[05:08] <saptarshi> away
[05:11] <saptarshi> ex
[05:11] <saptarshi> ex-chat
[05:16] <saptarshi> exit
[05:17] <saptarshi> Ex-Chat
[05:17] <saptarshi> Ex-Chat
[05:19] <saptarshi> hi everyone
[08:17] <brendand> jibel - where're the 10.04.3 images?
[08:17] <jibel> brendand, http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/lucid/
[08:18] <jibel> Could anyone with privileges changes the topic to "Currently testing Lucid 10.04.3 LTS candidates | http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com | nVidia/ATI Proprietary Drivers | http://xorg.qa.ubuntu.com"
[08:19] <jibel> psycopg2 is broken on oneiric :(
[08:20] <brendand> jibel - yep
[08:20] <brendand> jibel - there is a bug for that
[08:20] <xdatap1> jibel, morning
[08:21] <jibel> I've a script to update the list of image on the tracker to point to lucid but I can't run it :/
[08:21] <jibel> Hey xdatap1 how are you ?
[08:21] <xdatap1> jibel, i'm fine thanks
[08:21] <brendand> bug 811115
[08:21] <jibel> brendand, subscribed thanks
[08:21] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 811115 in psycopg2 (Ubuntu) "[oneiric] ImportError: can't import mx.DateTime module (affects: 2) (dups: 1) (heat: 1644)" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/811115
[08:22] <xdatap1> jibel, I tried the xorg tests last week. I think we could improve the instructions
[08:22] <xdatap1> jibel, is this xorg test planned for next week?
[08:23] <jibel> xdatap1, yes, I think nvidia couldn't be loaded and nouveau was used instead
[08:24] <xdatap1> jibel, the thing is that is not clear which driver to test with unity3d and unity2d, and there's 3d test also in unity2d.
[08:25] <xdatap1> jibel, we should improve the wikipage on side the tracker
[08:25] <xdatap1> jibel, people felt disoriented in my team
[08:25] <jibel> xdatap1, I see. how can we make it clear ? We only test proprietary drivers.
[08:26] <xdatap1> jibel, I will draft some improvement and I will send you a mail :)
[08:26] <jibel> xdatap1, that would be perfect. Shall we split in 2 test cases pages ? 1 for unity and the other for unity 2D  with only the relevant test cases ?
[08:27] <xdatap1> jibel, yes that would help a lot. Maybe it would make an instruction useless
[08:27] <xdatap1> jibel, and have it intuitive it would be the best
[08:28] <jibel> xdatap1,ok, only 2 test cases are not in 2d, maybe I could do something with includes to avoid duplicating contents.
[08:29] <xdatap1> jibel, well this would solve the problem :)
[09:20] <brendand> jibel - are we meant to be using the 16.1 images?
[09:25] <jibel> brendand, yes, why ?
[09:25] <brendand> my alternate stick is failing at syslinux
[09:26] <brendand> but i created it on Oneiric, so redoing it on Natty
[09:26] <brendand> will update in a little while
[09:58] <jibel> does anyone experience squashfs errors on shutdown just after installation ?
[10:09] <brendand> jibel - alternate image is, well, screwed
[10:09] <brendand> jibel - Unknown keyword in congfiguration file: gfxboot
[10:10] <brendand> jibel - vesamenu.c32: not a COM32R image
[10:14] <jibel> brendand, bug 645818
[10:14] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 645818 in usb-creator (Fedora) (and 5 other projects) "Unknown keyword in configuration file: gfxboot (affects: 98) (dups: 6) (heat: 346)" [Unknown,Unknown] https://launchpad.net/bugs/645818
[10:14] <brendand> jibel - yeah, cjwatson just told me
[10:15] <brendand> jibel - i guess i can create one in vbox, otherwise i'll not be participating :(
[10:15] <brendand> jibel - except maybe some VM based testing
[10:15] <jibel> brendand, or use CDs
[10:15] <cjwatson> shouldn't be regarded as an image failure certainly, the flaw is in host-side software post-10.04
[10:15] <cjwatson> sort of
[10:15] <brendand> cjwatson - indeed. thanks
[10:15] <cjwatson> or in problematic interactions between the two
[10:16] <brendand> jibel - what's a CD :) ?
[10:17] <jibel> its an acronym from Compact Disc http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compact_Disc ;-)
[10:19] <brendand> being serious once more, my iso testing system is a netbook...
[10:20] <davmor2> brendand: download the iso to the current system and drop it on a usb drive or use boot up disk creator to transfer it if you need persistence
[10:20] <jibel> usb cd driver ?
[10:21] <jibel> brendand, I added a notice to the tracker.
[10:29] <chadadavis> Hi all. I see new images but no trackers for DVDs. Will that not be released for 10.04.3 ?
[10:30] <chadadavis> Sorry, I meant for kubuntu. Ubuntu has the DVD test cases in the tracker.
[13:23] <jibel> tracker updated with correct path to the images
[13:24] <charlie-tca> anything in particular you want me to start testing?
[14:13] <ara> jibel, how true is this http://jenkins.qa.ubuntu-uk.org/view/oneiric-desktop/ ?
[14:13] <ara> jibel, is the testing broken? or the image broken?
[14:18] <jibel> ara, the tests moved to the QA lab, but there's no public face yet. That should come pretty soon.
[14:19] <ara> jibel, OK, thanks
[14:19] <jibel> ara, to summarize, alternate is ok, desktop is broken since July 15th, I need to investigate
[14:20] <charlie-tca> can't login using user name?
[14:20] <ara> jibel, the image is broken, or the testing?
[14:20] <jibel> images
[14:20] <ara> OK, thanks
[14:55] <charlie-tca> jibel: multiple drives doing an LVM Full encryption install with 10.04.3 i386, fails to write grub properly
[14:56] <charlie-tca> I can not boot into the encrypted install, because it can't even find it
[15:03] <charlie-tca> bug 812342
[15:03] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 812342 in ubuntu "Lucid 10.04.3 Encrypted Install fails to write to grub (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/812342
[15:04] <charlie-tca> title is wrong; fails completely. I can still boot into the original install on the drive. It did not install at all
[15:09] <charlie-tca> amd64 alternate encrypted install stuck at clearing hard drive for 22 minutes now
[15:09] <charlie-tca> looks like it fails too
[15:09] <charlie-tca> jibel, skaet : ^  ^
[15:10] <charlie-tca> both tests run on hardware
[15:11] <jibel> charlie-tca, thanks, I'll have a look
[15:17] <skaet> thanks charlie-tca
[15:26]  * patdk-wk waits for image downloads :(
[15:44] <jibel> charlie-tca, could you reproduce, and at the end, just before rebooting, switch to a console, run 'anna-install openssh-client-udeb' and scp the logs to another system ?
[15:51] <PaoloRotolo> jibel, hi
[15:51] <jibel> Hey PaoloRotolo , how are you ?
[15:51] <PaoloRotolo> jibel, fine, thanks :)
[15:52] <PaoloRotolo> jibel, i'm testing the xorg driver
[15:52] <jibel> Thanks! how are things going ?
[15:53] <PaoloRotolo> jibel, i have a problem with this testcase: http://testcases.qa.ubuntu.com/Hardware/X/ProprietaryDrivers#Different resolutions
[15:53] <PaoloRotolo> jibel, this: "xrandr --output default --mode <resolution>" don't works...
[15:54] <PaoloRotolo> terminal wrote "warning: output default not found; ignoring"
[15:57] <jibel> PaoloRotolo, xrandr -q will give you a list of connected device
[15:57] <jibel> for example on my laptop is LVDS1
[15:57] <jibel> the instructions are not clear there
[15:59] <jibel> PaoloRotolo, so the command should be 'xrandr --output LVDS1 1024x768' or whatever resolution you choose
[16:00] <jibel> PaoloRotolo, another example on a desktop with an ATI card, the connection device is DFP4
[16:00] <jibel> connection/connected
[16:00] <PaoloRotolo> jibel, yes, the command "xrandr --output LVDS1 1024x768" works
[16:00] <jibel> PaoloRotolo, Cool, you now should have a crappy resolution :-)
[16:01] <jibel> PaoloRotolo, feel free to update the tests to make them easier to understand.
[16:01] <PaoloRotolo> jibel, so, the testcase is wrong?
[16:02] <jibel> It was probably right at some point in time, but has not been updated
[16:02] <PaoloRotolo> jibel, ok, thanks for the time :)
[16:03] <jibel> PaoloRotolo, you're welcome. Thanks for helping !
[16:03] <PaoloRotolo> :)
[17:32] <charlie-tca> jibel: will attempt it
[17:32] <charlie-tca> prior to the restart, will pull the logs if I can
[17:32] <charlie-tca> 64bit just finished
[17:32] <charlie-tca> it worked
[17:32] <charlie-tca> takes a very long time to wipe swap
[19:03] <PaoloRotolo> Hi all
[19:03] <brendand_n310> hi
[19:05] <PaoloRotolo> hi have a problem with ubuntu oneiric ocelot
[19:05] <PaoloRotolo> Terminal-shortcut (ctrl+alt+t) does not work...
[19:06]  * roadmr can confirm that behavior
[19:06] <roadmr> I usually just super-a, xterm
[19:07] <brendand> PaoloRotolo - does for me.
[19:07] <brendand> roadmr - have you remapped that cause Super+A should be the app lense
[19:07] <roadmr> brendand: nope, default behavior, it is indeed the app lens
[19:07] <PaoloRotolo> bdmurray, I tried to reinstall ubuntu two times...
[19:08] <PaoloRotolo> sorry, brendand --^
[19:08] <brendand> i don't have a fresh install - infact upgrade from Natty, so might be a leftover from that
[19:08] <brendand> maybe it is broken in a fresh install
[19:09] <roadmr> brendand: I think it is broken :(
[19:09] <Claudinux> it works for me on a fresh install of oneiric
[19:10] <brendand> Claudinux - recent image or Alpha2?
[19:11] <PaoloRotolo> brendand, I have ubuntu daily 20110717
[19:11] <Claudinux> brendand, both
[19:12] <roadmr> urgh, it works on my new install, I have PaoloRotolo's image too - but it was giving me trouble with friday's images
[19:13] <brendand> it should make up its mind
[19:24] <PaoloRotolo> I must go now. Bye all!
[19:47] <charlie-tca> jibel: installing again; I was able to reproduce the issue, but let it kick the cd out before I tried to ssh the logs
[19:48] <charlie-tca> will do the install again, and get the logs
[20:55] <charlie-tca> jibel: got the logs, attaching to the report