[07:09] Hi [07:10] am trying to install xbmc on ubuntu-arm [07:10] which is giving some errors like [07:10] The following packages have unmet dependencies: [07:10] xbmc : Depends: xbmc-data (= 2:10.1~ppa1~maverick) but it is not going to be installed [07:12] am running natty , since there is no xbmc build for natty , added maverick path for XBMC installation [07:21] siji: If that's from the team-xbmc PPA, they don't have any packages built for armel. [07:22] siji: So, the arch:all xbmc package won't be able to find any arch-specific dependencies. [07:22] infinity, http://ppa.launchpad.net/team-xbmc/ppa/ubuntu/dists/maverick/main/ [07:22] this is my sourcelist entry [07:23] infinity, then how I have to proceed ? [07:23] siji: Yeah, that PPA doesn't build for armel. [07:23] oh ok [07:23] siji: You could donwload their source packages and build them yourself. [07:23] infinity, i have already started it [07:24] infinity, but that ppa weblink showing that armel package is there [07:25] (while opening from browser) [07:26] siji: You'll note that the "Packages" file for armel only has the arch:all packages in it. [07:26] siji: Which is less than useful for you. [07:26] oh ok [10:00] Now am trying to build xbmc on natty [10:01] and getting some ./configure error [10:01] checking boost/shared_ptr.hpp usability... no [10:01] checking boost/shared_ptr.hpp presence... no [10:01] checking for boost/shared_ptr.hpp... no [10:04] anyone can tell me a solution ? [10:14] Fixed :) === wellark_ is now known as Wellark [13:09] hi all [13:10] XBMC is giving sme errors while doing make [13:10] pls have a look into the log at http://pastebin.com/9d1JY5h2 [13:10] persia, you there? [13:11] (Os:natty ,hardware ;Beagleboard) [13:15] here the config.log http://pastebin.com/DjuFFmig [13:30] siji: sounds like a missing dependency, such as *guess* libgles-dev or such [13:30] LetoThe2nd, libgles is already there [13:31] siji: also the corresponding -dev package? [13:31] got it..Checking [13:31] I think dev package is not there [13:34] LetoThe2nd, I have refered this doc for installing gles https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ARM/OMAP/Graphics [13:36] siji: this page syas absolutely nothing about xmbc, so i doubt a bit that you are referring it very closely :P [13:36] siji: but basically, missing .h or .hpp file are nearly always due to some missing -dev package. [13:36] LetoThe2nd, ok [13:38] siji: background: the -dev packages contain the header files that are necessary for linking to the corresponding libs when compiling manually. i'd suggest to have a look on some documents about compiling on ubuntu/debian in this context. [13:38] LetoThe2nd, thanks [13:39] siji: this one looks good: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/CompilingEasyHowTo [13:40] siji: step 3 is exactly your topic. i _suggest_ you have a good look at it :) [13:40] LetoThe2nd, am familiar with those [13:40] here the problem because of ARM and the various OMAP drivers [13:41] siji: no, missing .h files are exactly what step 3 describes.... [13:44] LetoThe2nd, ok [13:48] persia, you there? === prpplague is now known as prpplague^2 [14:56] What type of arch should I select? http://paste.org/pastebin/view/36244 [14:57] if I have (armv4l) str8132 arch ? [15:03] slavanap: are you trying to run ubuntu on an amrv4? [15:04] slavanap: as for the selection - make sure your target has kernel support. might be you need to apply some board support patch [15:04] LetoThe2nd, I'm trying to build the kernel for ubuntu. Now I have debian with old kernel there, sources of that kernel I also have. [15:05] slavanap: just rebuilding the kernel won't get you far. [15:05] slavanap: ubuntu ist armv7 [15:05] LetoThe2nd, and in the old kernel I have str8132 support, but not in a new one. [15:06] slavanap: then probably your old kernel is patched and your new one not. [15:07] LetoThe2nd, Where can I ask how to extract patch from old kernel and apply it to new one? [15:07] slavanap: ask those who gave you the old kernel. they obvisouly have the patches. [15:07] slavanap: I know you've been told this before (a few times), but you realise that Ubuntu's userspace (ie: everything after the kernel boots) won't work on your machine, right? [15:08] slavanap: i can only also teel you again: ubuntu will not work on that machine, even if you have the kernel patch. the userland is armv7. and it will stay. [15:09] LetoThe2nd, ok. i se.. [15:09] *i see. [15:09] LetoThe2nd, then Gentoo is my choise. [15:10] LetoThe2nd, thank you for help. [15:10] have fun then. [15:50] anyone know of a decent PPA for armel builds of Firefox? === brendand_ is now known as brendand_n310 [16:07] Neko: we don't have a native PPA for the milestone builds yet, which ones are you looking for? [16:09] Firefox 5 for Maverick.. there's a firefox team PPA for other arches but no armel builds [16:36] rsalveti: ping [16:36] prpplague: pong [16:37] rsalveti: hey i am trying to clean up the pandaboard repos on gitorious. i can not delete the repo until all the clones are removed. would you mind removing the one you have? [16:37] prpplague: let me check [16:42] prpplague: I'm trying, but seems gitorious is slow when removing repos [16:42] rsalveti: indeed [16:42] and boom: 503 Service Unavailable [16:42] rsalveti: it removed it [16:43] prpplague: cool [16:43] prpplague: any other repo to remove? [16:43] rsalveti: nope thats plenty! [16:46] great [16:46] rsalveti: thanks [17:19] Is anyone here working on EDAC on Arm? === martyn1 is now known as Martyn [19:56] ugh.. natty on pandaboard, why did I even bother? [19:56] anyone know of any slightly newer preinstallation SD images? [20:06] oneiric Alpha 2. [20:07] Or if you want absolute bleeding edge, there are the dailies. [20:07] http://cdimage.ubuntu.com [20:09] what if I don't want to run buggy broken Oneiric [20:10] So, you want newer than the latest stable release, but you don't want a development release? :P [20:10] yeah I kind of want.. like how Lucid had a 10.04.1 release that was significantly better :D [20:11] We don't do point-releases for non-LTSes. [20:11] Well, not as a rule. [20:11] the whole idea was it ran a semi-stable distro and not one in constant alpha, but the stable one doesn't work even though it's "officially supported" [20:11] and it seems everyone just said "WONTFIX" and moved to Oneiric [20:11] For the record, my Panda runs natty just fine... [20:12] how do you get past this loop of oem-config running constantly [20:12] It... Doesn't? [20:12] this is my 5th time through.. I have a valid user, hostname is set up [20:13] it said "warning: GTK cannot open display .0" for about 10 seconds and then started oem-config again [20:13] And that's natty, not an oneiric daily? I've never seen that on natty (not that I don't believe that the bug is there, mind you) [20:13] But I'm not sure what to say, other than perhaps I'm lucky. [20:13] maybe my SD card is way too expensive? :D [20:14] I did a headless install (went fine) and a desktop install (also fine) on natty, and the machine is now a buildd over there *waves to his right*. [20:14] I am just gonna kill off /var/lib/oem-config/run and reboot [20:15] I've not seen that even with Class 10 SDs and the special 4-channel Class 6 SD that was supposed to be super-extra-fast [20:15] I really only got it so I could build packages on it for the efikamx [20:16] also to see how fucking awful a board it might be (and yes, it's a shitty design... confirmed! :) [20:16] I miss my beagle.. [20:17] for all it's flaws, rcn-ee's little rootstocks always worked great on it [20:17] !ohmy > neko [20:17] neko, please see my private message [20:17] now I have a storage-less dual core with wireless.. eh.. I dunno.. buyer's remorse I guess [20:19] w/win 20 [20:26] did the ubuntu-omap4-extras ppa move? [20:37] I heard that TI hadn't fully populated it for natty. I may be mistaken. [23:37] rsalveti, nudge? [23:38] neko: hey [23:38] rsalveti, you seem to maintain pvr-omap4 and so on, I noticed on installation it removes all the mesa stuff [23:38] how on earth did you manage that safely? we'd love to do the same on MX51 [23:39] neko: you just need to do the conflict/replace/provides correctly [23:39] hmm, we tried that, packaging system went haywire complaining about it [23:39] you can check the source package for both pvr-omap4 and omap3, they both do it the same way [23:39] that may have been around Karmic/Lucid though maybe mesa is less "fidgety" these days? [23:40] during old days I believe this was handled by update-alternatives [23:41] if you copy the packages from the omap4 one, it'll work the same way [23:41] just use apt then, as it'll need to solve the conflicts [23:41] dpkg will complain [23:41] hmm yep.. Provides/Conflicts/Replaces for our stuff is exactly the same.. I notice one bug though (typo in our openvg control..)... [23:42] hang on I thing I'm gonna give this a kick [23:44] hi guys [23:44] I am kinda new to ARM [23:57] jeramee, Hey. [23:58] jeramee, Unless you have very specific needs, it's about the same as everything else, except the hardware is different.