[03:44] <vibhav> ummm
[03:45] <vibhav> Is the word starting with bas and ending with tards banned in #ubuntu
[03:46] <rww> Likely. Why?
[03:47] <vibhav> cause somebody used this word in #ubuntu-offtopic
[03:47] <vibhav> check the IRCLOGS
[03:47] <vibhav> My Father saw it
[03:47] <vibhav> But I convinced him that it was spam
[03:49] <rww> Looking at the logs, that appears to have been dealt with 18 hours ago when it happened. Why are you bringing it up?
[03:50] <vibhav_> Is it bad
[03:50] <rww> 03:49 <+rww> Looking at the logs, that appears to have been dealt with 18 hours ago when it happened. Why are you bringing it up?
[03:50] <vibhav_> oh
[03:50] <vibhav_> lemme look
[03:52] <vibhav_> ok sorry
[04:02]  * elky headdesks
[04:03] <Jordan_U> I'd like to complain about an immature flooder in #ubuntu-offtopic...
[04:03] <Jordan_U> ;)
[04:03] <rww> you should kickban them forever, flooding is unacceptable
[04:03]  * rww slides a pillow onto elky's desk
[04:03] <elky> pfft, amateur, no figlet.
[04:04] <rww> ldunn has ops these days, I have to be careful
[04:04]  * ldunn peers in
[04:04] <rww> get out and take your flood protection with you :(
[04:05] <ldunn> :(
[04:06] <elky> by the looks of pictures in my g+ stream, the flooder needs a haircut :P
[04:06] <rww> oh for goddess' sake
[04:07] <ldunn> ruffian!
[04:07] <rww> I'm going to go get my cameraphone RIGHT NOW
[04:07] <rww> you people
[04:07] <elky> :D
[04:07] <elky> plz tell me you didn't cut it, just made it... purple or something
[04:08] <elky> i think i might do that next weekend. get most of my hair cut off and turned purple.
[04:08] <rww> of course I cut it, it looks like a birds nest when it's long
[04:08] <rww> 2 or 3 times a year i go to a cheap hair salon and pay them to make it half a centimetre long
[04:09] <elky> aww
[04:09] <elky> mine is at the needs a cut stage
[04:10] <elky> and all the bleaching for the foils earlier this year have taken a toll, so imma gonna get it cut to 2" or so, and since im sitting behind reception at work, i might as well visually troll all our clients too.
[04:11] <elky> since i chickened out of getting a bright pink keyboard because the only ones available looked crap
[04:40] <bazhang> #ubuntu threatens to become ##linux if not watched at times
[04:40] <bazhang> or just general personal websearching for random stuff channel
[04:41] <bazhang> "well, the most people are here..."
[04:41] <rww> Awesome rww suggestion: kick out anyone who doesn't talk at least once a day to decrease our channel size and stop us from being targetted by spammers and idiots
[04:43] <rww> !away > Wally|away
[04:45] <bazhang> why would someone need the sun-java6 on a server
[04:46] <rww> minecraft?
[04:48] <rww> !away > derp|gone
[04:52] <rww> Conveniently, I asked #ubuntu-devel about how the whole 3/5 year thing works for Ubuntu 8.04 earlier today :)
[04:59] <bazhang> L1nuxrules seems to just be giving random incorrect advice
[06:18] <melvincv> May I know which channel to ask queries about computers and related devices in general?
[06:30] <mrmist> suzzy is onjoin spamming, but didn't spam me ..
[06:34] <rww> Flannel: they're gone already yo
[06:44] <elky> mrmist, ^
[06:44] <mrmist> still. sigh. thanks
[08:50] <ikonia> mrmist: back again as KelebekUsr2 in #ubuntu and #debian
[08:51] <ikonia> what's the real name ban flag, was it n
[08:51] <ikonia> or r=
[08:52] <ikonia> ahh $r
[08:53] <ikonia> is it possible to do $r:version@85.* ?
[08:53] <ikonia> (I know that mask is off, just an example)
[09:00] <oCean> tsimpson:  siskawati (~meisya@119.235.29.210) is back in #u, it wasn't a ban?
[09:00] <tsimpson> oCean: just a remove
[09:01] <ikonia> worth forwarding to here to explain ?
[09:02] <tsimpson> well I was looking in -monitor and figured out they share IPs
[09:03] <tsimpson> oh, and $r does accept masks too, just like any other kind if ban/quiet
[09:03] <ikonia> tsimpson: how would you do it with a mask ?
[09:03] <oCean> I got a spam pm (irc.angeleyez.net) from him/her too
[09:03] <ikonia> $r:blah!@80.* ?
[09:04] <tsimpson> ikonia: $r is real name, so it's not <nick>!<user>@host
[09:04] <tsimpson> but, that'd work for webchat
[09:04] <ikonia> tsimpson: yes, that's what I'm trying to work out how to do r:name@80.*
[09:04] <ikonia> realname, on a specific host
[09:05] <tsimpson> ah, you want to use $x then
[09:05] <tsimpson> $x uses nick!username@host#name
[09:05] <tsimpson> so $x:*!*@host#name
[09:06] <tsimpson> (extbans are nice)
[09:06] <ikonia> ahhh
[09:06] <ikonia> but that's still against their nick
[09:06] <ikonia> that doesn't pickup against their irc/real name ?
[09:07] <tsimpson> the part after the # is the real-name
[09:07] <ikonia> ahhhhh
[09:07] <ikonia> that's very clever
[09:07] <ikonia> thank you
[09:07] <tsimpson> $x:nick!ident@host#real-name
[09:07] <ikonia> perfect
[09:08] <tsimpson> $r is like the old +d (?) mode on hyperiron
[09:08] <ikonia> ok, I'll tidy that ban up now
[09:09] <ikonia> lets see if that keeps the pm spammer out
[09:09] <oCean> tsimpson: have we had multiple reports on siskawati spamming in pm?
[09:09] <elky> what is with all this pm spam lately?
[09:10] <ikonia> dunno, but I have a long list of asian webcams
[09:10] <elky> this is their version of a school holiday job?
[09:10] <oCean> from siskawati it's about come join irc.angeleyez.net
[09:11] <tsimpson> oCean: from ie51cp53, but siskawati has the same ident/IP/real-name
[09:11] <tsimpson> so I think siskawati was collecting nicks for the other nick to spam
[09:11] <oCean> I had pm from copfleet-l with same ident
[09:12] <tsimpson> yep, same
[09:13] <oCean> ok, let me see if I get response in pm, otherwise we'll forward to here
[09:14] <tsimpson> someone else spoke to them in #u about it, with no response in channel
[09:20] <ikonia> the user KelebekUsr2 is now spamming me in pm no matter that he's in no channels at all
[09:25] <oCean> ikonia: new ident? Or ~meisya@119.235.29.210
[09:34] <oCean> ikonia: suzzy (~kelebek@85.100.168.152) just joined #u
[09:34] <bazhang> * [suzzy] (~kelebek@85.100.168.152): %version    <--- same?
[09:34] <bazhang> heh
[09:34] <bazhang> and k-lined
[09:34] <oCean> ah
[09:36] <oCean> what about this: FloodBot1 sets mode +q #ubuntu mang0!*@*
[09:36] <oCean> but there's no -q ?
[09:36] <bazhang> what is firesheep?
[09:36] <oCean> no clue, though i've heard it mention before
[09:37] <bazhang> hijacker
[09:37] <bazhang> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firesheep
[09:39] <oCean> that doesn't sound appropriate for #u
 glebihan: dont know, ^^ im using chromium usualy so just gona get firefox and this firesheep to steal cookies :D
[09:39] <oCean> bazhang: ok, let's end that discussion?
[09:40] <bazhang> it's mentioned in the wikipedia article that you can test your own security with it, but here kaellen seems to be saying something less benign
[09:43] <bazhang> so stalking purposes
[09:43] <oCean> so it seems
[09:43] <oCean> hello siskawati
[09:45] <oCean> siskawati: please respond
[09:50] <bazhang> well kaellan has been asked to stop multiple times now. I'm off for a bit
[09:50] <oCean> ok
[09:50] <oCean> I had man0 in pm, and unmuted him. I don't know why floodbot never set -q, it was an incidental flood afaics
[10:12] <bazhang> yep, the floodbots did that a day or two ago as well
[10:16] <topyli> siskawati: please don't idle here. if you have something we can help with, say so
[10:22] <oCean> hello siskawati
[10:23] <oCean> siskawati: please respond
[10:24] <melissa> hmm...
[10:24] <oCean> hmm?
[10:24] <ldunn> curious.
[10:25] <ldunn> ok, less curious.
[10:29] <ikonia> any idea what was wrong with my ban that let suzy back in ?
[10:30] <ikonia> I thought I had it covered with the name based ban, and It (in my head) should have blocked it from rejoining
[10:30] <oCean> ip range?
[10:31] <oCean> @85.100 vs @@85.107
[10:33] <Tm_T> K'day all
[10:34] <oCean> aaw
[10:35] <ikonia> did I set it on .100 ?
[10:35] <ikonia> ahh he changed to 100
[10:36] <tsimpson> that were k-lined anyway, so that beats a ban
[10:36] <oCean> siskawati: hello?
[10:36] <ikonia> tsimpson: removed the ban and updated it to wider as no doubt they will be back
[11:00] <topyli> wut
[11:03] <bazhang> ban forwarded, I presume
[11:03] <topyli> :(
[11:04] <topyli> siskawati: please stop rejoining here just for idling. you certainly don't want to be banned on this channel
[11:04] <tsimpson> lag...
[11:04] <tsimpson> topyli: it was a banforward from #u
[11:05] <topyli> then they should probably talk about this ban
[11:06] <tsimpson> topyli: we suspect it was a bot of some kind
[11:07] <topyli> ok
[11:08] <ikonia> sudokill: what's up ?
[11:08] <tsimpson> another forward iirc
[11:09] <ikonia> from where / what / why ?
[11:09]  * ikonia backs out
[11:09] <tsimpson> BT 41813 by rww
[13:41] <vibhav> how do I get a project cloak?
[13:41] <vibhav> for ubuntu
[13:42] <vibhav> helllo?
[13:44] <oCean> !membership
[13:45] <oCean> vibhav: you'll have to go through that procedure first ^
[13:45] <vibhav> oCean, that is what I am doing
[13:45] <vibhav> thanks
[13:58] <Ignacio> Hola
[13:58] <Ignacio> Hablo español
[13:58] <Ignacio> Necesito ayuda
[13:58] <Ignacio> Hello; Speak Spanish
[13:58] <Ignacio> Need Help
[13:58] <IdleOne> Ignacio: with what?
[13:59] <Ignacio> IdleOne: Only speak spanish
[13:59] <IdleOne> con que?
[13:59] <Ignacio> IdleOne: Turns out I banearon to "#ubuntu-es" and was told it would be for a week but two weeks go by and I do not unban
[13:59] <Ignacio> IdleOne:  uso el traductor de google
[14:00] <Ignacio> IdleOne:  Resulta que me banearon en #ubuntu-es y me dijeron que sería por una semana y llevo mas de dos semanas baneado y no  me desbanean
[14:00] <IdleOne> Ignacio: #ubuntu-es-ops
[14:00] <Ignacio> OKIS
[14:49] <oCean> vk4akp in #u back again (BT 40752) asking about white ubuntu version
[15:57] <exutux> Hi there...
[15:57] <vibhav> What is my edit req!?!?!
[15:58] <vibhav> Your edit request has been forwarded to #ubuntu-ops.  Thank you for your attention to detail
[15:58] <vibhav> which req
[15:58] <oCean> vibhav: we can see it
[15:58] <Flannel> In #ubuntu-irc, vibhav said: !who is your name
[15:58] <vibhav> what is this resque?
[15:58] <exutux> guys look for natali_ is a spam bot on join
[15:58] <Flannel> exutux: Did you get it too?
[15:58] <vibhav> I just wanted to see what would happen on that
[15:59] <exutux> Flannel: yeah
[15:59] <vibhav> what is !who is your name?
[15:59] <exutux> 7:51 -!- Irssi: Starting query in calvino with natali_
[15:59] <exutux> 17:51 <natali_> hi girls fantasy show http://camchat.eu.mn
[15:59] <Flannel> Thanks exutux, that's what I've been trying to find :)
[15:59] <vibhav> should I call !ops
[15:59] <oCean> vibhav: stop it
[15:59] <exutux> was just banned by ikonia ...but it changes nick and domain
[16:00] <vibhav> ok
[16:00] <vibhav> sorry oCean
[16:00] <exutux> Flannel: np :) by have a good work
[16:00] <oCean> vibhav: when you start a line with !word is (..) then the bot interprets that as an edit request
[16:01] <vibhav> what is an edit request?
[16:01] <oCean> it thinks you made a suggestion for a new factoid
[16:01] <tsimpson> a request to edit/add a factoid
[16:01] <vibhav> ok
[16:01] <vibhav> Thanks guys
[16:29] <Myrtti> *rolleyes*
[16:31] <ikonia> sheesh, I've had enough of this guy
[16:35] <vibhav> was my request good?
[16:35] <ikonia> vibhav: we don't need it thanks
[16:35] <vibhav> why ikonia ?
[16:36] <Flannel> !scope
[16:36] <ikonia> because it's not really a topic that comes up much
[16:36] <vibhav> ok
[16:36] <vibhav> thanks
[16:36] <ikonia> ubottu OH NO ?
[16:36] <Flannel> ubottu: sorry
[16:40] <charlie-tca> changes his quit message each time?
[16:40] <charlie-tca> oh, nope, same one
[16:42] <Flannel> charlie-tca: surely you mean "OH NO! Same one"
[16:42] <charlie-tca> yeah, I guess I do
[17:19] <Mark-Potter> How long is my ban?
[17:20] <Jordan_U> Mark-Potter: First, I'd like you to read our channel guidelines.
[17:20] <Jordan_U> !guidelines | Mark-Potter
[17:23] <Jordan_U> I need to leave. Can someone else handle Mark-Potter ?
[17:24] <Mark-Potter> I just have
[17:25] <Mark-Potter> Jordan_U
[17:27] <Jordan_U> Mark-Potter: You've finished reading the channel guidelines?
[17:40] <ikonia> Mark-Potter: are you still active ?
[17:46] <ikonia> !idle | Mark-Potter
[17:49] <Mark-Potter> yes
[17:50] <Mark-Potter> ikonia: I have read the guidelines and am active
[17:58] <Myrtti> Mark-Potter: do you understand why you were banned?
[17:58] <Mark-Potter> Yes
[17:59] <Myrtti> Mark-Potter: do you understand the guidelines you read?
[17:59] <Mark-Potter> yes
[18:00] <Myrtti> Mark-Potter: do you understand that if you continue your earlier behaviour on #ubuntu once you're unbanned, you will be banned again and possibly will not be able to negotiate yourself unbanned as easily?
[18:00] <Mark-Potter> Yes
[18:00] <Myrtti> here comes the tricky question
[18:01] <Myrtti> Mark-Potter: can we allow you to #ubuntu without the need to worry about banning you again?
[18:01] <Mark-Potter> Yes
[18:02] <Myrtti> we expect you to be helpful when helping, and polite when helped. if you think you can do that, without going against the guidelines of the channel, I can unban you
[18:02] <Mark-Potter> Yes
[18:03] <Mark-Potter> I will promise not to make personal remarks such as when I commented on someone's mum
[18:03] <Myrtti> good.
[18:04] <Myrtti> now remember, we have high hopes for you. Go forth and do not make the same errors again.
[18:04] <Mark-Potter> Ok and thanks :)
[18:05] <Myrtti> if that was all, you can leave this channel now
[18:06] <Mark-Potter> ok, bye :)
[18:53] <rww> tsimpson: I'm a bit behind on ban commenting. sudokill was forwarded for the cussing that's in the attached BT log
[22:35] <rww> I wonder. Is it possible to be a core-channel op and not have a Launchpad account?
[22:35] <IdleOne> um, not supposed to
[22:36] <rww> This seems silly to me.
[22:37] <IdleOne> why?
[22:37] <rww> because making people sign up for a website so that you'll give them permission to play janitor on an entirely different medium is... iono.
[22:37] <rww> my brain gets bored when I'm at work.
[22:38] <rww> wasn't there a push at some point to integrate access lists and Launchpad formally using launchpadlib?
[22:38] <IdleOne> sign up, forget about it, do janitorial stuff.
[22:40] <rww> hrm, where's the feature list for Bantracker2?
[22:41] <rww> because if it's not already on there, "login using OpenID and launchpadlib to replace the ridiculous URL system used in BT1" should be
[22:41] <rww> may as well make LP useful for something :|
[22:47] <Flannel> rww: I think the only current way to sign the CoC is via LP
[22:47] <Flannel> so, they'd have to have a LPID anyway
[22:47] <Flannel> No more faxing or whatnot.
[22:55] <rww> Flannel: oh, true
[22:55] <Flannel> I can't remember what the third method was; it's bugging me.
[22:55] <IdleOne> snail mail
[22:56] <Flannel> Was it?  I can't find the page anymore either.  Even in archive.org
[22:56] <IdleOne> I think that was one method iirc