| geser | wgrant: Hi, what was the magic url for the LP build chroots again? hrw was looking for it yesterday | 06:51 |
|---|---|---|
| wgrant | geser: https://launchpad.net/api/devel/ubuntu/oneiric/i386 | 06:52 |
| geser | thanks | 06:53 |
| geser | hrw: ^^ | 06:53 |
| dholbach | good morning | 06:58 |
| geser | good morning dholbach | 06:59 |
| dholbach | hi geser | 07:01 |
| iulian | Morning dholbach, geser. | 07:43 |
| dholbach | hey iulian | 07:44 |
| iulian | How's it going? | 07:47 |
| hrw | wgrant, geser: thanks | 07:59 |
| hrw | uf. now I have chroot where package fail ;D | 09:09 |
| tumbleweed | is that what you wanted? :) | 09:10 |
| hrw | yes | 09:11 |
| hrw | package built in my chroots and not on launchpad. now I have LP one locally | 09:12 |
| dupondje | https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/courier/0.66.1-1ubuntu1/+build/2611450/+files/buildlog_ubuntu-oneiric-i386.courier_0.66.1-1ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz | 09:47 |
| dupondje | umask 0022 is default to build no ? | 09:47 |
| geser | dupondje: bigjools and/or wgrant in #launchpad should know it | 09:51 |
| tumbleweed | seeing as we just changed the default in ubuntu, it's quite likely that affected sbuild too | 10:00 |
| tumbleweed | oh, that was noted in #ubuntu-devl | 10:00 |
| dupondje | ye :) | 10:01 |
| hrw | found issue ;) | 10:07 |
| hrw | i486 != i686 != i486 | 10:07 |
| hrw | die i386... asap | 10:07 |
| tumbleweed | what was different about the launchpad chroot that triggered that? | 10:07 |
| hrw | tumbleweed: bug 802985 hold me from using i386 chroot before | 10:09 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 802985 in eglibc (Ubuntu Hardy) "[lucid] /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/preinst: 399: arithmetic expression: expecting EOF: "3.0-0-generic"" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/802985 | 10:10 |
| hrw | so I tested on amd64 which is totally different | 10:10 |
| hrw | new lesson learnt | 10:10 |
| hrw | new patch to gcc-4.4 (nearly obsolete now) generated | 10:10 |
| tumbleweed | ah right | 10:11 |
| === dholbach_ is now known as dholbach | ||
| dupondje | dh_installman manpages/*.{5,8} | 12:37 |
| dupondje | this doesn't work anymore ? | 12:37 |
| tumbleweed | dupondje: that's a bashism separate it into two parameters | 12:47 |
| tumbleweed | err, prentend I used some punctuation there | 12:48 |
| dupondje | weird it worked before tho :s | 12:48 |
| tumbleweed | bash used to be the default shell (a while ago) | 12:49 |
| dupondje | https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shorewall-lite/+bug/806457 | 12:50 |
| ubottu | Ubuntu bug 806457 in shorewall-lite (Ubuntu) "Fix FTBFS in oneiric" [Undecided,New] | 12:50 |
| dupondje | looks fine ? | 12:50 |
| tumbleweed | I'd have put them both on the same line | 12:50 |
| tumbleweed | also, that's something to submit to debian | 12:50 |
| tumbleweed | and the changelog entry isn't very helpful :) | 12:51 |
| tumbleweed | dh_installman didn't change at all | 12:51 |
| dupondje | true, its because bash isn't the default shell anymore :) | 12:52 |
| jtaylor | it also fails in debian | 12:52 |
| jtaylor | please file a RC bug | 12:52 |
| jtaylor | User: debian-release@lists.debian.org Usertags: goal-dash | 12:53 |
| tumbleweed | dupondje: "Removed a bashism from debian/rules" would be far clearer. | 12:53 |
| jtaylor | hm no that tag does not apply | 12:54 |
| dupondje | but its still usefull to get it fixed in Ubuntu no ? | 13:00 |
| tumbleweed | yes, but as it's RC in debian, we can probably get it uploded there quite quickly. (if the maintainer doesn't respond within a week or so, ping me, I'll NMU it) | 13:01 |
| jtaylor | yes, but it needs fixing in debian too | 13:01 |
| * dupondje hates debian's bugsystem | 13:02 | |
| dupondje | launchpad is much more easier :) | 13:02 |
| tumbleweed | hrm, I'd say they both have their advantages. I'll agree launchpad is easier to use, though | 13:03 |
| jtaylor | I can file it if like | 13:03 |
| jtaylor | been massfiling the last few days anyway, one more does not matter :) | 13:04 |
| dupondje | well i'll try it out myself :) | 13:04 |
| dupondje | gotto learn it one day :D | 13:04 |
| Laney | you hate it, but you've never filed a bug there? | 13:05 |
| dupondje | well did file a bug | 13:05 |
| dupondje | or add comment | 13:05 |
| dupondje | but not alot :) | 13:05 |
| dupondje | and every time I need to read its man page again ^^ | 13:05 |
| geser | man page? | 13:10 |
| Laney | reportbug packagename ... | 13:10 |
| dupondje | geser: http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting | 13:10 |
| dupondje | :) | 13:10 |
| geser | I use reportbug, answer the questions, write the mail body, attach the patch and send it | 13:11 |
| jtaylor | reportbug crashes for me every 2nd time ._. | 13:12 |
| tumbleweed | jtaylor: why? | 13:13 |
| jtaylor | ought to file a bug for that, but I always just use regular email | 13:13 |
| jtaylor | no idea | 13:13 |
| jtaylor | its random, did not really have any success at debuggingit | 13:14 |
| jtaylor | so many opendrim packages broken :( | 13:26 |
| tumbleweed | we have someone working on those | 13:27 |
| tumbleweed | it's really easy to fix | 13:27 |
| jtaylor | who? | 13:27 |
| tumbleweed | scarneiro | 13:28 |
| jtaylor | they should be marked then | 13:28 |
| tumbleweed | he had branches filed for most of them that needed work. pitti marked them as "needs fixing" in his patch piloting today | 13:28 |
| tumbleweed | before thta, they were showing up on the bug pages | 13:28 |
| tumbleweed | oh, they still are | 13:29 |
| tumbleweed | I just picked one that wasn't | 13:29 |
| tumbleweed | jtaylor: there, marked them. | 13:32 |
| dupondje | tumbleweed: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/74646996/shorewall-lite.debdiff | 13:32 |
| tumbleweed | dupondje: LGTM | 13:32 |
| jtaylor | thx but you missed quite a few | 13:36 |
| tumbleweed | I marked the ones he had branches for | 13:36 |
| jtaylor | ah ok | 13:36 |
| directhex | Rhonda, you don't happen to have access rights to the backports.debian.org keyring do you? | 13:40 |
| dupondje | http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=632851 and forwarded to debian | 13:40 |
| ubottu | Debian bug 632851 in shorewall-lite "FTBFS due to bashism in debian/rules" [Serious,Open] | 13:40 |
| tumbleweed | dupondje: please link it to the ubuntu bug | 13:41 |
| dupondje | done | 13:42 |
| jtaylor | yey lua-svn has a randomly failing testsuite | 13:44 |
| * Rhonda laughs madly at directhex | 13:56 | |
| Rhonda | directhex: who else but me? :) | 13:56 |
| * Rhonda hmmms, I had rt.d.o open somewhere today already for processing tickets … | 13:57 | |
| Rhonda | directhex: buy me a beaverage at debconf :P | 13:57 |
| directhex | Rhonda, sadly i won't be at debconf :( | 13:57 |
| directhex | Rhonda, fosdem 2012? | 13:57 |
| Rhonda | too chaotic to attend for me | 13:57 |
| directhex | Rhonda, i can get robot101 to pay if i give a talk. the trick is working out a subject to talk about at debconf | 13:59 |
| jtaylor | does lua shake have an expect test macro? | 14:00 |
| Rhonda | Is it? I've been tricked into giving four this year .. %-) | 14:00 |
| directhex | Rhonda, :o | 14:00 |
| * Rhonda . o O ( alright, bits from the web team and bits from the backports team ones don't really count ) | 14:01 | |
| directhex | Rhonda, thanks. also thanks from sledge | 14:11 |
| Rhonda | Is he sitting beside you? | 14:11 |
| jtaylor | I can't reproduce this failure anymore: bug 771137 but instead there is a different problem causing a build failure | 14:12 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 771137 in lua-svn (Ubuntu Oneiric) "lua-svn version 0.4.0-2 failed to build on amd64 with GCC-4.6/oneiric" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/771137 | 14:12 |
| jtaylor | should I edit the bug or close it and open a new one? | 14:12 |
| directhex | Rhonda, he's in #debian-uk on oftc. | 14:12 |
| Rhonda | Why can't he send me the kudos himself? :) | 14:13 |
| tumbleweed | jtaylor: I'd just recycle the bug | 14:13 |
| directhex | Rhonda, well i told him to relay beer on my behalf. | 14:14 |
| Rhonda | … only if they have good beer in bosnia. ;) | 14:15 |
| === med_out is now known as medberry | ||
| === medberry is now known as med_out | ||
| === ximion2 is now known as ximion | ||
| === ximion1 is now known as ximion | ||
| === med_out is now known as medberry | ||
| micahg | tumbleweed: are you uploading pppstatus? | 19:29 |
| tumbleweed | micahg: err, just did | 19:30 |
| micahg | k, I was looking at it as well... | 19:30 |
| tumbleweed | sorry, I'll stop | 19:30 |
| micahg | tumbleweed: no, please continue | 19:30 |
| tumbleweed | hah | 19:30 |
| tumbleweed | I've just been uploading things from the same guy | 19:30 |
| micahg | I just wish there was a way to flag something as working on in the UDD view | 19:31 |
| micahg | tumbleweed: you're just doing the FTBFS fixes, right? | 19:31 |
| tumbleweed | yeah | 19:31 |
| micahg | k, I'll grab other things | 19:32 |
| micahg | there's plenty to do :) | 19:32 |
| tumbleweed | in that case, I'll look at some more | 19:32 |
| micahg | tumbleweed: thanks | 19:33 |
| === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| paultag | Rhonda: 'grats on the debian backports gig, just saw that mail :) | 21:00 |
| paultag | well done :) | 21:00 |
| Laney | 'aint real until it's appeared on d-d-a eh? ;-) | 21:01 |
| paultag | :) | 21:01 |
| tumbleweed | jtaylor: not waiting on a debian response for oval-interpreter? | 21:45 |
| jtaylor | no the RC bug in debian is too old with no reaction | 21:46 |
| tumbleweed | sounds NMUable :) | 21:46 |
| tumbleweed | let's give it a few days with a patch, and if there's no response, NMU it | 21:47 |
| tumbleweed | actually I'll nmu it now, it's an ancient bug | 21:48 |
| jtaylor | well there is still much time till debian release, does it need a nmu? | 21:48 |
| tumbleweed | 3 month old RC bug, with no maintainer response. Sounds fine to me | 21:48 |
| jtaylor | go ahead, I'm no dm so I can't | 21:50 |
| tumbleweed | jtaylor: uploaded to delayed/2 | 22:01 |
| jtaylor | thx | 22:01 |
| tumbleweed | bdrung_: hrm, are we doing some thing wrong with sponsor-patch? I'm noticing udd inconsistancies with branches I've sponosred | 22:26 |
| bdrung_ | tumbleweed: that's your code :P | 22:26 |
| tumbleweed | oh, duh, I probably didn't bzr commit while editing (sponsor-patch -e). Maybe we should detect uncommitted changes.. | 22:26 |
| broder | ...oh, you're supposed to commit with -e? | 22:27 |
| tumbleweed | you are in a bzr checkout, so yes | 22:27 |
| broder | i assumed sponsor-patch would run debcommit for me | 22:28 |
| bdrung_ | it does, doesn't it | 22:28 |
| tumbleweed | hmm, it does | 22:28 |
| bdrung_ | it should make sure that everything is committed before pushing | 22:28 |
| * tumbleweed takes a closer look at the inconsistancies | 22:28 | |
| tumbleweed | oh, quilt, urgh | 22:31 |
| === medberry is now known as med_out | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!