=== hunger_ is now known as hunger [09:23] Good morning === tazz_ is now known as tazz [09:32] hey Quintasan [09:32] debfx: ScottK: seems the qt branch moved to ~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/qt, isn't it? [09:33] didrocks: Yup, we did a move to keep the naming consistent [09:33] Quintasan: ok, would have been nice to have been warned about it for comaintainance, but it's fine :) [09:34] didrocks: I guess you are not subscribed to kubuntu-devel mailing list [09:34] Quintasan: no, I have already enough mailing list TBH ;) [09:35] but we kind of agree with ScottK that pinging on IRC was enough (even if last week, I was quite unavailable due to our rally) [09:35] woosh [09:36] I wonder why yofel did only send that to kubuntu-devel [09:36] Blame apachelogger for that [09:41] :) [09:42] so sni-qt should be moved as well, I guess? [09:42] not sure if it makes sense for kubuntu to have it as well [09:43] fixed [09:44] didrocks: is it a packaging-only branch? [09:45] apachelogger: it's a merge-upstream like branch, so contain sources (derived from upstream branch) + debian/ directory [09:45] Sput: on a related note, did you look into sni-qt to replace your own sni code? [09:45] didrocks: then there is no reason for it to be in packaging IMHO [09:45] apachelogger: ok, so let's keep it that way [09:46] apachelogger: not yet, no [09:46] packaging only ought to contain packaging-only branches, branches that have a strong relation with an existing launchpad project/src import still have a reason to exist :) [09:47] apachelogger: isn't that a patch for Qt itself? [09:47] apachelogger: ok, so ~kubuntu-packager/qt/ubuntu for now [09:47] Sput: I think it is a plugin of sorts [09:47] Sput: there is a patch for Qt, and a plugin [09:47] opss [09:47] ~kubuntu-packager/sni-qt/ubuntu [09:47] apachelogger: yeah but aiui, you need to patch Qt first to make it pluggable [09:47] didrocks: right :) [09:47] so that's nothing we can use [09:47] Sput: ah, I see [09:48] Sput: seems it will be integrated in next Qt merge window [09:48] at least not before requiring Qt 4.8 (or did it make it into 4.7?) [09:48] (the patch to Qt) [09:48] no, it didn't, even 4.8 is too late [09:48] there won't be a Qt 4.9 [09:48] morning [09:48] apachelogger: btw, I'm changeing the Vcs-Bzr tag for qt [09:48] and I don't think we'll depend on Qt5 anytime soon :) [09:48] didrocks: thx === freeflyi1g is now known as freeflying [10:07] fabo: what's your pick on removing libqt4-sql-sqlite2 package? [10:07] fabo: there is some intention of getting rid of sqlite2 in ubuntu, see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sqlite/+bug/747325 [10:07] Ubuntu bug 747325 in sqlite (Ubuntu Oneiric) "demote sqlite, or remove it from the archive" [Medium,Triaged] [10:25] Quintasan: in rev 164 or Qt, you remove debian/patches/kubuntu_26_dbusconnection_pointer.diff, with as a title "removed patches which wen upstream according to Qt developers at UDS" [10:25] http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/?rev=164&view=rev | svn://anonsvn.kde.org/home/kde/trunk -r 164 | Coolo: bug in my bugfix :-( [10:25] Quintasan: for this patch however, it's upstream in Qt 4.8, not 4.7 [10:26] didrocks: ddenis told us it's safe to remove that :s [10:26] Quintasan: I'll readd it though, it's needed for the new dconf-qt binding [10:26] no worry :) [10:26] just so that you are not surprised of seeing it back ;) [10:27] I see little chance we can go with 4.8 for oneiric, unfortunately :/ [11:41] apachelogger: ping [11:46] pogo === ximion2 is now known as ximion [11:51] shadeslayer: what's about kcfg btw ? did you find what you were looking for ? [11:52] :) [12:13] * yofel blames apachelogger for not checking recipients too. [12:13] Sorry though. [12:51] Nightrose: ping [12:51] apachelogger: pong [12:52] I spammed you a preview request for blog posty posty, if you get a chance it would be cool if you could take a look at it :) [12:52] low-tech intro blahblah [12:53] apachelogger: i'm at work for a few more hours [12:53] k, no hurry [12:57] apachelogger: another ping [12:57] syn-ack [12:57] apachelogger: http://paste.kde.org/91669 [12:57] rst [12:58] apachelogger: Am I doing library packaging right or wrong? [12:58] or horribly wrong? [12:58] inb4 symbols [13:01] well, hard to say with just the control file :P [13:01] Quintasan: the dev package ought to depend on the library packages [13:01] and you should make sure the libraries do not require stuff from the data package at runtime [13:02] for gluonengine you'd probably want a >= source:version or binary:version [13:02] on the libs [13:02] for -dev too for that matter [13:02] for the packages deping on libgluoncore0 too [13:03] rule of thumb: packages from the same source package usually should have some sort of versioned dep depending on the source or package version to prevent partial upgrade issues [13:04] also, while I am at it :P [13:04] Maintainer: Michał Zając [13:04] I think control fiels are restricted to ASCII by policy [13:05] So I am bound to be Michal Zajac? [13:05] ah na [13:05] only the field name is bound to ascii [13:06] The field name is composed of printable ASCII characters (i.e., characters that have values between 33 and 126, inclusive) except colon and must not with a begin with # [13:06] All control files must be encoded in UTF-8. [13:06] no further restrictions [13:06] also there is a typo in the manual [13:06] zomg [13:06] <-- to lazy to report [13:09] apachelogger: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/69524/packaging.tar.bz2 [13:09] Please check this [13:09] How's KDE 4.7 packaging going? [13:09] maco: Any luck on the keyboard crash thingy? [13:09] JT apparently got lost playing minewars or what's its name [13:13] * Quintasan will get to that when apachelogger reviews his Gluon magic [13:13] Package: gluonengine [13:13] Architecture: any [13:13] Depends: libgluonaudio0 (>= ${source:Version}), [13:13] are you sure it is only source? [13:14] like does it link against it? [13:14] if so it is binary not source [13:14] Package: gluon-games [13:14] Architecture: any [13:14] Depends: gluonengine, gluonplayer, ${misc:Depends}, ${shlibs:Depends} [13:14] missing deps [13:14] eh [13:14] versions [13:14] gluoncreator too [13:14] Package: libgluoninput0 [13:14] Architecture: any [13:14] Depends: libgluoncore0 (>= ${source:Version}), [13:14] that is definitely binary along with all the other libs [13:15] oh [13:15] come to think of it [13:15] Quintasan: why is it called libgluon-data and not gluon-data? [13:15] libgluon-dev still misses deps on the libs [13:15] wrap-and-sort-- [13:15] typo [13:15] It must have eaten them [13:15] "devlopment" [13:16] gluonplayer's advanced advanced description probably exceeds 80 chars/line [13:16] Homepage: http://gluon.tuxfamily.org/ [13:17] I thought gluon lives on gaminfreedom or something? [13:17] It odes [13:17] does* [13:17] your copyright file has mixture of tab and spaces to indent the copyright holders [13:17] also I think your dep5 is invalid [13:18] IIRC there must not be a newline before the license field, otherwise the paragraph will be licenseless [13:19] that said, what you can do is License: Foo and then have a sepearate paragraph that just contains "License: Foo\n description blah blah\n more description" [13:19] * ScottK wonders why we care? [13:19] license ought to be LGPL-2.1+ btw [13:19] ScottK: the parser [13:19] So? [13:19] Format: http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/dep/web/deps/dep5.mdwn?view=markup&pathrev=174 [13:19] I'm familiar with it. [13:19] if you tell the parser this file complies with the spec then it better does so [13:20] ScottK: no, no, note the Format: [13:20] So don't tell it that. [13:20] my point exactly :P [13:20] either you write valid dep5 or you do not denote it as such [13:20] Just about the last thing we need is making filling out debian/copyright harder. [13:20] in which case you can still follow the spec but as you please rather than as it defines ^^ [13:20] Right, so just ignore dep5 entirely. [13:20] ScottK: well, you could write a gui for it with dep5 :P [13:21] or I could spend my time doing something useful. [13:21] or cli for that matter [13:22] This DEP5 is totally...meh [13:22] Quintasan: gluon engines contains public libs? [13:22] No idea. [13:23] Since it's a library used to create games I guess it does [13:24] nono [13:24] my point being [13:24] usr/lib/libGluonEngine.so.* [13:24] that is a public lib so the package should be libgluonengine0 [13:24] also [13:25] BROTIP: *.so should be in a -dev package UNLESS there is no *.so.* or the .so is no link in which case it is a proper lib and not material for -dev [13:27] I do not have *.so anywhere in install files [13:28] core0.install: [13:28] usr/lib/libGluonCore.so [13:28] usr/lib/libGluonCore.so.* [13:28] audio0.install: [13:28] usr/lib/libGluonAudio.so [13:28] usr/lib/libGluonAudio.so.* [13:29] graphics0.install: [13:29] usr/lib/libGluonGraphics.so [13:29] usr/lib/libGluonGraphics.so.* [13:29] ..... [13:29] Are you implying I should put it in -dev? [13:29] yes [13:29] that is what the BROTIP sez [13:29] Quintasan: how was skateboarding btw? [13:29] then libgluon{input,graphics,audio,etc}0 is not neccessary? [13:30] read again [13:30] BROTIP: *.so should be in a -dev package UNLESS there is no *.so.* or the .so is no link in which case it is a proper lib and not material for -dev [13:30] apachelogger: I'm still not able to walk [13:30] lol [13:30] good [13:30] more work then! [13:30] muhahahaha [13:30] usr/lib/libGluonGraphics.so is not a link AFAIC [13:31] How the hell I am supposed to determine whether it is or not? [13:32] look at it? :P [13:32] + it most certainly is if there is a .so.x.x for the lib [13:32] (not always though) [13:32] So I should move usr/lib/libGluonGraphics.so [13:33] usr/lib/libGluonGraphics.so.* to -dev [13:33] and so on for the other stuff [13:33] that will make those packages empty :O [13:33] no [13:33] dude [13:33] BROTIP: *.so should be in a -dev package UNLESS there is no *.so.* or the .so is no link in which case it is a proper lib and not material for -dev [13:33] where do I say *.so.* should go into -dev? [13:33] hurp durp [13:33] K [13:34] oh, this just depressed me [13:35] apachelogger: http://paste.kde.org/91711 -> libgluon-dev.install [13:35] I am doing it right. [13:35] Otherwise, throw bricks [13:40] looks good [13:40] apachelogger: I guess I just fixed all that you mentioned, anything else? [13:40] no [13:41] * Quintasan goes to #debian-qt-kde [13:48] Is it correct ? http://paste.ubuntu.com/638431/ [13:57] bambee: correct in what way? [13:58] apachelogger: Does this copyright contain an error ? [14:06] bambee: an error in what way? [14:07] the only way copyright can be wrong is by not being complete or listing people who do not have copyright or by noting wrong licenses [14:07] neither of which I can check :P === ximion1 is now known as ximion [14:19] apachelogger: fix kgetsource so it uses new packaging branches [14:22] apachelogger: nvm [14:25] apachelogger: I fixed it [14:25] apachelogger: ok [14:29] [kubuntu-default-settings] Harald Sitter * apachelogger@ubuntu.com-20110705142930-wf3cfuoce0cmv3dl * (2 files in 2 dirs) Remove quickaccess widget from plasma init script === ximion is now known as ximion1 === ximion1 is now known as ximion [14:38] bambee: i used a QHash serialized the data using a QDataStream, wrote the stream into a QByteArray and wrote the QBA using KConfigGroup::write() :P [14:39] shadeslayer: you have a formatting error there [14:39] it is tpl not tpl [14:40] also what are you storing that way? [14:45] [kubuntu-dev-tools] Harald Sitter * apachelogger@ubuntu.com-20110705144530-dtx2kidiwv5k0eyq * bin/kgetsource merge [14:46] shadeslayer: ping [14:46] Quintasan: ping [14:46] yofel: ping [14:46] bambee: ping [14:46] pong [14:46] apachelogger: pong [14:46] * Quintasan has to go in a bit [14:47] * shadeslayer might pull a rodrigo any moment [14:47] what are you working on? [14:47] apachelogger: had to get my documents in order for my visa application [14:47] involves running to and fro to the college [14:48] apachelogger: ssup with the ping? [14:48] well [14:48] as you probably do not know [14:48] alpha2 is supposed to be released this week [14:49] seing as rc1 is not done that makes me a bit, erm, worrid [14:49] apachelogger: question is, do we want rc1 in the alpha ? [14:49] we have yet to test it [14:50] I reckon a alpha is meant to be tested [14:50] otherwise one would not bother releasing non-production quality sofware :P [14:51] i just don't think its a good idea if we rush it, thats all [14:51] there are only a couple of packages left on the wiki [14:51] so we should get them done [14:52] * Quintasan has to head out [14:52] sure, i can work on some of them after dinner [14:52] I'll be back like in 4 hours so I'll start working [14:52] kdetoys are on dep wait [14:52] kdenetwork still awaits response from Kopete [14:53] apachelogger: i'm also having a hard time figuring out ubiquity and python plasma kpart [14:54] shadeslayer: see, my point is that this is not particularly important right now [14:54] right, which is why i haven't worked on it one bit, just searched for docs [14:57] apachelogger: anyways, get RC1 done -> top priority [15:12] [kdegraphics-strigi-analyzer] Harald Sitter * apachelogger@ubuntu.com-20110705151247-tdug1nn0qd1dfsem * (10 files in 4 dirs) * Initial release (moved out of kdegraphics) * Repacked upstream source to include copies of LGPL and GPL [15:15] Quintasan: why is kdenetwork waiting? [15:15] that does not compute [15:15] ah, missing symbols [15:15] just dont package kopete :P === James1479 is now known as James147 [15:41] apachelogger: pong [15:42] [kdegraphics-strigi-analyzer] Harald Sitter * apachelogger@ubuntu.com-20110705154201-np2atqp4av6f2g4m * debian/control add missing deps and transitional package [15:42] [kdegraphics-strigi-analyzer] Harald Sitter * apachelogger@ubuntu.com-20110705154220-xf0xpxhuff79u12t * debian/kdegraphics-strigi-analyzer.install whoops, forgot to add an install file for the primary package [15:42] bambee: what are you working on right now? [15:43] apachelogger: libexiv2 to solve the build failure for kdeplasma-addons [15:43] libkexiv2 I mean [15:43] (required by kde-sc-dev-lastest) [15:43] any problems there? [15:43] except a build failure ... no [15:43] why? [15:44] [kdegraphics-thumbnailers] Harald Sitter * apachelogger@ubuntu.com-20110705154420-avl4ucwxfnqptt3b * (10 files in 4 dirs) * Initial release (moved out of kdegraphics) * Repack upstream source to contain copies of GPL and LGPL [15:44] I did something wrong ? [15:45] bambee: just checking [15:45] ...if you need help with anything [15:48] apachelogger: In fact, pkgkde-symbolhelpers does not work, I ask it to update symbols for libkexiv2 and NOTHING is updated [15:49] actually I build it with debuild, then I use the following command : pkgkde-symbolshelper patch -p libkexiv2-10 -v 4:4.6.90 < ../libkexiv2_4.6.90-0ubuntu1~ppa1_amd64.build [15:49] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uyn41Zjz3sk [15:49] * apachelogger packages away [15:49] oh gosh [15:49] ok, that dub is just horrible [15:49] I am sorry [15:49] the output: http://paste.ubuntu.com/638464/ <--- WTF ? [15:50] then if I try to build again the symbols are NOT UPDATED [15:50] bambee: do you ahve this in a branch? [15:51] apachelogger: I can update the package rules to my lp... [15:51] wait [15:53] [kdegraphics-strigi-analyzer] Harald Sitter * apachelogger@ubuntu.com-20110705155302-2e1aqw9lb317nywu * debian/control add libtiff builddep [15:57] apachelogger: https://code.launchpad.net/~bambi/kubuntu-packaging/libkexiv2 [15:57] the package is not perfect yet but it's almost done [15:58] the problem is: I cannot update libkexiv2-10.symbols with pkgkde-symbolshelper [15:58] [kdegraphics-thumbnailers] Harald Sitter * apachelogger@ubuntu.com-20110705155812-gj9w3d1n4fje4i2s * debian/changelog +repack [16:00] bambee: does it not do anything? [16:00] * apachelogger has not updated symbol files in ages [16:01] apachelogger: see yourself http://paste.ubuntu.com/638464/ [16:01] why yes, I reckon it is not supposed to print anything? [16:01] and when I try to build again the symbol file is definitively not updated, I see a "diff" on stdout [16:02] apachelogger: assuming it prints nothing, the build process should not compute a difference for the next build :) [16:03] well [16:03] you need to rebuild your source package :P [16:04] :P [16:05] debuild -S && debuild -j8 && pkgkde-symbolshelper :) [16:06] clearly the whole workflow surrounding symbols is flawed [16:06] * apachelogger puts on todo [16:06] bambee: you could just diff your symbols file against the one in bzr? :P [16:06] then you know whether it was updated or not [16:07] if there were any updates at all [16:07] also please paste an ls of your debian dir [16:08] [kdegraphics-strigi-analyzer] Harald Sitter * apachelogger@ubuntu.com-20110705160817-1whz5ht9q9j9msvx * debian/control fix dep name [16:08] apachelogger: found [16:09] the soname and the package name were not updated in the symbol file o_O (I have renamed libkexiv2-9 to libkexiv2-10) [16:10] [kdegraphics-strigi-analyzer] Harald Sitter * apachelogger@ubuntu.com-20110705160956-7vd4mxequz2bcr5j * debian/control I am in a good mood, here is a long description [16:12] someone messed up :P [17:25] [kgamma] Harald Sitter * apachelogger@ubuntu.com-20110705172528-wsb60of5cohpri2x * (10 files in 4 dirs) * Initial release (moved out of kdegraphics) * Repack upstream source to include copy of GPL2 [17:27] * apachelogger pokes shadeslayer [17:30] apachelogger: could you create a branch "libkexiv2" into lp:kubuntu-packagers please ? [17:31] then I will propose a merge [17:32] >>> bzr push lp:~kubuntu-packagers/kubuntu-packaging/libkexiv2 [17:32] Created new branch. [17:32] bambee: ^ [17:36] bambee: don't forget to copy the .bzr-builder dir from an existing branch [17:37] apachelogger: I've not the rights for that [17:37] into your branch [17:37] ah [17:37] what? [17:37] I do not compute [17:37] bambee: you are creating a new branch, no? [17:37] yes for libkexiv2, it's already pushed into my repository and I would like to push it into kubuntu-packagers [17:38] so someone has to create this branch before [17:38] and then I will propose a merge (from my branch to kubuntu-packagers) [17:38] :) [17:38] apachelogger: do you compute now? [17:39] there is the new branch now [17:39] BUT [17:39] you should copy the .bzr-builder dir from an existing packaging branch [17:39] ok [17:40] e.g. cd libkexiv2 && cp -r ../ksnapshot/.bzr-builddeb && bzr add .bzr-builddeb && bzr ci [17:40] well, I am tired xD [17:48] [kgeography] Harald Sitter * apachelogger@ubuntu.com-20110705174822-zq2867x5wrpyt84w * (12 files in 4 dirs) * Initial release (moved out of kdeedu) * Repack upstream source to include a copy of GPL2 [17:51] merge proposal : https://code.launchpad.net/~bambi/kubuntu-packaging/libkexiv2/+merge/66943 [17:51] * apachelogger wonders where everyone is [17:58] [kgeography] Harald Sitter * apachelogger@ubuntu.com-20110705175844-n40km43aaozp0qxf * debian/changelog Repack upstream source to include a copy of GPL2 and GFDL1.2 [18:00] [kgeography] Harald Sitter * apachelogger@ubuntu.com-20110705180023-6gzmm2meppjuxsgu * debian/changelog +repack kthxbai [18:12] [khangman] Harald Sitter * apachelogger@ubuntu.com-20110705181222-tvyq9ijaue7xwd60 * (11 files in 4 dirs) Initial release (moved out of kdeedu) [18:13] bambee: do you want a PITA review with that? [18:14] what's a PITA review? [18:14] one done apachelogger style [18:15] one where you'd probably have to spend a whole day fixing stuff :P [18:15] lets just start :P [18:15] bambee: wrong: Vcs-Browser: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~kubuntu-packagers/libexiv2/ubuntu [18:15] also wrong: Vcs-Bzr: https://code.launchpad.net/~kubuntu-packagers/libexiv2/ubuntu [18:15] i was reading the ninjas packing and i was wondering what was taking so long on 4.7 beta1 beta2 comes out tomorrow [18:16] apachelogger: oh right [18:17] ohoh [18:17] cpatrick08: you are not helping, so naturally it takes longer [18:18] bambee: I see at least one file that has LGPL [18:18] how very rude [18:18] bambee: but there is no full copy of the LGPL [18:18] or maybe I just can't find it? [18:19] "Any other files in libkexiv2/* and tests/* are under the GNU General Public License, version 2 or later (GPL-2+)" [18:19] s/Any/All/g [18:19] apachelogger meant: ""All other files in libkexiv2/* and tests/* are under the GNU General Public License, version 2 or later (GPL-2+)"" [18:19] ? [18:19] sounds bette rIMHO [18:20] bambee: it would be cool if you could make debian/copyright not exceed 80 chars/line [18:20] * apachelogger is too lazy to resize his terminal :P [18:20] bambee: it would be good if you could add the brief license statements of LGPL/GPL to the copyright ifle [18:20] *file [18:34] [khangman] Harald Sitter * apachelogger@ubuntu.com-20110705183412-4yz9yly2uilo2z6x * debian/control add libkdeedu-dev builddep [18:36] [khangman] Harald Sitter * apachelogger@ubuntu.com-20110705183601-regumkh2u6lo6cjr * debian/changelog Repack upstream source to include a copy of FDL1.2 === tazz_ is now known as tazz [18:52] [kig] Harald Sitter * apachelogger@ubuntu.com-20110705185209-z6g4u6ukz0y64k0q * (9 files in 4 dirs) Initial release (moved out of kdeedu) === _Groo__ is now known as _Groo_ [18:57] <_Groo_> hi/2 all [18:57] <_Groo_> any news on kde 4.7 for nautty? [18:59] _Groo_: help needed [19:00] <_Groo_> apachelogger: yeah i can see in ninjas we have packages for oneiric [19:01] apachelogger: ok I fill fix the copyright [19:01] <_Groo_> apachelogger: anyone working on any backports or i would be the first? [19:01] s/fill/will/ [19:01] bambee meant: "apachelogger: ok I will fix the copyright" [19:01] _Groo_: first we need oneiric!!!!! zomg [19:01] <_Groo_> apachelogger: dont have time for both :D i rather help with natty packages [19:02] _Groo_: you have to split a LOT of packages and to rewrite everything :) [19:02] <_Groo_> apachelogger: im making my weekly build of calligra AWS [19:02] <_Groo_> bambee: yeah, lots of fun :) [19:02] and a lot of work :) [19:02] <_Groo_> work = fun! [19:02] <_Groo_> all fun in packages is work! [19:03] right [19:03] _Groo_: there will be no natty packages unless oneiric gets finished [19:03] <_Groo_> apachelogger: ehehe ill start migrating base packages to nautty :D [19:03] <_Groo_> like soprano, kdelibs, kdebase etc etc [19:04] <_Groo_> those alone will keep me busy for a few days [19:04] perhaps I did not make myself clear, you should work on oneiric packages [19:04] <_Groo_> btw as soon as calligra hits the streets im i a position to release nautty almost in the same day [19:04] alpha2 is due this week and we are not done [19:05] <_Groo_> apachelogger: i DONT have a oneiric build in my machine [19:05] and somehow I feel we wont get done as motivation is falling into a big black hole [19:05] _Groo_: sudo pbuilder create --dist oneiric [19:05] <_Groo_> apachelogger: whi motivation is falling? no more beer? oO [19:06] <_Groo_> apachelogger: how many gigabytes that little command will throw at me? [19:08] <1 [19:08] in fact <0.5 [19:09] in fact < 0.2 I suppose [19:09] perhaps even <0.1 [19:11] <_Groo_> apachelogger: ok ok [19:12] [kig] Harald Sitter * apachelogger@ubuntu.com-20110705191240-o0vblpbu8rw8sy9i * debian/changelog Repack upstream source to include copy of FLD1.2 and COPYING-CMAKE-SCRIPTS [19:13] [kig] Harald Sitter * apachelogger@ubuntu.com-20110705191317-yzeoyog1ik9f5l8j * debian/rules phony tests anyone? [19:13] [kig] Harald Sitter * apachelogger@ubuntu.com-20110705191326-mfz74qjnelu9z1rm * debian/copyright add copyright [19:14] [kig] Harald Sitter