[02:10] is there a ppa or official repo with gnome-shell-extensions ? i'm very much enjoying oneiric on my dedicated testing machine, but i wanted to muck about with gnome-shell as well as unity. [06:12] Ex-Chat [06:14] hi everybody [09:59] anyone here???? [10:56] yes [13:55] Good morning [13:56] Good morning charlie-tca [13:56] weird bug I got, huh? [13:56] charlie-tca, I tried to reproduce your bug 812342 [13:56] Launchpad bug 812342 in debian-installer (Ubuntu) "Lucid 10.04.3 Encrypted Install fails to install Ubuntu (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/812342 [13:56] but failed [13:57] I can't even get it to remove the existing OS, so, apparently, it is doing nothing for the hour of installing [13:57] If there is an unencrypted swap partition on disk 1 then the installer refuses to add an LVM encrypted partition on disk 2 [13:57] (which doesn't happen in Oneiric BTW) [13:57] I have manually tell it to not use the existing swap files [13:58] s/have/have to [13:58] charlie-tca, oh, that's probably why. I can reproduce a slightly similar issue if there is an encrypted lvm on the other disk [13:59] I have had users report this strange thing to me, and told them try again. Normally it doesn't fail the second time. [13:59] after the installation only the new install can be loaded [13:59] I can't load the new install [13:59] the other is not overwritten but is lost because it can't be decrypted [13:59] According to grub, and booting, it just doesn't exist [13:59] charlie-tca, yeah probably because you set the partition manually it behaves differently [14:00] charlie-tca, indeed grub can't 'see' it, it is encrypted [14:00] but shouldn't it have over-written the existing install on the drive? [14:00] I can still boot to the install that was therer before [14:01] and I am telling it to use the entire drive space for the encrypted install [14:02] charlie-tca, I think I have the missing bit of information to reproduce the problem [14:02] thanks [14:02] Good luck [16:43] Hey all, [16:43] Latest candidates for Ubuntu 10.04.3 are on the tracker. === cr3_ is now known as cr3 [17:23] Kubuntu Alternate 10.04.3 images are on the tracker now as well. [17:24] Has anyone tried server yet? I'm getting "no kernel modules found" both for amd64 and i386 [17:30] chadadavis: will try it in VBox [17:34] chadadavis: verified, no kernel modules found, server and alternate images [17:35] charlie-tca, still installs, but without e.g. network, so pretty serious. [17:35] chadadavis, confirmed [17:35] cjwatson, ^ [17:35] alternate images for ubuntu give the same error [17:35] charlie-tca, didn't seem to affect desktop [17:36] server and alternate both use d-i, maybe that is why? === davmor2_ is now known as davmor2 [17:36] that affects d-i based images [17:36] charlie-tca, that's what I was assuming. [17:36] jibel, chadadavis - is there a bug number I can point to? [17:37] filing one with the logs [17:37] skaet, not from me. Thanks, jibel. [17:43] thanks jibel, chadadavis [17:43] thanks charlie-tca [17:43] btw: Kubuntu Desktop 10.04.3 images posted [17:43] syncing them now === cking is now known as cking-afk [17:54] Kubuntu alternate images use d-i, too? [17:55] * skaet is hoping charlie-tca is not seeing the same thing there too.... [17:56] yes, actually, I did [17:56] no kernel modules found [17:56] infinity, ^^ see backscroll for history of problem. [17:56] charlie-tca, drat. was hoping that a respin would solve things. [17:56] thanks for confirming that it won't. [17:56] Sorry [17:57] but you are welcome [17:57] no apologies - MUCH better to know now. === manjo` is now known as manjo [18:11] skaet: No promises about finding the issue in a timely fashion, but I'm grabbing images and poking. [18:20] skaet: Oh, wait, are these images based on -proposed, or did we get all the kernel bits into -updates/-security? [18:21] * infinity goes to look. [18:23] infinity, these images should all be based on -updates/-security. [18:45] jibel, ubuntu DVD now posted (20110719.2) [18:47] skaet: I might see the problem, but I'm not entirely sure what the resolution is. It seems to involve a publishing mishap with soyuz. [18:49] infinity, good to know. Let me know if I can do anything to help. [18:52] Hahahahaha. [18:52] So, I'm digging around for "soyuz publishing bugs" here, trying to decide why by-hand packages aren't getting copied from -proposed to -updates. [18:52] And I realise that we have *documentation* that states it doesn't work, and gives directions on how to bypass the publisher and mangle it all by hand. [18:53] Special. [18:53] skaet: Fixing in a short while here. [18:53] skaet: Not sure if this fix alone will fix your images, but it's a start. :) [18:53] :) [18:54] Let me know when its good to retrigger the builds. [18:54] Yeah. On a side note, have we had any update-manager updates in this point release cycle too? [18:54] I'll check. [18:55] Cause they suffer from the same misfeature. Well, lack of feature. [18:55] thanks [19:16] skaet, the new DVD has the same kernel module problem under the debian-installer. But, it seems fine under the 2.6.35 kernel. [19:17] chadadavis, thanks for flagging. will mark it for rebuild then as well. [19:18] Yeah, anything d-i-based will need a respin. [19:18] I'm just trying to decide if my changes will fix this, or if I need to do something else. Respinning might be the path of least resistance in sorting that out, though. :/ [19:19] inifinity, let me know if you want to or want me to kick off ubuntu alternate to test the hypothesis [19:22] Ubuntu DVD marked for rebuild now [19:28] skaet: Just making sure we have mirror propagation... [19:28] infinity: +1 :) [19:39] infinity, no update-manager update in this release, last update was in december [19:41] jibel: Yeah, though that version was never copied from -proposed to -updates either. I've fixed that now. [19:43] infinity, does it mean that u-m 1:0.134.11 was not in 10.04.2 either ? [19:44] jibel: Not the downloadable tarball bits, no. [19:44] (ie: the stuff found at http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/lucid-updates/main/dist-upgrader-all/ ) [19:45] No idea if there were fixes to the dist-upgrader payload, but if there were, no one was seeing them. [19:55] skaet: Want to re-spin server CDs as a test-case (since that's what I have here already :P) [19:55] skaet: I have a theory that things might work now. Maybe. [19:56] infinity, okie. kicking it off now. [20:08] skaet, wubi is broken [20:11] jibel, ack. Lets get a bug in, and flag it for ev and cjwatson. [20:11] filing now [20:21] jibel, ubuntu-server images posted (hopefully with d-i resolved). [20:21] infinity, jibel, if one of you can tell me that it solves the problem, I'll start the others off. [20:22] skaet, syncing [20:22] jibel: Keener. [20:22] :) [20:26] anyone knows magic runes to force hardy to upgrade to 10.04.3 instead of insisting on 10.04.2 ? [20:26] mvo help [20:27] there are days, you'd better go fishing. [20:29] infinity, skaet ubuntu-server looks better [20:29] at least it passes the previous failure [20:29] jibel: \o/ [20:30] Glad I could help. [20:30] jibel, infinity - thanks!!! ok, I'll start off the rest. [20:32] skaet: If you're making a point-release checklist (or updating a current one), you might want an "if newDebianInstaller || newUpdateManager { pokeArchiveAdmins.msg("by-hand processing from -proposed to -updates"); } [20:32] skaet, infinity: installation OK [20:32] infinity, Thanks! [20:33] infinity, yup, we need to update the current one with this. [20:34] hggdh, new server ISOs are ready. I canceled previous run and launch another one. [20:34] skaet: The actual process is well-documented ( https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ArchiveAdministration#Special_case:_debian-installer_updates ), so just need to add the poke to your workflow. [20:35] * skaet nods [20:35] (Well, or make sure we don't forget to do it when we do the pocket copy...) [20:35] But redundant poking is nice. [20:36] or at least not too annoying compared with late respins ;) [20:37] Indeed. [20:41] jibel: on the look [20:42] jibel, rebuilds started in order Ubuntu DVD, ubuntu alternate, kubuntu alternate. [20:42] jibel: after we finish this, I will install my fixes for the kernel selection [20:42] don't want to confuse things ;-) [20:46] hggdh, yes please :) [20:52] heh === yofel_ is now known as yofel [21:04] * skaet heading out for a bit, back later. [22:01] crashed Kubuntu Desktop 64 doing OEM install, it crashed at the start of End User Creation [22:02] pulling the logs for the report [22:03] hm, downloading debug packages went from 1.5 minutes to 45 minutes now [22:14] new Ubuntu DVD posted to the tracker [22:22] charlie-tca, how does it crash, segfault or something else ? [22:23] segfault [22:23] python 2.6 segfault [22:24] and... it refuses to file the report [22:25] I have to try it later, tired now. [22:25] Ubuntu Alternate 20110719.2 are published on the tracker [22:26] charlie-tca, I'm trying it there quickly and will visit my bed. [22:26] I will run the OEM install again in a couple of hours. [22:27] Maybe I did something wrong [22:28] a python segfault is rarely an expected behavior, I doubt you did something wrong. [22:30] yeah... [22:30] jibel: transcribing now [22:37] charlie-tca, it doesn't crash here. You did something wrong ;-) [22:37] j/k [22:38] heh [22:38] see above :) [22:38] I will run another install later. Maybe I have to hand copy the files if it crashes, since it is just before going to the install screen for the end user [22:42] Kubuntu Alternate 20110719.3 published. [22:44] hggdh, thanks for updating server tests. [22:44] any uec testing planned for 10.04.3 ? [22:45] ec2 I mean [22:45] ? [22:49] now, since compiz finds my system's memory yummy and ate most of it, it means it is time to say good night everyone! [22:57] jibel_: both [22:58] jibel_: running UEC test, and prearing to run ec2 tests