| * smb --> BOD | 07:46 | |
| cking | BOD? | 07:55 |
|---|---|---|
| smb | cking, Beginning Of Day | 07:57 |
| cking | ah | 08:00 |
| * apw notes cking is so last year | 08:17 | |
| cking | why? | 08:18 |
| cking | 'cos I don't comprehend an arbitary TLA | 08:18 |
| apw | not knowing BOD ... i bet you can't understand your kids either :) | 08:18 |
| smb | apw is quite harsh this morning. :) | 08:19 |
| apw | smb, its my job | 08:20 |
| cking | ignorance is not an excuse I see | 08:27 |
| apw | cking, there are no excuses | 08:31 |
| cking | shame | 08:32 |
| apw | smb, http://people.canonical.com/~apw/CVE-2011-1090-hardy/ | 08:32 |
| ubot2 | apw: The __nfs4_proc_set_acl function in fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c in the Linux kernel before 2.6.38 stores NFSv4 ACL data in memory that is allocated by kmalloc but not properly freed, which allows local users to cause a denial of service (panic) via a crafted attempt to set an ACL. (http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2011-1090) | 08:32 |
| apw | !kernel-src | 08:35 |
| ubot2 | Factoid 'kernel-src' not found | 08:35 |
| apw | !kernel-source | 08:35 |
| ubot2 | You can access all the kernels for previous and current development releases at http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git. There are repositories for each supported release under ubuntu/ubuntu-<release>.git - For more details see: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/SourceCode | 08:36 |
| apw | !faq | 08:36 |
| ubot2 | A list of common questions and answers about Ubuntu: http://help.ubuntu.com/community/CommonQuestions - Official documentation: http://help.ubuntu.com | 08:36 |
| smb | !kernel-faq | 08:38 |
| ubot2 | Factoid 'kernel-faq' not found | 08:38 |
| apw | !kernel-faq is A list of common questions about the Ubuntu Kernel: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/FAQ | 08:40 |
| apw | !kernel-mainline is Information and binaries of the upstream mainline kernels are found here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/MainlineBuilds | 08:43 |
| ubot2 | apw: Error: I am only a bot, please don't think I'm intelligent :) | 08:43 |
| apw | !kernel-mainline | 08:43 |
| ubot2 | Factoid 'kernel-mainline' not found | 08:43 |
| * apw tires of ubot2 | 08:46 | |
| smb | !kernel-mainline is <reply> Information and binaries of the upstream mainline kernels are found here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/MainlineBuilds | 08:47 |
| ubot2 | smb: Error: I am only a bot, please don't think I'm intelligent :) | 08:47 |
| smb | hm, does not like that either... | 08:47 |
| apw | no odd indeed | 08:50 |
| apw | !kernel-mainline | 09:09 |
| ubot2 | Factoid 'kernel-mainline' not found | 09:09 |
| smb | !kernel-faq | 09:10 |
| ubot2 | Factoid 'kernel-faq' not found | 09:10 |
| apw | !kernel-faq | 09:11 |
| ubot2 | Factoid 'kernel-faq' not found | 09:11 |
| apw | hmmm | 09:11 |
| apw | !kernel-faq | 09:12 |
| ubot2 | Factoid 'kernel-faq' not found | 09:12 |
| hemin | Hi, I compiled my kernel from the source code.. after make, make_modules and make install and update_grub, I rebooted.. Now when I choose the new entry from the list, It gives me this error "Kernel panic- not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(0,0)" .. any suggestions ?? | 09:44 |
| smb | Doing the install that way you likely missed to build an initrd. If "the source code" is our git repos, you should better follow https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/BuildYourOwnKernel which gives you .deb packages that will do that all when you install | 09:49 |
| hemin | I downloaded from kernel.org, 2.6.38.8 .. how do I know if I have missed to build initrd? | 09:52 |
| smb | You have no initrd.img-... with that version in /boot. Btw, if that is a vanilla 2.6.38.8 build, did you know those are already built? | 09:53 |
| smb | !kernel-mainline | 09:54 |
| ubot2 | The kernel team supply continuous mainline kernel builds which can be useful for tracking down issues or testing recent changes in the Linux kernel. More information is available at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/MainlineBuilds | 09:54 |
| apw | !kernel-faq | 09:54 |
| ubot2 | A list of common questions about the Ubuntu Kernel can be found in http://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/FAQ | 09:54 |
| apw | nice | 09:54 |
| cking | !kernel-oops | 09:59 |
| ubot2 | Factoid 'kernel-oops' not found | 09:59 |
| cking | !kernel-dev | 10:00 |
| ubot2 | Factoid 'kernel-dev' not found | 10:00 |
| cking | yawn | 10:00 |
| smb | cking, she does not like you. :) | 10:00 |
| hemin | smb: I tried to compile the same version installed on my machine through source which is 2.6.38.8 .. does it cause any problem? | 10:01 |
| smb | hemin, Apparently it does. But seriously, it would just save you the compile time and some of the worries when using the mainline builds. As your build now there are a few special drivers/modules missing but usually that does not cause problems. And installation is much simpler when using a .deb | 10:04 |
| hemin | smb, ok.. My motive to compile through sourcecode was to learn rather than just installing it | 10:07 |
| hemin | smb, i would try the .deb package too | 10:09 |
| smb | hemin, Then I would actually start with the build your own kernel link. Which uses the exact same sources as are used for the releases (and have the ./debian infrastructure). And when being familiar with that look at mainline kernels as a secondary step | 10:11 |
| hemin | smb, ok.. would go through that document and try out | 10:12 |
| hemin | smb, I would like to remove the kernel I installed from the source.. how to do that safely as my current working kernel and the installed one has the same version? | 10:33 |
| smb | hemin, While they are based on the same version, they should have slightly different names. You probably have a vmlinuz-2.6.38 and a vmlinuz-2.6.38-x-generic or so in /boot and likewise a directory with -gerneric (or whatever flavour you got) in /lib/modules | 10:37 |
| smb | But as you installed them without a package the way to remove them is to remove the file / directory in /lib/modules and then run update-grub to clean up your grub menu | 10:39 |
| smb | Note those files with -generic in them are the original ones and you should _not_ remove them | 10:39 |
| hemin | smb, yes.. vmlinuz-2.6.38.8, vmlinuz-2.6.38.8-generic both are there.. ok.. so the generic ones are not to be touched | 10:41 |
| ppisati | apw: when you want, can you open an lp tracker for CVE-2010-4251? thanks | 11:07 |
| ubot2 | ppisati: The socket implementation in net/core/sock.c in the Linux kernel before 2.6.34 does not properly manage a backlog of received packets, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) by sending a large amount of network traffic, as demonstrated by netperf UDP tests. (http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2010-4251) | 11:07 |
| bliss | hmm, haven't noticed that one | 11:08 |
| apw | ppisati, should be done: bug #807462 | 11:10 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 807462 in linux-ti-omap4 "CVE-2010-4251" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/807462 | 11:10 |
| ppisati | cool, 10 | 11:19 |
| ppisati | x | 11:19 |
| === chrisccoulson_ is now known as chrisccoulson | ||
| tgardner | apw, are you happy with 3.0.0-4.5 in kernel-ppa ? | 12:44 |
| smb | herton, sconklin It looks like I need to do yet another respin of lucid-ec2. This time it even needs an aditional revert for ec2 (as I had made changes to follow the reverted patch) | 12:45 |
| herton | smb: hmm ok, just invalidate the current tracking bug. In fact we should be doing the rebases now, you can just have the branch ready and we do the packages | 12:48 |
| smb | herton, ok. I will be pinging you when I have pushed the tree. Want to get it test built before | 12:49 |
| herton | ok | 12:50 |
| euroford | 连http://lists.debian.org/都被墙了？ | 12:53 |
| euroford | http://lists.debian.org/ | 12:53 |
| smb | herton, new lucid-ec2 branch pushed out. proceed at your leisure | 13:12 |
| herton | smb: ok | 13:12 |
| herton | smb: the repo misses the tag for 2.6.32-317.35, the previous release, not sure this matters much | 13:24 |
| smb | herton, I did put it. Maybe you need to try git fetch --tags? | 13:25 |
| smb | push I mean | 13:25 |
| herton | smb: yes, --tags brought it. I found strange as I had here the 317.36 tag but not the .35... | 13:27 |
| * smb thinks it may happen when the tag in question is not part of any named branch anymore... | 13:28 | |
| brendand | sconklin - what's up with lucid SRU? | 14:37 |
| brendand | sconklin - 33.69 not getting released? | 14:38 |
| ricotz | sconklin, hello :), i saw a lot of ubuntu kernel updates lately, but is there a reason that the natty kernel is still base on 2.6.38.7 instead of 2.6.38.8? | 14:38 |
| apw | ricotz, its pending the current round of updates making it through testing and out | 14:40 |
| smb | and lucid seems to have found one more regression | 14:40 |
| herton | brendand: sorry, we had to resping lucid again because of another regression | 14:40 |
| smb | so -33.70 got mode | 14:41 |
| smb | made | 14:41 |
| apw | herton, yep smb is correct, only things on the linear history are downloaded without --tags | 14:41 |
| brendand | skaet mentioned another fix going in? | 14:41 |
| apw | herton, what the hec was this one | 14:41 |
| brendand | and this is the one that will be used in 10.04.3? | 14:41 |
| herton | brendand: yep, steve talket to her | 14:41 |
| herton | *talked | 14:41 |
| herton | apw: let me see here the bug number | 14:41 |
| ricotz | apw, i see, it has been quite some time and the last update missed it by one day ;) | 14:42 |
| ppisati | do i need to put BugLink and "commit upstream" even on commits upon which other CVE commits depend? | 14:42 |
| herton | apw: bug 805209 | 14:42 |
| ubot2 | Launchpad bug 805209 in linux "System locks up after upgrading to linux-image-2.6.32-32-generic-pae" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/805209 | 14:42 |
| herton | brendand: correct, this one should end in .3 point release from what I got | 14:43 |
| apw | ppisati, all upstream commits should be recorded if they are pulled in in case we ever care to know where they came from | 14:43 |
| brendand | ok, good to know | 14:43 |
| apw | ppisati, and anything we commit for a specific fix should mention the bug number | 14:43 |
| apw | so i think thats yes and yes | 14:43 |
| herton | brendand: so just watch the 33.70 tracking bug when you got the task to confirmed | 14:43 |
| ppisati | ok | 14:43 |
| brendand | herton - certainly | 14:43 |
| kees | I'm nervous about the fix for 791019 -- this ends up mixing spinlock_bh() with spinlock(). I don't think this is safe... | 14:50 |
| tgardner | kees, for natty ? | 14:52 |
| kees | tgardner: oneiric | 14:53 |
| kees | I don't know if mixing _bh with non-_bh is safe | 14:53 |
| tgardner | kees, its not. what did we miss? | 14:53 |
| kees | let me look, I haven't seen the commit yet. fetching it now | 14:54 |
| tgardner | kees, looks like all uses of ptracer_relations_lock use _bh lock/unlock functions | 14:55 |
| kees | tgardner: ah, so they all got replaced? is that sensible? i.e. it's only to use _bh everywhere? | 14:56 |
| tgardner | kees, yes, its quite sensible. | 14:56 |
| kees | okay, cool. reading commit now | 14:56 |
| tgardner | kees, if any of the list manipulation functions can be called from soft IRQ context, then you must use _bh functions for protection. | 14:57 |
| kees | tgardner: right, that's cool. I wasn't sure if it was okay to use _bh in non-soft-IRQ context. | 14:58 |
| tgardner | kees, well, in fact you have to in order to prevent a soft IRQ context from getting control. Thats the whole point. | 14:59 |
| * kees nods | 15:05 | |
| ppisati | besides rolling an image and testing it with qemu, is there any quick way to test a lucid amd64 kernel? | 15:28 |
| ppisati | or if anyone wants to try it... | 15:28 |
| ppisati | i just need a "it boots!" | 15:28 |
| bjf | ppisati, there are a few of us that are running lucid 64, put the kernel up somewhere and we will boot test it for you | 15:51 |
| ppisati | bjf: i'm almosto done rolling my image | 15:52 |
| sconklin | manjo: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/790754 is going to be reverted | 16:44 |
| ubot2 | Ubuntu bug 790754 in linux "[NATTY] RICOH [1180:e823] unable to read MMC cards" [Undecided,Confirmed] | 16:44 |
| manjo | sconklin, agreed ... | 16:45 |
| manjo | sconklin, why revert for natty ? | 16:45 |
| sconklin | For Maverick | 16:45 |
| manjo | ok | 16:45 |
| * smb -> EOW | 17:07 | |
| * tgardner --> lunch | 18:03 | |
| * cking --> EOD | 19:06 | |
| === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan | ||
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| lamont | 15811424 build/buildd/linux-3.0.0/ | 20:02 |
| lamont | um... guys? that's a tad bit huge, don't you think? I'll put cash on it failing to build on most of the ppa buidlers | 20:02 |
| === dannf is now known as dannf-lunch | ||
| === _LibertyZero is now known as LibertyZero | ||
| lifeless | what target builds linux-header-x.y.x package? | 21:18 |
| Sarvatt | binary-headers | 21:19 |
| lifeless | Sarvatt: thanks! I should have nvidia going again on my custom build :) | 21:38 |
| === dannf-lunch is now known as dannf | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!