[07:30] ev, cjwatson could you update wubi isolist to 10.04.3 ? [09:14] jibel: I committed the change for that a few days ago and asked ev for a new build [09:15] huh, I'm confused now [09:15] http://people.canonical.com/~evand/wubi/lucid/ has wubi-r191.exe dating from 21 Jan [09:15] my commit was r191, dated 15 Jul [09:15] ev: did you forget to push your 10.04.2 wubi commit, perhaps? [09:15] trying to figure out how to update my lucid chroot with a 3.0 kernel [09:16] probably :-/ [09:20] use a 3.0.0 kernel instead, it'll be less painful [09:20] maybe you could use a checkout to avoid that problem? [10:36] cjwatson: new wubi up [10:36] thanks for the tips [10:44] jibel: is there any hope of validating the installer changes in lucid-proposed in time? [10:47] jibel: given that Peter checked my grub-installer patch for bug 695842 when applied out of band, I think regression-testing some other system with apt-setup/proposed=true passed as an installer boot parameter (alternate or server install) would be enough to let that into lucid-updates. What do you think? [10:47] Launchpad bug 695842 in grub-installer (Ubuntu Maverick) (and 2 other projects) "Cannot install on HP Proliant DL385 G7 - dual RAID controllers (affects: 1) (heat: 26)" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/695842 [10:48] jibel: bug 442941 should be easy to validate - the permissions check would be enough, given that the update-manager test will be hard to do in this case [10:48] s/would/should/ [10:48] Launchpad bug 442941 in ubiquity (Ubuntu Oneiric) (and 14 other projects) "debconf failed to upgrade from 1.5.27ubuntu1 to 1.5.27ubuntu2: exit status 128 - Use of uninitialized value $reply in scalar chomp at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/FrontEnd/Passthrough.pm line 66 (affects: 452) (dups: 300) (heat: 2461)" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/442941 [10:49] pitti: I think we need to waive the waiting period for base-files and debian-installer to get them into lucid-updates in time for 10.04.3 [10:50] is anything else in lucid-proposed needed for 10.04.3? [10:51] oh, bug 777759 too, that should be easy to validate as well (per my comment 1 indicating that we can probably just do regression-testing there) [10:51] Launchpad bug 777759 in casper (Ubuntu Natty) (and 3 other projects) "10.10 live CD prompts to upgrade to 11.04 (affects: 1) (heat: 57)" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/777759 [10:51] cjwatson, 442941 if tha's the only check then I verified it on many installs. [10:51] 777759 is verified, i'll update the status [10:52] jibel: 442941> the permissions check? [10:52] right, permissions check. Anything else I can verify ? [10:53] it's tricky with an up-to-date image, is the problem [10:53] since there's naturally nothing to update [10:53] and doing any preparatory operation that touches the debconf database in any way will invalidate the test [10:54] perhaps check that you can install a package on top with software-center or whatever [10:54] just as an extra regression test [10:55] other than that I don't think there's much we can check - we'll just have to revisit if the problem recurs later [10:55] that's one of the post-install test I run. installing something with software-center. [10:56] 695842, I can only do regression-testing, since I don't have the hardware. [10:57] cjwatson, I get the problem again with oem install, I can't pass the second stage of the installation. [10:58] 695842> I think we can accept that given Peter's comment 17; but since I wrote the patch, I'd like a second opinion from pitti [10:58] how can I debug this ? it is not reproducible. It happens on less than 10% of the install I did. [10:58] can I have logs, to start with? [10:59] I can at least see if there's anything obvious in them [10:59] ok [11:00] it must mean that oem-config has failed part-way through [11:00] I think you'll find that /var/lib/oem-config/run still exists? [11:00] (it'll be zero-length) [11:00] yes [11:01] this happens if oem-config exits non-zero [11:02] right, that's the only error I see in the logs "oem-config main process terminated with status 1" [11:05] did you run the second stage with the 'debug-oem-config' boot parameter [11:05] ? [11:05] jibel, cjwatson: I'm fine with regression-testing on bug 695842, indeed [11:05] Launchpad bug 695842 in grub-installer (Ubuntu Maverick) (and 2 other projects) "Cannot install on HP Proliant DL385 G7 - dual RAID controllers (affects: 1) (heat: 26)" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/695842 [11:06] cjwatson: want me to move to -updates? [11:06] let's wait 'til regression-testing has actually been done [11:06] cjwatson: the current lucid dailies use -proposed? [11:07] oh, yes, that grub-installer version should be what's on the CD [11:07] I'll just double-check that [11:07] yeah, it is [11:07] i. e. the iso testing, and the following certification testing pretty much serves as regression testing [11:08] should do, yes [11:08] jibel: I'd like to see the logs just in case there's something that doesn't look like an error but that might give me a clue, though [11:12] cjwatson, logs attached to bug 812230 [11:12] Launchpad bug 812230 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "OEM install always boots to 'prepare for shipping' (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/812230 [11:14] oh, I misread your original report [11:14] you never even get oem-config running, do you [11:16] jibel: can you boot with the '--verbose' boot parameter, and then attach /var/log/syslog? [11:19] cjwatson, I add it to the kernel boot command ? [11:21] interesting, I also get logged out after few minutes. [11:21] yes [11:24] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/812230/+attachment/2214765/+files/syslog [11:24] Launchpad bug 812230 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "OEM install always boots to 'prepare for shipping' (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] [11:24] I think ev already fixed something similar with upstart. [11:26] if you have details, that would be helpful [11:28] it apparently at least tries to run [11:28] then immediately afterwards, gdm starts [11:28] I wonder if they're both running on different VTs [11:29] this looks like a straightforward race between 'starting gdm' and 'stopping rc' [11:30] it was fixed in oneiric [11:30] actually natty, at least in part [11:30] however, it took a few goes to get it right; I'm not comfortable with backporting it in a hurry [11:31] bug 650703 [11:31] Launchpad bug 650703 in ubiquity (Ubuntu Natty) (and 4 other projects) "oem-config-prepare works, but oem-config fails to start after reboot (affects: 15) (dups: 2) (heat: 45)" [Critical,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/650703 [11:31] hah, d'oh, it has a 10.04.3 task [11:31] well, I don't know. what do other people think? [11:31] yep, that's the one [11:33] I think the fix is http://paste.ubuntu.com/646431/ [11:34] what we could do is move all the current installer bits to -updates, and then I do a fresh upload for this bug [11:34] then we build new images against -proposed [11:35] if they pass, we waive the waiting period and let the new one in; if not, we leave it in -proposed [11:35] then either way, we build 10.04.3 images against -updates [11:50] anyone? Bueller? [12:14] pitti: do you think I can go ahead and copy base-files and debian-installer to -updates despite the short wait, on the basis of iso testing? [12:14] cjwatson: pease do; base-files only was the .3 bump anyway, right? [12:14] yes [12:16] cjwatson: want me to move ubiquity, too? was verified now [12:17] re 650703, sounds good to me. [12:18] done base-files and debian-installer [12:18] do you think of a way to reproduce it ? [12:18] pitti: grub-installer needs to go before ubiquity [12:19] ah [12:22] jibel: well, it's a race between 'stopping rc' and 'starting gdm', so to reproduce it, you could try to force 'starting gdm' to happen later to widen the window [12:22] jibel: here's one possible hack that might do it: [12:22] jibel: edit /etc/init/dbus.conf, and find the 'post-start' line; in oneiric that reads 'post-start exec kill -USR1 1' [12:22] change that to: [12:22] post-start script [12:22] kill -USR1 1 [12:23] sleep 10 [12:23] end script [12:23] ok, trying [12:24] ah, grub-installer verified now; I'll go ahead and move the installer bits, then [12:24] sorry for the delay [12:26] that's ok [12:35] urgh, 'sru-release lucid ubiquity' is timing out [12:35] I bet it's the bazillion duplicates of bug 442941 [12:35] Launchpad bug 442941 in ubiquity (Ubuntu Oneiric) (and 14 other projects) "debconf failed to upgrade from 1.5.27ubuntu1 to 1.5.27ubuntu2: exit status 128 - Use of uninitialized value $reply in scalar chomp at /usr/share/perl5/Debconf/FrontEnd/Passthrough.pm line 66 (affects: 452) (dups: 300) (heat: 2506)" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/442941 [12:35] * cjwatson wonders whether doing it on cocoplum will work better [12:38] right, there we go. 15 seconds, too long for the API I guess :-/ [12:39] cjwatson, I can move part of the duplicates to another report if that helps. [12:40] it's ok, it's done now [12:42] I confirm that I can reproduce 650703 with the additional sleep in dbus.conf [12:45] good, preparing an upload now [12:58] pitti (or other ubuntu-sru member): could you review ubiquity in {lucid,maverick}-proposed, please? [12:58] well, the maverick version might not be there yet. somebody in the bug report is asking for it urgently though so I thought I should do both [12:59] cjwatson: can do; still waiting a couple of minutes for the diff to arrive [13:02] fyi, chroot tarballs freshened for natty ('twas pre-release) and oneiric [13:11] cjwatson: so, admittedly I don't fully understand the correctness of the upstart condition changes, but as this was a backport, it looks fine to me [13:11] (accepted) [13:11] doing maverick a little later, when the queue diff arrives [13:12] the quick explanation is that this moves the 'stopping rc' off into a separate package that isn't installed except on server systems [13:12] ah, we don't install this; that makes it clearer indeed [13:12] so you get either 'stopping rc' or 'starting gdm' in your job graph but not both [13:12] typically, anyway [13:13] I don't think it's *ideal*, but I think it should be sufficient [13:13] so, once that builds and publishes, I'll do another build with -proposed, which should amount to fixing that ubiquity bug plus sorting out wubi isolist versions [13:14] once 650703 is validated, we should then push it to -updates and do a 10.04.3-candidate build with -updates only [13:14] and verify the hell out of that === barry` is now known as barry_ === barry_ is now known as barry [14:59] I tried ubiquity 2.2.27 in lucid-proposed and that fixes 650703. [15:01] whee [15:01] with the dbus.conf hack to widen the race? [15:01] did you just upgrade it in place? [15:02] yes I upgraded in place [15:02] but I need to try on a real image to validate the fix because the conditions of the race are a bit different [15:03] for example with the sleep in dbus there is a process that locks debconf config.dat that is not running in the original bug. [15:04] OK, not entirely surprising that it would permute some things [15:04] I was waiting for the powerpc build to finish before starting images, since that will be less hassle === brendand_ is now known as brendand_n310 [16:14] bug 675396 [16:14] Launchpad bug 675396 in nmap (Ubuntu) "Icon missing in Kubuntu Remix menu (affects: 3) (heat: 14)" [Low,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/675396 [16:23] Ursinha: is that the bug you meant to quote? it doesn't seem urgent [16:24] cjwatson: I was just abusing the bot, sorry [16:25] ah, ok [16:39] !msgthebot > Ursinha [16:39] Ursinha, please see my private message [17:58] skaet: Why is ubuntu server armel+omap daily on the tracker for 10.04.3 release testing? Is this something I need to look at? [18:07] GrueMaster, hmm, that's not an image I was expecting to see... and am not seeing the netbook ones on it. hmm... [18:07] There should be no armel images in 10.04.3, We have no LTS releases at this time. [18:08] GrueMaster, ack. [18:08] I do SRU testing for 10.04, but that support ends with 11.10 release (yea!). [18:10] cjwatson, ^^ I'm going ahead and disabling ubuntu server armel+omap, since it wasn't on the 10.04.2 manifest. [18:54] cjwatson, have started off DIST=lucid buildlive ubuntu-netbook daily-preinstalled && (for-project ubuntu-netbook cron.daily-preinstalled &) === charlieS_ is now known as charlie === charlie is now known as charlieS === Ursinha is now known as Ursinha-nom [20:46] building another round of lucid images now that ubiquity 2.2.27 is in place === Ursinha-nom is now known as Ursinha