| Laney | bah, oneiric schroot broken | 07:50 |
|---|---|---|
| Laney | stupid /run | 07:50 |
| aonyx | So, a quick bit of advice is sought. I am editing debian/rules to get a package to build. The changes I make allow the package to build using pdebuild. | 08:55 |
| aonyx | However, once I turn those changes into a patch use edit-patch the package no longer builds using pdebuild. | 08:56 |
| aonyx | Any suggestions as to what might cause this? | 08:56 |
| Ampelbein | aonyx: it would help to see a buildlog. | 09:04 |
| Ampelbein | aonyx: and for changes to files in debian/ you don't have to make a patch anyway. | 09:05 |
| Ampelbein | only for changes to upstream files (outside of debian/) | 09:05 |
| aonyx | Ampelbein: Thanks, well now that I don't have to make a patch my life just got a whole lot easier | 09:07 |
| tumbleweed | aonyx: we use patches (quilt etc) for changes to the upstream code, not the contents of debian/. Those we just change directly | 10:17 |
| tumbleweed | broder: still looking for a sponsor? | 10:17 |
| aonyx | oki-doki, should have it uploaded soon, jtaylor seemed to think that your initial suggestion was fine so I am doing that. | 10:19 |
| tumbleweed | cool | 10:21 |
| tumbleweed | aonyx: I'd also remove the -lc LDFLAGS addition | 10:39 |
| jtaylor | it should be tested that bug 205783 is not reintroduced somehow | 10:40 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 205783 in libpam-encfs (Ubuntu) "pam-encfs fails on upgrade to Hardy" [Undecided,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/205783 | 10:40 |
| jtaylor | tumbleweed: can you ack this sync? bug 808288 | 10:45 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 808288 in unison2.27.57 (Ubuntu) "Sync unison2.27.57 2.27.57-4 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/808288 | 10:45 |
| aonyx | tumbleweed: good point, getting to it now. | 10:47 |
| tumbleweed | jtaylor: acked | 10:52 |
| aonyx | tumbleweed: they're removed now | 10:59 |
| tumbleweed | aonyx: I'd reuse the "Explicitly link to C library" comment for DEBIAN_PAMLIB | 11:00 |
| aonyx | sounds like a good idea | 11:00 |
| aonyx | tumbleweed: done | 11:08 |
| tumbleweed | aonyx: LGTM, thanks. Please forward that to Debian | 11:10 |
| aonyx | woohoo, will do | 11:11 |
| directhex | RainCT, if you don't want me to NMU mistelix, i'd speak up. | 12:26 |
| RainCT | directhex: I'm fine with NMUs (or with mistelix, I'm OK with having it team-maintained) | 12:29 |
| directhex | it's one of the final blockers on completing the 2.10 transiiton | 12:30 |
| RainCT | directhex: well, I've no idea what the error is about | 12:47 |
| directhex | ... i just worked out an error in mistelix. it's cringeworthy | 12:49 |
| directhex | it uses AC_PATH_PROG to get the MCS variable... but uses hardcoded CSC variable as the compiler instead | 12:49 |
| jtaylor | what is the CMAKE equivalent of configure LIBS=... ? | 13:02 |
| jtaylor | noo my experiment has invalidated my ccache :( | 13:09 |
| === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan | ||
| evaluate | Any idea why the baltix package was added to bug 791950 ? | 14:54 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 791950 in Baltix "Please merge clipit 1.4.1-1 (universe) from debian unstable" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/791950 | 14:54 |
| tumbleweed | evaluate: baltix is a distribution, not a package. And on +activity, you can see who added it | 15:07 |
| evaluate | Hmm? Never heard of baltix... | 15:08 |
| evaluate | Will look it up, thanks! | 15:08 |
| broder | tumbleweed: yeah, i'm still looking, although i'm going to be out for the next several hours, so i might have a delayed response to feedback | 15:27 |
| tumbleweed | broder: only feedback I have: README is probably worth including, and please bump the changelog timestamp | 15:27 |
| tumbleweed | oh, also I wasn't aware that there was a format for using branch names in Vcs-Git. Are you sure that there is? | 15:28 |
| broder | no! :) | 15:28 |
| broder | i think it's totally underspecified for VCS's that can hold multiple branches at a single URL | 15:28 |
| broder | hmm...i also forgot to check my watch file now that nelson's started tagging releases | 15:30 |
| tumbleweed | broder: I found a devscripts bug on the subject that was wontfix | 15:30 |
| tumbleweed | ah, yeah I seem to recall some mangling was necessary with githubredir | 15:30 |
| xteejx | Hi guys, I want to start helping with FTBFS again but have forgotten how to pull source for oneiric into natty....HELP brain not working! | 15:30 |
| tumbleweed | xteejx: pull-lp-source | 15:31 |
| broder | tumbleweed: when i originally packaged this up, nelson hadn't tagged any releases yet, so i was using awesome 0.0.0.git+TIME~etc+more+crud version numbers :) | 15:31 |
| xteejx | tumbleweed: That's the one! Thanks :D | 15:31 |
| broder | tumbleweed: do you think i should drop the branch name and assume people will be able to guess? | 15:34 |
| tumbleweed | broder: ah, debian bug 508433 | 15:35 |
| ubottu | Debian bug 508433 in devscripts "[debcheckout] Impossible to specify branch to checkout" [Wishlist,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/508433 | 15:35 |
| tumbleweed | no, ubottu, it's won'tfix, closed, and archived. Not open at all | 15:36 |
| broder | heh. ok, i'll drop the branch | 15:37 |
| broder | it'll still be in vcs-browser so hopefully that's enough of a pointer | 15:37 |
| broder | tumbleweed: ok, new packages at http://web.mit.edu/broder/Public/reptyr/ | 15:45 |
| broder | but i do actually have to run now | 15:45 |
| broder | i'll check backscroll when i get back, and thanks for looking :) | 15:46 |
| tumbleweed | np | 15:46 |
| psusi | can anyone tell me why this merge is still on hold? https://code.launchpad.net/~psusi/ubuntu/oneiric/dmraid/drop-64bit-pdc/+merge/60136 | 15:49 |
| tumbleweed | psusi: because commenting with a "resumit" review isn't the same as resubmitting the merge proposal | 15:49 |
| psusi | it isn't? | 15:50 |
| tumbleweed | it's ambiguous and confuses people :) | 15:50 |
| psusi | what is a resubmit comment then? | 15:50 |
| tumbleweed | as I understand it, it's for a reviewer to say you should resubmit this | 15:50 |
| psusi | isn't that what needs information is for? | 15:50 |
| tumbleweed | I've never seen the point for it, but I think different projects use it differently. | 15:51 |
| tumbleweed | at any rate, what you want is to either change the merge proposal's status back to "Needs review", or click the "resubmit this merge request" button | 15:51 |
| psusi | k, got it | 15:52 |
| xteejx | How do I test build a package? Sorry guys I lost my reference material :S | 15:54 |
| xteejx | debuild -S ? | 15:54 |
| psusi | that will build the source package... leave off the -S to build both source and binary | 15:55 |
| xteejx | cool thanks :) | 15:55 |
| xteejx | Hmm, it's not auto grabbing the build-deps | 15:56 |
| tumbleweed | xteejx: it won't. Are you maybe thinking of pbuilder / sbuild? | 15:57 |
| xteejx | Well I just wanted to test build a package, rule out autobuiler gremlins | 15:57 |
| xteejx | *autobuilder | 15:58 |
| psusi | then you probably want to use pbuilder | 15:58 |
| xteejx | doh I just remebered | 15:58 |
| xteejx | pbuilder build *.dsc | 15:58 |
| jtaylor | why do people not read the warning dh emits :( | 16:34 |
| jtaylor | libosl.so has no links against its deps | 16:34 |
| jtaylor | dh_shlibs detects that | 16:34 |
| tumbleweed | jtaylor: people suck :) (seriously though, dh_shlibdeps was always pretty noisy esp. before --as-needed) | 16:36 |
| jtaylor | yes, those "uncessary link" messages mask the important ones | 16:37 |
| jtaylor | unecesary link is really only a warning, but missing link should be an error | 16:37 |
| Ampelbein | jtaylor: it didn't matter much without --as-needed, if you mean gpsshogi FTBFS. Before --as-needed you just had to pass the libraries to the linker to "fix" this, which is why in debian the build succeeds. | 16:38 |
| jtaylor | missing dependency is a RC bug or? | 16:38 |
| jtaylor | Ampelbein: it does matter as dependencies are missing, that the rdeps build due because they declare there b-d properly does not make it better | 16:39 |
| jtaylor | thats all libosl1 depends on: http://paste.ubuntu.com/641403/ | 16:40 |
| jtaylor | and its a 150mb source package ^^ | 16:40 |
| Ampelbein | jtaylor: just saying why this problem didn't show up in debian, not saying it's right. | 16:41 |
| Ampelbein | and yes, I think missing dependendy is RC bug. | 16:43 |
| xteejx | Hi guys, I'm having problems with pbuilder-dist with a debootstrap error, any way to fix this? | 16:48 |
| jtaylor | which error? | 16:51 |
| xteejx | http://paste.ubuntu.com/641410/ | 16:52 |
| xteejx | ^^ pasted here | 16:52 |
| xteejx | I issued "pbuilder-dist oneiric create" btw | 16:54 |
| xteejx | Any idea what the problem is? | 16:56 |
| tumbleweed | xteejx: that's a known bug | 16:56 |
| xteejx | tumbleweed: Oh right, any way around it for the moment? | 16:57 |
| tumbleweed | bug 807974 | 16:57 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 807974 in eglibc (Ubuntu) "debootstrap fails to install libc6 installing oneiric from natty" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/807974 | 16:57 |
| tumbleweed | easy workaround is to mkdir -p /var/run in your target directory before debootstraping | 16:58 |
| xteejx | Ah ha! I'll try that now :) | 16:59 |
| xteejx | tumbleweed: It didn't work, I did "mkdir -p /var/run" from ~/sources (where I keep MOTU type stuff) and redone the pbuilder-dist oneiric create but the same error came up | 17:04 |
| xteejx | Not to worry I'm sure it'll be sorted - I'll be back ont eh scene in a couple of weeks and hopefully itll be fixed :) | 17:04 |
| xteejx | Thanks again btw | 17:04 |
| ap0th | Hello. I'm following http://people.canonical.com/~dholbach/packaging-guide/html/getting-set-up.html and getting an error when I run "pbuilder-dist oneiric create" | 19:01 |
| tumbleweed | ap0th: known problem, I'm afraid | 19:02 |
| ap0th | oh, ok | 19:03 |
| tumbleweed | you do raise a point that ubuntu dev week is going to be painful until that's fixed :) | 19:03 |
| tumbleweed | in the meantime, you should be able to create a natty chroot successfully | 19:03 |
| ap0th | I tried "pbuilder-dist natty create" as well w/o luck (on Oneiric alpah 2) | 19:04 |
| tumbleweed | ap0th: what was the error you got? | 19:05 |
| tumbleweed | oh, that could be the linux 3.0 issue | 19:05 |
| ap0th | "W: Failure trying to run: chroot /var/cache/pbuilder/build/14464/. dpkg --force-depends --install /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.13-0ubuntu13_i386.deb" then "E: debootstrap failed" | 19:06 |
| tumbleweed | that's the oneiric debootstrap issue, bug 807974 | 19:07 |
| ap0th | (sorry...running in tty1 in Virtualbox because can no longer login after dist-upgrade...so can't really copy-paste) | 19:07 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 807974 in eglibc (Ubuntu) "debootstrap fails to install libc6 installing oneiric from natty" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/807974 | 19:07 |
| ap0th | so I need to create a /var/run directory? | 19:08 |
| tumbleweed | in the directory that debotstrap create the chroot in | 19:09 |
| ap0th | pardon my ignorance...but how do I know what directory that is? | 19:10 |
| tumbleweed | your ignorance isn't out of place here, it can't be predicted :) | 19:12 |
| ap0th | should I just skip the pbuilder step then? | 19:13 |
| tumbleweed | or wait for this issue to be resolved | 19:14 |
| tumbleweed | hopefully tomorrow morning... | 19:14 |
| ap0th | I installed Oneiric alpha 2 in Virtualbox and did an update/dist-upgrade and now I am no longer able to graphically login to all 3 options (Unity/Unity-2D/Gnome)...getting "failed to load errors at GDM" - any ideas on that? | 19:15 |
| tumbleweed | no idea. but you should probably switch to lightdm which will be the default login manager for oneiric | 19:16 |
| ap0th | maybe it was lightdm...whatever was default | 19:16 |
| ap0th | Is there a "proper" time to do dist-upgrades? thinking that bonked my system | 19:17 |
| tumbleweed | no. There is occasional breakage, so if you see people mentioning massive problems on IRC / the planet, maybe don't upgrade for a couple of days. Otherwise any time is good | 19:18 |
| ap0th | Would there be anything wrong with setting up an Oneiric pbuilder environment on my Natty system or would I run into the same bugs? | 19:19 |
| tumbleweed | you'll run into the same bug. natty on natty should work, though | 19:19 |
| ap0th | would that help me if I just want to get started working on simple bugs? | 19:21 |
| tumbleweed | it'll certainly help you get the feel of how to do things | 19:21 |
| ap0th | ok. thanks for your help! | 19:21 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === Quintasan_ is now known as Quintasan | ||
| psusi | are there any release managers around that could approve a natty task in bug #675108? | 20:26 |
| ubottu | Launchpad bug 675108 in gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu) "gnome-power-manager adds battery to indicator twice when battery hot-unplugged and plugged back in" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/675108 | 20:26 |
| stgraber | psusi: accepted for natty | 20:35 |
| psusi | stgraber, ty | 20:35 |
| stgraber | psusi: I'm not sure it's relevant for oneiric as default ubuntu will be using the power indicator and I'm not even sure of what's the state of g-p-m with gnome 3.x | 20:36 |
| stgraber | but if you're sure it affects Oneiric too (in a gnome 3.x fallback session for example), I'm happy to accept the oneiric nomination too | 20:37 |
| psusi | g-p-m seems to have undergone some serious weirdness in oneiric... gnome-power-preferences seems to have gone away, there is no icon, and the new system settings thing shows some sort of configuration that is a much more stripped down version of gnome-power-preferences | 20:38 |
| psusi | I can't confirm that it affects oneiric or not since it doesn't show up at all... so should it still get a task and just leave it new until it can either be confirmed, or invalidated? | 20:38 |
| stgraber | well, I'm guessing that if you have a task opened for both oneiric + natty the SRU team will expect you to fix it in oneiric first then backport to natty | 20:39 |
| stgraber | which isn't really doable in this csae | 20:39 |
| stgraber | *case | 20:39 |
| psusi | good point | 20:40 |
| stgraber | ok, I declined it for Oneiric for now. The task can still be re-approved later if needed | 20:40 |
| stgraber | which reminded me I wanted to install indicator-power on oneiric :) | 20:43 |
| stgraber | wow, and it even works! | 20:45 |
| ajmitch | you sound surprised at this | 20:45 |
| psusi | does that bring back the battery icon? isn't that a third party thing? shouldn't gnome-power-manager just work? | 20:45 |
| stgraber | well, considering how difficult it was to get some kind of battery indicator before, I'm :) | 20:45 |
| stgraber | as I understand it (from some mailing lists post) g-p-m essentially dropped the applet. Gnome shell somehow pokes g-p-m for battery info to display in their UI | 20:46 |
| stgraber | and now unity has an indicator doing the same thing | 20:46 |
| stgraber | http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.powermanager.devel/2144 was the one I was thinking about | 20:47 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!