!  makes sense.
[19:20] <micahg> sveinse: thunderbird is doing it now for the locales
[19:20] <directhex> can someone push nunit through binary new, so i can upload the updates for the packages that it breaks?
[19:25] <sveinse> micahg: Thunderbird on Oneiric? I didnt find anything (after a quick glance) in the natty sources
[19:27] <micahg> sveinse: yes, check debian/rules in oneiric
[19:48] <sveinse> micahg: Sorry, but I can't seem to find the magic in the debian/rules file. I don't see how the version number is overridden
[19:49] <micahg> sveinse: line 122
[19:50] <sveinse> Is the DEB_DH_GENCONTROL_ARGS var automatically passed to dh_gencontrol?
[19:52] <micahg> it appears to be a per package argument that's passed
[19:52] <sveinse> jup, I see the makefile things of this. I'm just wondering how this is passed on to dh_xx
[19:53] <micahg> appears to be automagical
[19:53] <sveinse> dh_gencontrol doesn't seem to be overriden at least
[19:53] <dupondje> Somebody knows how to get pbuilder-dist have umask 0022 ?
[20:17] <nh2> is there an API for the message indicator I can use to check if it is green (new message) or that tells me when it turns green?
[20:18] <bdrung_> Laney: sorry. i was busy and forgot to let you know
[20:29] <dupondje> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=631087
[20:30] <dupondje> seems we have this in ubuntu also
[20:30] <dupondje> :s
[20:37] <`26> I'm trying to build a LiveCD image from scratch and I can't find the build scripts anywhere. Have I not been looking deep enough or are they simply not available?
[23:03] <dupondje> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=631087 => I hope somebody can look at this bug. It affects Oneiric also :(
[23:18] <faina> The // makes me think that one of the $DIST variables isn't being set?
[23:27] <faina> Hi. I tried building a new pbuilder on a 11.04 system and it worked for me. Though I have fairly customized .pbuilderrc