[04:43] <tgm4883> Is there currently an issue with revu? I've uploaded a package to revu a few hours ago yet I don't have any email stating it was uploaded nor does it show up under my revu profile. I didn't receive any error messages when I uploaded it. The package I uploaded was mythbuntu-bare
[04:57] <ajmitch> tgm4883: had you logged into revu prior to uploading?
[06:47] <dholbach> good morning
[06:48] <ajmitch> morning dholbach
[06:48]  * nigelb waves to ajmitch 
[06:48] <philipballew> good night in california dholbach !
[06:48] <ajmitch> & hi nigelb
[06:49] <dholbach> hey ajmitch, philipballew :)
[06:49] <geser> good morning
[09:29] <dholbach> bdrung, Laney, tumbleweed: do you think you can help out with the open packaging guide mps?
[09:29] <dholbach> there's some that have been sitting around for a while already and it'd be good to get a second opinion :)
[09:42] <Laney> dholbach: yeah, ok, looking at the retheming quickly
[09:42] <dholbach> sweet
[09:42] <dholbach> it's not as bad as it looks, I did a quick analysis of the actual diff in my comment
[09:43] <Laney> yeah
[09:53] <Laney> et voila
[09:55] <dholbach> thanks
[09:55] <dholbach> I added a few small bits as well
[09:58] <tumbleweed> Laney: the ¶ is normally visible on hover
[09:58] <Laney> not for me
[09:58] <tumbleweed> ah I haven't looked at the rendering yet
[09:58] <dholbach> Laney, can you see it here: http://people.canonical.com/~dholbach/packaging-guide/html/getting-set-up.html?
[09:59] <dholbach> (I can)
[09:59] <Laney> that one does require me to hover
[09:59] <Laney> what is the point of that?
[09:59] <tumbleweed> nafc, it's just default sphinx styling
[09:59] <dholbach> but I agree that it'd be nice to have it less visible - it gives you a permalink for the specific anchor
[09:59] <dholbach> less prominent, I mean
[10:00] <Laney> aha
[10:28] <bdrung> dholbach: should we use version numbers instead of codenames in the packaging guide?
[10:30] <dholbach> bdrung, I don't know
[10:40] <geser> what about mentioning both like "oneiric (11.10)"? as a dev I'm more used to codenames and have always trouble when somebody only mentions the version to map it back to its codename
[12:27] <bdrung> dholbach: what do you think about https://code.launchpad.net/~bdrung/ubuntu-packaging-guide/fix-name/+merge/68372
[12:36] <bdrung> dholbach: shouldn't the sponsor do the merge?
[12:37] <dholbach> it doesn't matter
[12:38] <dholbach> but if you want, I can do it
[12:38] <bdrung> dholbach: please :)
[12:40] <dholbach> done
[12:40] <dholbach> → taking the dog for a walk
[12:40] <bdrung> have fun
[12:40]  * tumbleweed finishes fighting a dodgy adsl line
[12:40] <tumbleweed> turns out a phone cable I crimped was at fault :/
[12:57] <jtaylor> tumbleweed: can you ack 812880 please
[13:04] <tumbleweed> jtaylor: looks like bdrung beat me :)
[13:05] <jtaylor> :O
[13:06]  * bdrung is faster than tumbleweed. :P
[13:07]  * tumbleweed might have also been hiding for a few days
[13:58] <oier> is anybody up for reviewing indicator-bug? Thanks to jtaylor I think that the package looks quite good, I would love it if some motu could help me by reviewing and eventually uploading it http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?upid=9151
[14:29] <dupondje> dh_installdocs --all AUTHORS NEWS README
[14:29] <dupondje> cp: not writing through dangling symlink `debian/openmpi-bin/usr/share/doc/openmpi-bin/AUTHORS'
[14:29] <dupondje> dh_installdocs: cp -a AUTHORS debian/openmpi-bin/usr/share/doc/openmpi-bin returned exit code 1
[14:29] <dupondje> Whats exactly the cause of this failure?
[15:04] <tgm4883> ajmitch, Not recently, last time I uploaded was in 2009
[23:10] <alex-weej42174> python-django is old and unsupported on 10.04 LTS... is there some semi official way to track currently supported versions?
[23:10] <alex-weej42174> i don't want my stable server to get hacked by rupert murdoch
[23:14] <alex-weej42174> there are some backports on launchpad i see
[23:14] <alex-weej42174> but i have no idea who to trust...