=== danilo_ is now known as danilos [12:30] hi [12:30] bac benji danilos gmb, call in 1-ish [12:30] Yeo [12:30] *p [12:31] rt [12:48] gary_poster, oh, I am CHR/OCR today as well [12:48] danilos, ok. another reason to be pitiful :-) [12:48] gmb: ...ac/launchpad/other/lp-dev-utils/trunk> dpkg -S /usr/bin/lp-shell [12:48] ubuntu-dev-tools: /usr/bin/lp-shell [12:48] gary_poster, heh, yeah [12:48] bac: Thanks. [13:10] benji, gary_poster: So, you know how I said I was convinced that lifeless was wrong, and how I said I was bound to be wrong about that? Well, I was 50% right. Guess which 50%. [13:12] heh [13:12] gmb: so what was he talking about? [13:13] gmb, heh, I'll be very curious to see how it works if what he proposed works. [13:13] benji, gary_poster: Well. If I declare linked_branches thusly: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/643234/ [13:13] Calling [13:14] >>> bug.linked_branches [13:14] gets me: [13:14] [13:14] *Somehow* it magically knows that treating it as a property is OK. [13:14] wow [13:15] lifeless for the win! [13:15] I had no idea [13:15] Lifeless is basically Merlin. [13:15] heh [13:15] And Knows Things [13:16] well, leonard should get some merlin props too for making it work that way, even if surprising [13:16] true [13:16] Very true. [13:17] I don't think "props" and "surprising" can be used together like that. [13:17] gmb: i'm unclear why your original version with ILaunchBag was so hideous in a property. [13:17] benji, gary_poster: Do either of you know how I can make sure this is exported for all version of the API? Is it just a case of multiple @operation_for_version declarations? [13:17] benji: leonard still gets demerits for it being so damned hard to figure out [13:17] gmb: i think you just do it for 'beta' and all others follow [13:18] bac: LaunchBag is considered ugly and the model shouldn't know about view-level stuff (I believe that's the logic anyway). [13:18] bac: Oh, awesome, thanks. [13:18] gmb, if you declare it for a lower version and don't cancel it for a higher...yeah what bac said [13:18] Right :) [15:01] CHR! [15:27] the way unittest assumes that one of the arguments to assertEqual is the expected value and the other is the actual value irriates me to no end [15:33] yeah. it is not consistent across libraries. We seem to have settled on (expected, actual) though [16:22] lunch [17:00] Ciao folks. [18:42] * danilos -> off as well [19:00] CHR time for me [20:00] darn: "No space left on device" I guess my VM isn't big enough. [21:10] CHR...better late than never [21:29] danilos: can you look at https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/164475 tomorrow?