[16:41] <opello> Hello, I filed a bug on launchpad (#806728) but then found out about "SRU" vs. backports, and was wondering if it was ultimately in the right place?
[16:43] <yofel> lp 806728
[16:44] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 806728 in lucid-backports "Please backport patch 2.6.1 (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/806728
[16:45] <bdmurray> pedro_: it looks like bug 793714 could use a bug pattern
[16:45] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 793714 in zeitgeist (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "zeitgeist-daemon crashed with AttributeError in close(): 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'execute' (affects: 121) (dups: 22) (heat: 652)" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/793714
[16:46] <seb128> bdmurray, pedro_: didrocks is working on updating to the new version which fixes it
[16:46] <yofel> opello: is that the same issue as in lp 575330 ?
[16:46] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 575330 in patch (Ubuntu) "wrong name used when adding new file with patch 2.6 (affects: 2) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/575330
[16:46] <opello> yofel: sure looks like it (based on the description)
[16:47] <opello> I didn't find that in my searching before filing :/
[16:47] <yofel> then you could use that for an SRU
[16:47] <yofel> !sru
[16:47] <ubot4> Stable Release Update information is at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates
[16:48] <opello> I guess I don't follow?
[16:50] <yofel> opello: the patch needs to be converted into a debdiff for the SRU, I can look at it more in-depth in a bit
[16:51] <opello> the new version wouldn't just be adopted?
[16:51] <yofel> the backport can be done, but you need to ask the backporters that, I was talking about the SRU
[16:53] <opello> sorry, I guess I'm not familiar enough with how releases flow and such, I'm simply affected by the issue (and am rather surprised that it's not a bigger deal, because patch is effectively broken)
[16:54] <yofel> funny, I don't use patch much, but when I do I never noticed that it was broken
[16:55] <opello> well, it's only broken when you want to use it to create new files (diff -N...) but ... :)
[17:33] <bil21al> how to debug the empathy crash any one tell me the command for terminal or guide me??
[17:34] <charlie-tca> bil21al: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingEmpathy
[18:57] <hggdh> this is almost requesting moderation: I state, on an email to bugsquad, that I do not intend to take action against subscribers that do a blanket invite to LinkedId and include the ML
[18:57] <hggdh> and a poor misguided soul goes and... sends an invite copying the email thread...
[18:57] <hggdh> so. Poll: should I moderate the user or not?
[19:01] <brendand_n310> he's probably possessed by a spambot
[19:02] <pedro_> hggdh, i'm ok on moderating
[19:03] <roadmr> LinkedIn is *very* sneaky, it asks you for your email login and password in a way that makes it look like their own login screen, then probably goes spamming your entire address book
[19:04]  * micahg thinks lists.ubuntu.com should > /dev/null any mail from linkedin
[19:05] <hggdh> in this case, the email is from the poster, not from linkedIn. I will /dev/null LinkedIn, and moderate this person
[19:07] <micahg> hggdh: ah, right, pushing your buttons I see :)
[19:07] <hggdh> micahg: and successfully, I must admit
[19:08] <charlie-tca> I had one at xubuntu-users sent about 5 of those things, including reminders that the list had not responded properly
[19:09] <brendand_n310> attaching them to bug reports as comments, that's always a classic
[19:10] <charlie-tca> You do the best you can to catch them, as moderator, but some will always get through
[19:19] <hggdh> yeah. S/he just got moderated
[19:28] <hjd> Hi all. A few days back I commented on some unmetdeps bugs I was unable to reproduce to see if the reporters still had the same issue. Turns out some of them do, and I'm unsure how to proceed (bug 792212 and bug 777484).
[19:28] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 792212 in qt-sdk (Ubuntu) "Cannot install qt-sdk: broken package (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/792212
[19:28] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 777484 in padre (Ubuntu) "i can't install padre in lucid (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/777484
[19:29] <yofel> qt-sdk broken again o.O
[19:31] <yofel> hjd: not broken here, and since the OP said he had dep issues I would say close with 'unknown fix'  response
[19:35] <hjd> yofel: ok, is that listed among the standard responses?
[19:36] <yofel> hjd: should be https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Responses#Bugs_resolved_after_update_or_config_change
[19:38] <yofel> hjd: as for the second bug. We don't support packages from 3rd party repositories, so the bug is Invalid. ppa-purge might be one way to get the dependencies right, not sure
[19:51] <hjd> yofel: done. Thanks. There was also a third unmetdeps bug which I was unable to reproduce, and the original reported commented he was not using Ubuntu anymore? I assume that should be closed as invalid as well? (bug 555991)
[19:51] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 555991 in ktechlab (Ubuntu) "Cannot install ktechlab because gpsim does not exist (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/555991
[19:52] <hjd> s/reported/reporter/
[19:56] <yofel> yeah, at least on the reported architecture (amd64) I can't reproduce that either
[19:56] <yofel> letting the bug expire would also be an option
[19:59] <kamusin> seems like something in the latest zeitgeist package has changed and many applications are crashing?
[20:01] <hjd> yofel: hm, hadn't considered that. If I leave it, should I follow up and comment something when it expires or is that optional?
[20:03] <yofel> LP will comment that the bug auto-expired
[20:03] <yofel> (since there was no activity in the last 60 days)
[20:06] <hjd> oh, right. I'll leave that one alone then. Thanks again :)
[20:08] <pedro_> kamusin, file a bug about the crash?
[20:12] <hggdh> pedro_: good afternoon :-)
[20:13] <pedro_> hggdh, good day to you Sir!