[07:09] <siji> Hi
[07:10] <siji> am trying to install xbmc on ubuntu-arm
[07:10] <siji> which is giving some errors like
[07:10] <siji> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
[07:10] <siji>  xbmc : Depends: xbmc-data (= 2:10.1~ppa1~maverick) but it is not going to be installed
[07:12] <siji> am running natty , since there is no xbmc build for natty , added maverick path for XBMC installation
[07:21] <infinity> siji: If that's from the team-xbmc PPA, they don't have any packages built for armel.
[07:22] <infinity> siji: So, the arch:all xbmc package won't be able to find any arch-specific dependencies.
[07:22] <siji> infinity, http://ppa.launchpad.net/team-xbmc/ppa/ubuntu/dists/maverick/main/
[07:22] <siji> this is my sourcelist entry
[07:23] <siji> infinity, then how I have to proceed ?
[07:23] <infinity> siji: Yeah, that PPA doesn't build for armel.
[07:23] <siji> oh ok
[07:23] <infinity> siji: You could donwload their source packages and build them yourself.
[07:23] <siji> infinity, i have already started it
[07:24] <siji> infinity, but that ppa weblink showing that armel package is there
[07:25] <siji> (while opening from browser)
[07:26] <infinity> siji: You'll note that the "Packages" file for armel only has the arch:all packages in it.
[07:26] <infinity> siji: Which is less than useful for you.
[07:26] <siji> oh ok
[10:00] <siji> Now am trying to build xbmc on natty
[10:01] <siji> and getting some ./configure error
[10:01] <siji> checking boost/shared_ptr.hpp usability... no
[10:01] <siji> checking boost/shared_ptr.hpp presence... no
[10:01] <siji> checking for boost/shared_ptr.hpp... no
[10:04] <siji> anyone can tell me a solution ?
[10:14] <siji> Fixed :)
[13:09] <siji> hi all
[13:10] <siji> XBMC is giving sme errors while doing make
[13:10] <siji> pls have a look into the log at http://pastebin.com/9d1JY5h2
[13:10] <siji> persia, you there?
[13:11] <siji> (Os:natty ,hardware ;Beagleboard)
[13:15] <siji> here the config.log http://pastebin.com/DjuFFmig
[13:30] <LetoThe2nd> siji: sounds like a missing dependency, such as *guess* libgles-dev or such
[13:30] <siji> LetoThe2nd, libgles is already there
[13:31] <LetoThe2nd> siji: also the corresponding -dev package?
[13:31] <siji> got it..Checking
[13:31] <siji> I think dev package is not there
[13:34] <siji> LetoThe2nd, I have refered this doc for installing gles https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ARM/OMAP/Graphics
[13:36] <LetoThe2nd> siji: this page syas absolutely nothing about xmbc, so i doubt a bit that you are referring it very closely :P
[13:36] <LetoThe2nd> siji: but basically, missing .h or .hpp file are nearly always due to some missing -dev package.
[13:36] <siji> LetoThe2nd, ok
[13:38] <LetoThe2nd> siji: background: the -dev packages contain the header files that are necessary for linking to the corresponding libs when compiling manually. i'd suggest to have a look on some documents about compiling on ubuntu/debian in this context.
[13:38] <siji> LetoThe2nd, thanks
[13:39] <LetoThe2nd> siji: this one looks good: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/CompilingEasyHowTo
[13:40] <LetoThe2nd> siji: step 3 is exactly your topic. i _suggest_ you have a good look at it :)
[13:40] <siji> LetoThe2nd, am familiar with those
[13:40] <siji> here the problem because of ARM and the various OMAP drivers
[13:41] <LetoThe2nd> siji: no, missing .h files are exactly what step 3 describes....
[13:44] <siji> LetoThe2nd, ok
[13:48] <siji> persia, you there?
[14:56] <slavanap> What type of arch should I select? http://paste.org/pastebin/view/36244
[14:57] <slavanap> if I have (armv4l) str8132 arch ?
[15:03] <LetoThe2nd> slavanap: are you trying to run ubuntu on an amrv4?
[15:04] <LetoThe2nd> slavanap: as for the selection - make sure your target has kernel support. might be you need to apply some board support patch
[15:04] <slavanap> LetoThe2nd,  I'm trying to build the kernel for ubuntu. Now I have debian with old kernel there, sources of that kernel I also have.
[15:05] <LetoThe2nd> slavanap: just rebuilding the kernel won't get you far.
[15:05] <LetoThe2nd> slavanap: ubuntu ist armv7
[15:05] <slavanap> LetoThe2nd, and in the old kernel I have str8132 support, but not in a new one.
[15:06] <LetoThe2nd> slavanap: then probably your old kernel is patched and your new one not.
[15:07] <slavanap> LetoThe2nd,  Where can I ask how to extract patch from old kernel and apply it to new one?
[15:07] <LetoThe2nd> slavanap: ask those who gave you the old kernel. they obvisouly have the patches.
[15:07] <infinity> slavanap: I know you've been told this before (a few times), but you realise that Ubuntu's userspace (ie: everything after the kernel boots) won't work on your machine, right?
[15:08] <LetoThe2nd> slavanap: i can only also teel you again: ubuntu will not work on that machine, even if you have the kernel patch. the userland is armv7. and it will stay.
[15:09] <slavanap> LetoThe2nd, ok. i se..
[15:09] <slavanap> *i see.
[15:09] <slavanap> LetoThe2nd, then Gentoo is my choise.
[15:10] <slavanap> LetoThe2nd, thank you for help.
[15:10] <LetoThe2nd> have fun then.
[15:50] <Neko> anyone know of a decent PPA for armel builds of Firefox?
[16:07] <micahg> Neko: we don't have a native PPA for the milestone builds yet, which ones are you looking for?
[16:09] <Neko> Firefox 5 for Maverick.. there's a firefox team PPA for other arches but no armel builds
[16:36] <prpplague> rsalveti: ping
[16:36] <rsalveti> prpplague: pong
[16:37] <prpplague> rsalveti: hey i am trying to clean up the pandaboard repos on gitorious. i can not delete the repo until all the clones are removed. would you mind removing the one you have?
[16:37] <rsalveti> prpplague: let me check
[16:42] <rsalveti> prpplague: I'm trying, but seems gitorious is slow when removing repos
[16:42] <prpplague> rsalveti: indeed
[16:42] <rsalveti> and boom: 503 Service Unavailable
[16:42] <prpplague> rsalveti: it removed it
[16:43] <rsalveti> prpplague: cool
[16:43] <rsalveti> prpplague: any other repo to remove?
[16:43] <prpplague> rsalveti: nope thats plenty!
[16:46] <rsalveti> great
[16:46] <prpplague> rsalveti: thanks
[17:19] <martyn1> Is anyone here working on EDAC on Arm?
[19:56] <neko> ugh.. natty on pandaboard, why did I even bother?
[19:56] <neko> anyone know of any slightly newer preinstallation SD images?
[20:06] <GrueMaster> oneiric Alpha 2.
[20:07] <GrueMaster> Or if you want absolute bleeding edge, there are the dailies.
[20:07] <GrueMaster> http://cdimage.ubuntu.com
[20:09] <neko> what if I don't want to run buggy broken Oneiric
[20:10] <infinity> So, you want newer than the latest stable release, but you don't want a development release? :P
[20:10] <neko> yeah I kind of want.. like how Lucid had a 10.04.1 release that was significantly better :D
[20:11] <infinity> We don't do point-releases for non-LTSes.
[20:11] <infinity> Well, not as a rule.
[20:11] <neko> the whole idea was it ran a semi-stable distro and not one in constant alpha, but the stable one doesn't work even though it's "officially supported"
[20:11] <neko> and it seems everyone just said "WONTFIX" and moved to Oneiric
[20:11] <infinity> For the record, my Panda runs natty just fine...
[20:12] <neko> how do you get past this loop of oem-config running constantly
[20:12] <infinity> It... Doesn't?
[20:12] <neko> this is my 5th time through.. I have a valid user, hostname is set up
[20:13] <neko> it said "warning: GTK cannot open display .0" for about 10 seconds and then started oem-config again
[20:13] <infinity> And that's natty, not an oneiric daily?  I've never seen that on natty (not that I don't believe that the bug is there, mind you)
[20:13] <infinity> But I'm not sure what to say, other than perhaps I'm lucky.
[20:13] <neko> maybe my SD card is way too expensive? :D
[20:14] <infinity> I did a headless install (went fine) and a desktop install (also fine) on natty, and the machine is now a buildd over there *waves to his right*.
[20:14] <neko> I am just gonna kill off /var/lib/oem-config/run and reboot
[20:15] <persia> I've not seen that even with Class 10 SDs and the special 4-channel Class 6 SD that was supposed to be super-extra-fast
[20:15] <neko> I really only got it so I could build packages on it for the efikamx
[20:16] <neko> also to see how fucking awful a board it might be (and yes, it's a shitty design... confirmed! :)
[20:16] <neko> I miss my beagle..
[20:17] <neko> for all it's flaws, rcn-ee's little rootstocks always worked great on it
[20:17] <persia> !ohmy > neko
[20:17] <ubot2> neko, please see my private message
[20:17] <neko> now I have a storage-less dual core with wireless.. eh.. I dunno.. buyer's remorse I guess
[20:19] <infinity> w/win 20
[20:26] <neko> did the ubuntu-omap4-extras ppa move?
[20:37] <persia> I heard that TI hadn't fully populated it for natty.  I may be mistaken.
[23:37] <neko> rsalveti, nudge?
[23:38] <rsalveti> neko: hey
[23:38] <neko> rsalveti, you seem to maintain pvr-omap4 and so on, I noticed on installation it removes all the mesa stuff
[23:38] <neko> how on earth did you manage that safely? we'd love to do the same on MX51
[23:39] <rsalveti> neko: you just need to do the conflict/replace/provides correctly
[23:39] <neko> hmm, we tried that, packaging system went haywire complaining about it
[23:39] <rsalveti> you can check the source package for both pvr-omap4 and omap3, they both do it the same way
[23:39] <neko> that may have been around Karmic/Lucid though maybe mesa is less "fidgety" these days?
[23:40] <rsalveti> during old days I believe this was handled by update-alternatives
[23:41] <rsalveti> if you copy the packages from the omap4 one, it'll work the same way
[23:41] <rsalveti> just use apt then, as it'll need to solve the conflicts
[23:41] <rsalveti> dpkg will complain
[23:41] <neko> hmm yep.. Provides/Conflicts/Replaces for our stuff is exactly the same.. I notice one bug though (typo in our openvg control..)...
[23:42] <neko> hang on I thing I'm gonna give this a kick
[23:44] <jeramee> hi guys
[23:44] <jeramee> I am kinda new to ARM
[23:57] <persia> jeramee, Hey.
[23:58] <persia> jeramee, Unless you have very specific needs, it's about the same as everything else, except the hardware is different.