| blkperl | so it appears the nvidia kernel module no longer works (fully updated alpha 2) | 06:11 |
|---|---|---|
| evfool | ping brendand | 08:24 |
| brendand | pong evfool | 08:30 |
| evfool | about bug 329441 ... I just have found that there is a context menu with check/uncheck all in update-manager, maybe the bug should be updated to be about the discoverability of these? | 08:32 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 329441 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "Need to have select all and unselect all option when asking for installing updates (heat: 4)" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/329441 | 08:32 |
| evfool | brendand^ | 08:32 |
| mvo | evfool: yeah, that makes sense | 08:37 |
| evfool | mvo: also, the Check all/Uncheck all maybe should be updated to select/unselect all, as there is a Check button | 08:41 |
| evfool | mvo: and Check all and Check are not related at all... one checks for updates, the other selects all | 08:41 |
| evfool | although it's hard to find a place to expose select/unselect all without cluttering the UI | 08:42 |
| mvo | evfool: hm, interessting point. I guess select make indeed more sense than check | 08:50 |
| evfool | mvo: anyway I guess it should be updated before translations freeze, even if the discoverability is not changed at all | 08:51 |
| mvo | agreed | 08:51 |
| evfool | mvo: I'll do it this week, along with some other string changes and bugfixes | 08:51 |
| mvo | great, thanks. I will merge it right away | 08:53 |
| brendand | evfool - on my system it says 'Tick All' and 'Untick All'. Are you guys translating from German? | 08:59 |
| brendand | or maybe using US English? | 09:00 |
| evfool | brendand: US English | 09:00 |
| brendand | huh, interesting | 09:00 |
| brendand | select is probably more widely translatable | 09:01 |
| === zyga-afk is now known as zyga | ||
| brendand | jibel - i need your help with a lightdm bug | 10:44 |
| brendand | jibel - there are so many reports it's getting lost amongst them all | 10:44 |
| jibel | brendand, how can I help ? | 10:45 |
| brendand | you need to assign the bug to a team | 10:45 |
| brendand | (i'm not sure can i do that) | 10:45 |
| brendand | it's a tiny bit ridiculous that the only confirmed, non-dupe of this bug is Importance - Medium and not assigned | 10:46 |
| brendand | i had set it to critical but somehow that one got marked as a duplicate and the 'master' bug is not even confirmed | 10:47 |
| brendand | no idea how that happened | 10:47 |
| brendand | i think maybe the retracer did it | 10:47 |
| brendand | this is the master bug at the moment: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/811222 | 10:48 |
| ubot4 | brendand: Error: Bug #811222 is private. | 10:48 |
| brendand | oh, it needs to be unprivated | 10:48 |
| brendand | let me check the Core Dump | 10:49 |
| jibel | it already known and the master is critical IIRC | 10:49 |
| jibel | it/it is | 10:49 |
| brendand | where is it? | 10:50 |
| brendand | there was this one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/809890 | 10:51 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 809890 in lightdm (Ubuntu) "lightdm-example-gtk-greeter crashed with SIGSEGV in __strcmp_ssse3() (dup-of: 811222)" [Critical,Confirmed] | 10:51 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 811222 in lightdm (Ubuntu) "lightdm-example-gtk-greeter crashed with SIGSEGV in _start() (affects: 14) (dups: 8) (heat: 168)" [Medium,New] | 10:51 |
| brendand | jibel - if there is a proper bug for this issue can you let me know which one it is? | 10:54 |
| jibel | urgh, the apport-duplicate finder hit again. Let me fix this | 10:55 |
| jibel | the original issue was 809890 | 10:55 |
| jibel | brendand, I changed the order. Master is now 809890, there is a proposition of patch in it | 10:59 |
| jibel | and targeted to oneiric so it won't fall off radar | 10:59 |
| brendand | jibel - cool. hopefully one of the lightdm maintainers will look at it soon | 11:00 |
| brendand | jibel - not too sure the patch is correct, might fix the immediate problem but sounds like it could break other stuff. | 11:01 |
| brendand | now, i have a couple of pretty serious bugs i need to file myself... | 11:02 |
| brendand | thanks jibel | 11:02 |
| brendand | anyone else having problems with suspend all of a sudden in Oneiric? | 12:44 |
| brendand | i would have assumed hardware specific kernel regression but using 3.0.4 for example doesn't help | 12:44 |
| brendand | basically my system just won't suspend | 12:44 |
| yofel | I do, as in bug 809729 | 12:44 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 809729 in linux (Ubuntu) "[oneiric] kernel 3.0.0-4 fails to suspend on a eeePC 1000H (affects: 1) (heat: 655)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/809729 | 12:44 |
| brendand | yofel - strange, i only got it yesterday and i'm sure i was on 3.0.4 for a while (3.0.5 even) | 12:45 |
| brendand | maybe i didn't suspend my system after updating to 3.0.4??? | 12:45 |
| brendand | i guess only i can answer that, but it seems unlikely | 12:46 |
| yofel | haven't tried -5 yet actually, I'll do that later | 12:46 |
| yofel | anything in dmesg? | 12:46 |
| brendand | i can't switch vt's either | 12:46 |
| brendand | yofel - i also lose my network after suspending :( ... | 12:56 |
| yofel | that I can't confirm, in my case the system simply stuck for ~20s and came up again since it couldn't suspend | 12:57 |
| yofel | the kernel or syslog should have some information about the network | 12:57 |
| brendand | yofel - are you able to shutdown cleanly after failure to suspend? | 13:09 |
| yofel | yes | 13:09 |
| brendand | sounds a bit different from what i have | 13:10 |
| brendand | i'm running 3.0.3 now, going to try it and see what happens | 13:10 |
| brendand | pedro_ - any bug day this week? | 13:20 |
| pedro_ | brendand, yes, just created the page, banshee is the target | 13:22 |
| pedro_ | https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay/20110721 | 13:22 |
| pedro_ | kamusin is going to send the announcement shortly | 13:23 |
| kamusin | announcement sent pedro_ | 13:39 |
| pedro_ | kamusin, awesome, thanks! | 13:40 |
| bdmurray | micahg: my math was bad its about 5% of bugs | 16:03 |
| micahg | bdmurray: ok, BTW, we're down to ~92k from ~97k, so you're doing some good work, but as was discussed on -devel the other night, open bugs aren't the issue as much as weeding out non-bugs | 16:08 |
| bdmurray | micahg: right I'm cleaning up lots of apport-package duplicates / invalid bugs and stopping them from coming in | 16:10 |
| * micahg hugs bdmurray | 16:10 | |
| * bdmurray presents http://status.qa.ubuntu.com/qapkgstatus/dpkg as an example | 16:12 | |
| kamusin | something is happening with lightdm in the latest Oneiric daily image right? it doesn't ask for the password | 16:45 |
| jibel | kamusin, you mean you have only the background when you select a user ? | 16:46 |
| kamusin | I was able to select my username and after click on it seems like he wants to start the session immediately without ask for the password | 16:47 |
| charlie-tca | It starts your session? | 16:48 |
| jibel | kamusin, but does the session start or nothing happens ? | 16:48 |
| charlie-tca | mine give a blank wallpaper | 16:48 |
| kamusin | nope, nothing happens | 16:48 |
| jibel | kamusin, bug 809890 | 16:48 |
| charlie-tca | https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/811909 | 16:48 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 809890 in lightdm (Ubuntu Oneiric) (and 1 other project) "lightdm-example-gtk-greeter crashed with SIGSEGV in __strcmp_ssse3() (affects: 15) (dups: 9) (heat: 198)" [Critical,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/809890 | 16:48 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 811909 in lightdm (Ubuntu) "lightdm-example-gtk-greeter crashed with SIGSEGV in _start() (affects: 9) (dups: 5) (heat: 72)" [Medium,Confirmed] | 16:48 |
| charlie-tca | hm, maybe mine should be critical too? | 16:49 |
| kamusin | excelent, thank you guys | 16:49 |
| kamusin | I wish they could fix this issue soon and even better before the bugday begins heh | 16:54 |
| pedro_ | QA Meeting at #ubuntu-meeting in ~2 mins! | 16:58 |
| psusi | bug reports against PPAs are not accepted as a rule, right? I don't see a standard response for that. | 18:27 |
| charlie-tca | I believe it stems from the fact that bug reports are only accepted against current packages in repositories, and if the package is in a PPA, it is not currently in the repository | 18:29 |
| psusi | hrm... might need to add a standard response for this... | 18:29 |
| charlie-tca | We don't accept them against source forge or any other thing outside the repositories, either | 18:30 |
| charlie-tca | We already have a standard response - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Responses#Packages_not_provided_by_Ubuntu | 18:31 |
| psusi | ahh, I was searching for PPA and coming up empty handed | 18:31 |
| jibel | RedSingularity, about bug 797673, you were right with libdrm-nouveau. There is a dependency tree that makes the upgrader remove upstart, which hopefully it refuses. | 19:57 |
| jibel | My opinion is to move it to answers.lp.net | 19:57 |
| ubot4 | Launchpad bug 797673 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "upgrade from Ubuntu 10.10 to 11.0.4 64bit is halted (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/797673 | 19:57 |
| brendand | nagging question - is it the duty or the right of bug-control to assign bugs to teams? | 20:37 |
| greg-g | brendand: that depends on the team and their policies | 20:38 |
| greg-g | in general, it isn't a good idea to assign people work without asking | 20:39 |
| brendand | well, of course not to individuals ;) | 20:40 |
| yofel | well, usually you assign bugs to the person that's working on it (which is usually done by him/herself) | 20:42 |
| charlie-tca | brendand: as a general ru8le, bug-control does not assign bugs to teams or people | 20:42 |
| yofel | if a team has a policy that bugs should get assigned to them then you do so | 20:42 |
| yofel | but I don't know of one currently now that the desktop team doesn't do that anymore | 20:42 |
| bdmurray | brendand: is there a specific bug you are concerned about? | 20:43 |
| brendand | bdmurray - no, it's a general question. | 20:43 |
| bdmurray | then no ;-) | 20:43 |
| bdmurray | why would you want to assign it to a team? | 20:43 |
| yofel | correction: bugs are only assigned to people that are working on _fixing_ them, not working on them in general | 20:44 |
| brendand | it's a very usual part of the bug management process to assign bugs to either a team or a individual within the team whose job it is to manage them on behalf of the team | 20:47 |
| brendand | i'm only asking if this is a role of ubuntu-bug-control | 20:51 |
| yofel | we currently don't do that so: No. But if you wanted to do that you would need bug control permissions. | 20:53 |
| brendand | so we *can* but shouldn't | 20:57 |
| === yofel_ is now known as yofel | ||
| === kentb is now known as kentb-out | ||
| === rsalveti` is now known as rsalveti | ||
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.7 by Marius Gedminas - find it at mg.pov.lt!