=== yofel_ is now known as yofel [17:06] nice, instant nvidia update [17:06] :D [17:50] horstle, oh, you mean a 280.04 package? === yofel_ is now known as yofel [22:59] RAOF, so... wayland-demos needs wayland-egl from mesa. thoughts? [22:59] We MIR wayland, enable wayland-egl in mesa, and win? [23:00] optimist ;-) [23:00] well, was more asking if you'd started on the MIR yet [23:00] er, wondering [23:00] Oh! I thought you were doing that.\ [23:00] Communication. [23:00] I haz it. [23:01] aha [23:01] ok, not a big deal [23:01] * bryceh mirrs [23:01] How do our wayland packages compare with debian's? Are we based on them yet? [23:01] yeah I did the merge work yesterday [23:03] the binary packages were done differently than us, that made it interesting. but it's up and installable and all. [23:03] wayland-demos is ready to go too, but won't build without wayland-egl [23:05] I'll check that the wayland we've got now is new enough to build wayland-egl in mesa. [23:06] looks like it is; you had to disable it in the 7.11~1-0ubuntu1 merge at least [23:06] er, wow I misread your comment [23:08] Yeah. I disabled it in Debian because it wasn't new enough ;) [23:08] the uploaded wayland is from june 10, and is the same snapshot version debian used, so if they're building mesa with that, then it should be good to go. [23:11] Let's play with some mesa. Wrangling with the finer points of binary-blob licensing is getting old. [23:55] bryceh: No dice; mesa's been updated to use a newer libwayland than we have. I can patch that back, or we can update wayland. [23:55] seriously? [23:56] Yeah. [23:56] what's the error? [23:56] Specifically: “wayland-drm.c:101:16: error: ‘struct wl_buffer’ has no member named ‘client’” [23:57] probably easier to update wayland; there's only about a dozen commits we're missing [23:58] however I'm curious how debian packaged mesa without hitting that [23:59] They didn't; when I updated to a newer 7.11 snapshot I had to disable it. [23:59] The 7.11~1 upload isn't uploaded yet, though.