[08:07] <jibel> mvo, good morning, could you have a look at bug 806065 pleasE ?
[08:07] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 806065 in update-manager (Ubuntu Oneiric) (and 1 other project) "apt_btrfs_snapshot.py", line 30, in from_line return FstabEntry(*line.split()) TypeError: __init__() takes exactly 7 arguments (5 given) (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/806065
[08:08] <mvo> jibel: uhhh, sure!
[09:27] <kidsodateless_> team, after the installation was completed, everytime it boots up I got this "underv[65]:error:runtime directory 'run/udev' not writeable, for now falling back up'/dev/.udev/ "  and i wait for about a minute before the flash screen start.
[09:29] <jibel> kidsodateless_, it is bug 784216, but not what is causing the 1 min delay before the splash screen
[09:30] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 784216 in udev (Ubuntu) "/run/udev not writable error message (affects: 22) (dups: 2) (heat: 120)" [Low,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/784216
[09:31] <jibel> kidsodateless, you can find if there's anything slow to start in dmesg after booting.
[09:46] <kidsodateless_> jibel, i'm about to file a bug, my question was  how to file a bug for that case, since it was filed already.  i'll move on next test case. thanks
[10:45] <jibel> charlie-tca, bad news xubuntu doesn't upgrade at all. i386 upgrade fails on doc-base and session doesn't start after upgrade on amd64
[12:29] <charlie-tca> jibel: thanks for testing the upgrades. Session won't start is because you must choose Xubuntu session in lightdm
[12:30] <charlie-tca> Anyone not choosing the session gets a fail
[12:30] <charlie-tca> I think that is bug 803499
[12:30] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 803499 in xubuntu-default-settings (Ubuntu) "Xubuntu session using wrong settings (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/803499
[12:34] <jibel> charlie-tca, you're right. by default the combo is empty and I didn't notice it was not xubuntu. session starts fine after selecting xubuntu
[12:36] <jibel> charlie-tca, updating result on tracker
[12:37] <charlie-tca> which makes life much harder for the user now
[13:45] <jibel> anyone to help with alternate, cjk or ltsp ?
[13:46] <hggdh> jibel: getting the alternate
[13:46] <hggdh> jibel: I believe you are referring to the kubuntu alternate, correct?
[13:47] <jibel> hggdh, thanks. I'm referring to ubuntu
[13:49] <hggdh> duh
[13:50] <hggdh> jibel: on the amd64 now
[13:51] <jibel> hggdh, how critical is bug 806453 for a2 ?
[13:51] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 806453 in udev (Ubuntu) "udevd fails with error creating queue file, instance fails to boot (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/806453
[13:52] <charlie-tca> jibel: I can run Ubuntu alternate 386
[14:09] <skaet> jibel, was looking through the results on the tracker,  and not many for ubuntu server images recorded.   Are we just just behind on the paperwork, or have the tests not been run yet?
[14:14] <jibel> skaet, results need to be reported to the tracker.
[14:15] <skaet> jibel,  fair enough,  any ones to be concerned about? (ie. respins needed?)
[14:34] <patdk-wk> hmm, I think the installer is faster
[14:36] <charlie-tca> um, need someone to verify the Ubuntu 386 alternate image will even boot using hardware. I burned it to a dvd-r since it is oversize, but the dvd won't boot, and tells me my primary slave hard disk is bad
[14:36] <ubot4> Ubuntu bug 386 in baz "change to removed files does not conflict (affects: 1) (heat: 3)" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/386
[14:36] <charlie-tca> works in VBox
[14:36] <patdk-wk> hmm
[14:37] <charlie-tca> Not only won't work, but gives a smart error on the second hard drive? That really has me confused
[14:37] <charlie-tca> Xubuntu images work on the same computer
[14:38] <patdk-wk> downloading
[14:40] <charlie-tca> burned two dvd-r's on two different computers
[14:42] <charlie-tca> I will also try a second computer, but it is installing a xubuntu test image right now
[14:43] <patdk-wk> I have a stack of dell optiplex 755's to test with, just have to wait for images to download :(
[14:43] <charlie-tca> Kind of worries me, if it really won't boot
[14:44] <charlie-tca> hm, my dvd drive is failing with dvd's; works with cd's
[14:45] <patdk-wk> nice
[14:45] <patdk-wk> sony drive?
[14:46] <charlie-tca> no,
[14:46] <charlie-tca> hm, it worked with xubuntu alternate burned to dvd
[14:47] <charlie-tca> nope, it is the ubuntu image refusing to start
[14:48] <charlie-tca> thanks for verifying, patdk-wk
[14:48] <patdk-wk> ran esx tests, now running iscsi while I wait for that to download
[14:49] <charlie-tca> heh, I got studio downloading here
[14:49] <hggdh> jibel: my libvirt is failing on default network, will have to dig into it
[14:49] <patdk-wk> I have gigabit :( but downloads only ever go about 200-300kyte/s
[14:50] <charlie-tca> lucky! mine are at 150kB/s
[14:50] <jibel> skaet, sorry was otp. server tests revealed nothing critical
[14:52] <skaet> jibel,  thanks.
[14:53] <charlie-tca> patdk-wk: they are working on the other computer here
[14:53] <charlie-tca> faulty hardware?
[14:53] <patdk-wk> possible
[14:53] <patdk-wk> or dvd didn't burn well, and other drive picks it up easier
[14:54] <charlie-tca> hm, maybe time to retire the motherboard
[14:54] <charlie-tca> That one is new, too (almost). I only bought it used a year ago
[15:04]  * patdk-wk is doing all tests in vmware, unless something needs confirming :)
[15:12] <charlie-tca> patdk-wk: verified here; it is the controller on the motherboard
[15:12] <charlie-tca> swapped the dvd drive to another computer and it is working
[15:13] <patdk-wk> nice
[15:18] <patdk-wk> oh you won't like this :)
[15:22] <charlie-tca> huh?
[15:22] <charlie-tca> what happened?
[15:22] <patdk-wk> iscsi i386 tests failed, again
[15:22] <patdk-wk> iscsi amd64 worked ok
[15:22] <charlie-tca> Oh, that's for jibel to not like
[15:22] <charlie-tca> heh
[15:23] <patdk-wk> ya, I see, I thought it was you name on the bug report :)
[15:23] <jibel> patdk-wk, same error than what was fixed in natty ?
[15:23] <patdk-wk> yep
[15:23] <patdk-wk> same results
[15:23] <jibel> :(
[15:23] <patdk-wk> reopen the old bug?
[15:24] <patdk-wk> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/open-iscsi/+bug/728088
[15:24] <jibel> patdk-wk, bug 728088 ?
[15:24] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 728088 in open-iscsi (Ubuntu Oneiric) (and 2 other projects) "iscsi root with or without auth fails to boot (affects: 8) (heat: 73)" [High,Fix released]
[15:24] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 728088 in open-iscsi (Ubuntu Oneiric) (and 2 other projects) "iscsi root with or without auth fails to boot (affects: 8) (heat: 73)" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/728088
[15:24] <jibel> :-) we agree on the bug number
[15:25] <jibel> patdk-wk, file a new bug, add a reference to the previous issue and tag it regression-release
[15:25] <patdk-wk> ok
[15:25] <patdk-wk> going test i386-auth just incase
[15:25] <jibel> ok
[15:41] <patdk-wk> heh, my bad
[15:41] <patdk-wk> I tested an old natty iso :)
[15:42]  * charlie-tca rattles his brain. Got too many installs going while trying to download, with total 150kB/s to use
[15:43] <charlie-tca> jibel: my Ubuntu 386 tests are mostly on hardware
[15:43] <ubot4> Ubuntu bug 386 in baz "change to removed files does not conflict (affects: 1) (heat: 3)" [Medium,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/386
[15:44] <charlie-tca> hm, ignore that bug. I didn't realize there was such a number
[15:44] <charlie-tca> and it is not fixed!
[15:44] <jibel> but it is not an ubuntu bug
[15:48]  * charlie-tca likes the 3d appearance better then the 2d appearance.
[15:58] <patdk-wk> yep, all is well, I just used the wrong iso :)
[16:03] <brendand> cr3 - launchpad-results is failing to build for me in oneiric. has it been tried out there yet?
[16:31] <mvo> jibel: you did not get a debconf prompt for lightdm?
[16:31] <mvo> jibel: on natty->oneiric upgrade?
[16:31] <jibel> mvo, yes
[16:31] <mvo> jibel: yes means no ;) ?
[16:32] <jibel> mvo, let me rephrase, I noticed a debconf prompt for lightdm
[16:32] <jibel> :)
[16:32] <jibel> is that bad ?
[16:32] <mvo> jibel: heh :) thanks! I just reported it. I consider it bad
[16:32] <mvo> jibel: its not something we should bother the user with
[16:32] <mvo> jibel: but for a2 of course its fine
[16:33] <mvo> bug 806559
[16:33] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 806559 in lightdm (Ubuntu) "debconf prompt about DM to use during natty->oneiric (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/806559
[16:33] <mvo> (just fyi)
[16:33] <mvo> I just wanted to confirm that its not something crazy with my test box
[16:33] <jibel> mvo, cool. thanks for testing.
[16:50] <jibel> qa meeting in 10mn on #ubuntu-meeting
[16:56] <charlie-tca> hm, I can not make ubuntu alternate image work on one computer here. It refuses to boot the dvd
[16:58] <charlie-tca> jibel: what do we do with this? Out of my four systems, the ubuntu alternate will not work on one system
[16:59] <PaoloRotolo> hi all
[16:59] <jibel> charlie-tca, report it, and add the specs of your system. Is it the 1rst time ? bad dvd drive or controller ?
[16:59] <charlie-tca> moved the dvd drive to a different system and it worked with the same disc
[17:00] <charlie-tca> xubuntu alternate burned to dvd works
[17:00] <jibel> charlie-tca, motherboard controller ?
[17:00] <charlie-tca> Wouldn't that fail with any dvd?
[17:00] <jibel> charlie-tca, yes it would
[17:00] <charlie-tca> It is very consistent. Only the Ubuntu alternate fails
[17:01] <charlie-tca> I will report it as system specific
[17:01] <jibel> but if the exact same dvd works on other systems, the only difference is hardware, might be a kernel issue ?
[17:01]  * charlie-tca is going crazy with this
[17:01] <jibel> charlie-tca, how about a1 alternate ?
[17:01] <charlie-tca> could be
[17:01] <charlie-tca> everything worked
[17:01] <charlie-tca> a1, even kubuntu installed on it
[17:02] <charlie-tca> But xubuntu works, and it uses the same kernel
[17:03] <hggdh> jibel: my libvirt is really borked :-(
[17:03] <charlie-tca> I moved the dvd drive with disc to another system and it worked
[17:04] <jibel> aren't supposed to have a qa meeting right now on #ubuntu-meeting ? I'm feeling lonely there :(
[18:17] <hggdh> shouldn't we update the calendar with the correct call for the QA meeting? We still have two entries, one for 1800-1900 and one for 1700-1800
[18:18] <PaoloRotolo> Hi all
[18:21] <hggdh> jibel: I am seeing segfaults on unity-2d-launch (alternate, AMD64). Is it known?
[18:55] <njin> PaoloRotolo: hello friend
[18:56] <PaoloRotolo> njin, hi :)
[19:40] <charlie-tca> I got Ubuntu Alternate 386 except ltsp; I can not do that test
[19:56] <skaet> jibel, around?
[20:34] <charlie-tca> both ubuntustudio images fail
[20:34] <charlie-tca> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
[20:34] <charlie-tca> gnome-panel : Breaks: libpanel-applet2-0 but 1:2.32.1-0ubuntu6.5 is to be installed
[20:34] <charlie-tca> liblash-compat-1 : Breaks: lashd but 0.6.0~rc2-5build1 is to be installed
[20:34] <charlie-tca> filing bug now
[20:35] <charlie-tca> skaet: ^  ^  ^
[20:35] <skaet> charlie-tca, ack.  thanks