[00:10] <bazhang> is apt-fast recommended for slow downloads?
[00:27] <bazhang> * [famicube64] (~quassel@75-121-236-186.dyn.centurytel.net): Tyler  <-- ban evading rww ?
[00:30] <bazhang> * [jadams] (~jadams@adsl-98-83-130-111.bhm.bellsouth.net): Josh Adams  <-- PM spam, but weird, as we share no channels
[01:22] <bazhang> keyctl_search: rewuired key not available ....Perhaps try the interactive 'ecryptfs-mount-private'
[01:22] <bazhang> would that error occur with a non-encrypted hdd? simply a lost user pw?
[01:27] <bazhang> and PM spam from ray24. yay
[01:32] <bazhang> <Guest90287>  if someone has a clue about his issue, please feel free. seems awfully strange for simply a lost password
[02:06] <bazhang> the whole !>user seems to be defeated when most users insist on doing the ! in channel
[02:07] <bazhang> someone typed !password in their terminal to try and fix a lost password situation
[02:27] <bazhang> we need to translate "not supported here" into all the UN official languages and have the bot pipe to users who dont get that
[02:39] <bazhang> pooltable is offering very suspect advice.
[02:39] <bazhang> step one: reinstall. but first dismantle computer and "deep clean " it
[03:14] <bazhang> <mohammed52> does anyone know how to install run a .bat file    <--- for windows I thought
[03:19] <Flannel> bazhang: could be wine
[03:23] <bazhang> http://www.ubuntugeek.com/nfs-server-and-client-configuration-in-ubuntu.html could be Flannel , but he was just asking about this prior, which has no mention of .bat files
[03:36] <rww> bazhang: yeah, BT# 36049
[03:37] <bazhang> rww, okay, he swore, then quit
[06:53] <rww> !u > sunshine1
[06:53] <Tm_T> hi all
[06:54] <rww> k'day Tm_T
[07:50] <bazhang> sources.list empty? that seems odd
[08:10] <jpds> Some people just hate security updates so much.
[08:10] <ikonia> ?
[08:28] <ikonia> @mark #ubuntu-offtopic Stockholm_Angel childish behaviour, had a bit of a strop and /parted after being asked not to use "wtf" - getting quite common behaviour
[08:28] <ubottu> The operation succeeded.
[12:07] <bazhang> <m_> anyone know how to run python .py in apache
[12:07] <bazhang> use perl?
[12:07] <Pici> Thats valid
[12:09] <Pici> Whats blackbuntu?
[12:09] <popey> black hat thing
[12:09] <popey> apparently
[12:09] <popey> stupid name
[12:10] <Pici> Agreed.
[12:12] <persia> If it's unliked, someone could have a trademark discussion.  Folks aren't supposed to use *buntu unless they are in the primary archive.
[12:12] <bazhang> thought it was jewbuntu
[12:12] <bazhang> err like
[12:13] <Pici> bazhang: you mean like a re-themed variant with some specific apps pre-installed?
[12:13] <bazhang> Pici, not really what I was implying, no
[12:16] <popey> fwiw http://board.blackbuntu.com/showthread.php?tid=552 details how they can get on #blackbuntu irc chat
[12:21] <bazhang> perhaps it would be better to integrate the alis factoid with the derivattive factoids, as its fairly huge now, and lists only a subset of those not supported.
[12:21] <bazhang> -t
[12:45] <bazhang> that wubi bug seems of long standing, dating back to at least 2009
[12:46] <bazhang> pinning a kernel seems odd
[13:38] <bazhang> if only prh3red would come back and tell how he removed classic had only gnome 3 session, but was still running unity, without using the gnome3 ppa
[13:38] <bazhang> ie gnome 3 from the selector
[14:16] <bazhang> the eolupgrades link has a type in it that leads to a dead end wiki page. the lucidupgrades one
[14:16] <bazhang> err typo
[14:34] <Pici> bazhang: did you update the factoid?
[14:34] <bazhang> Pici, nope, wanted to garner consensus first
[14:36] <bazhang> <lotutu> hello all, how can I run vim in perl?
[14:37] <ubottu> In #xubuntu, charlie-tca said: ubottu is a robot, it is not a person
=== jpds_ is now known as jpds
[17:38] <Corey> Good morning, lovelie.
[17:38] <Corey> lovelies*
[19:49] <maco> what the crap does "honorary bug" mean?
[19:49] <maco> surfsue's getting on my nerves
=== tomaw_ is now known as tomaw
[21:15] <Myrtti> os2mac: hi
[23:54] <bazhang> sudokill seems to be providing nothing of substance
[23:55] <rww> they've been an issue in the past :(