[00:00] ah [00:00] anyway, mir is at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wayland/+bug/810217 [00:00] Launchpad bug 810217 in wayland (Ubuntu) "Main Inclusion Request for wayland protocol package (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,New] [00:00] Funkyawesome. [00:01] Bloody hell. Less cold, more coffee please! [00:11] Man. Intel are getting serious about linux driver debugging. Would you like to attach a debugger to your shader code? Certainly, sir! [00:11] That sounds promising. [00:12] (the Intel part, not the less cold part) [00:17] a bit ironic that I was waiting on doing wayland until mesa was newer, and now mesa is too new so I have to update wayland [00:17] go go interdependencies [00:29] looks like mesa needs http://cgit.freedesktop.org/wayland/wayland/commit/?id=a56c0455717c4772e8e4b78e56af439ccd2356af [00:30] in wayland [00:30] which is only 3 revisions after what debian snapshotted [00:31] RAOF, would you mind slapping that patch into your wayland and see if it then enables mesa to build proper? [00:32] RAOF, or alternatively, looks like commit 0cb356dd5c93f745bb1b17987d206a24ab708f31 in mesa could be reverted [00:32] Not at all. [00:32] both patches by the same guy, guessing they go together [00:33] At this point we're probably better off with a newer wayland than with reverting mesa. [00:33] yeah [00:34] if it's just that one commit as I suspect, I may be lazy and just slip that into wayland's patches/ [00:45] ah, nope... we do need some of these other patches [00:47] RAOF, I'll have a newer wayland package in the hopper in a minute [00:54] Yeah, that failed. [00:55] is this an insane version number for a new snapshot? 0.1.0~0+gitaa7bbb21-0ubuntu1 [00:55] oh, I should include the date [00:55] 0.1.0~0+git20110629.aa7bbb21-0ubuntu1 [00:55] * bryceh squints [00:56] RAOF, look ok to you? [00:57] I think Debian are going for serial snapshot names, with the git commit in the changelog. [00:57] maybe just the date and the sha in the changelog [00:57] So, 0.1.0~1 [00:57] And I'd like it to be acceptable to Debian for diff-minimisation purposes ;) [00:58] well, won't 0.1.0~1 conflict with whatever they choose to use as a tarball? [00:58] That also has the plesant side effect of making 0.1.0~rc1 > 0.1.0~$DIGITS [00:59] Um, yes. Of course it will conflict. Silly me! [01:01] I could go with 0.1.0~0+1-0ubuntu1 or 0.1.0~0.1-0ubuntu1 [01:02] Either are good with me. [01:08] wayland_0.1.0~0.1-0ubuntu1_source.changes uploaded [02:06] bryceh: Where's the wayland? I can't see it in either launchpad or in git. [02:08] bryceh: Bah, false alarm. I need to learn to read launchpad better. [02:32] ubuntu branch on alioth [04:43] No rule to make target `/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.6.0/include/stddef.h' [04:43] That's an interesting architecture :) [04:43] Now, what in the nine circles of hell is causing it. [05:22] RAOF: screwed up tarball, making one from git works.. [05:46] Odd. [06:09] Ah, no. [06:09] I see. [14:53] RAOF: hmm whats in debian-experimental is going to need --disable-gallium-gbm or install the pipe drivers, no? [14:54] oh nevermind was merged after rc1 [18:27] * bryceh waves [18:27] anyone else using nvidia on oneiric that's updated in the last few days? we might have a problem https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers/+bug/810647 [18:27] Launchpad bug 810647 in nvidia-graphics-drivers (Ubuntu) "[10de:08a0] nvidia isn't loading (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [High,Confirmed] [18:28] couple people saying its not working [18:28] * Sarvatt has a machine updating to see [18:28] heyo bryce! [18:29] heya Sarv [18:29] so many bugs [18:30] yeah oneiric is going crazy the past few weeks [18:31] X isn't too bad yet - http://www.bryceharrington.org/Arsenal/Reports/ubuntu-x-swat/totals-oneiric-workqueue.svg [18:31] but we're probably going to start seeing an increase by this point === yofel_ is now known as yofel === bjsnider_ is now known as bjsnider