[03:54] <chrisvj> I have a checkout of my code on launchpad. When I try to commit, I get http://pastebin.com/mNfaDG5X  can someone help me?
[04:01] <mwhudson> sigh, i thought those errors were a thing of the past
[04:01]  * mwhudson pokes spiv 
[04:02] <chrisvj> i brought back an old problem?
[04:02] <spiv> mwhudson: most of the sources have been squashed...
[04:03] <mwhudson> chrisvj: that traceback is doubly unfortunate because what it means is "something went wrong, and then this error happened trying to clean up so you can't see what went wrong"
[04:03] <chrisvj> oh :/
[04:03] <chrisvj> afk
[04:08] <chrisvj> back
[04:11] <chrisvj> so... what do i do about it?
[06:55] <ttx> soren: https://help.launchpad.net/API/launchpadlib#Persistent%20references%20to%20Launchpad%20objects
[09:33] <doko> lifeless: do you know about the status of bug #797915 ? shouldn't that work again, if the import which was causing the timeout, was done manually?
[09:34] <lifeless> doko: I believe that its bzr-svn reading all the tags
[09:34] <doko> ahh, ok. so jelmer would need to update an import manually again?
[09:34] <poolie> fyi jelmer will be back at work on monday
[09:36] <lifeless> doko: well, its more we need to address the underlying performance issue
[09:36] <lifeless> doko: then they will all come good
[09:36] <doko> lifeless: I know, I know, however the release schedule doesn't move because of this
[09:37] <lifeless> right
[09:37] <lifeless> but AIUI doing one by hand does not make the next run faster
[09:37] <lifeless> doko: perhaps poolie can ask jelmer to work on this
[09:38] <doko> I'll work around it
[09:38] <poolie> hm no jam?
[09:41] <poolie> doko, i asked him to look at it for today
[09:42] <doko> cool, thanks!
[09:46] <poolie> no problem; thanks for escalating it
[09:46] <jam> hey doko, poolie wanted me to check with you about bug #797915
[09:47] <poolie> it looks like jelmer did a manual import somewhere else?
[09:47] <poolie> i'm not sure whether/how to do that again, or where it is failing now
[09:47] <jam> poolie: it sounds like he did a "bzr svn-import" manually, and pushed it up over the gcc branch
[09:47] <poolie> right
[09:47] <poolie> i don't know if we should just do that again or if it's feasible to make the automatic import faster
[09:48] <poolie> it could be interesting actually to get your memory-usage fu together with jelmer on bzrsvn
[09:48] <poolie> since there are some memory bugs there
[09:48] <jam> yeah, we talked about the latest one
[09:48] <jam> which is that he requests the full history for all tags (concurrently)
[09:53] <doko> jam: I'll work around the import failure, so please don't spend time on a manual update
[09:53] <jam> sure, is that the only one that blocks, though?
[09:53] <jam> gcc
[09:58] <doko> yes, just because ubuntu is getting the baseline from linaro, which is using bzr
[10:02] <jam> ok
[10:02] <jam> I still think it is worth fixing these things, but probably not must-do-right-now since you're unblocked
[15:02] <smspillaz> adeuring: is staging still being cleaned out ?
[15:03] <adeuring> smspillaz: seems so.
[15:03] <smspillaz> ah ok
[15:03] <smspillaz> how long does that usually take ?
[15:03] <adeuring> smspillaz: I haven't accessed staging today before you asked. It the server down since a longer time
[15:03] <wgrant> It's currently half-way through an update which is going to fail.
[15:03] <smspillaz> oh, fun :)
[15:03] <wgrant> It's been down for about an hour now.
[15:03] <wgrant> It will be wiped on Sunday.
[15:04] <smspillaz> ah ok, ping me when it comes back up I guess
[16:02] <smspillaz> wgrant: hm, I guess its still down
[16:02] <smspillaz> wgrant: in that case, should i just use launchpad proper for now and inform someone on the launchpad team which projects need to be deleted ?
[16:03] <wgrant> smspillaz: Try qastaging.
[16:03] <wgrant> smspillaz: We're trying to get staging back up and running, but qastaging is still fine.
[16:03] <smspillaz> ah, will try that
[16:03] <smspillaz> wgrant: no problem
[16:03] <wgrant> (it's erased manually, rather than weekly, but otherwise is pretty similar)
[16:03] <smspillaz> wgrant: for that, if I need to login with launchpadlib, I just use 'qastaging' right ?
[16:04] <wgrant> smspillaz: Natty's should know about it, yes.
[16:04] <wgrant> Maverick's probably doesn't.
[16:04] <smspillaz> I'm on oneiric :)
[16:26] <jono> In a few mins, join Francis Lacoste, head of the Launchpad team, for a Q+A session about Launchpad - join #ubuntu-classroom
[16:42] <ScottK> wgrant: BTW, I'm accepting a bunch of packages today and it's working well.
[16:46] <Cube``> hey guys, i forgot my password, tried the email password feature, but the email hasent reached me in over a week
[16:46] <Cube``> idk what to do
[19:26] <m4n1sh> I am working on a small writeup of LP
[19:26] <m4n1sh> is it right to name the correct the various components of LP
[19:26] <m4n1sh> like Malone
[19:26] <m4n1sh> Soyez?
[19:26] <m4n1sh> or the name has been deprecated?
[19:53] <Quintasan> NCommander: Can you please retry https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kwordquiz/4:4.6.90+repack1-0ubuntu1/+build/2616392 ?
[20:04] <smspillaz> hrm, was qastaging just taken down now as well ?
[20:20] <Guest6749> how do I find fabricator4?
[20:40] <benji> https://launchpad.net/~fabricator4 ?
[20:55] <ScottK> First +queue timeout today: (Error ID: OOPS-2015AQ375) - Want a bug?
[20:56] <ScottK> Quintasan: I retried it.
[20:56] <Quintasan> ScottK: Thanks.
[21:05] <lifeless> ScottK: sure, file a bug
[21:05] <ScottK> OK.
[21:05] <lifeless> ScottK: if its a dupe we'll dupe it, but need to wait for the oopses to sync first
[21:05] <ScottK> OK
[21:05] <lifeless> so don't worry about lots of detail or anything just yet :)
[21:06] <ScottK> Done.  807739
[21:07] <lifeless> thanks
[21:32] <zachtib> can anyone tell me what "Failed to upload" means in the context of a ppa package?
[21:32] <zachtib> it seems to build fine, but then I get that error back
[21:32] <maxb> It means you need to check the upload log for a more detailed erro
[21:32] <maxb> +r
[21:32] <maxb> You can see this on the Launchpad page for the build
[21:34] <zachtib> oh, whoops. forgot to put anything in the description field >.<
[21:34] <zachtib> maxb, thanks
[22:08] <komputes> I've noticed that bug notification emails sometimes do not have a subject other than [Bug ######]
[22:09] <komputes> I've also noticed that most of these bugs are related upstream to mozilla (with comments in the lp bug from the mozilla bug)
[22:29] <micahg> komputes: bug 488536
[22:29] <komputes> micahg: cool thx