[04:43] Is there currently an issue with revu? I've uploaded a package to revu a few hours ago yet I don't have any email stating it was uploaded nor does it show up under my revu profile. I didn't receive any error messages when I uploaded it. The package I uploaded was mythbuntu-bare [04:57] tgm4883: had you logged into revu prior to uploading? [06:47] good morning [06:48] morning dholbach [06:48] * nigelb waves to ajmitch [06:48] good night in california dholbach ! [06:48] & hi nigelb [06:49] hey ajmitch, philipballew :) [06:49] good morning === bloodyMind is now known as bloody-grim [09:29] bdrung, Laney, tumbleweed: do you think you can help out with the open packaging guide mps? [09:29] there's some that have been sitting around for a while already and it'd be good to get a second opinion :) [09:42] dholbach: yeah, ok, looking at the retheming quickly [09:42] sweet [09:42] it's not as bad as it looks, I did a quick analysis of the actual diff in my comment [09:43] yeah [09:53] et voila [09:55] thanks [09:55] I added a few small bits as well [09:58] Laney: the ¶ is normally visible on hover [09:58] not for me [09:58] ah I haven't looked at the rendering yet [09:58] Laney, can you see it here: http://people.canonical.com/~dholbach/packaging-guide/html/getting-set-up.html? [09:59] (I can) [09:59] that one does require me to hover [09:59] what is the point of that? [09:59] nafc, it's just default sphinx styling [09:59] but I agree that it'd be nice to have it less visible - it gives you a permalink for the specific anchor [09:59] less prominent, I mean [10:00] aha [10:28] dholbach: should we use version numbers instead of codenames in the packaging guide? [10:30] bdrung, I don't know === dholbach_ is now known as dholbach [10:40] what about mentioning both like "oneiric (11.10)"? as a dev I'm more used to codenames and have always trouble when somebody only mentions the version to map it back to its codename [12:27] dholbach: what do you think about https://code.launchpad.net/~bdrung/ubuntu-packaging-guide/fix-name/+merge/68372 [12:36] dholbach: shouldn't the sponsor do the merge? [12:37] it doesn't matter [12:38] but if you want, I can do it [12:38] dholbach: please :) [12:40] done [12:40] → taking the dog for a walk [12:40] have fun [12:40] * tumbleweed finishes fighting a dodgy adsl line [12:40] turns out a phone cable I crimped was at fault :/ [12:57] tumbleweed: can you ack 812880 please [13:04] jtaylor: looks like bdrung beat me :) [13:05] :O [13:06] * bdrung is faster than tumbleweed. :P [13:07] * tumbleweed might have also been hiding for a few days [13:58] is anybody up for reviewing indicator-bug? Thanks to jtaylor I think that the package looks quite good, I would love it if some motu could help me by reviewing and eventually uploading it http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?upid=9151 [14:29] dh_installdocs --all AUTHORS NEWS README [14:29] cp: not writing through dangling symlink `debian/openmpi-bin/usr/share/doc/openmpi-bin/AUTHORS' [14:29] dh_installdocs: cp -a AUTHORS debian/openmpi-bin/usr/share/doc/openmpi-bin returned exit code 1 [14:29] Whats exactly the cause of this failure? [15:04] ajmitch, Not recently, last time I uploaded was in 2009 === cr3_ is now known as cr3 === Zic_ is now known as Zic === med_out is now known as medberry === yofel_ is now known as yofel === kentb_ is now known as kentb-out [23:10] python-django is old and unsupported on 10.04 LTS... is there some semi official way to track currently supported versions? [23:10] i don't want my stable server to get hacked by rupert murdoch [23:14] there are some backports on launchpad i see [23:14] but i have no idea who to trust...