[09:55] <doko> ScottK, pitti, seb128: please don't process the kde stuff in NEW within the next two hours
[09:56] <pitti> doko: acknowledged
[09:56] <pitti> (I don't do regular NEWing anyway)
[09:56] <doko> who is? will start the test rebuild first
[09:56]  * pitti looks at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ArchiveAdministration
[09:56] <pitti> apparently jdstrand today
[09:56] <pitti> jdstrand: ^
[09:57] <doko> ok, thanks
[12:14] <jdstrand> doko, pitti: ack, but I am off today anyway
[13:55] <charlie-tca> Can someone kick the server hard for me? All Xubuntu images failed to build today
[13:55] <charlie-tca> desktop errors:
[13:55] <charlie-tca> W: Failed to fetch file:/srv/cdimage.ubuntu.com/ftp-universe/dists/oneiric/main/binary-i386/Packages.bz2  Hash Sum mismatch
[13:55] <charlie-tca> E: Some index files failed to download, they have been ignored, or old ones used instead.
[13:55] <charlie-tca> make: *** [apt-update] Error 100
[13:56] <charlie-tca> Sorry, alternate log errors above.
[13:56] <charlie-tca> Desktop image has no log today
[13:57] <charlie-tca> livefs failure by email:
[13:57] <charlie-tca> W: Failure trying to run: chroot /build/chroot dpkg --force-depends --install /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.13-9ubuntu1_i386.deb
[14:11] <charlie-tca> Why am I getting the same failure for the LiveFS that I got the day before the alpha2 candidates were built?
[14:11] <charlie-tca> cjwatson: ^  ^  any idea?
[14:13] <cjwatson> don't know, haven't had time to debug it yet.  it's affecting all images.
[14:13] <cjwatson> perhaps you could look into it?
[14:14] <cjwatson> I've scheduled a Xubuntu alternate rebuild
[14:14] <charlie-tca> Thank you
[14:15] <charlie-tca> Somebody throw the wrong switch and cause everything to revert ?
[14:20] <cjwatson> that seems overly simplistic
[14:21] <cjwatson> there's no evidence as yet that it's the same thing, merely that it has similar symptoms; somebody needs to debug it
[14:21] <charlie-tca> I was afraid of that
[14:21] <charlie-tca> I honestly don't know how, but I will be patient, as long as I know you are aware of it.
[14:22] <cjwatson> see if you can reproduce it with a bare debootstrap, then look at the logs inside the half-completed chroot
[14:24] <tumbleweed> charlie-tca: yeah I was running into those this morning. mkdir /var/run before you debootstrap
[14:24]  * tumbleweed hasn't got around to writinga  decent bug report :)
[14:25] <cjwatson> so what's changed?  (it's definitely not the same thing as before; I just looked at the eglibc diff.)
[14:26] <cjwatson> ah, base-files 6.3ubuntu3
[14:26] <cjwatson> hooray for semi-coordinated start of /run transition.  in that case if I were you I would just not expect coherent images until it's done.
[14:26] <tumbleweed> it loooks like we're behind debian in /run transition
[14:26] <cjwatson> creating /var/run is probably the wrong answer
[14:26] <cjwatson> we want to end up on /run
[14:27] <tumbleweed> cjwatson: yaeh, that was my quick solution to get a working chroot
[14:27] <tumbleweed> IIRC there were broken permissions on /var/lock too
[14:27] <cjwatson> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/oneiric/+source/base-files/6.3ubuntu3
[14:29] <tumbleweed> right
[14:31] <charlie-tca> I got the same results on the alternate image respin; no image
[14:32] <cjwatson> there is an image
[14:32] <cjwatson> http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/xubuntu/daily/20110708.1/
[14:32] <charlie-tca> Then I wasn't patient.
[14:34] <charlie-tca> cjwatson: Thank you again. I got in to big a rush, and it wasn't quite there when I looked
[16:07] <slangasek> cjwatson: base-files in Debian still ships /var/run; you think this isn't the right thing to do?
[16:14] <cjwatson> slangasek: don't know, it was Keybuk's change :-)
[16:14] <cjwatson> I guess I don't mind that being smoothened in base-files
[16:15] <slangasek> ah; you'd said "creating /var/run is probably the wrong answer"
[16:16] <cjwatson> I meant as a hack in debootstrap
[16:16] <cjwatson> minimum-diff from Debian where we can, as usual, seems like the right answer since they're already in progress on this
[16:19]  * slangasek nods
[16:57] <skaet> Spamaps, cjwatson;   could one of you copy the new lucid kernel into -proposed?  would like to get qa and cert testing started on it,  so we can see if wecan use it for 10.04.3.
[17:00] <cjwatson> I think I'm done for the day ...
[17:01] <skaet> ttps://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/807175
[17:04] <skaet> hiya brendand,  looks like the kernel's built and ready, but we're needing to get someone to copy it into -proposed.
[17:04] <brendand> skeat - cool. i'll be waiting for the certification-testing task to go to confirmed
[17:05] <cjwatson> skaet: I thought you had the necessary permissions
[17:05] <cjwatson> (I'd have to look up how to do it just as much as you, I expect)
[17:06] <skaet> cjwatson, possibly,  not sure.  I can look it up and try too.
[17:06] <cjwatson> you should do, it just requires being an archive admin
[17:07] <skaet> ok,  will give it a shot.   Spamaps is on holiday here, so that fall back isn't in place.
[18:08] <skaet> brendand,  I'm getting errors when running the script,  so will probably need to wait until one of the more experienced folk is around to help.
[18:09] <brendand> skaet - no panic
[18:09] <skaet> thanks
[22:14] <bdmurray> alpha2 is still an active milestone