[09:55] ScottK, pitti, seb128: please don't process the kde stuff in NEW within the next two hours [09:56] doko: acknowledged [09:56] (I don't do regular NEWing anyway) [09:56] who is? will start the test rebuild first [09:56] * pitti looks at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ArchiveAdministration [09:56] apparently jdstrand today [09:56] jdstrand: ^ [09:57] ok, thanks === chrisccoulson_ is now known as chrisccoulson [12:14] doko, pitti: ack, but I am off today anyway [13:55] Can someone kick the server hard for me? All Xubuntu images failed to build today [13:55] desktop errors: [13:55] W: Failed to fetch file:/srv/cdimage.ubuntu.com/ftp-universe/dists/oneiric/main/binary-i386/Packages.bz2 Hash Sum mismatch [13:55] E: Some index files failed to download, they have been ignored, or old ones used instead. [13:55] make: *** [apt-update] Error 100 [13:56] Sorry, alternate log errors above. [13:56] Desktop image has no log today [13:57] livefs failure by email: [13:57] W: Failure trying to run: chroot /build/chroot dpkg --force-depends --install /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.13-9ubuntu1_i386.deb [14:11] Why am I getting the same failure for the LiveFS that I got the day before the alpha2 candidates were built? [14:11] cjwatson: ^ ^ any idea? [14:13] don't know, haven't had time to debug it yet. it's affecting all images. [14:13] perhaps you could look into it? [14:14] I've scheduled a Xubuntu alternate rebuild [14:14] Thank you [14:15] Somebody throw the wrong switch and cause everything to revert ? [14:20] that seems overly simplistic [14:21] there's no evidence as yet that it's the same thing, merely that it has similar symptoms; somebody needs to debug it [14:21] I was afraid of that [14:21] I honestly don't know how, but I will be patient, as long as I know you are aware of it. [14:22] see if you can reproduce it with a bare debootstrap, then look at the logs inside the half-completed chroot [14:24] charlie-tca: yeah I was running into those this morning. mkdir /var/run before you debootstrap [14:24] * tumbleweed hasn't got around to writinga decent bug report :) [14:25] so what's changed? (it's definitely not the same thing as before; I just looked at the eglibc diff.) [14:26] ah, base-files 6.3ubuntu3 [14:26] hooray for semi-coordinated start of /run transition. in that case if I were you I would just not expect coherent images until it's done. [14:26] it loooks like we're behind debian in /run transition [14:26] creating /var/run is probably the wrong answer [14:26] we want to end up on /run [14:27] cjwatson: yaeh, that was my quick solution to get a working chroot [14:27] IIRC there were broken permissions on /var/lock too [14:27] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/oneiric/+source/base-files/6.3ubuntu3 [14:29] right [14:31] I got the same results on the alternate image respin; no image [14:32] there is an image [14:32] http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/xubuntu/daily/20110708.1/ [14:32] Then I wasn't patient. [14:34] cjwatson: Thank you again. I got in to big a rush, and it wasn't quite there when I looked [16:07] cjwatson: base-files in Debian still ships /var/run; you think this isn't the right thing to do? [16:14] slangasek: don't know, it was Keybuk's change :-) [16:14] I guess I don't mind that being smoothened in base-files [16:15] ah; you'd said "creating /var/run is probably the wrong answer" [16:16] I meant as a hack in debootstrap [16:16] minimum-diff from Debian where we can, as usual, seems like the right answer since they're already in progress on this [16:19] * slangasek nods === micahg_ is now known as micahg [16:57] Spamaps, cjwatson; could one of you copy the new lucid kernel into -proposed? would like to get qa and cert testing started on it, so we can see if wecan use it for 10.04.3. [17:00] I think I'm done for the day ... [17:01] ttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/807175 [17:04] hiya brendand, looks like the kernel's built and ready, but we're needing to get someone to copy it into -proposed. [17:04] skeat - cool. i'll be waiting for the certification-testing task to go to confirmed [17:05] skaet: I thought you had the necessary permissions [17:05] (I'd have to look up how to do it just as much as you, I expect) [17:06] cjwatson, possibly, not sure. I can look it up and try too. [17:06] you should do, it just requires being an archive admin [17:07] ok, will give it a shot. Spamaps is on holiday here, so that fall back isn't in place. [18:08] brendand, I'm getting errors when running the script, so will probably need to wait until one of the more experienced folk is around to help. [18:09] skaet - no panic [18:09] thanks === utlemming is now known as utlemming_lunch === utlemming_lunch is now known as utlemming === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-afk [22:14] alpha2 is still an active milestone