[00:17]  * infinity thinks the topic might be slightly outdated.
[07:37] <whereami> Is it an error that the TechnicalOverview page for OneiricOcelot is linking to alpha-2, which does not seem to be present on the servers?
[07:39] <jibel> whereami, which link, this one http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/oneiric/alpha-2/ ?
[07:39] <whereami> yeah, that's the one.
[07:39] <jibel> images have not been released yet.
[07:39] <whereami> i see... seems strange to link to them before they are available.
[07:41] <whereami> Is it that the packages are available, just not the isos?
[07:48] <jibel> whereami, the release notes need to be ready by the time the images are out. you can download and _test_ candidates from http://cdimage.ubuntu.com and the packages which alpha2 is made of are available from the archive.
[07:52] <whereami> jibel, alright, thanks for the info. :) strange way to do things, if you ask me.
[07:53] <jibel> whereami, what is strange in preparing the release material before the release ?
[07:54] <whereami> preparing makes sense, it's the releasing broken links on the primary place folks might find links that's strange.
[07:55] <whereami> I can handle it, though. Don't change just because I say so :)
[07:55] <whereami> I'm sure I don't have the big picture.
[13:04] <skaet> whereami,  links should be working now.   Its just a timing thing (publishing needs to happen, but we know where they should end up).
[13:17] <jibel> hggdh, did you test UEC install on amd64 ?
[13:45] <hggdh> jibel: UEC testing running
[14:47] <jibel> hggdh, do you know what is the status of Ubuntu Server EC2 HVM ?
[15:07] <hggdh> jibel: no, I do not, I do not even know what test this would be in the test rig
[15:56] <skaet> Hi all,  just want to let you know that Alpha 2 has been released now.
[15:57] <skaet> Thank you to alessiogrossosgarrillo, alo21, antonioallegretti, bennachie, brendand, carlotux, chadadavis, charlie-tca, cking, Claudinux, DomenicoRotolo, dpolehn, Erick Brunzell, Fly82, freefly, gjditchfield, glaze, GridCube, GrueMaster, hggdh, jamespage, jibel, Kamusin, kidsodateless, Letozaf_, MarcoBuono, marius78, mvo, NightSilente, njin, PaoloRotolo, PatrickDK, pedro_, per-inge-hallin, primes2h, RRRRube, starsli
[15:57] <skaet> ghts, stgraber, thearkenin, totopalma, uComputer, Unit193 and xdatap1 for testing the ISOs.   The images would not be able to go out today without your efforts!
[15:58] <brendand> skaet - no problem. happy to do it
[15:58] <chadadavis> Well done everyone!
[15:58] <pedro_> well done folks!
[15:58] <cking> that's what we're here for :-)
[15:58] <patdk-wk> not sure about you, cking, but I'm here for the pizza
[15:58] <cking> LOL
[15:59] <GrueMaster> Wait!  There's pizza????
[15:59] <stgraber> pizza? where?
[15:59]  * brendand wants pizza
[15:59] <brendand> iso testing or no iso testing
[16:01]  * skaet is now hungry too...
[16:02] <patdk-wk> http://www.adriennespizzabar.com/ :)
[16:02] <patdk-wk> need to have another trip to the DC again soon, so I can stop by
[16:03] <cking> cd-roms can look like pizza when one is very hungary and had too many beers...
[16:08]  * mvo hugs skaet
[16:08] <mvo> (for the earlier thanks, appreciated :)
[16:17]  * charlie-tca is late again; no pizza left
[16:41] <jibel> skaet, thanks for coordinating the release of alpha2, see you for 10.04.3 :-)
[16:43] <charlie-tca> Good job on alpha2, I guess I will come around for testing 10.04.3, too.
[16:44]  * charlie-tca has decided Xubuntu will not need 10.04.3, though
[16:44] <skaet> charlie-tca, good to know about Xubuntu and 10.04.3 ;)   and glad to have your help on 10.04.3 testing.  :)
[16:45] <charlie-tca> no problem
[16:45] <charlie-tca> Maybe I can even get all my computers working at one time ;)
[16:47] <patdk-wk> when is 10.04.3 due?
[16:49] <charlie-tca> two weeks
[16:49] <charlie-tca> July 21, to be more exact
[17:18] <chadadavis> Do we have a different set of test cases and/or list of SRUs to validate for 10.04.3 or will it be primarily smoke testing of the images?
[17:18] <charlie-tca> images
[17:19] <charlie-tca> Since it is a rebuild of 10.04 with all the changes to date, we test the images to make sure they still work
[17:20] <chadadavis> But the standard test cases then ? Or do we also validate that the SRUs are still fixed for everything that's in the new image? Or is that not necessary?
[17:21] <charlie-tca> We would prefer the SRU's be done before we start testing images. Mostly it is standard test cases
[17:21] <chadadavis> OK. Good to know. Thanks, charlie-tca
[17:21] <infinity> chadadavis: The SRUs themselves are already validated on the package level, you're really just testing the images themselves, boot -> install -> not explode.
[17:21] <charlie-tca> you are welcome