[00:24] <maujhsn> Can anyone tell me why I get this message on latest download in launchpad?  "Couldn't find package 0.8.1+svn20110714.r5790-0ubuntu0~sunab~lucid1".
[00:25] <wgrant> maujhsn: What gave you that message?
[00:25] <maujhsn> terminal command
[00:26] <maujhsn> sudo apt-get install 0.8.1+svn20110714.r5790-0ubuntu0~sunab~lucid1
[00:26] <maujhsn> wgrant sudo apt-get install 0.8.1+svn20110714.r5790-0ubuntu0~sunab~lucid1
[00:27] <wgrant> maujhsn: That's a package version, not a package name.
[00:28] <maujhsn> wgrant>  Yes I am trying to install this version!
[00:29] <wgrant> But you didn't specify a package to install.
[00:29] <wgrant> You just told it what version you wanted.
[00:29] <wgrant> You'd normally say "sudo apt-get install somepackage"
[00:29] <maujhsn> wgrant  https://launchpad.net/~sunab/+archive/kdenlive-svn
[00:30] <maujhsn> Its is from this PPA
[00:30] <wgrant> What is?
[00:30] <wgrant> Which package?
[00:30] <wgrant> kdenlive?
[00:30] <wgrant> sudo apt-get install kdenlive
[00:30] <maujhsn> Yes!
[00:31] <maujhsn> An older version is already installed
[00:31] <wgrant> That will upgrade to the latest version available.
[00:32] <wgrant> Have you added the PPA to your software sources?
[00:32] <maujhsn> wgrant I'll give it a shot!
[00:32] <maujhsn> wgrant Yes I added the PPA!
[00:35] <maujhsn> wgrant check this out! http://pastebin.com/WHn4Qw0C
[00:36] <wgrant> maujhsn: sudo apt-get install kdenlive
[00:39] <maujhsn> wgrant I get this! The following packages have unmet dependencies:
[00:39] <maujhsn>   kdenlive: Depends: libqjson0 but it is not installable          Depends: xine-ui but it is not going to be installed
[00:39] <maujhsn> wgrant I need the svn version!
[00:40] <wgrant> How did you add the PPA?
[00:41] <maujhsn> wgrant synaptic package manager 'update software sources!
[00:41] <wgrant> How did you do it in there?
[00:43] <maujhsn> wgrant Why do you ask?
[00:43] <wgrant> Because I don't know if you've done it correctly.
[00:45] <wgrant> It looks to me like you have more PPAs enabled that are breaking your packages.
[00:45] <wgrant> As lpbqjson0 does not normally depend on xine-ui.
[00:46] <maujhsn> wgrant I do not know!
[00:47] <maujhsn> wgrant I think this is PGP key is my problem! 1024D/8C720439
[00:48] <wgrant> Have you run apt-get update?
[00:48] <maujhsn> Yes!
[00:48] <wgrant> Did it give any errors?
[00:49] <maujhsn> No!
[00:49] <wgrant> Then the key is not the issue./
[00:49] <wgrant> Which PPAs do you have enabled?
[00:50] <maujhsn> wgrant Let me check!
[00:52] <maujhsn> wgrant http://ppa.launchpad.net/sunab/kdenlive-svn/ubuntu/ lucid/main Translation-en_US new PPA!
[00:53] <wgrant> apt-cache policy libqjson0
[00:54] <maujhsn> wgrant What does Ign in front of the PPA mean?
[00:55] <wgrant> Nothing of importance.
[00:56] <maujhsn> wgrant OK.
[00:57] <maujhsn> wgrant installed & candidate = (none)
[00:58] <maujhsn> wgrant apt-cache policy libqjson0 reference!
[00:58] <wgrant> Oh, you mispasted above, I see.;
[00:58] <wgrant> Which version of Ubuntu are you using?
[01:00] <maujhsn> wgrant 10.04
[01:01] <wgrant>  libqjson0 |    0.7.1-1 |         lucid | amd64, i386
[01:01] <wgrant> libqjson0 is in lucid, so there is a candidate version.
[01:03] <maujhsn> wgrant OK!
[01:04] <maujhsn> wgrant Thanks! Take Care!
[01:13] <patdk-lap> is there something wrong with i386 builds?
[01:14] <wgrant> patdk-lap: We're currently running with fewer builders than normal. Let me send some of the amd64 builders over to i386...
[01:14] <patdk-lap> heh, not good news
[01:15] <StevenK> Why not? It's normal behaviour.
[01:15] <patdk-lap> I've never had a build take >2hours before
[01:15] <patdk-lap> so >8hours is new to me
[01:15] <StevenK> Which build?
[01:15] <patdk-lap> https://launchpad.net/~patrickdk/+archive/general-lucid/+packages
[01:16] <StevenK> Oh, you mean waiting to build for >8 hours? As opposed to actually *building* for >8 hours?
[01:16] <patdk-lap> ya
[01:16] <wgrant> i386 now has 50% more builders.
[01:16] <StevenK> 50% of 2 is still only 1 more :-P
[01:17] <patdk-lap> :)
[01:17] <patdk-lap> that is why I figured it wasn't good news
[01:17] <StevenK> patdk-lap: Most of the builders primary job is hardware testing, so they do disappear from time to time.
[01:18] <patdk-lap> is it possible to donate builders?
[01:18] <wgrant> Well, it's now up to 13.
[01:18] <wgrant> Normally has about 20.
[01:18] <wgrant> There is a 4 hour queue left.
[01:18] <StevenK> patdk-lap: No, it isn't possible.
[01:23] <patdk-lap> well, other than my little annoyance :) that I thought maybe i386 was dead, the sites been working good
[01:39] <patdk-lap> heh, big difference, those went fast :)
[01:41] <wgrant> There's still quite a queue, as can be seen on https://launchpad.net/builders
[01:41] <wgrant> But it's not as bad as it was before.
[01:47] <poolie_> "the diff has been truncated for viewing" is kind of backwards
[01:47] <poolie_> s//has been truncated to prevent viewing
[02:20] <michaelh1> Hi there.  I'd like to import the GDB 7.3 release branch into Launchpad.  They use CVS and have a GIT mirror.  Who should I ask? (mwhudson is away)
[02:20] <lifeless> michaelh1: generally its self service
[02:21] <michaelh1> lifeless: I'd like something that keeps up to date a'la the GCC import.
[02:21] <wgrant> https://code.launchpad.net/gdb, "Import a branch"
[02:22] <michaelh1> wgrant: it doesn't work with branches from GIT or CVS.
[02:22] <wgrant> Ah.
[02:22] <michaelh1> Yip, one of those chestnuts
[02:24] <lifeless> hmm, we really should just allow ;branch=xxx - I think bzr has most of the bits done to support that now
[02:24] <lifeless> [separate from N-branch imports in one place]
[02:26] <michaelh1> If I wanted to do it manually, how would I do it?  Use the git repo and ask bzr to import from a branch of that, then push to LP?
[02:26] <wgrant> bzr-git has support for importing branches, but bzr has no support for specifying them.
[02:26] <wgrant> You could hack bzr-git to default to a different branch, but that makes automatic updating hard.
[02:27] <wgrant> (it's difficult because bzr uses a URL to specify a branch, and it's hard to get a branch name into the URL while also allowing arbitrarily named files)
[02:27] <michaelh1> wgrant: I'm not using bzr-git anywhere else, so a hack is OK.  I could put it into a virtualenv.
[02:43] <michaelh1> lifeless, wgrant: I'll set something manual.  Is there a ticket on importing git branches that I can +1?
[02:47] <lifeless> yes
[02:50] <michaelh1> heh.  OK.  I'll find it.
[02:52] <lifeless> so its listed as https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/380871
[02:52] <lifeless> but thats actually, technically, something totally different
[02:53] <wgrant> Howso?
[02:54] <wgrant> The bug does not talk about supporting colocated branches in bzr's formats.
[02:54] <wgrant> Only the summary comes close.
[02:55] <lifeless> well, theres confusion somewhere
[02:58] <wgrant> Look at the description and comments and merge proposals and everything except the summary.
[09:24] <brendand> what's up with karma these days?
[10:01] <persia> karma has never meant anything specific.
[10:10] <brendand> just seems like it's not updating or something
[10:11] <wgrant> It has not updated for a couple of days, no.
[10:11] <wgrant> Due to various upgrades and database switches.
[10:50] <asilva> Hello, I posted a new ubuntu , release and archive mirrors, its about a month now and still is 'Pending Review'
[11:55] <asilva> Hello, I posted a new ubuntu , release and archive mirrors, its about a month now and still is 'Pending Review'
[12:25] <lag> Is it possible to see the full changelog of a package?
[12:40] <geser> lag: for a package in the archive? then yes, in LP and also on packages.ubuntu.com
[12:42] <lag> geser: No, for a package in my PPA
[12:42] <lag> geser: I ended up downloading the package and opening the changelog within it
[12:42] <lag> geser: What I really want to do is view it from within LP
[12:43] <geser> lag: I don't know of any option to see the changelog for packages in a PPA (besides downloading them)
[12:43] <lag> That sucks
[12:44] <lag> I know you can see the last changelog, but not in its entirety
[13:01] <asilva> Hello, I posted a new ubuntu , release and archive mirrors, its about a month now and still is 'Pending Review'
[13:25] <persia> asilva: I suspect you're running into the same issue here as you ran into there: none of the people who can deal with your request are about.
[13:26] <persia> You might try the ubuntu-mirrors mailing list: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-mirrors
[13:27] <asilva> persia, tkz
[16:12] <bdmurray> I keep seeing these weird "'None' is a binary package. This bug has been assigned to its source package 'memtest86+' instead." when modifying Ubuntu bugs via the web interface.
[16:16] <bdmurray> It happens with memtest86+ bug reports when clicking the expandy for commenting in the task table.  I haven't touched the package name.
[16:27] <bdmurray> Oh great, it won't let me change the package name that's awesome.
[17:43] <apmasell_> I'm trying to add a package to my PPA, but I get the error email address is not valid, even though it is registered with my account and PGP key. What could I be doing wrong?
[17:47] <maxb> You should pastebin the entire error email, the context may be relevant
[17:51] <apmasell_> maxb: https://gist.github.com/f202f7b2d6bb313069c4
[18:15] <brendand> is it known issue that there is an error when trying login_with...'staging') in launchpadlib on Oneiric?
[18:18] <Ampelbein> Hi there, I'm getting timeouts all the time trying to access bug 728840, OOPS-2022AU38, OOPS-2022G63, OOPS-2022A66
[21:22] <Daviey> Anyone have a launchpadlib snippet for checking/adding a milestone to a bug?
[21:27] <wgrant> Daviey: Just read/write the milestone attribute of a bug_task.
[21:30] <Daviey> wgrant: ah, ok - great. Thanks.
[21:30] <Daviey> wgrant: Has the cert changed on staging.* ?
[21:31] <wgrant> Daviey: No, but it possibly won't work with Oneiric's launchpadlib at the moment.
[21:31] <Daviey> Yeah, seems httplib2 is trying to validate the cert.
[21:32] <wgrant> Ah, I see it was brought up earlier.
[21:36] <Daviey> wgrant: I just patched out the raise in httplib2.. good enough for this testing.
[23:35] <poolie_> Daviey, there's an rt underway to give staging the right cert
[23:35] <poolie_> if that's what you're hitting
[23:35] <wgrant> poolie_: Isn't that only for www/feeds?