[00:00] <BUGabundo> "Chrome
[00:00] <BUGabundo> It’s the fastest growing browser
[00:00] <BUGabundo> With over 160 million users"
[00:00] <BUGabundo> how many chromium? ChromeOS?
[00:03] <BUGabundo> fta ^^^^^
[00:03] <BUGabundo> where's fta???
[12:35] <bhearsum> chr1sccoulson: ah, that's not so bad :)
[12:56] <mdeslaur> chrisccoulson: I've got an apport change for firefox. It uses apport stuff that only works in oneiric. Is that appropriate, or do we want to maintain apport script compatibility for all releases?
[12:57] <chrisccoulson> mdeslaur, what's the change? that will break the aurora and nightly builds (although, the apport hook doesn't work properly on those builds yet anyway)
[12:58] <chrisccoulson> bhearsum, the PGO build failed when i uploaded it :(
[12:58] <chrisccoulson> https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/ppa/+build/2627581
[12:58] <chrisccoulson> not had a chance to figure out why just yet though
[12:58] <mdeslaur> chrisccoulson: I now have an apparmor hook directly in apport, so the patch just simplifies the apport script. It's not important, it can stay as it is if we want it to work on older releases.
[12:59] <mdeslaur> chrisccoulson: what's "aurora"?
[12:59] <bhearsum> wow, your builds create a new chroot every time??
[13:00] <chrisccoulson> mdeslaur, https://edge.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-daily/+archive/firefox-aurora
[13:00] <chrisccoulson> bhearsum, yeah, the build environment is completely clean
[13:00] <bhearsum> that scares the bejesus out of me :)
[13:00] <mdeslaur> chrisccoulson: oh, it's a fancy name for "alpha"? :P)
[13:00] <bhearsum> though, i come from a land where we link builds against CentOS 5.0 system libraries, so take that with a grain of salt :(
[13:01] <bhearsum> mdeslaur: kindof
[13:01] <chrisccoulson> heh :)
[13:01] <mdeslaur> chrisccoulson: ok, never mind...I don't think it's worth changing then. Thanks!
[13:01] <chrisccoulson> mdeslaur, i'm going to completely scrap and rewrite our apport hook at some point anyway
[13:01] <chrisccoulson> it's a bit of a mess
[13:02] <mdeslaur> chrisccoulson: this was it: http://paste.ubuntu.com/644756/
[13:02] <mdeslaur> chrisccoulson: but, as I said, that only works on oneiric+
[13:02] <chrisccoulson> ah, that does make it a bit simpler
[13:16] <chrisccoulson> mdeslaur, did you know that you can use ifdef's in our apport hook? ;)
[13:16] <chrisccoulson> so you could commit it and still have it work on all releases
[13:16] <chrisccoulson> we put pretty much everything through a preprocessor
[13:17] <mdeslaur> chrisccoulson: well, that would _add_ code instead of simplifying it :)
[13:17] <chrisccoulson> mdeslaur, right :)
[13:17] <mdeslaur> chrisccoulson: it can stay as it is
[13:17] <mdeslaur> chrisccoulson: I was going through all the packages making that change, but firefox is a special case as we backport it, etc...
[13:18] <chrisccoulson> mdeslaur, yeah, it's a bit of a pain. although, we can be selective of what we take for beta and release branches (because we have a branch for each release)
[13:18] <chrisccoulson> but that's not the case for the aurora and nightly builds
[13:18] <chrisccoulson> we just have a single branch for those, so they need to work everywhere
[13:43] <Arran> hello everybody
[15:10] <bhearsum> anyone else find launchpad to be REALLY slow in Aurora?
[15:12] <micahg> bhearsum: do you have an nvidia chipset?
[15:12] <bhearsum> yeah
[15:12]  * micahg hasn't had a problem with nvidia, but others have been reporting issues for a while
[15:13]  * bhearsum checks his hardware accel settings
[15:13] <micahg> I wasn't hoping getting an nvidia chipset would show me the issues so I can report/debug, but no dice
[15:13] <micahg> s/wasn't/was/
[15:16] <bhearsum> hmm
[15:32] <Dimmuxx> I have that issue on one of my computers with a nvidia card
[15:33] <bhearsum> i filed https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671862
[15:33] <ubot2> Mozilla bug 671862 in Graphics "launchpad.net is really slow on Linux (possibly NVIDIA only)" [Normal,New: ]
[15:37] <Dimmuxx> it's fast on this laptop which is using intel hd 3000 so seems likely that it might be nvidia related
[16:26] <bhearsum> mind commenting in the bug? would be nice to have someone else confirm it!
[20:41] <BUGabundo> evening!