[00:03] <bryceh> tjaalton, pst push xserver to git
[05:27] <tjaalton> bryceh: can't, need to rebase first.. and please don't push such changelog entries if you know I might have the commit :/
[05:29] <tjaalton> but, sorry for not pushing it anyway! :)
[05:30] <tjaalton> it was an easy merge anyway, pushed now
[05:50] <tjaalton> bryceh: sorry, let me try another entré _after_ the breakfast..
[06:12] <bryceh> something's up with vmware - 805777 and 798830.  needs rebuild?
[06:16] <tjaalton> abi hasn't changed, probably just unity fail
[06:17] <tjaalton> note that if it's using lightdm, it doesn't actually restart the xserver
[06:20] <RAOF> Hm.  It sounds not totally unlike Robert's ‘nothing draws after I log out on radeon’ bug that I'm trying to reproduce once the box finally finishes updating.
[06:22] <tjaalton> i should have vmware workstation licenses somewhere..
[06:22] <bryceh> I'm seriously weirded out at how few -intel bug reports there are against oneiric right now
[06:22] <bryceh> the apport hook has to be  broken or something
[06:23] <tjaalton> 3.0 is working ok, it seems.. after the catastrophic .38 that is :)
[06:25] <bryceh> yeah most reports being filed against xorg are ending up being bugs in something else
[06:52] <tjaalton> "unable to initialize module building library", so much for trying out vmware workstation
[06:53] <tjaalton> probably multiarch related
[09:18] <_asdf_> someone there?
[09:18] <_asdf_> i installed the driver but i think im kinda not useing it :S
[14:19] <Sarvatt> RAOF: so wait, we dont ship pipe_*.so in libegl1-mesa-drivers anymore?
[14:20] <Sarvatt> also started getting a new build failure in the past few days with 7.12, do we want to ship these files? http://paste.ubuntu.com/638909/
[17:03] <Sarvatt> so is adding foreign-architecture i386, doing a apt-get update and installing wine:i386 supposed to be the way to go now for amd64?
[17:04] <Sarvatt> err adding that to /etc/dpkg/dpkg.conf
[18:07] <Prf_Jakob> I know its kinda of a long shot to ask here, but does anybody know how to make dkms packages that also installs a udev rule?
[19:22] <Sarvatt> Prf_Jakob: it totally depends on how the packaging is done, for most things these days just throwing packagename.udev in debian/ is enough and you can add an override_dh_installudev line in debian/rules to adjust the priority it installs to if need be. man dh_installudev might help or looking at another package doing the same thing (virtualbox maybe?)
[19:51] <Prf_Jakob> Sarvatt: thanks!
[22:49] <RAOF> Sarvatt: Correct.  We don't ship pipe_*.so in libegl1-mesa-drivers because they're not built :).  egl_gallium now contains *everything*
[23:11] <Sarvatt> RAOF: well now gbm ships them :P
[23:12] <RAOF>  /o\
[23:14] <Sarvatt> had to add a echo "dri/usr/lib/${DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH}/gbm/*.so usr/lib/${DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH}/gbm" >> debian/libgbm1.install.in hook to the edgers packaging
[23:15] <RAOF> Have you enabled gbm's gallium support?
[23:16] <Sarvatt> i'm using origin/ubuntu packaging at the moment, trying not to have to maintain a packaging fork this time around
[23:16] <Sarvatt> i'll give it 2 more weeks before it's changed enough that I have to at this rate :P
[23:17] <Sarvatt> the build system has changed in fun new ways breaking the packaging at least once a week every week since UDS, been a pain in the butt :)
[23:20] <RAOF> Fiddling 'round with configure flags is *much* more fun than trying to automake/autoconf the buildsystem :/
[23:20] <Sarvatt> RAOF: oh http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/commit/?id=b18b2994eff2f51588abe29c7a2209220c9ee9c5
[23:20] <Sarvatt> guess disabling gallium would have been the better option
[23:20] <Sarvatt> coming soon to a 7.11 near you :)
[23:21] <RAOF> Heh.
[23:23] <Sarvatt> thank you so much for working on the 7.11 packaging, massive amounts of changes in the span of 2 weeks right before branching made me not want to even look at it. fix it, broken next day, repeat
[23:24] <Sarvatt> Physical id 0: +98.0°C  (high = +86.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)  
[23:24] <RAOF> Mmmm, sweet!
[23:24] <Sarvatt> shoving a 45w quad in a chassis designed for 35w dual cores makes for some sketchy mesa building :)
[23:25] <RAOF> Although my 7.11 packaging has included a bunch of crazy mistakes :(
[23:26] <Sarvatt> you saying i should look at the contents of the debs and not just blindly accept its right because it builds? :P
[23:29] <RAOF> NO!  I didn't mean to git clean -xdf!  My beautiful build objects!
[23:33] <RAOF> Ok, new plan.
[23:34] <RAOF> Scrounge a power cable from the netbook, and use the shiny dell.
[23:34] <Sarvatt> oh right I gave you a US lead, whoops
[23:35] <bryceh> RAOF, one day I'll swap you that US lead for an aussie one
[23:35] <RAOF> Ta :)
[23:36] <RAOF> The US lead wouldn't be such an issue if it didn't have a ground pin.  My universal connector doesn't do grounding :)
[23:36] <Sarvatt> RAOF: bend it off? :P
[23:44] <Prf_Jakob> Sarvatt: still around?
[23:48] <RAOF> Hm, ok.  The dell seems a little hardlock happy.
[23:50] <Sarvatt> Prf_Jakob: kinda, it's well past beer o'clock so you'll have to forgive me if I'm not too helpful :)
[23:50] <Sarvatt> RAOF: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~sarvatt/lp761065/
[23:50] <Sarvatt> RAOF: absolutely essential on sandybridge :(
[23:51] <RAOF> That's in the oneiric kernel, right?
[23:51] <Sarvatt> there's a natty one in there
[23:51] <Sarvatt> its the 2 patches that are desperately needed
[23:51] <Sarvatt> they'll be in 2.6.38-11
[23:52] <Sarvatt> http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~sarvatt/lp761065/natty/
[23:52] <RAOF> Well, I upgraded to oneiric at the sprint.
[23:52] <Sarvatt> oh crash happy on the oneiric kernel?!
[23:52] <RAOF> Yeah.  On whatever kernel I happen to be running.
[23:52] <Sarvatt> you must be looking at desktop crashy, i'm using the same machine
[23:52] <Sarvatt> (and haven't upgraded in a week and half)
[23:53] <Sarvatt> btw if you swap a SSD in you'll probably need to pin natty's udev, oneiric udev doesn't work on this machine for me
[23:53] <Sarvatt> something tells me it would if i was using a slow hdd
[23:54] <Prf_Jakob> Sarvatt: okay, are you up for some noob packaging questions?
[23:54] <Prf_Jakob> debian packaging*
[23:54] <RAOF> Always :)
[23:54] <Prf_Jakob> if not I'll go and bother somebody else.
[23:55] <Sarvatt> of course, whats up? I'm a noob packager myself but other people might be able to help if I can't :)
[23:55] <Prf_Jakob> Cool, well I just created a vmwgfx package with dkms mkdeb which was suprisingly painless, but I need to get a udev rule in there.
[23:56] <Prf_Jakob> (udev rule is because the drm rules doesn't work for the standalone vmwgfx driver).
[23:56] <Prf_Jakob> (which includes drm & ttm in some sort of unholy combination).
[23:57] <Sarvatt> did you dkms-ify drm too?
[23:57] <Sarvatt> oh that's going to be fun
[23:57] <Sarvatt> we tried that for nouveau in lucid, had to patch udev and plymouth too
[23:57] <Prf_Jakob> it just builds it into one binary so it works okay.
[23:58] <Prf_Jakob> Oooh, hmm plymouth might be a problem, if its not running ontop of fbdev.
[23:58] <Prf_Jakob> except for the udev rules