[00:00] <bryceh> ah
[00:00] <bryceh> anyway, mir is at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wayland/+bug/810217
[00:00] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 810217 in wayland (Ubuntu) "Main Inclusion Request for wayland protocol package (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,New]
[00:00] <RAOF> Funkyawesome.
[00:01] <RAOF> Bloody hell.  Less cold, more coffee please!
[00:11] <RAOF> Man.  Intel are getting serious about linux driver debugging.  Would you like to attach a debugger to your shader code?  Certainly, sir!
[00:11] <ScottK> That sounds promising.
[00:12] <ScottK> (the Intel part, not the less cold part)
[00:17] <bryceh> a bit ironic that I was waiting on doing wayland until mesa was newer, and now mesa is too new so I have to update wayland
[00:17] <bryceh> go go interdependencies
[00:29] <bryceh> looks like mesa needs http://cgit.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland/commit/?id=a56c0455717c4772e8e4b78e56af439ccd2356af
[00:30] <bryceh> in wayland
[00:30] <bryceh> which is only 3 revisions after what debian snapshotted
[00:31] <bryceh> RAOF, would you mind slapping that patch into your wayland and see if it then enables mesa to build proper?
[00:32] <bryceh> RAOF, or alternatively, looks like commit 0cb356dd5c93f745bb1b17987d206a24ab708f31 in mesa could be reverted
[00:32] <RAOF> Not at all.
[00:32] <bryceh> both patches by the same guy, guessing they go together
[00:33] <RAOF> At this point we're probably better off with a newer wayland than with reverting mesa.
[00:33] <bryceh> yeah
[00:34] <bryceh> if it's just that one commit as I suspect, I may be lazy and just slip that into wayland's patches/
[00:45] <bryceh> ah, nope... we do need some of these other patches
[00:47] <bryceh> RAOF, I'll have a newer wayland package in the hopper in a minute
[00:54] <RAOF> Yeah, that failed.
[00:55] <bryceh> is this an insane version number for a new snapshot?  0.1.0~0+gitaa7bbb21-0ubuntu1
[00:55] <bryceh> oh, I should include the date
[00:55] <bryceh> 0.1.0~0+git20110629.aa7bbb21-0ubuntu1
[00:55]  * bryceh squints
[00:56] <bryceh> RAOF, look ok to you?
[00:57] <RAOF> I think Debian are going for serial snapshot names, with the git commit in the changelog.
[00:57] <Sarvatt> maybe just the date and the sha in the changelog
[00:57] <RAOF> So, 0.1.0~1
[00:57] <RAOF> And I'd like it to be acceptable to Debian for diff-minimisation purposes ;)
[00:58] <bryceh> well, won't 0.1.0~1 conflict with whatever they choose to use as a tarball?
[00:58] <RAOF> That  also has the plesant side effect of making 0.1.0~rc1 > 0.1.0~$DIGITS
[00:59] <RAOF> Um, yes.  Of course it will conflict.  Silly me!
[01:01] <bryceh> I could go with 0.1.0~0+1-0ubuntu1 or 0.1.0~0.1-0ubuntu1
[01:02] <RAOF> Either are good with me.
[01:08] <bryceh> wayland_0.1.0~0.1-0ubuntu1_source.changes uploaded
[02:06] <RAOF> bryceh: Where's the wayland?  I can't see it in either launchpad or in git.
[02:08] <RAOF> bryceh: Bah, false alarm.  I need to learn to read launchpad better.
[02:32] <bryceh> ubuntu branch on alioth
[04:43] <RAOF> No rule to make target `/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.0/include/stddef.h'
[04:43] <RAOF> That's an interesting architecture :)
[04:43] <RAOF> Now, what in the nine circles of hell is causing it.
[05:22] <Sarvatt> RAOF: screwed up tarball, making one from git works..
[05:46] <RAOF> Odd.
[06:09] <RAOF> Ah, no.
[06:09] <RAOF> I see.
[14:53] <Sarvatt> RAOF: hmm whats in debian-experimental is going to need --disable-gallium-gbm or install the pipe drivers, no?
[14:54] <Sarvatt> oh nevermind was merged after rc1
[18:27]  * bryceh waves
[18:27] <Sarvatt> anyone else using nvidia on oneiric that's updated in the last few days? we might have a problem https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers/+bug/810647
[18:27] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 810647 in nvidia-graphics-drivers (Ubuntu) "[10de:08a0] nvidia isn't loading (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [High,Confirmed]
[18:28] <Sarvatt> couple people saying its not working
[18:28]  * Sarvatt has a machine updating to see
[18:28] <Sarvatt> heyo bryce!
[18:29] <bryceh> heya Sarv
[18:29] <bryceh> so many bugs
[18:30] <Sarvatt> yeah oneiric is going crazy the past few weeks
[18:31] <bryceh> X isn't too bad yet - http://www.bryceharrington.org/Arsenal/Reports/ubuntu-x-swat/totals-oneiric-workqueue.svg
[18:31] <bryceh> but we're probably going to start seeing an increase by this point