brycehanyway, mir is at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wayland/+bug/81021700:00
ubot4Launchpad bug 810217 in wayland (Ubuntu) "Main Inclusion Request for wayland protocol package (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,New]00:00
RAOFBloody hell.  Less cold, more coffee please!00:01
RAOFMan.  Intel are getting serious about linux driver debugging.  Would you like to attach a debugger to your shader code?  Certainly, sir!00:11
ScottKThat sounds promising.00:11
ScottK(the Intel part, not the less cold part)00:12
bryceha bit ironic that I was waiting on doing wayland until mesa was newer, and now mesa is too new so I have to update wayland00:17
brycehgo go interdependencies00:17
brycehlooks like mesa needs http://cgit.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland/commit/?id=a56c0455717c4772e8e4b78e56af439ccd2356af00:29
brycehin wayland00:30
brycehwhich is only 3 revisions after what debian snapshotted00:30
brycehRAOF, would you mind slapping that patch into your wayland and see if it then enables mesa to build proper?00:31
brycehRAOF, or alternatively, looks like commit 0cb356dd5c93f745bb1b17987d206a24ab708f31 in mesa could be reverted00:32
RAOFNot at all.00:32
brycehboth patches by the same guy, guessing they go together00:32
RAOFAt this point we're probably better off with a newer wayland than with reverting mesa.00:33
brycehif it's just that one commit as I suspect, I may be lazy and just slip that into wayland's patches/00:34
brycehah, nope... we do need some of these other patches00:45
brycehRAOF, I'll have a newer wayland package in the hopper in a minute00:47
RAOFYeah, that failed.00:54
brycehis this an insane version number for a new snapshot?  0.1.0~0+gitaa7bbb21-0ubuntu100:55
brycehoh, I should include the date00:55
* bryceh squints00:55
brycehRAOF, look ok to you?00:56
RAOFI think Debian are going for serial snapshot names, with the git commit in the changelog.00:57
Sarvattmaybe just the date and the sha in the changelog00:57
RAOFSo, 0.1.0~100:57
RAOFAnd I'd like it to be acceptable to Debian for diff-minimisation purposes ;)00:57
brycehwell, won't 0.1.0~1 conflict with whatever they choose to use as a tarball?00:58
RAOFThat  also has the plesant side effect of making 0.1.0~rc1 > 0.1.0~$DIGITS00:58
RAOFUm, yes.  Of course it will conflict.  Silly me!00:59
brycehI could go with 0.1.0~0+1-0ubuntu1 or 0.1.0~0.1-0ubuntu101:01
RAOFEither are good with me.01:02
brycehwayland_0.1.0~0.1-0ubuntu1_source.changes uploaded01:08
RAOFbryceh: Where's the wayland?  I can't see it in either launchpad or in git.02:06
RAOFbryceh: Bah, false alarm.  I need to learn to read launchpad better.02:08
brycehubuntu branch on alioth02:32
RAOFNo rule to make target `/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.0/include/stddef.h'04:43
RAOFThat's an interesting architecture :)04:43
RAOFNow, what in the nine circles of hell is causing it.04:43
SarvattRAOF: screwed up tarball, making one from git works..05:22
RAOFAh, no.06:09
RAOFI see.06:09
SarvattRAOF: hmm whats in debian-experimental is going to need --disable-gallium-gbm or install the pipe drivers, no?14:53
Sarvattoh nevermind was merged after rc114:54
* bryceh waves18:27
Sarvattanyone else using nvidia on oneiric that's updated in the last few days? we might have a problem https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers/+bug/81064718:27
ubot4Launchpad bug 810647 in nvidia-graphics-drivers (Ubuntu) "[10de:08a0] nvidia isn't loading (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [High,Confirmed]18:27
Sarvattcouple people saying its not working18:28
* Sarvatt has a machine updating to see18:28
Sarvattheyo bryce!18:28
brycehheya Sarv18:29
brycehso many bugs18:29
Sarvattyeah oneiric is going crazy the past few weeks18:30
brycehX isn't too bad yet - http://www.bryceharrington.org/Arsenal/Reports/ubuntu-x-swat/totals-oneiric-workqueue.svg18:31
brycehbut we're probably going to start seeing an increase by this point18:31
=== yofel_ is now known as yofel
=== bjsnider_ is now known as bjsnider

Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!