[16:00] <Ursinha> hello
[16:00]  * utlemming is here 
[16:00] <zul> hi
[16:00] <m_3> hola
[16:00] <Ursinha> hola :)
[16:00]  * smb \o
[16:01] <zul> who is running the meeting today?
[16:01] <adam_g> o/
[16:01] <Daviey> o/
[16:02] <serge_af1> \o
[16:02] <Daviey> smoser: Is this your chair?
[16:02] <smoser> are you being funny?
[16:02] <smoser> or is it actually my turn
[16:02] <smoser> it has been a while
[16:02] <smoser> ..
[16:02] <Daviey> smoser: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ServerTeam/Meeting
[16:02]  * smoser quickly does 's,smoser,Daviey,' and reloads
[16:03] <smoser> but i will chair
[16:03] <Daviey> smoser: good cookies
[16:04] <smoser> #startmeeting
[16:04] <MootBot> Meeting started at 11:04. The chair is smoser.
[16:04] <MootBot> Commands Available: [TOPIC], [IDEA], [ACTION], [AGREED], [LINK], [VOTE]
[16:04] <smoser> [TOPIC] Review ACTION points from previous meeting
[16:04] <MootBot> New Topic:  Review ACTION points from previous meeting
[16:04] <smoser>  * sommer and j1mc to look at doc presentation (continued)
[16:04] <smoser> no sommer here.
[16:04] <smoser> no j1mc here.
[16:05] <smoser> marking postponed
[16:05] <smoser> [ACTION] sommer and j1mc to look at doc presentation (continued)
[16:05] <MootBot> ACTION received:  sommer and j1mc to look at doc presentation (continued)
[16:05] <smoser>  * test alpha2
[16:05] <smoser> woot. alpha2 delievered. i assume tested.
[16:06] <smoser> my personal thanks to jamespage and utlemming for helping with cloud images in my absense.
[16:06] <smoser> moving on
[16:06] <smoser> [TOPIC] Oneiric Development
[16:06] <MootBot> New Topic:  Oneiric Development
[16:06] <Daviey> o/
[16:06] <smoser> Daviey, anything here?
[16:06] <Daviey> Looking at the current progres we have taken on more work items, this is probably due to some discovieries we had week before last.  I think we are on track to be able to still deliever what we have committed to.  If anyone has any specifc concerns regarding work items, please raise them now.
[16:07] <Daviey> Regarding incomming bug count, this seems to have raised significantly.  Most of them don't seem to be Oneiric, but stable releases.  The higher count is probably due to people targetting their time to feature work, and getting A2 out of the door.  The smaller team last week, is also probably a contributing factor.
[16:07] <Daviey> Anyone have anything specific to raise?
[16:07] <zul> nope..
[16:07] <Daviey> good stuff.. smoser, feel free to progress then. :)
[16:07] <smoser> [TOPIC] Ubuntu Server Team Events
[16:07] <MootBot> New Topic:  Ubuntu Server Team Events
[16:07] <smoser> i heard that Daviey is attending an openstack europe event tomorrow.
[16:08] <smoser> any thing else ?
[16:08] <Daviey> not from me
[16:08] <adam_g> ill be doing an ensemble presentation at portland AWS users group  july 19
[16:08] <serue> cool
[16:08] <Daviey> http://emeaopenstackday.eventbrite.com/
[16:08] <MootBot> LINK received:  http://emeaopenstackday.eventbrite.com/
[16:08] <Daviey> (feel free to say H"i")
[16:09] <smoser> i think its time for our friend hggdh now.
[16:09] <smoser> [TOPIC] Weekly Updates & Questions for the QA Team (hggdh)
[16:09] <MootBot> New Topic:  Weekly Updates & Questions for the QA Team (hggdh)
[16:09] <hggdh> I am here :-)
[16:09] <hggdh> (for a change)
[16:09] <hggdh> and no news from me
[16:09] <hggdh> ..
[16:10] <smoser> then we move on to another intelligent young man
[16:10] <smoser> [TOPIC] Weekly Updates & Questions for the Kernel Team (smb)
[16:10] <MootBot> New Topic:  Weekly Updates & Questions for the Kernel Team (smb)
[16:10]  * smb thinks he found the final answer to bug 634487
[16:10] <smb> Though you won't like it...
[16:10] <smb> The answer to that bug is...
[16:11]  * smoser stopped his hands from clapping
[16:11] <smb> You really want to hear?
[16:11] <utlemming> use a different instance type?
[16:11] <smb> f1574ad9f702
[16:11] <smoser> http://xen.1045712.n5.nabble.com/xen-3-1-testing-x86-Fix-mod-l3-entry-for-PAE-on-64-guests-The-adjustment-of-td2616303.html ?
[16:11] <MootBot> LINK received:  http://xen.1045712.n5.nabble.com/xen-3-1-testing-x86-Fix-mod-l3-entry-for-PAE-on-64-guests-The-adjustment-of-td2616303.html ?
[16:12] <smb> This is the xen-3.1 patch that Amazon has to apply to their dom0.
[16:12] <smoser> yeah
[16:12] <smoser> well, its something at least.
[16:12] <smb> I seemed to work for me when applying to centos5.3
[16:12] <smoser> we will raise that.
[16:12] <smb> before 3/3 fail
[16:12] <smb> after 3/3 ok
[16:12]  * smb will update the bug report
[16:12] <smoser> thank you, mr smb.
[16:13] <smoser> you have anything else ?
[16:13] <smb> nope
[16:13] <smb> ..
[16:13] <smb> (apart from it being hot here)
[16:13] <smoser> smb, can you confirm for me https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux
[16:13] <smb> ?
[16:13] <smoser> my understanding is that I would expect a new kernel to move from -proposed to -updates in ~ 21 days
[16:13] <smoser> is that right ?
[16:13] <utlemming> smb: what versions will we backport that fix for?
[16:14] <smb> utlemming, It needs to go into the dom0 kernel
[16:14] <smb> if it is not there
[16:14] <smb> smoser, you link seems not complete
[16:15] <smb> smoser, though there were quite some unlucky delays with lucid
[16:15] <smoser> no, it was complete.
[16:15] <smoser> i'm just asking if that is the general rule
[16:15] <smoser> that when something says "2 weeks ago" in -proposed, that i would expect a flow to -updates in 1 week.
[16:16] <smb> smoser, In theory there is a three weekly cycle... in theory
[16:16] <smb> for some of those there were regressions
[16:16] <smb> which then needed another upload
[16:16] <smoser> yeah.
[16:16] <smoser> ok.
[16:17] <smoser> anythign else for our friend smb ?
[16:17] <smoser> moving on....
[16:17] <smoser> [TOPIC] Weekly Updates & Questions regarding Ubuntu ARM Server (NCommander)
[16:17] <MootBot> New Topic:  Weekly Updates & Questions regarding Ubuntu ARM Server (NCommander)
[16:17] <NCommander> on a call,
[16:18] <smoser> ok. then we're moving on... look forward to hearing more next week.
[16:18] <smoser> one interesting thing in arm, though: https://rsalveti.wordpress.com/2011/07/11/net-booting-with-tftp-and-pxe-with-pandaboard/
[16:19] <smoser> [TOPIC] Weekly Updates & Questions from the Ubuntu Community
[16:19] <MootBot> New Topic:  Weekly Updates & Questions from the Ubuntu Community
[16:19] <smoser> kim0, jcastro?
[16:21]  * smoser ignores the chirping crickets and moves on
[16:21] <smoser> [TOPIC] Open Discussion
[16:21] <MootBot> New Topic:  Open Discussion
[16:22] <Ursinha> o/
[16:22] <smoser> hello Ursinha did you have something for Open Discussion ?
[16:22] <Ursinha> smoser: not sure what's this topic for, assuming it's free for all
[16:23] <Ursinha> I'd like to tell the SRU guys that I'm reenabling their scripts, so they'll have SRU reports again
[16:23] <smoser> well, i try to avoid politics and religion
[16:23] <Ursinha> lol
[16:23] <smoser> but other than that, i think its pretty open
[16:23] <Ursinha> :)
[16:23] <Ursinha> Clint isn't here, I'll poke him somewhere else :)
[16:23] <Ursinha> That was pretty much all, thanks smoser
[16:25] <smoser> in deed.  SpamapS will be disciplined for his absense.  Thank you for pointing that out.
[16:25] <smoser> [TOPIC] Announce next meeting date and time
[16:25] <MootBot> New Topic:  Announce next meeting date and time
[16:26] <smoser> Tue, 19 Jul 2011 16:00:00 +0000
[16:26] <smoser> #endmeeting
[16:26] <MootBot> Meeting finished at 11:26.
[16:26] <SpamapS> just made it!
[16:26] <Ursinha> haha
[16:26] <utlemming> lol
[16:27] <SpamapS> 09:26 ... Irssi: Join to #ubuntu-meeting was synced in 0 secs
[16:27] <SpamapS> 09:26 < smoser> #endmeeting
[16:27] <SpamapS> Proof
[16:27] <Ursinha> lol
[17:00] <ppisati> o/
[17:02] <sconklin> o/
[17:02] <jjohansen> \o
[17:02] <sforshee> o/
[17:02] <herton> \o
[17:03] <bjf> #startmeeting
[17:03] <MootBot> Meeting started at 12:03. The chair is bjf.
[17:03] <MootBot> Commands Available: [TOPIC], [IDEA], [ACTION], [AGREED], [LINK], [VOTE]
[17:03] <bjf> ##
[17:03] <bjf> ## This is the Ubuntu Kernel Team weekly status meeting.
[17:03] <bjf> ##
[17:03] <bjf> [LINK] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/Meeting
[17:03] <bjf> [LINK] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/ReleaseStatus/Oneiric
[17:03] <MootBot> LINK received:  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/Meeting
[17:03] <MootBot> LINK received:  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/ReleaseStatus/Oneiric
[17:03] <bjf> # Meeting Etiquette
[17:03] <bjf> #
[17:03] <bjf> # NOTE: '..' indicates that you are finished with your input.
[17:03] <bjf> #       'o/' indicates you have something you'd like to add (wait until you are recognized)
[17:03] <bjf> #
[17:03] <bjf> [TOPIC] ARM Status (ppisati)
[17:03] <MootBot> New Topic:  ARM Status (ppisati)
[17:03] <ppisati> Kernel development: nothing to report.
[17:03] <ppisati> Oneiric/ti-omap4: got a new drop from agreen, this time with video, audio, 3d support, etcetc. Rebased it on top of 3.0.0-rc6 and work is ongoing to produce the new Oneiric kernel based on it.
[17:03] <ppisati> ..
[17:03] <bjf> [TOPIC] Release Metrics and Incoming Bugs (ogasawara)
[17:03] <MootBot> New Topic:  Release Metrics and Incoming Bugs (ogasawara)
[17:04] <ogasawara> [LINK] http://reports.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/ogasawara/kt-meeting.txt
[17:04] <MootBot> LINK received:  http://reports.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/ogasawara/kt-meeting.txt
[17:04] <ogasawara> [17:04] <ogasawara>  * 30 linux kernel bugs (up 10)
[17:04] <ogasawara> [17:04] <ogasawara>  * 2 linux kernel bugs (up 2)
[17:04] <ogasawara> [17:04] <ogasawara>  * 0 linux kernel bugs (no change 0)
[17:04] <ogasawara> [17:04] <ogasawara>  * 23 linux kernel bugs (down 1)
[17:04] <ogasawara> [17:04] <ogasawara>  * 3 linux kernel bugs (no change 0)
[17:04] <ogasawara> [17:04] <ogasawara>  * 8 linux kernel bugs (no change 0)
[17:04] <ogasawara> [17:04] <ogasawara>  * 0 linux kernel bugs (no change 0)
[17:04] <ogasawara> [17:04] <ogasawara>  * 40 oneiric bugs (up 7)
[17:04] <ogasawara>  * 1380 natty bugs (up 13)
[17:04] <ogasawara>  * 1120 maverick bugs (up 1)
[17:04] <ogasawara>  * 1033 lucid bugs (down 3)
[17:04] <ogasawara>  * 39 hardy bugs (no change 0)
[17:04] <ogasawara> [17:04] <ogasawara> [17:04] <ogasawara>  * 0 oneiric bugs (no change 0)
[17:04] <ogasawara>  * 5 natty bugs (no change 0)
[17:04] <ogasawara>  * 43 maverick bugs (no change 0)
[17:04] <ogasawara>  * 81 lucid bugs (no change 0)
[17:04] <ogasawara>  * 0 hardy bugs (no change 0)
[17:04] <ogasawara> [17:04] <ogasawara>  * 0 oneiric bugs (down 1)
[17:04] <ogasawara>  * 447 natty bugs (no change 0)
[17:05] <ogasawara>  * 245 maverick bugs (down 1)
[17:05] <ogasawara>  * 223 lucid bugs (down 1)
[17:05] <ogasawara>  * 2 hardy bugs (no change 0)
[17:05] <ogasawara> [17:05] <ogasawara>  * 0 oneiric bugs (no change 0)
[17:05] <ogasawara>  * 2 natty bugs (no change 0)
[17:05] <ogasawara>  * 1 maverick bugs (no change 0)
[17:05] <ogasawara>  * 0 lucid bugs (no change 0)
[17:05] <ogasawara>  * 0 hardy bugs (no change 0)
[17:05] <ogasawara> ..
[17:05] <bjf> [TOPIC] Blueprints: Oneiric Server Requirements (smb)
[17:05] <bjf> [LINK] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/other-kernel-o-server-requirements
[17:05] <MootBot> New Topic:  Blueprints: Oneiric Server Requirements (smb)
[17:05] <MootBot> LINK received:  https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/other-kernel-o-server-requirements
[17:06] <smb> As last week. Only the seccomp mode 2 stuff and that is waitied for
[17:06] <smb> ..
[17:06] <bjf> [TOPIC] Status: General Oneiric (ogasawara)
[17:06] <MootBot> New Topic:  Status: General Oneiric (ogasawara)
[17:06] <ogasawara> I was out last week, but we've recently uploaded the 3.0.0-5.6 Oneiric kernel.  It's based on the latest v3.0-rc7 mainline kernel.  We've also converged upon using a 3 digit version scheme for our Ubuntu kernel version, ie. 3.0.0 rather than 3.0
[17:06] <ogasawara> ..
[17:07] <bjf> [TOPIC] Status: Stable Kernel Team (sconklin)
[17:07] <MootBot> New Topic:  Status: Stable Kernel Team (sconklin)
[17:07] <sconklin> || Status of kernels:
[17:07] <sconklin> || Detailed information here: http://people.canonical.com/~kernel/reports/sru-report.html
[17:07] <sconklin> ||
[17:07] <sconklin> || Hardy: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/801636
[17:07] <sconklin> ||   Kernel in -proposed is awaiting QA and/or Certification testing
[17:07] <sconklin> ||
[17:07] <sconklin> || Lucid: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/807175
[17:07] <sconklin> ||   Kernel in -proposed is awaiting security signoff before publishing to -updates and possibly -security
[17:07] <sconklin> ||
[17:07] <sconklin> || Maverick: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/808934
[17:07] <sconklin> ||   Kernel in PPA if currently awaiting copy to -proposed. This is a kernel with reverts after verification,
[17:07] <sconklin> ||   and will not require reverification. Therefore, it will be queued for QA and Certification upon being
[17:07] <sconklin> ||   copied to -proposed
[17:07] <sconklin> ||
[17:07] <sconklin> || Natty: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/802464
[17:07] <sconklin> ||   Kernel in -proposed is ready to be published to -updates and -security
[17:07] <sconklin> ||
[17:07] <sconklin> ||   There was a failure of this kernel in QA due to a kernel option that was not correctly set.
[17:07] <sconklin> ||   This option had been changed to work around some problems in the ec2 environment.
[17:07] <sconklin> ||   Those issues have been resolved and the option can be returned to the former state.
[17:07] <sconklin> ||   This was not serious enough of an issue to prevent releasing this kernel.
[17:07] <sconklin> ||
[17:07] <sconklin> ..
[17:08] <bjf> [TOPIC] Security & bugfix kernels - Maverick/Lucid/Hardy (sconklin)
[17:08] <MootBot> New Topic:  Security & bugfix kernels - Maverick/Lucid/Hardy (sconklin)
[17:08] <sconklin> || Current Kernel versions are always available here: http://people.canonical.com/~kernel/reports/versions.html
[17:08] <sconklin> ||
[17:08] <sconklin> || Package                                    || Upd/Sec              || Proposed             ||  TiP || Verified ||
[17:08] <sconklin> ||                                            ||                      ||                      ||      ||          ||
[17:08] <sconklin> || hardy    linux                             || 2.6.24-29.90         || 2.6.24-29.91         ||    4 ||        4 ||
[17:08] <sconklin> || lucid    linux-meta-lts-backport-natty     ||                      || 2.6.38.10.20         ||    0 ||        0 ||
[17:08] <sconklin> || ---      linux-ec2                         || 2.6.32-316.31        || 2.6.32-317.36        ||    4 ||        4 ||
[17:08] <sconklin> || ---      linux-lts-backport-natty          ||                      || 2.6.38-10.44~lucid1  ||    1 ||        1 ||
[17:08] <sconklin> || ---      linux-ports-meta                  || 2.6.32.32.24         || 2.6.32.33.25         ||    0 ||        0 ||
[17:08] <sconklin> || ---      linux-meta-lts-backport-maverick  || 2.6.35.25.36         || 2.6.35.30.38         ||    0 ||        0 ||
[17:08] <sconklin> || ---      linux-lts-backport-maverick       || 2.6.35-25.44~lucid1  || 2.6.35-30.54~lucid1  ||   21 ||       21 ||
[17:08] <sconklin> || ---      linux-meta                        || 2.6.32.32.38         || 2.6.32.33.39         ||    0 ||        0 ||
[17:08] <sconklin> || ---      linux-firmware                    || 1.34.7               || 1.34.10              ||    0 ||        0 ||
[17:08] <sconklin> || ---      linux                             || 2.6.32-32.62         || 2.6.32-33.70         ||    4 ||        4 ||
[17:08] <sconklin> || ---      linux-backports-modules-2.6.32    || 2.6.32-32.32         || 2.6.32-33.33         ||    0 ||        0 ||
[17:08] <sconklin> || ---      linux-meta-ec2                    || 2.6.32.316.17        || 2.6.32.317.18        ||    0 ||        0 ||
[17:08] <sconklin> || maverick linux-mvl-dove                    || 2.6.32-416.33        || 2.6.32-417.34        ||    6 ||        6 ||
[17:08] <sconklin> || ---      linux-meta-mvl-dove               || 2.6.32.416.6         || 2.6.32.417.7         ||    0 ||        0 ||
[17:08] <sconklin> || ---      linux-firmware                    || 1.38.6               || 1.38.8               ||    1 ||        0 ||
[17:08] <sconklin> || ---      linux                             || 2.6.35-30.54         || 2.6.35-30.55         ||    1 ||        1 ||
[17:09] <sconklin> || natty    linux-meta-ti-omap4               ||                      || 2.6.38.1209.7        ||    0 ||        0 ||
[17:09] <sconklin> || ---      linux-backports-modules-2.6.38    ||                      || 2.6.38-10.6          ||    0 ||        0 ||
[17:09] <sconklin> || ---      linux-firmware                    ||                      || 1.52.1               ||    0 ||        0 ||
[17:09] <sconklin> || ---      linux                             ||                      || 2.6.38-10.46         ||   15 ||       15 ||
[17:09] <sconklin> || ---      linux-ti-omap4                    ||                      || 2.6.38-1209.13       ||   10 ||       10 ||
[17:09] <sconklin> || ---      linux-meta                        ||                      || 2.6.38.10.25         ||    0 ||        0 ||
[17:09] <sconklin> ||
[17:09] <sconklin> ..
[17:09] <bjf> [TOPIC] Open Discussion or Questions: Raise your hand to be recognized (o/)
[17:09] <MootBot> New Topic:  Open Discussion or Questions: Raise your hand to be recognized (o/)
[17:10] <bjf> for your amusement: http://people.canonical.com/~bradf/
[17:10] <bjf> thanks everyone
[17:10] <bjf> #endmeeting
[17:10] <MootBot> Meeting finished at 12:10.
[19:20] <jasric89> hi
[19:21] <jasric89> is anyone here
[19:24] <jasric89> ?
[19:27] <charlie-tca> yes
[19:27] <charlie-tca> this is the meeting channel
[19:27] <charlie-tca> There is no meeting at this time
[19:33]  * patdk-wk runs around the meeting hall like a 2year old