| siji | Hi | 07:09 |
|---|---|---|
| siji | am trying to install xbmc on ubuntu-arm | 07:10 |
| siji | which is giving some errors like | 07:10 |
| siji | The following packages have unmet dependencies: | 07:10 |
| siji | xbmc : Depends: xbmc-data (= 2:10.1~ppa1~maverick) but it is not going to be installed | 07:10 |
| siji | am running natty , since there is no xbmc build for natty , added maverick path for XBMC installation | 07:12 |
| infinity | siji: If that's from the team-xbmc PPA, they don't have any packages built for armel. | 07:21 |
| infinity | siji: So, the arch:all xbmc package won't be able to find any arch-specific dependencies. | 07:22 |
| siji | infinity, http://ppa.launchpad.net/team-xbmc/ppa/ubuntu/dists/maverick/main/ | 07:22 |
| siji | this is my sourcelist entry | 07:22 |
| siji | infinity, then how I have to proceed ? | 07:23 |
| infinity | siji: Yeah, that PPA doesn't build for armel. | 07:23 |
| siji | oh ok | 07:23 |
| infinity | siji: You could donwload their source packages and build them yourself. | 07:23 |
| siji | infinity, i have already started it | 07:23 |
| siji | infinity, but that ppa weblink showing that armel package is there | 07:24 |
| siji | (while opening from browser) | 07:25 |
| infinity | siji: You'll note that the "Packages" file for armel only has the arch:all packages in it. | 07:26 |
| infinity | siji: Which is less than useful for you. | 07:26 |
| siji | oh ok | 07:26 |
| siji | Now am trying to build xbmc on natty | 10:00 |
| siji | and getting some ./configure error | 10:01 |
| siji | checking boost/shared_ptr.hpp usability... no | 10:01 |
| siji | checking boost/shared_ptr.hpp presence... no | 10:01 |
| siji | checking for boost/shared_ptr.hpp... no | 10:01 |
| siji | anyone can tell me a solution ? | 10:04 |
| siji | Fixed :) | 10:14 |
| === wellark_ is now known as Wellark | ||
| siji | hi all | 13:09 |
| siji | XBMC is giving sme errors while doing make | 13:10 |
| siji | pls have a look into the log at http://pastebin.com/9d1JY5h2 | 13:10 |
| siji | persia, you there? | 13:10 |
| siji | (Os:natty ,hardware ;Beagleboard) | 13:11 |
| siji | here the config.log http://pastebin.com/DjuFFmig | 13:15 |
| LetoThe2nd | siji: sounds like a missing dependency, such as *guess* libgles-dev or such | 13:30 |
| siji | LetoThe2nd, libgles is already there | 13:30 |
| LetoThe2nd | siji: also the corresponding -dev package? | 13:31 |
| siji | got it..Checking | 13:31 |
| siji | I think dev package is not there | 13:31 |
| siji | LetoThe2nd, I have refered this doc for installing gles https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ARM/OMAP/Graphics | 13:34 |
| LetoThe2nd | siji: this page syas absolutely nothing about xmbc, so i doubt a bit that you are referring it very closely :P | 13:36 |
| LetoThe2nd | siji: but basically, missing .h or .hpp file are nearly always due to some missing -dev package. | 13:36 |
| siji | LetoThe2nd, ok | 13:36 |
| LetoThe2nd | siji: background: the -dev packages contain the header files that are necessary for linking to the corresponding libs when compiling manually. i'd suggest to have a look on some documents about compiling on ubuntu/debian in this context. | 13:38 |
| siji | LetoThe2nd, thanks | 13:38 |
| LetoThe2nd | siji: this one looks good: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/CompilingEasyHowTo | 13:39 |
| LetoThe2nd | siji: step 3 is exactly your topic. i _suggest_ you have a good look at it :) | 13:40 |
| siji | LetoThe2nd, am familiar with those | 13:40 |
| siji | here the problem because of ARM and the various OMAP drivers | 13:40 |
| LetoThe2nd | siji: no, missing .h files are exactly what step 3 describes.... | 13:41 |
| siji | LetoThe2nd, ok | 13:44 |
| siji | persia, you there? | 13:48 |
| === prpplague is now known as prpplague^2 | ||
| slavanap | What type of arch should I select? http://paste.org/pastebin/view/36244 | 14:56 |
| slavanap | if I have (armv4l) str8132 arch ? | 14:57 |
| LetoThe2nd | slavanap: are you trying to run ubuntu on an amrv4? | 15:03 |
| LetoThe2nd | slavanap: as for the selection - make sure your target has kernel support. might be you need to apply some board support patch | 15:04 |
| slavanap | LetoThe2nd, I'm trying to build the kernel for ubuntu. Now I have debian with old kernel there, sources of that kernel I also have. | 15:04 |
| LetoThe2nd | slavanap: just rebuilding the kernel won't get you far. | 15:05 |
| LetoThe2nd | slavanap: ubuntu ist armv7 | 15:05 |
| slavanap | LetoThe2nd, and in the old kernel I have str8132 support, but not in a new one. | 15:05 |
| LetoThe2nd | slavanap: then probably your old kernel is patched and your new one not. | 15:06 |
| slavanap | LetoThe2nd, Where can I ask how to extract patch from old kernel and apply it to new one? | 15:07 |
| LetoThe2nd | slavanap: ask those who gave you the old kernel. they obvisouly have the patches. | 15:07 |
| infinity | slavanap: I know you've been told this before (a few times), but you realise that Ubuntu's userspace (ie: everything after the kernel boots) won't work on your machine, right? | 15:07 |
| LetoThe2nd | slavanap: i can only also teel you again: ubuntu will not work on that machine, even if you have the kernel patch. the userland is armv7. and it will stay. | 15:08 |
| slavanap | LetoThe2nd, ok. i se.. | 15:09 |
| slavanap | *i see. | 15:09 |
| slavanap | LetoThe2nd, then Gentoo is my choise. | 15:09 |
| slavanap | LetoThe2nd, thank you for help. | 15:10 |
| LetoThe2nd | have fun then. | 15:10 |
| Neko | anyone know of a decent PPA for armel builds of Firefox? | 15:50 |
| === brendand_ is now known as brendand_n310 | ||
| micahg | Neko: we don't have a native PPA for the milestone builds yet, which ones are you looking for? | 16:07 |
| Neko | Firefox 5 for Maverick.. there's a firefox team PPA for other arches but no armel builds | 16:09 |
| prpplague | rsalveti: ping | 16:36 |
| rsalveti | prpplague: pong | 16:36 |
| prpplague | rsalveti: hey i am trying to clean up the pandaboard repos on gitorious. i can not delete the repo until all the clones are removed. would you mind removing the one you have? | 16:37 |
| rsalveti | prpplague: let me check | 16:37 |
| rsalveti | prpplague: I'm trying, but seems gitorious is slow when removing repos | 16:42 |
| prpplague | rsalveti: indeed | 16:42 |
| rsalveti | and boom: 503 Service Unavailable | 16:42 |
| prpplague | rsalveti: it removed it | 16:42 |
| rsalveti | prpplague: cool | 16:43 |
| rsalveti | prpplague: any other repo to remove? | 16:43 |
| prpplague | rsalveti: nope thats plenty! | 16:43 |
| rsalveti | great | 16:46 |
| prpplague | rsalveti: thanks | 16:46 |
| martyn1 | Is anyone here working on EDAC on Arm? | 17:19 |
| === martyn1 is now known as Martyn | ||
| neko | ugh.. natty on pandaboard, why did I even bother? | 19:56 |
| neko | anyone know of any slightly newer preinstallation SD images? | 19:56 |
| GrueMaster | oneiric Alpha 2. | 20:06 |
| GrueMaster | Or if you want absolute bleeding edge, there are the dailies. | 20:07 |
| GrueMaster | http://cdimage.ubuntu.com | 20:07 |
| neko | what if I don't want to run buggy broken Oneiric | 20:09 |
| infinity | So, you want newer than the latest stable release, but you don't want a development release? :P | 20:10 |
| neko | yeah I kind of want.. like how Lucid had a 10.04.1 release that was significantly better :D | 20:10 |
| infinity | We don't do point-releases for non-LTSes. | 20:11 |
| infinity | Well, not as a rule. | 20:11 |
| neko | the whole idea was it ran a semi-stable distro and not one in constant alpha, but the stable one doesn't work even though it's "officially supported" | 20:11 |
| neko | and it seems everyone just said "WONTFIX" and moved to Oneiric | 20:11 |
| infinity | For the record, my Panda runs natty just fine... | 20:11 |
| neko | how do you get past this loop of oem-config running constantly | 20:12 |
| infinity | It... Doesn't? | 20:12 |
| neko | this is my 5th time through.. I have a valid user, hostname is set up | 20:12 |
| neko | it said "warning: GTK cannot open display .0" for about 10 seconds and then started oem-config again | 20:13 |
| infinity | And that's natty, not an oneiric daily? I've never seen that on natty (not that I don't believe that the bug is there, mind you) | 20:13 |
| infinity | But I'm not sure what to say, other than perhaps I'm lucky. | 20:13 |
| neko | maybe my SD card is way too expensive? :D | 20:13 |
| infinity | I did a headless install (went fine) and a desktop install (also fine) on natty, and the machine is now a buildd over there *waves to his right*. | 20:14 |
| neko | I am just gonna kill off /var/lib/oem-config/run and reboot | 20:14 |
| persia | I've not seen that even with Class 10 SDs and the special 4-channel Class 6 SD that was supposed to be super-extra-fast | 20:15 |
| neko | I really only got it so I could build packages on it for the efikamx | 20:15 |
| neko | also to see how fucking awful a board it might be (and yes, it's a shitty design... confirmed! :) | 20:16 |
| neko | I miss my beagle.. | 20:16 |
| neko | for all it's flaws, rcn-ee's little rootstocks always worked great on it | 20:17 |
| persia | !ohmy > neko | 20:17 |
| ubot2 | neko, please see my private message | 20:17 |
| neko | now I have a storage-less dual core with wireless.. eh.. I dunno.. buyer's remorse I guess | 20:17 |
| infinity | w/win 20 | 20:19 |
| neko | did the ubuntu-omap4-extras ppa move? | 20:26 |
| persia | I heard that TI hadn't fully populated it for natty. I may be mistaken. | 20:37 |
| neko | rsalveti, nudge? | 23:37 |
| rsalveti | neko: hey | 23:38 |
| neko | rsalveti, you seem to maintain pvr-omap4 and so on, I noticed on installation it removes all the mesa stuff | 23:38 |
| neko | how on earth did you manage that safely? we'd love to do the same on MX51 | 23:38 |
| rsalveti | neko: you just need to do the conflict/replace/provides correctly | 23:39 |
| neko | hmm, we tried that, packaging system went haywire complaining about it | 23:39 |
| rsalveti | you can check the source package for both pvr-omap4 and omap3, they both do it the same way | 23:39 |
| neko | that may have been around Karmic/Lucid though maybe mesa is less "fidgety" these days? | 23:39 |
| rsalveti | during old days I believe this was handled by update-alternatives | 23:40 |
| rsalveti | if you copy the packages from the omap4 one, it'll work the same way | 23:41 |
| rsalveti | just use apt then, as it'll need to solve the conflicts | 23:41 |
| rsalveti | dpkg will complain | 23:41 |
| neko | hmm yep.. Provides/Conflicts/Replaces for our stuff is exactly the same.. I notice one bug though (typo in our openvg control..)... | 23:41 |
| neko | hang on I thing I'm gonna give this a kick | 23:42 |
| jeramee | hi guys | 23:44 |
| jeramee | I am kinda new to ARM | 23:44 |
| persia | jeramee, Hey. | 23:57 |
| persia | jeramee, Unless you have very specific needs, it's about the same as everything else, except the hardware is different. | 23:58 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!